Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
Take advantage of the stretchy, warm, and breathable Patagonia Men’s R2 Fleece Jacket when running errands around town, skiing, hiking, camping, climbing, or anything else you can do outside in brisk weather. Thanks to the R2’s high breathability this fleece jacket will dry out quickly if you get caught in the rain without your shell and provides quality layering for cold or stormy days. Patagonia added a chest pocket so you can stash your keys, snacks, or whatever else you need to shove in there while doing whatever it is you do best.
Bottom Line: Never venture into dropping temperatures without it.
Stellar second layer that is highly breathable and warm under a hard shell. Warm when very wet! Great for on-the-go and comfortable under a pack. Coming from Hawai'i I have used the R2 on all the major volcanoes in sub-freezing temps, high winds, and driving rain paired with a lightweight (Golite) shell. I purchased the R2 for the athletic cut and the high warmth to weight ratio. Construction is tops. I am 5 11 175# and went with the large.
I have recently been turned onto Patagonia gear, and I must confess it lives up to the hype. This particular fleece is absurdly comfortable and lightweight, utilizing variable length fibers that mimics 'fur' for maximum warmth. The weight to warmth ratio is fantastic, quickly replacing my TNF Denali fleece. With a BC.com Merino Crew underneath, I could wear it down to the mid 20s. With a shell of sorts, you could certainly meander about in temperatures near zero. however, like the Denali, it is not windproof. Hence, if there is wind or precipitation of sorts, a shell is necessary. The R1 interior material is very comfortably against the skin, and stretches very well. The pockets are conveniently snag-free due to the use of supplex around the zippers. At roughly 15 oz, the R2 is very packable and relatively lightweight. Honestly if you want only one midlayer, for most of you, this is would be it. But for frigid regions, a Polartec Windpro fleece would be better suited (like the Patagonia R3 or Mountain Hardwear Windstopper Tech Jacket).
I have only two gripes: first, is the lack of internal pocket (just one for an iPod wouldn't hurt!) Secondly, the material, like all fleece, attracts pet hair. This could be a problem for some, which would make a softshell jacket a feasible alternative.
Yim, We're of similar size and I'm guessing medium would be a trim fit for you, and the large would fit well also, but would give you some extra length in the arms and waist to work with. So it kind of depends on the fit you're looking for and how you want to wear it. Personally I'd go large. Hope this helps
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
I really like this fleece. The Polartec Pro fuzz is super soft, not as high or warm as a MH Monkey Man but more breathable and versatile. If you're out in the wind on a chilly day you'll definitely feel it, but that's not this jacket's forte'. Alone, it's good for about 50*F. I took it snowboarding and wore a thermal, R2 and Stoic Bombshell (non-insulated) and was warm in 10 degrees. It regulates your body temperature like something out of NASA. The fit is on the slim side so if you're between sizes you might want to size up. For a reference point, in this picture I'm wearing a large and I'm 6', 190. I could put the medium on, but the large was more practical.
Definitely not the fleece to wear as an outer layer on a windy day, but toasty warm under a shell and keeps you war on a fall/spring day. As always, love the Patagonia fit. Something about the fuzzy outside makes me feel a little warmer. I also like the offset zipper...The beard always seems to grab on my other fleeces and jackets, but never on this one. They also went the extra lenght and sewed in an R1 fleece into the cuffs to keep em snug.
Bought a 2009/2010 model. The material around the zippers is so hard, that it feels like a constructional defect - everything is so cosy and than this alien elements at the zippers. Really disappointed from the Patagonia engineers. I have also a R2 Vest and there the material around the zippers is still perfect. Did patagonia a change of the material in the new model? Did they also a change of the material in the R2 Vest? Does anybody know this?
super soft, super breathable, air cuts right through, super toasty under a shell (10 degrees anyone?), REALLY LIGHT, but uh oh, where's the waist cinch? come on Patagonia!! i love your jacket, but no waist cinch? i've gotten over it though. first new fleece in 6 years, definitely not disappointed.
I really like the R2, it's a great jacket for me. Top notch quality, very soft, and as soon as I put it on I can feel the heat retention. As others have mentioned, it's not stated to be windproof, and it's certainly not. But it sure fits perfect under a rain shell so that takes care of that.
