Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 9 Reviews

Patagonia R3 Fleece Jacket - Men's - 2009 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

R3 Fleece Jacket - Men's
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

Pull on your Patagonia Men's R3 Insulated Jacket to bag that 14,000-foot peak in summer or ski tour the Colorado Rockies in winter. This new Patagonia jacket features warm, breathable, wind-resistant R3 polyester fabric. The R3 Jacket has a velour face that stops the wind and a grid interior that wicks your sweat to keep you dry. You'll appreciate the details on this regular-fit jacket, such as offset seams for backpack strap comfort and a chin flap to prevent chafing.

Bottom Line: Alone or as a mid-layer, the Patagonia R3 Insulated Jacket keeps your core warm when you play in the mountains.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 5

So Soft.

By:
January 16, 2009

I got this jacket as an "around town fleece" but it turns out that I wear it for just about everything now. The R2 is just a little to light for the winter season but this fleece is pefect under a shell for skiing and looks good downtown too. Others say it is a little loose but for me a medium is perfect. 6'1" 170 lbs.

Was this helpful? (4) (0)

Flag

Without taking wind resistance into consideration, would this

Without taking wind resistance into consideration, would this be as warm as The North Face Khumbu? Also is there a flap behind the zipper?

By:
July 30, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

John,
The R3 would definitely be as warm as the Khumbu, and most likely warmer. The face fabric on the R3 is a tight weave that increases warmth, and it's a much nicer fleece overall.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
July 30, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Jacket

By:
April 25, 2010

I'm an avid backpacker, and outdoor enthusiast. This R3 is an amazing jacket. I'm 6'4 and 200lbs and a Large fits me perfectly. The sleeves are slightly baggy, but not noticeable. It has an athletic cut to it, and is shaped quite nice for wearing a pack. I've had this jacket 3 weeks now, and absolutely love it. It is heavy enough to be an outer shell if its a cool breezy day, but light enough to be worn as a base layer under a soft shell. I've worn a normal base layer, this, and my soft shell jacket in -10 degree weather, skiing. I never had a problem with being cold. Its stylish enough to wear around Boulder, yet comfortable enough to lounge around the house in all day. By far this is the most comfortable fleece I own. Ive een some reviews that say its too big and baggy in the arms. I would disagree. It fits great. The arms are long... and thats how i like it. I have a difficulty finding jackets that fit my long arm span. The only draw back that Iv'e seen is that it doesn't have a drawcord on the bottom. Fortunatly, my soft shell does... so it keeps the cold from drafting up my back. Thats the only thing I would change about this fleece. For the price, its a great buy. I've had several Colombia fleeces and this by far is the best. It doesn't block 100% of the wind... but it does a pretty great job. Combine it with a soft shell... and you've got yourself a great coat.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Ok, so I'm debating between the regular R4, the lightweight

Ok, so I'm debating between the regular R4, the lightweight R4 and the R3. I want something to use as a midlayer under a light technical shell jacket, but also something to wear around town without looking like a tool. I like how the R3 looks more the the R4, but I don't know how functional/warm/practical/dirt-resistant it is. The R4 seems more useful, since it's warmer and has the chest vent pockets. Help?

By:
November 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'd say it depends on what you're doing! Anything aerobic, I'd definitely recommend the R3 - its light enough to be functional and blocks wind really well. The R4 is certainly warmer, but also thicker and I feel like one might have a tendency to overheat, but for resort skiing it might be nice. The lightweight R4 would also be a great compromise between the two! And yes, I think the R3 looks better too - especially for around town...

By:
November 26, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Excellent fleece!

By:
February 1, 2008

Light, highly compressible, very warm, breathable, and excellent fit! The only reason I did not give this 5 stars is because it lacks a hem drawcord and the wrist opening is not adjustable.

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

Wondering how this jacket compares in warmth and breatheability

Wondering how this jacket compares in warmth and breatheability to Patagonia's lightweight R4, and is one significantly warmer than the other? I know the R4 line is theoretically warmer, but the lightweight R4 has R1 underarm panels, so I'm not sure.

By:
November 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Lightweight R4 is going to be warmer overall because it's totally windproof, except for the R1 panels you mentioned. R3 is definitely more breahtable. It's got a high loft/fuzzy interior that insulates well, and the jacket still does pretty well in the wind. So maybe on it's own LW R4 will be warmer, but layered R3 would be warmer and more breathable in any application.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
November 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

For sure the R3 is lighter than the R4. The R3 is not quite as warm, but probably a bit more breathable, which is hard to compare since they are both breathable. Personally I feel that if you are debating between the 2, the R3 is about all you will ever need for a midlayer, and fall/casual outerlayer.

