Clothing

Gear

Accessories

$5.99 2-Day Shipping
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Close
Flag This
Close This Window
Scott Mission Alpine Ski

Scott Mission Alpine Ski

Item #SCO0127|67 in Stock – Ships Wicked Fast & Free
On Sale: $419.37
40% Off, Regularly: $698.95
Suggested Retail: $825.00
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

One Color, 168cm (419.37)
One Color, 178cm (419.37)
One Color, 183cm (419.37)
One Color, 158cm (419.37)
Quantity:
Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List
  • Pass It On

Scott Mission Alpine Ski

Billed as an all-mountain mid-fat performer, the Scott Mission does anything but disappoint. Thanks to Scott’s dual-radius sidecut, this deceptively light ski can carve up groomers with authority, making short or long turns at any speed. When you get bored, point it away from the corduroy for some chute bagging, zipperlining and crud-busting, or find some hidden pow stashes in the trees under the cliffs. At 90mm underfoot in its longest length, the Mission looks slender next to the newest crop of fatties, but it planes quickly and is forgivingly predictable in powder thanks to an early-rising, early-tapering Pro Tip Pre-Track profile. We know it sounds cliché, but seriously: if you are an advanced skier, this ski will do anything short of bashing gates and dropping 30-footers with surprising ease. If you only have the cash, time, or space in your closet for one pair of sticks, and you aren’t a heli guide by profession, the Mission is a great pick.

Bottom Line: The Mission makes it all possible.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

I'm 6'1", 250 lbs. Grew up racing GS, and have

I'm 6'1", 250 lbs. Grew up racing GS, and have been a bomb the groomers at lightspeed guy until about 3 years ago. Now I ski everything but the tight chutes and deep powder/trees at Mammoth, Squaw and Alpine and currently have a pair of older 181cm K2 Apache X (109/68/99) that I have completely grown out of skill-wise. I'm looking for a ski that will make the powder and ungroomed steeps easier to manage, but still let me bomb everything else. These Missions seem like great skis, but I'd be going from narrow to mid-fat and these have no metal in the core. All the reviewers weigh much less than I do - will these be stable and are the 183s long enough? Any suggestions? I'm heading up to Mammoth this week and will be demoing skis, but any thoughts would be appreciated.

By:
2 days ago

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Turny, floaty, turny, floaty

By:
March 23, 2009

Excellent, fun-filled skis. These are about as narrow of a ski as I'd really want to ski on every day. Their sidecut is perfect for arc-ing on the groomers and they are floaty enough to handle deep, bottomless pow. Though there are wider skis that are more fun on deep days and skinnier skis that will carve up blue East Coast ice "groomers", the Missions are some of the more versatile skis I've ridden. I totally dig them. The only negative is that they are so turny that slow-speed wedge turns can feel a little hooky. They want to catch and carve, not skid... so skidders beware!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey folks. 6 foot, 177lb here. Would you go 178cm or 183cm for

Hey folks. 6 foot, 177lb here. Would you go 178cm or 183cm for all purpose. Or punishers. Dont ski switch however. Thanks in advance

By:
August 11, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Write your answer here...i would go 183.I'm 150 lb. expert and ski the 178's.perfect for me. so u should definitely go longer

By:
August 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

183. With a narrower ski it's easier to move edge-to-edge, so if you're on the fence between lengths, I'd always go up. 183 will give you stability at speed and a little extra float in deeper snow, plus room to grow into the longer ski length and improve your skiing.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
August 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Scott Mission

By:
January 19, 2009

I'm 5-11 175lb got the 183 mounted with Naxo nx21 AT bindings. Perfect size for me. These skis have an incredibly aggressive sidecut for a fatter ski, so in comparison to say a mantra, they are quicker to initiate a turn and can turn a sharper radius. On the downside of that quickness is a little bit of twitch on high speed runouts.. I love these skis, they carve the hardpack, rip through crud, and have no problems in the bumps... a great all mountain ski - If you like to turn!-.. I definitely don't feel comfortable letting them run full speed, as they tend to get the speed wobbles big time. I've also found that on the super hard pack they tend to chatter a bit if I'm really laying into a carve. This is probably partially due to the 90m waist, and may also have something to do with the play in the Naxo bindings. Overall, I think these are great skis they do what they are supposed to, and are a blast to ski!!

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Scott mission vs. Vokl bridge. Which is the better all around

Scott mission vs. Vokl bridge. Which is the better all around ski for an advanced skier.

