We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
We guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time - now, next month, in 30 years - you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked. Need help returning an item? - Click Hereclose
Due to contracts with the following brands, we are unable to ship any of their products outside the US.
more...
Int'l Shipping
Backcountry.com uses UPS Worldwide Express or Worldwide Expedited
for all shipping outside the United States. We have found this method to be quick,
secure, and cost effective.
The Scarpa Men's Kailash GTX Hiking Boot provides the durability of a suede upper and the waterproof breathable performance of Gore-Tex. A Vibram Hi-Trail Lite sole creates all the traction you need for anything from scree to dirt to mud, and it lasts for years and years of trail time. Scarpa added a protective rubber toe cap to this midweight boot, so you don't go wearing it out before its time. The Kailash GTX Hiking Boot supports your ankles well enough for a weeklong trip yet remains light enough for day hikes.
Bottom Line: If you can handle it, so can this boot.
Nice boots, good ankle support but a little wide in the heel. I have to tie really tight to keep my foot stable. I hike about 30 miles a week in these and after 2 months the rubber toe gaurd is starting to come off. I find that this happens in almost all boots I purchase. Besides that it is a good boot but expensive compared to other similar boots.
We are preparing to leave the country to serve as missionaries in Papua New Guinea, in a VERY rugged, very remote area in the Eastern Highlands region where it reportedly rains every day from late afternoon-overnight. We have a large family and will not be able to just return a pair of boots if they are not "right". There are four of us big people and four little ones. We wear size 12 and 13 men's and size 8 and 9 women's. These look like great boots ... can anyone help me please? Thanks!
I would advise against just blindly purchasing the same boot for everyone in your family. When you are in that type of situation, having good fitting boots is very important. Since everyone's foot is a bit different, I strongly recommend each person trying on various boots to see what fits best. Then make sure you wear them as much as you can before you leave so you can break them in and identify any hot spots, or determine if an insole (SuperFeet) is needed. Take time, and do this right and your feet will thank you.
Great fit right out of the box but 10 miles into the trail with 50 lbs on my back I dicovered that the editors of backpacker magazine must all be flat footed becouse these boots have absolutely no arch support. Now after spending 40 dollors on inserts I am still afraid to bring these botts back on the trail. Thanks Backpacker magazine for you editors choice awards not.
All hiking boots come with worthless factory insoles, it is generally accepted that you get superfeet or cork insoles if you need arch support. You should review the shoe not the insole.
i am a male 6'2" 200 lbs,will be doing about 20 miles backpacking in Hawaii a month from now with about 35 lb. pack. I have slightly narrow,low to medium volume feet (size 13/47). Need enough support/stiffness without too much boot weight. also there are some sections of the trail which are a loose-gravel type of rock/dirt where the trail is only a foot wide with a life-threatening steep dropoff on one side and cliff wall on the other, meaning confidence in my boot's sole/traction is a MUST. so far i like what i have read about the Kailash. other boots i have been considering (from reviews only so far) are Montrail Torre , and maybe a couple of Vasque boots. i would greatly appreciate your helpful advice ! thanks ...
Wore these to work a couple times before heading up to Northern California's Lost Coast for 4 days of backcountry hiking with a full pack. I appreciated the big toebox, good stability on cobbles and scrambling over boulders, and the waterproof finish. The arch support isn't much, but some inserts should address that. Great boot for the weight.
I am looking at either the Scarpa women's kailash or the Scarpa womens ZG 65 .... which would be a better boot for trail hiking with a backpack of about 30 liters?
I bought mine abou a month ago and so far I have really just been wearing them at work and school, but I have spent some time in them in Shenandoah NP. The toe box is a little narrow for me, but it doesn't bother me until I've put a few miles in the hills. I have a pretty wide forefoot (I can't wear penny loafers) so this isn't too surprising, and I may take them to a bootfitter to see what they can do. The arches are a little low with the stock insoles, but I replaced them with some Superfeet and it's all good (they take up a little more volume than the Scarpa insoles, though).
The outsoles are pretty aggressive and they've been great on all types of terrain. The suede looks great and they haven't really required any break-in time. They will be awesome boots for you if they fit you correctly, not so much if they don't. Just don't get too fixated on one boot model if it won't fit your feet. I would suggest you try a few before you buy this if you have a wide foot (try the Asolo Fugitive or Vasque Breeze).
These boots fit great right out of the box with no break in. I have a long (46.5) narrow foot. Put a pair of Green Superfeet in and now have the best I have ever had. So far their performance has been very good and I cannot fault them in any way.
Hey im gonna buy this boots and i am a 9.5... all my trekking and running shoes (Asics, Columbia) are 9.5.. so what size should i go with??? a 42.5 or a 43???
