Clothing

Gear

Accessories

1¢ Next Day Shipping on all Jackets, Pants, & Shoes
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Close
Flag This
Close This Window
Patagonia R2 Fleece Jacket - Men's

Patagonia R2 Fleece Jacket - Men's

Item #PAT0936|149 in Stock – Ships Wicked Fast & Free
$175.00
Discontinued Colors: $87.50
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

Black, S (175.00)
Black, M (175.00)
Black, L (175.00)
Black, XL (175.00)
Black, XXL (175.00)
Continental Blue, S (175.00)
Continental Blue, M (175.00)
Continental Blue, L (175.00)
Continental Blue, XL (175.00)
Continental Blue, XXL (175.00)
Forge Grey, M (175.00)
Forge Grey, L (175.00)
Forge Grey, XL (175.00)
Forge Grey, XXL (175.00)
Henna Brown, S (175.00)
Henna Brown, M (175.00)
Henna Brown, L (175.00)
Henna Brown, XL (175.00)
Pirate Blue, XXL (87.50)
Real Red, S (175.00)
Real Red, M (175.00)
Real Red, L (175.00)
Real Red, XL (175.00)
Real Red, XXL (175.00)
Quantity:
Gift Bag it: More Info
Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List
  • Pass It On

Patagonia R2 Fleece Jacket - Men's

The Patagonia Men's R2 is the fleece jacket you'll reach for every time you go outside. Constructed from Patagonia's trademark R2 stretchy, midweight fleece material, the R2 Jacket keeps you comfortable in brisk temps and lets you move freely. Wear it alone in moderately cold weather or underneath a shell when snow is falling or the wind picks up. The R2 Fleece Jacket dries quickly in case you get caught in drizzly weather. Plus, this breathable fleece speeds moisture away from your core to keep you warm as you ski, hike, or belay your climbing partner. Patagonia gave this jacket an offset zipper at the chin to prevent chafing and a Napoleon chest pocket for your energy bar.

Bottom Line: If you live anywhere there's a nip in the air, hang the Patagonia R2 Fleece Jacket by your door.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 4

Finally.

By:
October 26, 2009

A fleece with arms as long as they should be. One complaint = there is no waist cinch.

6'0", 130 lbs, second or third layer, getting a large.

UPDATE: I returned this in favor of a Stoic Welder Hi Softshell from SAC. "Domination."

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

waist cinch?

By:
December 5, 2007

super soft, super breathable, air cuts right through, super toasty under a shell (10 degrees anyone?), REALLY LIGHT, but uh oh, where's the waist cinch? come on Patagonia!! i love your jacket, but no waist cinch? i've gotten over it though. first new fleece in 6 years, definitely not disappointed.

Was this helpful? (5) (0)

Flag

I am looking at Patagonia R2 Fleece Jacket. I noticed in the

I am looking at Patagonia R2 Fleece Jacket. I noticed in the pictures that all of the colors look tapered except the black. The black looks a lot fulller and I think the tapered looks much better. Is it just the picture or the way the black is made?

By:
October 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Stephen, the photo of the black R2 Jacket is the most accurate representation of the fit for all colors. For some reason Backcountry pinned the back of the other colors back when the photos were shot, and it exaggerates the fit greatly. It's a slim fit jacket, but not that slim. hope that helps!

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
October 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Warm under...

By:
February 26, 2008

Definitely not the fleece to wear as an outer layer on a windy day, but toasty warm under a shell and keeps you war on a fall/spring day. As always, love the Patagonia fit. Something about the fuzzy outside makes me feel a little warmer. I also like the offset zipper...The beard always seems to grab on my other fleeces and jackets, but never on this one. They also went the extra lenght and sewed in an R1 fleece into the cuffs to keep em snug.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

I'm 6'3" 215# with an athletic build, and generally

I'm 6'3" 215# with an athletic build, and generally wear a L in most brands, Patagonia included. However, with the slim fit and the desire to use this as a layering piece I'm wondering if I shouldn't go for the XL. For reference, I don't plan on having a whole lot underneath as far as space goes, with a Patagonia Wool 1 t-shirt, and a smartwool midweight merino wool base layer (and depending on weather an REI sahara long sleeve) underneath not taking up much room I still think a L in the R2 should work all right. I would appreciate any advice anyone may have that is between a L and XL, thanks in advance!