Not being able to afford a dedicated technical fleece it's nice to be able to have it function so well just wearing around town. This is worth the money, it has Patagonia quality, it's warm, breathes well and looks/feels great.
Should i get the r3, r4 or get the r2 and layer it with my marmot kingpin softshell?
i'm kind of bewildered with the choices in regulator fleeces. i'd like something that would be comfortable in winter appalachian weather while i am hiking or fly-fishing (standing in a near-freezing river for long periods) . would the r2 + softshell+ baselayer be enough? or should i just pony up for the r4?
Could you explain what you mean with the stylish jacket comment? Is it more tight. I tried the r series one and I want one. I remember trying them on that for one model I needed a size smaller than for the other.
I think R2 would be the best bet to layer under your soft shell. R3 if you get really cold often, but the R2 should provide plenty of warmth. R4 would be as warm/warmer than your soft shell, and might not be the best layering piece underneath it.
I think the biggest difference you're going to see is in the wind resistance. I feel like the r3 fits more like a stylish jacket than a technical fit like the r2 or r4. If you're not worried about wind at all, the r2 would be a great and less expensive choice. However, if you are concerned about wind, check out the r4, it would be much better at blocking the wind. It is however, heavier, less compressible, and bulkier. A great compromise though, is the light weight version of the R4. Its closer in warmth to the R2, fits great, and is still windproof. FYI - I'm 6'3 175# and I wear a medium in all three of these jackets. Good luck and don't forget about backcountry.com's awesome return policy! Hope this was helpful!
Very comfortable. Fits perfectly and the material is so soft and comfy (and also VERY warm). It's not windproof, but Patagonia never said it was and I knew I wasn't getting this to block the wind.
Probably my favorite fleece that I own. The R2 is uber comfy and wicks away sweat well. It is my go-to fleece while starting out hikes in cooler temps and have used it as a layer while snowshoeing. Not very windproof but thrown on under my acteryx beta AR it is the perfect match. Bomb proof construction is what I expect from patagonia and I was not disappointed.
Can anybody tell me what size would be best for me? I am 6 ft 3 inches 175# and I wear a large in all capilene baselayers and they fit perfect. I would like to layer them underneath and I would like it to be a more technical piece. I am just worried it would be too short in the torso. Thanks!
I'm 6'3" 215 and teetered between the L and XL. I tried them both on and went with the XL because the L was just a bit tighter than I want in a fleece that will be worn as an every day coat as well as a technical layer when backpacking. When I tried on the L I had no problems at all with length, so in my opinion at your H/W you'd be better suited with the Large, the XL will be too bulky as a tech piece in my opinion.
I think for the R2 Jacket you'd be happy with an XL. I'm slightly smaller than you, and also wear large capilene, but have an XL R2 that fits great, is long enough, and has some room underneath to layer.
I love this mid-weight layering fleece - it's my favorite fleece that I own, and I own many. I find that I can hike in a thin baselayer and this fleece from temperatures in 40s and 50s. Above that and you'll likely find it too warm while hiking.
I see too many reviews of this product that say "didn't like it - not windproof". Well, it's not a windproof jacket, and in fact it's been purposefully designed to be virtually transparent to wind. Why? Because it's just about the most breathable fleece you can buy! The wicking ability is partly the fabric and partly the slim fit, as close contact to your base-layer will encourage better transfer of moisture.
So, this fleece will work well for you if you're doing high output activity in cooler conditions, but not if you're sitting at basecamp in a breeze without a shell on top of the fleece. It's mostly just a mid-layer, but works well alone if it's not breezy. If you want a windproof piece, then do you self a favor and buy the windproof fleece as this will result in you receiving what it is that you actually want. Check out the Lightweight-R4 for a thinner windproof, or the regular R4 for a thicker one. The LWR4 is about as thick as the R2, and the regular R4 is about as thick as the R3, which is another NON windproof fleece.
For Patagonia gear, check out their website as they have much more information on the products than Backcountry does....
