Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50*
Memorial Day SaleMemorial Day Sale
Detail Pics

Description

Classic style meets lightweight windproofing in Patagonia's Retro-X Jacket.

The Patagonia Classic Retro-X Jacket is made for working under the hood of your truck or spending the night in a bivy. Patagonia made this jacket with a plush Synchilla Fozzie-the-Bear outer, a polyester mesh liner, and a windproof breathable membrane sandwiched in the middle. The Classic Retro-X Jacket packs a surprising amount of warmth for its light weight. The sooner you get this jacket, the sooner you'll be able to mat down the ¼-inch Synchilla for its real Classic look.

Share your thoughts

What do you think of the

Patagonia Classic Retro-X Jacket - Men's

? Share a...

No file chosen

Rather attach a photo from another website?

Rather attach a photo from your computer?

  • Product review:
  • Share a video
  • Share a photo

How familiar are you with the product?(optional)

Invalid filetype.

Save

Here's what others have to say...

4 5

BzBrian

Member since 
  • Gender: Male

Yes, it's really windproof.
Yes, it's made of recycled materials.
But no, it's not soft. The Patagonia R3 fleece and the Mountain Hardwear Monkey Man look similar to the Retro-X but unlike the Retro-X, they are SOFT AND FUZZY. However, this jacket isn't. The jacket feels like the yellow insulation materials they put in buildings/houses. It's not soft. I'm in college and a couple of girls literally ran up to me to feel my jacket, but leave disappointed in it's roughness. Times like that I wished I chose the R3 or the Monkey Man.
But considering that the Retro-X is windproof unlike its counterparts, it's nice. But keep in mind that the jacket feels a bit stiff even after wearing it for a couple of months and I don't think it'll get any less stiff because of its construction with the inner windproof layer design.

But the jacket is very warm and cuddly looking, but beware it's not soft and fuzzy like how I was hoping.

5 5

MacKenzie Clayton

Member since 
Groups:

This is a great, warm, heavy fleece. It is very "tight knit" so it keeps the wind out but yet it is breathable. The lining isn't the same as the outside but is a smooth mesh. Fits true to size.

5 5

David Page

Member since 

I bought one of these jackets around 1993. It was my main jacket for winter for many years. I left it at a new years party and my friend refused to return it conveniently because he love it so much.

This jacket is one of the greatest jackets ever designed. It has a thicker fleece exterior but it keeps you incredibly warm due to the wind-proof membrane. Pockets are large.

Patagonia makes quality products that are durable and this is one of the best.

I'm glad to have my new one for this winter.

In the picture the Black Oak color looks...

mue5493922

Member since 
Posted on

In the picture the Black Oak color looks not so black. Is The chest pocket and the neck really black or some kind of brown?

Eli Hauschild

Member since 
Responded on

The chest pocket and the neck is a maroon or burgundy color, as pictured. It is not black.. black oak is a type of tree, i'm guessing the colors of this jacket are made to somewhat resemble the colors of this tree in the fall.

4 5

js1924119

Member since 

The wind blocking layer really works and the jacket is quite warm. i would call it more of a casual/around town/maybe a day hike fleece. It's not the most packable, i wouldn't take it in the backcountry with me. i could see wearing it as a thick midlayer under a shell on the ski hill tho. All in all, i bought it for casual wear so i am happy with it. The vest is a good option too.

I am 5 foot 9, 150 lbs, and a 32 waist. I...

Finn Barrett

Member since 
Posted on

I am 5 foot 9, 150 lbs, and a 32 waist. I can't decide between a small and medium. I understand a medium would be better for layering, but would a small still be big enough to fit a sweatshirt under? How does it compare sizing wise to the north face Denali or the Patagonia better sweater?

Dave Marcus

Member since 
Best Answer Responded on

I'm stressing out man. Your waist...has...nothing...to...do...with...your...jacket...size...!

Tell us your chest size and we can help you with your sizing question.

Ty Nelson

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

Finn I think you could go medium for sure and be happy. Doubtful you could fit a sweatshirt underneath a small.

5 5

Sean

Member since 

First off, I'm 6'4 190-200lbs (depending if its the holidays) and i fit very well in size large. I bought the black retro x with the grey pocket.

Used this from camping and hiking to everyday use in the wind, rain sleet and snow up here in the pacific northwest. Never has let me down. People have commented on it on several occasions and have even gotten a few random people asking if they can feel the fabric.

Over the past year and a half of owning the jacket the only wear and tear is under the elbows where the fleece has gotten a little matted while driving or resting my arms. Does not affect the integrity whatsoever. And can be remedied by rubbing your hands over it for a few seconds to kind of rough it back up.

I see myself using this for a long time.

