Hello, for sure these will fit normal ski width. I say this with one caveat though, the normal ski width has been increasing the last few years. But, this brake will fit any waist up to 100mm perfectly and can fit to about 103mm with a little bending (a ski-shop should be doing the bending) and unless you have a ski with a really narrow waist (65mm and under) you should be fine.

Hey Kswazzu, good question. As far as bindings go, the best binding to get is the one where your DIN setting will fit in the middle of the binding's DIN range. For example, if you are a DIN setting of 8 in this case, then the Rossi SAS2 Ti 140 Wide would be best because that setting of 8 would fit right in the middle of the 4-14 DIN range better than the other two.

Also, when it comes to bending the brakes, you should be okay with getting a 100mm brake binding with those Moments Baggy Skis. 2mm of bend is pretty easy to pull off, but it does get difficult in the 4-5mm range and I don't recommend buying a brake that is less than 5mm of the ski waist.

they weigh about 5 pounds together....4-din is like 120 130 pounds anywhere past 6 is 180+ technically speaking... but really its mostly its personal preference of how good you are and what your skiing i am an all mountain skier i think of myself as an expert to advanced level i ski an 8 din level. most ski shops will take care of that for you.

Yeah man, these bindings are pretty sick, and they have a good deal right now. White looks super steezy, and the hold is just what you need.

Any shop should be able to bend your brakes 4mm.

If you just use the stock brakes, you will have to bend out a bit for the brakes to be useful. I'm not 100% sure if you can get a bigger brake for this binding. Look and Dynastar make the same bindings though, so you might be able to find something that is similar with a wider brake option.

I had a pair of these mounted to my steezes last year until I shorted a jump and snapped the toe piece off. I replaced them with the axial freeride 150s and have been very happy. Both are good bindings the freeride 150s are bomb proof metal housing while these bindings are plastic. If you want a slightly lighter binding buy these but if you want a better binding definately buy the freeride 150s.

Nothing besides color and branding.

Even if they don't match up, just take them to your local shop, and they can mount them, and fill in the holes from the old ones. No big deal, and fairly cheap. As for the weight... HEAVY!6 of the 8 holes will match between the rossignol axial2 and this binding. That means you are adding 2 new holes to each ski and will need to plug two holes. The difference is in the back two screws on the heal piece.

These are a good binding for these skis. Can also look at Salomon STH and Marker Griffon/Jester.

What he said, plus it has a DIN of 14 instead of 12.

The main difference between the SAS2 140 ti and the SAS2 120 is that the SAS2 140 has titanium construction in order to save weight. The SAS2 series also has more metal in the heel piece than the traditional Axial2 series of binding.

The sas2 is more of a freesyle binding, and axial2 is more of a big mountain binding, they are almost exactly the same. But the sas2 mount lower on your ski,s and the axial's are a little more heavy duty. Both are excellent, but seeing that you going to put them on b3, which are big mountain skis go axial2 they sit a tad higher to help in carving.

That will work wonderfully.