Far and away this is the most versatile fleece jacket that I have ever owned. It doesn't do much to cut down wind but it is super breathable and doesn't restrict movement one bit. The sleeves have a narrow cuff so you can slide into your shell without any annoying cuff bunchage. If you are looking for a great fleece for both high performance layering and casual wear this is it. A note on fit: this bad boy runs slim. I am 5'9" 190 and a size large is stretching it for anyone looking for a more casual fit.
This fleece is basically the softest and most comfortable jacket I've encountered. It is super breathable and dries really fast. Wind cuts through it, which is part of why it's so breathable. So if you need a windproof fleece go with the lightweight R4 or some other model. I normally wear patagonia small, but went with the medium for this because it fits tightly. If you're going to be using it exclusively as a technical layering piece I would not size up. It will be tight, but it is somewhat stretchy, and breathes well. Otherwise, if you want to wear it for a wider range of purposes, go one size up and it will fit more like a traditional fleece. Even with the medium, I can comfortably layer it under my normal shells. Considering how long these are rumored to last, and how great of a product it is, I think $150 is a really good price.
Hi, I ordered this jacket and returned it. I wanted a versatile fleece to be used as outer layer over a baselayer and as a mid-layer under my shell.I was expecting the R2 to be better. Fit is too short and rides up easily so when you put on pack and or harness it just doesnt work very well. The outer surface is also not smooth or tidy with threads all over the place to hang and catch stuff. The fleece is just a tad thicker than some baselayers but the outer texture works well to hold warmth when you have a shell over it, without it its easy to get cold.I am going to try the R3 next since I need something a bit more substantial. The r2 is just too close in warmth to my powerstretch fleece but the powerstretch fits better and its smooth outer face makes it easier to layer and more durable. Its also way too expensive for what it is. Should be $100 if that.
I am looking at Patagonia R2 Fleece Jacket. I noticed in the pictures that all of the colors look tapered except the black. The black looks a lot fulller and I think the tapered looks much better. Is it just the picture or the way the black is made?
Stephen, the photo of the black R2 Jacket is the most accurate representation of the fit for all colors. For some reason Backcountry pinned the back of the other colors back when the photos were shot, and it exaggerates the fit greatly. It's a slim fit jacket, but not that slim. hope that helps!
I was lucky enough to get one of these issued at work. As a layer under a shell, this is fabulous...lightweight, stretchy, and breathable. As an outer layer, it does not do so well...the slightest wind goes right through it. Traditional old Polartec 200 fleece is more windproof than this making it a better outer fleece, but not as good as the R2 under a shell. I also would never pay $150 for this thing. Bottom line... great if you want to invest in a very high quality, but expensive layering system, look elsewhere if you want a versatile fleece usable as an insulation or outer layer.
This seems more like a really heavy shirt to me than a really light jacket. The fit is very tight, I usually wear a M and the L in this still inhibits movement when I climb, so order up a size and don't expect to be doing anything too flexible. The sleeves are too tight to be pulled up without cutting off circulation at the elbow, which for me is a problem because when cooking or climbing, I like to have my sleeves up. And finally, it is not windproof at all. I didn't expect it to be, but it really has no windproofing whatsoever, to the point where if you are wearing it at a comfortable temperature and a breeze kicks in, you will be too cold. All that said, it is a great fleece for day to day, walking to class, not too cold, urban environments, etc, it's just not practical enough for me to want to take it anywhere.
I'm 6'3" 215# with an athletic build, and generally wear a L in most brands, Patagonia included. However, with the slim fit and the desire to use this as a layering piece I'm wondering if I shouldn't go for the XL. For reference, I don't plan on having a whole lot underneath as far as space goes, with a Patagonia Wool 1 t-shirt, and a smartwool midweight merino wool base layer (and depending on weather an REI sahara long sleeve) underneath not taking up much room I still think a L in the R2 should work all right. I would appreciate any advice anyone may have that is between a L and XL, thanks in advance!
If I were you I'd go with an XL R2 Jacket. I'm 6'1" 170 and I have an XL that's a little roomy and a little more of a casual jacket. If I were going to wear it as more of a technical piece I would go for a large, so I think an XL should do fit you well for that purpose.
At first out of the bag I was disappointed. It looked like I just bought another MH monkey fur. It seemed kind of flimsy. I honestly thought I was going to send it back then and there.