5 5

Alldogz

Member since 

He loved it. Gift for the BF...and i was uncertain about size as Patagonia usually runs a bit small. He normally wears an XL so i was in a quandry..but the XL fit fine. Plenty big (he can wear a heavy shirt or two layers under it).As stated in previous posts, it is looser at the bottom, but in my case that was what i wanted...many of the snap tees i have ended up with because they are too tight on him (too big on me).I would say this Patagonia item was pretty true to size. Thanks to those who helped me on the chats on this one trying to figure out size. its a KEEPER!!!!

4 5

Alldogz

Member since 

It FIT!!! I held off on doing the review until after gifting it because i really thought it may have been too large. Patagonia has a tendency to run a wee bit on the small side, but after "chatting" with some of the customer service reps who checked and re-checked i was pretty comfortable with ordering the XL. Recipient is 5' 8", longish torso(short legs) and broad chested...this fit fine...a wee bit large, but i know a Large would have been too tight in the chest. It is loose around the bottom which I liked but some readers complained about (cold air etc) but if it had been tight i think it would have hung a bit funny. This was a great bargain...and "recipient" is quite happy with it..and he is a hard one to buy for..but he is a sucker for patagonia and fleece.

4 5

Brandon

Member since 

Love how wind resistant this is, it is a little baggy in the arms, The zippered pockets zip opposite way than used to, but nothing bad. No drawstring at waist so have draft once in a while. Great with sweater or extra layer underneath. The high loft i get confused for a muppet sometimes,

My blood runs pretty warm and I tend to...

Kurt Stein

Member since 
Posted on

My blood runs pretty warm and I tend to get pretty hot inside most jackets with a waterproof-type membrane - but this one is just windproof. I can't ever get a feel for how well something like this breathes. How stuffy is this jacket?

Also...I am about 5'11" and 175-180 lbs or so - what size?

SKOL

Member since 
Best Answer Responded on

This is more of a style, wear around town jacket, and a warm one at that. It is hot and heavy. if you're looking for a jacket that breathes well during aerobic activity, get a softshell.

Hi -
I'm 5'7 165 lbs... 32 waist with a...

JDF100303927

Member since 
Posted on

Hi -
I'm 5'7 165 lbs... 32 waist with a shorter torso and athletic build. I am always between a small and a medium in shirts and jackets. I have read this jacket is a tad big and I'm looking for a replacement for my frazzled monkey man (medium - but they ran a bit small)... i'm looking for something I can throw on over a t-shirt and use as a layer under my shell for skiing and other winter activities. I'll rarely have more than a t-shirt or other base under the retro. That said - would a small be too small - or would it fit perfect? I'd imagine a medium would give more freedom - but I also think the retro might stretch just a hair over time. Thanks for any advice....

Ty Nelson

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

JDF,
Thanks for the question. I'd say you should give the small a shot and rest assured that Backcountry's return policy will help you out if it doesn't fit. I think since you only want to wear a T underneath, or use the fleece as a mid layer that the size small might possibly give you the perfect fit. Hope that helps, good luck

love these but, my diet hasn't helped me....

ty nichols

Member since 
Posted on

love these but, my diet hasn't helped me. I'm 6 2 265 with 38 waist so could 2x fit my body . I hope

Travis Knoop

Member since 
Responded on

It should; I bought an XL and it was too big for me (6'3", 220#, 34" waist). It seems to run big in the waist and for me was hanging off my body

3 5

Thomas Knight

Member since 

I'd like to know what Patagonia's thought process is behind not putting a hem drawstring on their fleeces. Its such a simple but crucial thing that would really put them over the top. Without it they're technical fleece becomes just casual wear or mere fashion. And even that will be drafty casual wear....Its a pity, especially for the price.

Is it just me or does this jacket have a...

John

Member since 
Posted on

Is it just me or does this jacket have a wider waist than the older versions?

McClimber

Member since 
Responded on

I can't speak to the older version but this new one does have a really wide waist... and no drawstring. Patagonia was probably trying to appeal to a greater percentage of the American market... or should I say "wider". Ugg... fat Americans... I just puked a little in my mouth.

4 5

wil3345439

Member since 

great jacket, really warm and perfect for almost all conditions. one and only downside is that it has no scrunchies on the bottom especially since it is supposed to be a windproof jacket.

4 5

wil3345439

Member since 

great jacket, really warm and perfect for almost all conditions. one and only downside is that it has no scrunchies on the bottom especially since it is supposed to be a windproof jacket.

5 5

Garrett Mixon

Member since 

Just got this jacket in the mail this morning, LOVE it. I am guilty for being addicted to fleece jackets and I have a very large assortment, and I am very excited to put my first Patagonia jacket to good use. The only downside to this jacket is the lack of warm pockets, but this is a very small issue. For reference, I am 5'9" 195lbs, average build and the large fits great with room for a base layer. I probably could have gone to medium but I usually wear something under.

View all contributions... Be patient, it might take a while.