By:
August 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Ski

By:
January 20, 2009

This is a great ski. I am 155 lb / 5'8" expert skier. I bought the 178 and mounted Fritschi Freerides. I was a bit concerned about the length, but in fact, they are exactly the same length as the K2 Outlaws they replace / supplant. I've skied them about 6-7 days, mostly groomed / hard pack because of lack of snow here in the Sierras. They are not quite as stable as the Outlaws on the hard stuff, and in fact chatter quite a bit when you edge firmly on packed snow. However, they turn easily, and carve beautifully, and in the few chances I've had to venture off piste (1 foot powder, and some serious sun-softened mashed potatoes) they skied beautifully, floating nicely, responding quickly, and despite their lightness, cutting through the crud and heavy stuff without hesitation. They beat the Outlaws off piste, I think, and are neck and neck on piste in all but the very hardest snow. Glad I got 'em.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

5'10", 190lbs intermediate/advanced skier, like the

5'10", 190lbs intermediate/advanced skier, like the powder, but ski lots on the groomers (born on the icy slopes of NE Ont/ and Que, but interior BC skier now).Have tried the Missions (178) 2 days after a 50cm day and had a blast on all slopes. Gave me great confidence. Also tried Elan 888 (177?) on more of a hardpack day... also comfortable, but seemed not to hold as well... a shame there was no powder to play in to fully compare.Question is... how would the Punishers or the Line (Chronic? Prophet?) compare? Also the Salomon Lords were a recommended demo that I have yet to get to. Size suggestions welcomed. Probably 60/40 groomer to powder (if not 70/30). I ski a lot with boarders and need more float and crud busting ability.Thanks... great site/reviews/comments!!

By:
February 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Punisher in the same length will ski shorter and looser, due to the twin tip tail. The Prophet 100's are stiffer but they are a little more floaty because they are wider. Surprised the 888 didn't hold for you on hardpack; it's what they do best. You say 70/30 groomers/pow, but you need more float and crud performance? I'd step up to a longer length in this ski.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
April 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Right Coast Perspective

By:
January 2, 2009

After skiing these a few days in a bunch of conditions, I really like these skis. Floated in the foot deep pretty well, ripped the soft/wet snow and cord, and felt controllable on ice. They are big planks (wide) by east coast standards, so you really need to lay on them to get an edge. These babies need room to run, so if you like to ski on "auto-pilot" I would say go for something else that is less apt to cruise at breakneck speeds. For those of us that like to charge and make big turns, they're great. Mission 183 w/ Look PX12, 6'2" and 215 lbs.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

As an advanced skier, 5'10, 135lbs female....would the 168's

As an advanced skier, 5'10, 135lbs female....would the 168's do well skiing the east coast? And also, does anyone have a binding recommendation?

By:
November 30, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

yes they would, they would rip, for a binding take a look at the rossignal saphire 120 pro wb, it's a great womens binding.

By:
December 1, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Mission accomplished.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 10, 2008

I am 5ft 10, 165lbs, and this review is for the 07/08 183cm Missions (same as 08/09, different graphic) mounted around +1 with Salomon S914s. I usually ski the Scott P4 (also an amazing ski) but borrowed a pair of these for a month last spring, and they were a real surprise. For such light skis, they are very stable and confidence-inspiring. The wide, early-rise shovel design (Scott calls it Pro Tip) keeps them from deflecting in crud, and while they don't lay down arcs quite like the P4s, they are quicker in bumps and tight spots. Pretty floaty in pow, too, though I didn't bring them out on really deep days. A great spring choice for the Intermountain West, and would make a fine east coast pow/crud ski but wouldn't be my #1 pick for icy steeps. With an AT setup, they'd kill it. Wish I still had them.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

With all these amazing reviews, the mission is the ski I will

With all these amazing reviews, the mission is the ski I will be investing in. However seeing as I am buying from New Zealand I need as much advice as possible. The big question is what bindings to buy? I am 210 pound 6'4 skier so any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.

By:
November 7, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Look or Rossie px 14 or 15, salomom STH 14 or 16, I won't go less then a din of 14 for your size. just make sure they have a brake of at least 90.

By:
November 10, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

missions or mantra

By:
December 17, 2008

stuck for choice between the mission or volkl mantra, getting jester bindings for which ever, about 50 50 piste/off quite aggressive, any help?

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

OK ... everyone says the Mission is "light", but I

OK ... everyone says the Mission is "light", but I can't find anyone actually saying what weight it is ..... so what weight are the Missions????

By:
October 19, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I just weighed a pair of 178's at the shop. They weigh 8.2 lbs for both. Not a real lightweight, but not bad. The K2 Coombas in 174 weigh 8.55 lbs, for comparison. Volkle Mantras weighed in at 8.75 lbs in 178, and the Scott Crusade came in at 9.75 lbs.

By:
November 7, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Scott Mission 07

By:
February 2, 2009

I had the previous version of this ski. I think Scott just changed the design but the ski stayed the same. It's a great all around ski. However it skis shorter that it is! I'm 5'10, 190 lbs, racing and freeride background and even if I really liked the 17m radius (yeah radius info is wrong on the website, 16.9m is written on the ski) those skis seemed pretty short. So I went for the Punisher -same radius, same sidecut- in 191cm: even if tips are a bit softer, the main "body" of the ski is stiffer, what's best if you want to rip a bit more on groomy days :)

Was this helpful? (0) (2)

Flag

Change me.

Tech Specs:

Lengths:
168cm, 178cm, 183cm 
Dimensions:
[183cm] 130 / 90 / 116cm 
Turn Radius:
[183cm] 15.9m 
Construction:
SSCL sidewall sandwich 
Core Material:
Wood 
Base:
Race Finish 
Tail:
Raised 
Binding System:
No 
Binding Included:
No 
Recommended Binding:
No 
Recommended Use:
Pretty much anything covered in snow 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 Year 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: