We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 (excluding kayaks) shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
With enough width in its waist and shovel for powder, the twintipped Rossignol's Scratch Scream In' Alpine Ski gives you a true all-mountain shape and feel that'll have you floating bowls in the morning and charging the park in the afternoon. The Scratch Scream In's tough and poppy THC2 wood core maintains its smooth flex even after harsh treatment in the park, and the lightweight construction makes for effortless spins in the air. When the park fills with beaters, the Scratch Scream In' hits the cords or the bumps will equal stoke. A consistent sidecut slips easily through trees and arcs hard lines on the bulletproof piste.
Bottom Line: The Rossignol Scratch Scream In' splits its time between the park and the back bowls.
These skis rip! I'm an expert skier, 71" and 175lbs and love these. Just got 'em after a huge Utah powder day and they float really well, afternoon carves on the groomers were exceptional. I can seriously go fast on these and they don't let go. The weight is sweet too, I just landed my first backwards landing. Overall fun skis- I mostly ski the steep and deep and the crud and these have been excellent.
Two Left FeetI bought these skis from backcountry and was sent two left skis. I didn't notice until I drilled them and put on tele bindings. Obviously, the serial numbers don't match. Do you guys at backcountry have my two right skis?
my girlfriend adores these skis. she is a beginner turning into intermediate, and these are giving her the stability and float she needs to try harder lines and ski faster. no problems on durability so far, but she's still early in the game. graphics are awesome.
I recently saw these skis at Sports Authority and they mentioned that they were manufactured by Rossignol just for Sports Authority? Should I avoid purchasing these special manufactured skis? Also on the ski it states that under foot is 9.5 cm(95mm) for the 09's yet several other sites claim its 88mm?
I don't know about the dimensions, but I'm highly skeptical that Rossignol would make a custom ski for Sports Authority, which in all honesty is not a very outdoorsy store. Why not REI or EMS? Why doesn't it say Sports Authority on them? How did Backcountry get them? I think the guy in Sports Authority took you for a fool and thought you'd believe him. Either way, they're great skis.
20 days telemarking on these skis and they still have plenty-o-pop. They are stable and quick through tight trees, groomers, steeps, and bumps. They don't float like my sick-birds, but I'm kinda lardy. I must be doing something right... adam called me a jerk.
I am 6'2", 195 lbs and I already have a pair of k2 PEs in flawless condition. Are the Rossi Scream 'Ins that much different from the PEs? Lighterweight? I'm not sure if they are worth the purchase compared to what i have already. Thanks.
Honestly, these are so close in dimensions to the PE that I don't think it would be worth it for to to spend money on a ski that will perform the same. They are also not that light weight either, so not much improvement there. I'd look into a different ski. The P.E's are a way better ski, you would be downgrading if you got the scream in's.
These skis are great. They can handle anything and feel super stable through crud. They float well in powder and are great in the air. I would highly recommend them.
Just picked these up recently and got on them for the first time earlier this week. This is the widest all-mountain ski I have personally ridden, and simply put - freakin sweet. Easy enough to turn on the front side - even at low speeds - but this ski was incredibly stable doing big fast Super G turns. Perfect amount of stiffness in the shovel and tail for me (5'7" - 150lbs) in the bumps. Took a few runs through the trees where these really excelled - light underfoot and turn super-quickly. Not enough time in any real powder yet - but they certainly are fun with even 1/2 foot on the ground. I can't really ski backwards, and I'm not much into half-pipes/parks - so I can't speak to their performance there. But, if you are looking for a really fun all mountain twin tip, this is a great ski to check out.
Its a great ski for the price, at 88mm under foot it will ski some pow if your small, carve the groomers and work all over the mountain, its light and holds up well. go for it.
I skied these in the park last week (the bling, which looking at the dimensions is the same ski with a new graphic). I have an injury so I couldn't really jump on them, but I did get a feel for them and messed around on them. They don't have the WRS core like the other Rossignol park skis do so they are heavier, their edge is also thinner than most park skis edges, so I can see that becoming a problem if you slide a ton of rails etc. This ski isn't really fat enough to float very well in powder in my opinion, if you want a powder ski get the Rossignol Scratch Steeze. It is a great ski though if you want a park ski that can kind of ski everywhere. For being so cheap, I don't think you can go wrong.
No, you only have an 88mm sidecut. The brakes will be wide, which means they will drag while you are carving. Also, when you try and lock the skis together to carry, they aren't going to hold together very well. ADD IT! I have the scratch ghetto i got a 84 sidecut and have 100 mm brakes the brake slide in more to the binding when they're on your feet go with a 100mm brake Rossignol suggest's it and Rossi and Look/Dynastar dont make 90mm brakes its 80 100 and 120. ---fixing the answer--- Woah.... I have 110 brakes on my Line Anthems with a 93mm waist, the brakes tuck in so nicely, I'm sure you could use a 110 with a ski only 5mm skinnier. I'm using the Marker Jester FYI.
I recently bought a pair of these skiis from a fellow in the Vail area. I am an advanced skier, 6 feet and 185lbs. I have never skied twin tips or a wide ski prior to these skiis. Nevertheless, I have skiied about ten days on them in every condition possible and I am very disappointed across the board. They did perform very well in the powder, but when it came to groomers, crude, ice...they were hard to work with and unpredictable. Granted I have never skiied with this type of ski, but other than that, I would not recommend. They are very lightweight, but also very unstable at high speeds. Great for the pow, but that's it---not an all mountain ski.
I'm 6'10, weigh approximately 260 lbs, and wondering what size/type of ski I should look for. I usually rent, but am curious about looking around. I would rate myaself as a solidly intermediate all mountain skier. Anyone?
Honestly, you're going to want a strong stiffer ski for all-mountain conditions. The Scratch Scream'in is a fun little ski, but I (180 lbs) didn't enjoy it nearly as much as my 135 lb skinny-rod friends.Check out the B-94, B-100, or B-104 from Rossignol. The 104 and 100 are super fattys, but the 94 provides a good balance between fatty and great all-mountain ski.http://www.backcountry.com/store/ROS0223/Rossignol-Bandit-B94-Alpine-Ski.html
it'd be an interesting tele setup. those are kinda more all mountain freestyle skisThere are a lot of great Tele skis on the market right now, from Black Diamond, G3 and K2 and others. There's no reason to compromise everything that a true tele ski gives you by getting a park ski. Unless you free-heeling in the park, I'd look elsewhere.
Comment on mtnnate's review >