I purchased these Scarpas in mid-December, put them on and have rarely taken them off. They are really comfortable, with no manufacturing quality issues (stitching and materials are perfect). The sizing was just right (I wear a 9 1/2 sneaker and bought a 42.5). Looking at them, there is an impression that they are a bit narrow, but they conform to your foot shape really well and there are no tight spots. I'd have to say that this impression is confined to the exterior of the boot. There is plenty of room inside, so you can flex your feet and wiggle your toes without meeting resistance. We have had snow in the last two weeks and so I have had the opportunity to try them out in wet and mushy conditions. They definitely keep your feet dry and comfortable. I just don't see a downside.
I'm wondering if this boot would be good for me out here in Afghanistan. Temperatures range anywhere from -10 F all the way up to 140 F, and terrain can be dry desert or rocky mountain. I'm currently wearing a pair of Kayland Contacts, and have found that they are a bit too bulky and cold weather oriented for this job. Not to mention the soles are a bit too stiff for this much walking. I'm usually carrying about a 50lb pack, wearing around 80lbs of gear and walking all types of terrain at a quick pace. Would the Kailash work out for this? If not, what would you recommend? Thanks alot for any help.
Would be glad to send you a pair. Just want to offer a soldier what he needs to keep him safe when you're doing your job for the rest of us. What is your size, unit, address,etc. that I would need to send it to you.
I used these for about three months and have a 100 miles or so on the boots. These took 15 miles to properly break in.
They are NARROW, so get a while size bigger to accommodate for feet swelling and socks and narrowness. I usually wear a 10-10.5 and got a 11.5. The sole is strong and uneven terrain doesn't hurt my foot. I wouldn't recommend this boot though. If the bigger size means not slippage of the foot in the shoe, then that will result in blisters from friction. Pick another boot if you are interested in using a shoe for a lot of backpacking.
I started buying Scarpas based on their reputation. I have a pair of Escape GTX and now the Kailash GTX. They are great for my feet. I have a low arch and normal width feet, and the boots feel comfortable when I walk with them. I have now found a brand that suits my feet and I am sticking with it. They are made in Europe also, while most of the boots nowadays are made in China. Definitively will pay a premium for the quality boots!
Hey folks. I generally wear a 11.5. Should I go for the 45 or the 45.5 in the Scarpa Kailash gtx? Tried on the Mustang GTX in a 45 a while back and it fit good from what I remember. Do the these Kailash 's fit the same?
Write your answer here...No! I just purchased the boots you are inquiring about. I wear a 101/2 hiking boot in a D width. I ordered the Scarpa Kailash GTX in a 43.5 and 44, both were too small especially in the toe box area. I ended up with a 44.5 and there are just a tad small feeling with my green Superfeet inserts. However, the boots feels like the right size with the original insert. Bottom line: You need to go bigger, start with a 46.5 and probably go up.
Further to my review posted on 31 July 2008, I have worn the boots for app 4months, covering app 8Kilometers per day, around 640 kms 90% of the time on grass mowing lawns,Sadly the soles around the balls of both feet have no tread left at all, A cost in New Zealand dollars of app 55 cents per Kilometer. On contacting the local supplier they have not seen this wear rate on this type of sole considering work is mostly on grass. The boots have been otherwise perfect for the job i do but a little dissapointing considering the cost
I would recommend the 44. The smaller you can get into, the better. Reason being is that these are going to pack out a bit and leave some extra room so the smaller the better.
I too agree with pistolpete and painless, there is little arch support and I am finding them quite narrow fitting. I mow lawns so i hope they will carry me 8 to 10 kilometers walking each day. They are definitely hard in the inner sole but i hope they will soften up in time.
Hey guys-Does anybody have any experience using these boots on canoe trips (or similar)? What I really need is a boot that is supportive enough for carrying 30-40lbs pack and a 90lbs canoe to boot (sorry for that awful pun) for relatively short bursts of portaging (up to ~6km). That is the easy part of my search. I need to find a boot that dries quickly. Fancy gore tex and event waterproof membranes do not help if you are standing in a river up to your knees and putting on cold wet boots as I am sure you know is the most miserable feeling ever. Do you guys think it worth it to forgo the membrane completely? I have gone through a pair of cheap boots a year so I am tempted to get an uber-durable leather boot like the Scarpa SL M3, but leather takes AGES to dry. IS the durability of synthetics significantly worse?Thanks!
6 km sounds like an awfully long portage and you will not want to be wearing soaking wet boots for that. And where did you find such a heavy canoe? My guess is that will be a two-trip portage because a lighter kevlar boat and a portage pack are bad enough to carry at the same time.
If you need the stability of boots I would drag everything out of the water and put them on after that. Or else stick with trail runners or light hikers with no membrane. Leather does take a long time to dry but some of the synthetics out there can really take a beating without showing too much wear and tear. Depending on where you canoe the terrain can go from a walk in the park to boulder-hopping, which would require some extra support and stability.
