We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
We guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time - now, next month, in 30 years - you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked. Need help returning an item? - Click Hereclose
Due to contracts with the following brands, we are unable to ship any of their products outside the US.
more...
Int'l Shipping
Backcountry.com uses UPS Worldwide Express or Worldwide Expedited
for all shipping outside the United States. We have found this method to be quick,
secure, and cost effective.
Although the injinji Outdoor Crew Socks use a blend of wool and Lycra for stretch, softness, and durability, their real story is the independent toes that reduce the chance of blisters. A thin, seamless material between the toes lets them move freely without rubbing each other raw as they can do in regular socks. Plus, you can slip your feet right into your flip-flops when you hit camp in the injinji Outdoor Crew Socks.
Bottom Line: The injinji Outdoor Crew Socks keep your toes blister-free and comfortable from trailhead to camp.
I wear Injinji toe socks when running, hiking and walking long distances/duration over any other sock. They offer blister freedom and better balance. The benefits and comfort far outweigh the annoyance of putting them on : )
I wore these for the first time in a 26 mile trail race and LOVED them! No blisters or chaffing at all. The true test will be when I wear them for a 24 hour rogaine. A tad expensive for socks but I would recommend them.
Absolutely the best socks I've got! I use to get blisters in between my toes but no more. These have helped eliminate hot spots I use to get with other socks. Very, Very well worth the the dough!
My toes still got a few tiny blisters from rubbing together, but I doubt anything short of cutting them off my feet would stop the rubbing. I also like how they didn't bunch down my leg after a bit of activity.
very good socks.from walking around vegas in 100+ deg heat in sneakers all day, to hiking idahos selkirk mtns in heavy boots,feel great,fit like gloves,dont leave without them.
I was apprehensive at first, because I don't normally like things between my toes. But these socks are warm and comfy. They are the only socks that keep my feet warm during xc skiing. The only downside about them is the big-toe sleeve developed a hole after only a few months. I still wear them, though!
For years I've been doing the moleskin, liquid skin, and stop to dry my feet out every 3-6 miles so I don't blister up on my backpacking trips. I'm an extreme sweater & an avid backpacker (I'm even sweating right now & it's the middle of winter and I'm in a 65 degree room!). Even with the right boots and high end socks I still will blister up if I don't get my feet dry every few hours. I've also got a really bad hammer toe that I've always had to tape up so it won't get really ugly quick, but these Injinji socks have literally changed all of that for me! I still like to dry my feet every few hours on the trail (but it's out of comfort now instead of necessity); I haven't gotten a blister (and the toe sock design helps cover up my hammer toe so I don't have to tape it anymore) since I've started wearing these and I've even started using them for hockey games because it feels like a naked foot in my skate (which a lot of players like) but I still get the added padding and sweat absorption of a sock so my skate lasts longer. I LOVE INJINJI, EVEN IF THE LADIES TEASE ME WHEN THEY SEE MY TOE SOCKS!
Also try adding a small amt of cornstarch with baking soda, or other drying powder (there are some good ones on the market) inside your socks to help keep them dry. Kudos for good foot care.
Comment on K. Rawson's review >