I'm 5-5 154 wih a 40inch chest and 32inch arm and the medium fit pretty darn good - which doesnt always happen especially with Patagonia that seems to be all over for me on what fits. Sleeves not too long -unusual.
I wore it with just a tee shirt inside on a cold day and my arms were kind of cold. With a shirt it seems like a wearing a sweater an expensive one.
Wore it to work and inside on a cold wet day and it kept me at the perfect body temp. Wore it outside to kids lacross game under a north face shell and my torso was ok, legs and feet were really cold.
I'm starting to like it. I think of it as more of sweater that I can probably run or hike in if I have to. I think Monkey Fur is the warmest damn stuff on a shell you can find. I see this as fall/spring maybe cool summer monkey fur (if you wear monkey fur in anything above mid-30's you roast unless the wind is blowing and no shell. I'm hoping that when I get off the bike and pull of the sweaty stuff this will be a nice cozy reward that will still vent well so I don't start sweating it up all over again.
If it doesn't stink then I will wear as a sweater out on the town.
I also think it will be the perfect piece for the long red eye plane trip where you need to escape into some comfort zone or else lose your mind and yet be good enough looking to not have to pack extra clothing options.
Why not 5 because if it was perfect I would have to give up this obsession on jackets.
I didn't get it for 50 bucks..BUT I'm used to paying for clothes in NYC & I usually shop online..but MISSED that deal....but I got a size larger and just layer away ...This is the fIRST time in my life that I haven't worn a winter coat yet but it does take time to get the look...AND I do not like the snow so don't ski...but I have gotten so many compliments on this jacket ,I can't tell you how many and it's so comfy , I don't want to take it off....but those layers I learned you have to take extra when they get wet...while walking to the gym(like 1/2 mile)..just the bottom two...I have had about 5 thin layers and just this jacket at temps in the 20s and it works...now the legs is a WHOLE other story..
if you can get it for 50 bucks get it in all colors..I want the RED!!
I am thinking about getting an R2 to backpack around Europe in the fall. Everything I read about it seems perfect so far. It looks good, breathes well, is comfortable. However, I am a little concerned about wind and rain. Can anyone recommend a layer for over the top of the R2 that is light, wind resistant, water resistant (or pretty good at keeping dry) that wouldn't be too bulky to pack and wear over the top? I was thinking the Patagonia Rain Shadow Jacket, but I don't know if the combination will be warm enough. Any other ideas would be much appreciated.
The Rainshadow would work well with this. While hiking/backpacking you'll be fine with just a T-shirt and the R2 if you need it. However, if you feel like you might be spending some time hanging out waiting for trains, or hitchhiking, then consider a vest to add to your system. When it's chilly and you're not active, you'll probably want something in addition to keep you warm. A vest will pack down nicely and give you the most warmth per ounce/size as it will keep your core warm. Don't bother with a wind-proof vest - just use your shell as your windproof protection, and something to add 5-10F in warmth even when not active.
Check out the Patagonia down sweater vest or the Micropuff vest. For your purposes I recommend the micropuff as it will likely fit better under your rainshadow, and because it'll stay warm even if wet. Wet down is not something you want to drag around with you. Also consider a wool baselayer because it really does resist the inevitable smell.
With a baselayer, R2, vest, shell, you can pick and choose which piece(s) to wear for the conditions, and ultimately end up wearing all of them when it's really getting cold. That's the way to keep your pack size down.
I think the Rain Shadow and an R2 would be plenty warm. With a capilene/or wool baselayer underneath it would be warm enough to ski in, so I'm sure it would do well enough for a fall Euro trip. The Patagonia Houdini is another cool option. Super, super lightweight, not as wind or waterproof, but it packs down very small and is great for travel
I had a Mt. Hardware Monkey Man fleece that was warm but uncomfortable so I returned it for the R2. While the R2 is not as warm, it is a overall better fleece. The R2 is more durable, looks great and is welcome on the slopes as well as casual dinners, and it fits great. It has great side pockets that are very roomy and a double as vents when open. It has a great breast pocket that I put my phone and keys in and it keeps them warm, accessable, and protected. The R2 has provided confort on 28 degree 10 hour days of teaching with my Backcountry Shift softshell and on sunny 40 degree spring days I have really enjoyed this jacket with my Arcteryx Sidewinder Jacket. When the temps climb I just break open the pit zips and open the pockets on the R2 and I have direct venting. I bet the R3 will more closely resemble the warth of the Monkey man and I plan to try it next year for the 20 degree days. I don't get touched as much as I did with the Monkey but the look is still fuzzy and is more civilized. I find Myself wearing this fleece everyday and can see it as a useful item until temps are above 70 degrees.