Last time I went to Algonquin I ended up leaving my boots in the car and either wore my trail runners or my Chaco's the entire time. If you are able to I would really suggest renting a kevlar boat from Algonquin Outfitters. I spent a week with a kevlar Swift Kipawa and it was a great boat.
If you plan on stepping in knee deep water, then don't get any GTX boots unless they are knee high. heh. Once GTX boots get wet, they take a long time to dry.
I, too, read about this boot in Backpacker, and ordered a pair to start breaking in. Like pistolpete, I also noticed there is little arch support, which was surprising given all the accolades it received. However, I usually slip in my orthotics anyway, which helps this immensely. These appear to have high quality construction, but seem to run a bit narrow for my feet, and are not very cushioned inside. Otherwise, a very nice boot.
I am looking at these vs another pair of Scarpa ZG 65 XCR for a 2 week backpacking trip to Patagonia, South America. Pack weight 45-50lbs. What is the better boot??? Love the Scarpas and don't want to use any other brand.
Hey Andrew,Personally I would go with the ZG 65 XCR's simply for the fact that they're a beefier boot. They are heavier but the sole is quite a bit more bullet proof and the construction is suppose to be quite a bit more heavy duty. Both great boots though!
Got these from a local outfitter and I couldn't be happier. I tried on 7 different brands/models for this past summer and these won out. I fixed the arch problem with some green Super Feet soles, flawless fit and feel now. Did a very technical 16 mile trail with 4K vert and 45lbs on me and these boots saved my body. My friends went in trailrunners and after this trip I was the only one feeling fresh as a daisy. I would recommend these boots if you have narrower feet and kinda long toes. Definitely replace the insoles though, the stock ones are crap.
I have hiked about 1/2 the AT in the Vasque Zephyr boot. They work very well for me with never any blisters or break in period. The Zephyr weighs in at 3# 10 oz (2 1/4 # more than the Scarpa Kailash!!!!). Knowing the construction, toe box size, etc of the Zephyr would you think that the Scarpa would be good for me???
I think the scarpa would be a great boot if you're looking for something fitting the same as the Zephyr. They fit close. Both are great boots. Normally I might be worried with a large drop in weight, just for the durability factor, but you'll be fine with these. They're plenty durable! Great choice!
First up the sizing is pretty spot on. Those with a wider foot (as I do) will still be comfortable in this boot just by selecting their regular size. Scarpa seem to build these a little long which is great in minimising toe crush on extended descents. That said, some minor rubbing did occur on my little toes after a continuous five mile decent but i would have expected this regardless. For those coming out of trail shoes, the Scarpas can feel a little firm underfoot but this is in keeping with their role and can be easily remedied with some softer inserts. The grip is good in dry and wet but does require a little use to wear off the factory finish and get the best traction from the tread. The leather simply beads water off and the goretex lining does a great job for waterproof-ness and in minimising sweatiness. After only about 30 miles of trekking in them so far the boots seem extremely well built with no real signs of use. The general feel of snugness and comfort around the foot and ankle is great. My only gripe is that the laces are thin and are not held under tension by the top two pairs of tangs, a feature I am used to on other boots.Overall however, I am very pleased with my Kailash's and certainly have no buyer's remorse.
Planning on the John Muir Trail this summer (09). Looking at the Asolo series (they all seem to look alike), the Garmont Sitka XCR, this Scarpa Kalish and the Scarpa Mustang. Which do you think would make the best choice? I've got a high arch and narrow feet. Thanks Heaps!!!
Michael,Congratulations and good luck on your summer endeavor! When fitting boots I always break things down into 4 main components: socks, insoles, lacing, and fit. All four of these will make our break the proper fit of a boot. I always wear Green or Orange Superfeet in all of my boots. If your arch is really high you might want to consider Sole insoles. These will give you much better support, keep your heal locked in place, and after a long day of hiking your feet will be much less fatigued.Socks - The Fox River X Static liner combined with the appropriate weight Smartwool hiking sock combination has always gotten the job done. Footwear - there are some people that rather have a full grain leather boot because it has less stitching and appreciate the simplicity (less things to go wrong). Others enjoy blends of leather and fabric which are often times more breathable and much lighter.I have made a few comments on several boots that would work for your trip.(+)Asolo Powermatic 200 GV, stiff with a nice bend, medium, medium high volume I highly recommend this boot. It has a great fit and is very comfortable.(+)Asolo Flame GTX, medium weight. Should provide a nice fit for your foot.(+)Montrail Torree GTX medium weight, runs narrow, not high volume(+)Montrail Blueridge GTX very stiff, runs medium to narrow, high volume(-)Scarpa Mustang GTX medium weight, medium+ width, medium volume(+)Scarpa Kailash GTX medium weight, same as Mustang (they are both built on the same last) Between the Kailash and Mustang I would lean towards the Kailash only because the more aggressive sole will suit you better with the elevation gain / drop of the John Muir trail.A lot of times a high instep foot will fit in the boot fine, until the person really starts climbing (when the forefoot flexes it will dig in to the top of the toes or lower part of the instep). Order a couple pairs and try doing some lunges in your living room and see how your feet feel. All of these boots with the exception of the Montrails, might feel loose in the width. If this is the case a five iron (very dense spacer) under your insole will solve this problem. Order at least 2 if not 3 pairs to try on, think about how many pairs you try on if you to a store. Try at least one Asolo and one Motrainl. You can decide if a heavy weight (Asolo Powermatic or Montrail Blueridge) or medium weight (Asolo Flame, Montrail Torree, or Scarpa) is more appropriate for your needs and backpacking style. Please let me know if this helped answer your question or if you have any follow up questions.Mahalo, Sumo
I bought these boots and wore them twice while cutting the grass. Then I went out and hiked close to 100 miles in the San Rafael Swell in Utah with zero blisters. My brother and I hiked up washes, climbed out of canyons, trudged across mountain tops and forded rivers. These boots are comfortable and took quite a beating. Would definitely buy another pair.