By:
November 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Jacket

By:
March 25, 2008

Well I grabbed this sucker when it was on sale and I am totally happy with my purchase. The day I got the fleece in the mail our University got smacked with a narly blizzard and R3 performed great in the elements right from the get-go. While it doesn't soak up water like a sponge, it is good for cold to very cold conditions. I have coupled this piece with my Patagonia down jacket and together I was warm in -20C weather.

PROS: Lightweight and very warm. Wind doesn't get through the jacket, even in the sleeves. Looks good. Has a good functional pocket at the chest...good for cell phones and the like.

CONS: It fits me perfect but I would have liked a drawstring around the bottom of the jacket to prevent the wind from sneaking up there when it gets crazy out (I have an older model, and I think they have fixed this problem in the newer version). I would have also liked a pocket on the inside of the jacket for a wallet/keys!

OVERALL: Phenom jacket and I don't have regrets buying it whatsoever. Best uses would be for bombing around campus, around town, and heading out to the bars during the winter!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Need sizing help. I just read some of the comments and it seems

Need sizing help. I just read some of the comments and it seems to run very big. I looked at the size information and on paper, the medium would seem to fit very well. I like an athletic fitted jacket that isn't paunchy around the middle (I had this issue with the MHW Monkey Man jacket and had to return it because it was too loose and paunch around the stomachh). I'm 5'9", 41 inch chest, 31 inch waist and 160lbs. Should I get the mediume or small?

By:
October 14, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

For the R3 Jacket you're between sizes and I would recommend a small if you're looking for more of a trim fit.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
October 15, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Fleece Heaven

By:
March 23, 2009

Forget down. I don't care about the extra weight or space when I think about the warmth and coziness that awaits me with this fleece. Very very warm. Wicks very well too. These combine to create a very comfortable experience, whether hoofin it up for a descent or just chillin. Its pretty classy too which will be sure to score you a few more points with the wilderness women.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

How does the warmth of the current R3 compare to the Retro-X

How does the warmth of the current R3 compare to the Retro-X?

By:
September 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Scott,
The R3 and the Retro X are going to be similar in warmth, but the Retro X is is windproof, so when things get nasty it will be the warmer piece, but the R3 is no slouch in cold weather on its own. If you're going to layer either underneath a shell from time to time the R3 would be the better jacket since it handles heat and moisture so well.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
September 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Warm!

By:
February 17, 2009

I've worn this in single digits with only a long-sleeve shirt underneath and remained toasty. Only negative is no drawcord around the waist. Works very well as an intermediate layer while skiing in cold conditions(wore it under a shell in 5 degrees) and remained plenty warm. Doesn't block wind entirely, but better than my MH monkey man.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Good Heavy-weight fleece

By:
April 30, 2009

This fleece perfomed well on a multi-day alpine hike. Very nice breathability for its warmth/weight. I liked the fit and the weight alot, and it is pretty useful both at altitude and going to work. There are, however, a few things which really put me off about this coat. I do like the fabric/feel of the garment, but the pattern of the fleece makes it look kind of plaid. I like plaid, but not in my fleece. It is really kind of off-putting and I didn't appreciate this in the pics. More importantly, there is no waist draw strap, which leads to the inevitable icy breeze up the spine.
Overall, a great multi-purpose garment with a couple of things that could be improved.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

Too Loose

By:
October 27, 2008

On my 6'0", 165 lb. frame, this "regular" Pataguchi fit is not what I am looking for. My arms a sorta muscular from woodworking and some core training, but the medium bags out and doesn't look good, and wouldn't layer well as there is too much fabric in the arms. Sent it back.

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Hangs Loose

By:
October 27, 2008

Well, I guess Patagonia designs the "regular fit" for the typical overweight American, if you have an athletic build, unless you're a linebacker, this jacket is cut too big. I'm 6'0", 165 lbs., tried a medium, and want something more form fitting, yet still warm. This is'nt it. I am a woodworker, so my arms are a bit muscular, but the sleeves are huge. Not good for under a shell... Didn't look great either.

Was this helpful? (2) (3)

Flag

Change me.

Out of Stock

Item: PAT0939

2009 Model No Longer Available

We have a lot more Men's Fleece Jackets than that

Men's Fleece Jackets

Research other out-of-stock versions:

So Soft.

5 star rating

By: Jeremy Sinnema January 16, 2009

I got this jacket as an "around town fleece" but it turns out that I wear it for just about everything now. The R2 is just a little to light more...

Great Jacket

5 star rating

By: nom3768947 April 25, 2010

I'm an avid backpacker, and outdoor enthusiast. This R3 is an amazing jacket. I'm 6'4 and 200lbs and a Large fits me perfectly. The sleeves more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Material:
Polartec WindPro (microfleece polyester face with high-loft grid polyester back) 
Fleece Weight:
300 
Windproof:
Wind-resistant 
Pockets:
2 Hand, 1 Chest 
Weight:
22oz (684g) 
Recommended Use:
Skiing 
Manufacturer Warranty:
Lifetime 
Country of Origin:
Colombia