Once again you can feel the quality - well done Patagonia. Of course, you pay for it. The R2 is well designed and constructed but it is pitched at people who like a snug fit, so you may prefer to order one size larger than normal. Maybe it's the fleece equivalent of a muscle shirt? It feels great and is both warm and light but I'd give it an extra star if they slipped the sizes up one notch. Once you get the fit right -add a wind breaking outer shell and you're set.
I am a perfect medium, is the R2 a size up item? I am not looking to do any heavy layering under it at most a wool or cap base layer. I do plan to layer above it when the weather gets nasty, an ul down inner (large) and above that a shell if weather is wet. So should i size up or is patagonia on target with sizing I'm 5"9.5 and 160lbs. Thanks!
Too late for you, I know, but the medium will fit perfectly. This jacket is a layering piece that is designed to go *under* other layers (thicker insulation and/or shell) and it should only go over a baselayer.
It's supposed to be form-fitting to perform its function: keeping you warm, keeping you dry.
I"m about 5'9" and 145, with quite long arms, and the medium fits me great. It is a bit form fitting, which isn't a problem because it's such a light jacket, but if you don't want it to fit as close, I'd size up. The sizing is on target, but only if you want it to fit close like that.
The R2 is a great fleece that is extremely comfortable and warm. It fits me perfectly and was designed really well. It also is light weight, but still affords a good warmth. A great fleece and well worth its value.
Perfect for what it is, I am 6'4" wear an XL in patagonia and this is very fitted which is awesome. Breathes like a champ and wicks fairly well. This is my go to layering piece when it is too warm for my mountain hardwear monkey man. R2 is one of the lightest and warmest peices i own and it packs down fairly small. hope that helps
I want more of a layering piece that is warmer than the R1. The R1 fits under my jacket nicely but it's just not enough. I'd even go with something over the R1 to add insulation, but still under my jacket. This would mean that it would have to be thin and function with the R1 - as in not bunch up and things.Any ideas, insulation... but very light to go over the r1 or even by itself like the r1 is now?
This R2 could be the right jacket for you. Similar fit to the R1, so you might want to size it up to wear over the R1. It would be a super warm combo for you to wear under your jacket. The R2 is a sweet piece to wear on its own as well.
I have to say that I didnt purchase this fleece from Backcountry I got it off ebay a year or so ago. I got it in red which is the best color I think. Anyway; its a great fleece. Same as others have said; on a windy day it will cut through but its a GREAT layer under my Mt Hardwear Typhoon jacket (plenty warm in 10F or so). The fit is a little tight; if you have a coller'd shirt on you will choke! But with a nice base layer and a nice shell its the perfect mid layer. And it looks great as a spring/fall coat too. I get compliments on it all the time!
Write your question here...Is the R2 warmer than the R1, I am freezing in the R1 this winter.I ski with the r1 and a gortex shell, that's it unless I add a vest for really cold days.Can you wear the r2 as a base layer or would I need a really thin capillini or what ever it's called underneath. Would my r1 work underneath?20* feels like 0* now!
I agree with Babak's answer. Try upgrading your underwear first. Don't wear the R1 or R2 as your base-layer and go for thicker outer layers, first try the Capilene 3 or 4 (or wool equivalents if you can afford it). I go snowshoeing in Capiline 4 + R2 + shell and I'll take the shell off if i'm too hot and it's not windy.
oh yeah R2's warmer...the R1 isnt much of a jacket but more of a layering piece, this is more of a fleese jacketIm in the same boat but want something warmer than the R2 which is what I currently use. I want to go to 3 layers instead of 4. I was just in NH skiing and found that it's tough to get away with less than 4 layers including the shell. I did try on a ARCteryx HERCULES which i think would be perfect. Warm long underwear, the Hercules, and the shell may help. Otherwise, currently im wearing thin long underwear, Cap 3, R2, shell which also works well.In skiing in anything from -10 to 20 F, I wear a baselayer (usually Wool 2 or 3), R1 (preferably Hoody) R2 and a shell and I stay perfectly comfy. The wool creates a microclimate around your body, and the R1 allows for prime heat exertion while the R2 breathes and retains heat like its nobody's business. The Shell is to keep the wind and elements out.