These boots are amazing. Excellent Scarpa construction, as usual. I had some doubts, because my feet are really wide, but these fit well. There has been barely any break-in period. I used to have Asolos, but these are an upgrade.
The people at Backpacker Magazine were soooooo right these boots fit perfectly right out of the box...No break in required!!! I haven't put them through their paces yet but I'm sure they will perform Amazingly!!!!
For everyone complaining about the arch support: FYI, no high-end boots come with insoles you should EVER trust out of the box. Some La Sportiva's come with only a piece of cardboard. You should ALWAYS purchase quality insoles for any decent boot you buy. (Keep in mind that this may affect sizing, btw.)
That's a good point. I believe that many of the gear testers at Backpacker Mag. say they don't test boots with the factory insoles, and instead replace them with high-end inserts from companies like Superfeet.I tried on a pair today in the store today and they felt about as comfortable as my 8 year old Vasques, but I'll definitely be replacing the insoles when I man up and buy them.You're correct about the "included" mfg. insoles. Try these. They're very comfortable not matter what load you're carrying:http://www.backcountry.com/store/SFT0003/Superfeet-Trim-To-Fit-Green-Insole.html
This is an absolutely awesome boot. I'll tell you the only negative up front. It could use a little more padding on the tongue and around the ankle area. Positive from here. First trip was Mount LeConte and it seemed like I had owned them for years. Zero break in time. The Vibram Hi-Trail Lite sole is great. I have put about one hundred miles of trail wear on these boots and the soles are better now than out of the box. Serious hikers know exactly what I mean. had them in snow for hours on the way up and down Mount Sterling and my feet were always comfortable and the Gore-Tex keeps me dry. I can honestly say I'll buy more Scarpa boots. I'm heading out west this June for some 14er's and I'll be wearing these boots. I love them. I bought Steph a pair for her B-Day and after a lacing issue she is all smiles too. Happy hiking!
I wear a size 9 or 9.5. I like this boot, but for me the size choice seems to be either 41.5 (8.5 US) or 43.5 (10.5 US) Can I get it in a 42.5, or are they accounting for thick socks and assuming I will get the bigger size?
These boots are incredibly comfortable, very well made, and very light (for what they are). It took me seriously only about 5 miles of walking around town to break them in. Since then I've had them out on the trail several times, in the water, scrambling up rocks, etc. They've stood up to everything. I climbed a steep (hands required) trail that snowmelt had turned into a waterfall this weekend and they kept my feet perfectly dry. I've had no blisters, no rubbing, nothing but perfect comfort. I honestly can say that about no other boot I've had. My feet are a bit narrow, so your experience might be different if your feet are wider. These boots feel true to size.
Great combination of beefy construction and light weight. I recently used these for the first time on a weekend trip that brought me through sloppy mud, rocky outcrops, and even 2 foot snow drifts in some areas. Never got wet once and kept really good footing/traction the entire time. The fitment was good, toe box not too narrow for me and the arch support wasn't great but didn't hurt either. I am very impressed with these boots.
I ordered these suckers because they got great reviews and their color went along with the rest of my uniform. They have not let me down. After four days walking around my office I had the pleasure of taking them out on a mission that lasted four days! They never gave me a single problem. They hiked up and down mountains 4-5 times daily and were routinely soaked while digging trucks out of the mud. My feet were never uncomfortable or wet. After 4 days taking them off only once to change socks, the only complaint I had was the smell when I took them off, ha! I'd recommend them to any one. I would also recommend ordering a half size small. I ordered my normal boot size and they have just a tad bit more room in them than I'd like but they still work great.
Comment on Ranger's review >