This fleece was exactly what I was looking for. If you are looking for a wind proof heavy duty fleece look elsewhere. However, for a cool weather low wind fleece this is perfect. This is the type of fleece you can leave on when you go indoors. Its also about as good looking a fleece as I've seen. Some fleeces are extremely warm and windproof at the expense of comfort. The insides are sometimes rough and uncomfortable. This one is not. This is the most comfortable fleece I've worn.
a couple of years ago I bought this jacket for rowing and hiking in the colder months. it has served the purpose (and plenty of others) perfectly, and has lasted well over 2 years of nearly daily use four months out of the year. it's just roomy enough to fit a layer of capilene and/or R1 base underneath, and streamlined enough to toss a vest and shell over without feeling like a pufferfish. i realized today that i need a fresh jacket - this one will be relegated to outdoor chores. and i also realized one reason i enjoy getting up on cold mornings is the pleasure of tossing this thing over my shoulders. buy it!! you'll be happy.
First, add the item or items to your cart. Then proceed to checkout (don’t worry—proceeding to checkout doesn’t make you obligated to purchase anything). Enter your address in the billing and shipping fields. Once you change the country, the page will show you the shipping charges.
I love this jacket. It's very warm, yet lightweight. I wore it under a shell the other day while skiing. It's thin enough to wear as a layer under a shell, and doesn't restrict movement. It's very breathable, which is great for most purposes. At the same time, it is not windproof at all, so be wary if it's a windy day.
Good warm fleece. I wore it all winter under the Ascentionist and I never had complaints. I was a little put off by the fuzzy exterior at first, but I still wear it because of the performance.
How warm is this for under a shell? I am replacing a worn our NF Denali, and would like something at least as warm. I am considering some of the down/synthetic options, such as the MH Lodown or SubZero, but would prefer not to look like the Stay-Puff man.
It is a warm layer. If you are considering a down and you don't want to look like a puff, I would recommend the Patagonia Down Sweater. It is about as thick as this fleece and much warmer. http://www.backcountry.com/store/PAT0359/Patagonia-Down-Sweater-Jacket-Mens.htmlAdded: The Patagonia R2 is not at all like the NF Denali. Firstly, the cut is significantly slimmer. The R2 is cut very slim, and the NF Denali is designed to be an outer layer, or for the larger individual. Secondly, the R2 is a thinner layer. If you want something as warm as the NF Denali go for the more-regular-cut R3 and layer it, or the windproof R4 (which I love) and also layer. Depending on the level of activity, the windproof R4 might be too warm or stuffy. If you're not going to move around a whole lot then DEFINITELY go for a down or synthetic insulation material. The Mountain Hardwear compressors are great and Patagonia have some excellent options in that area too, especially in the down jackets/hoodys...Note to above: the Patagonia down sweater - while thin - is significantly thicker than the R2 and significantly warmer. I would not recommend it for high activity as it will get sweaty and useless *especially* if you're wearing a backpack.
A nice jacket that can be used in a layering system pretty effectively. However, this is not the jacket to wear everyday as i would have liked. The wind cuts right through like your wearing nothing at all. Nice and fashionable but i would have went for another stand alone fleece instead of just a layer.
I own at least half a dozen fleece jackets, but this particular Patagonia is by far the best! I'm 5'6" and 145 lbs. and the small fits me just right. I could wear the medium, but I like especially like the way it hugs my body as an sublayer. My other fleece jackets are loose, so they're too bulky as an under garment. The R2 is perfect alone as a warm jacket, or fantastic as an insulating layer under a softshell jacket like the Backcountry Shift Welder Hoody. I purchased the pirate blue which is an awesome color. My next one will be black. I really like the high collar which keeps my neck warm, yet lays out of the way when unzipped. Great stylish jacket!
Yarrgh!! A bit late for your question but Patagonia has changed it up and added "Pirate Blue" to their collection of cool colors. It's a pretty bright blue, but I still think it's super dope. Hope this helps.
Patagonia doesn't make this one in blue -- the closest they have is a color called "North Sea," which is sort of grayish... See here: http://www.patagonia.com/web/us/product/product_focus.jsp?OPTION=PRODUCT_FOCUS_DISPLAY_HANDLER&catcode=MAIN_FA_US.CLOTHING_GEAR.MENS.JACKETS.FLEECE&style_color=25135-767&ws=
I love my R2. Just took it skiing in Canada. It works great as a mid layer or outer layer on days when it isn't windy. This is a very athletic jacket as it breathes well and insulates well when needed. However, I would never pay 150 for it. I copped this badboy on Patagonia's website on closeout for 54 bucks. Great jacket, bad price, super breathability.
You need a good piece of fleece to wear under a shell? Then this one is your choice! This fleece jacket offers a perfect weight to performance ratio which keeps you really warm when worn under a shell. Unfortunately it is not windproof, but somehow that is made up for by a very high breathability which might be preferred especially when skiing or hiking with a waterproof jacket. The touch of this fleece is very cool, it feels just like a sheep!
Well this is $75 less and lighter. The R4 is 300 weight fleece while the R2 is 200 weight but lacks the chest pocket of the R4. The R2 will be stretchier but the R4 will block wind better (thanks to the Polartec). It depends on what you want to use the jackets for. If you want a midlayer, the R2 is probably better, but if you were hoping for a heavier duty outer fleece, the R4 is your best bet.Update: The questioner is asking about the "Lightweight R4" which is a windproof version of the R2, as far as I can tell, and I have both. The cut is slim, like the R2, and the material is light too, like the R2. So really it's the windproof aspect that's the main difference and this makes a *massive* difference if you're out in the snow or where there's a chilly breeze.It's difficult to say which one you should get as you don't lay out what you want it for, but here is my advice:-R2 - great mid layer, or outer layer in benign weather for high activity. If you're hiking up a hill in spring or fall and it's not raining, this is the fleece I would wear. The Lightweight R4 will quickly get sweaty and you'll be busy venting it the whole time. The Lightweigh R4 is also less packable as the windproof laminate prevents it from squishing together as well as the R2.-Lightweight R4 - walking around your neighborhood in spring or fall and it's a bit windy. OR, you're out snowshoeing in 25F+ weather. Combine this lightweight R4 with an R1 pullover underneath + R2 T-shirt and you'll be toasty but have venting options. Take a down jacket to slip over it when you stop for lunch. The slim cut gives great mobility, and I'm also led to believe it's waterproof due to the windproof laminate, but that's a backup plan, as if this thing gets wet, it gets WET and soggy, and therefore colder.
this jacket is warm when it needs to be, breathes when it needs to, and it always looks cool. the best part about the R2 is that it is so comfortable. i've been everywhere in this thing, in the same day. skiing, dinner, bar, it's awesome and performs well in all circumstances. buy one, you'll feel the same!
TARZAN LIKE!!! this thing is fitted nice and slim, with an extra long external fleece which performs like a thug on the inside of a shell. assuming no wind, it is a great outwear peice which looks like a classy version of the MH monkey man jacket. granted, this puppy aint cheep, but if you see it at a patagonia outlet or steep/cheap, snatch it up. you will look smoking hot, your lady will love snuggling to it, and you dog will love leaving his hair all over it.
I bought this as a gift for my boyfriend. He loves it and the the bright green looks really great on him. However, I tried it on and took it for a test run. It's not very warm, probably better for layering. Wind was coming right through it and I was cold. I think $150 is quite a lot for such a lightweight jacket.
Maybe try a windproof product next time? The lightweight R4 and regular R4 are both windproof. The R2 is specifically designed to be highly breathable, which inevitably means that wind can come in too.
Stellar second layer that is highly breathable and warm under a hard shell. Warm when very wet! Great for on-the-go and comfortable under a pack. Coming more...
I have recently been turned onto Patagonia gear, and I must confess it lives up to the hype. This particular fleece is absurdly comfortable and lightweight, more...