By:
August 9, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If I were you I'd go with an XL R2 Jacket. I'm 6'1" 170 and I have an XL that's a little roomy and a little more of a casual jacket. If I were going to wear it as more of a technical piece I would go for a large, so I think an XL should do fit you well for that purpose.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
August 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Understand the product before buying

By:
September 8, 2009

I love this mid-weight layering fleece - it's my favorite fleece that I own, and I own many. I find that I can hike in a thin baselayer and this fleece from temperatures in 40s and 50s. Above that and you'll likely find it too warm while hiking.

I see too many reviews of this product that say "didn't like it - not windproof". Well, it's not a windproof jacket, and in fact it's been purposefully designed to be virtually transparent to wind. Why? Because it's just about the most breathable fleece you can buy! The wicking ability is partly the fabric and partly the slim fit, as close contact to your base-layer will encourage better transfer of moisture.

So, this fleece will work well for you if you're doing high output activity in cooler conditions, but not if you're sitting at basecamp in a breeze without a shell on top of the fleece. It's mostly just a mid-layer, but works well alone if it's not breezy. If you want a windproof piece, then do you self a favor and buy the windproof fleece as this will result in you receiving what it is that you actually want. Check out the Lightweight-R4 for a thinner windproof, or the regular R4 for a thicker one. The LWR4 is about as thick as the R2, and the regular R4 is about as thick as the R3, which is another NON windproof fleece.

For Patagonia gear, check out their website as they have much more information on the products than Backcountry does....

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

R U Going to try the R2? The answer should be yes.

By:
March 24, 2008

I had a Mt. Hardware Monkey Man fleece that was warm but uncomfortable so I returned it for the R2. While the R2 is not as warm, it is a overall better fleece. The R2 is more durable, looks great and is welcome on the slopes as well as casual dinners, and it fits great. It has great side pockets that are very roomy and a double as vents when open. It has a great breast pocket that I put my phone and keys in and it keeps them warm, accessable, and protected. The R2 has provided confort on 28 degree 10 hour days of teaching with my Backcountry Shift softshell and on sunny 40 degree spring days I have really enjoyed this jacket with my Arcteryx Sidewinder Jacket. When the temps climb I just break open the pit zips and open the pockets on the R2 and I have direct venting. I bet the R3 will more closely resemble the warth of the Monkey man and I plan to try it next year for the 20 degree days. I don't get touched as much as I did with the Monkey but the look is still fuzzy and is more civilized. I find Myself wearing this fleece everyday and can see it as a useful item until temps are above 70 degrees.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

I am thinking about getting an R2 to backpack around Europe in

I am thinking about getting an R2 to backpack around Europe in the fall. Everything I read about it seems perfect so far. It looks good, breathes well, is comfortable. However, I am a little concerned about wind and rain. Can anyone recommend a layer for over the top of the R2 that is light, wind resistant, water resistant (or pretty good at keeping dry) that wouldn't be too bulky to pack and wear over the top? I was thinking the Patagonia Rain Shadow Jacket, but I don't know if the combination will be warm enough. Any other ideas would be much appreciated.

By:
April 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Rainshadow would work well with this. While hiking/backpacking you'll be fine with just a T-shirt and the R2 if you need it. However, if you feel like you might be spending some time hanging out waiting for trains, or hitchhiking, then consider a vest to add to your system. When it's chilly and you're not active, you'll probably want something in addition to keep you warm. A vest will pack down nicely and give you the most warmth per ounce/size as it will keep your core warm. Don't bother with a wind-proof vest - just use your shell as your windproof protection, and something to add 5-10F in warmth even when not active.

Check out the Patagonia down sweater vest or the Micropuff vest. For your purposes I recommend the micropuff as it will likely fit better under your rainshadow, and because it'll stay warm even if wet. Wet down is not something you want to drag around with you. Also consider a wool baselayer because it really does resist the inevitable smell.

With a baselayer, R2, vest, shell, you can pick and choose which piece(s) to wear for the conditions, and ultimately end up wearing all of them when it's really getting cold. That's the way to keep your pack size down.

By:
September 8, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I've used the Rain Shadow and R2 on winter summits of 2K meter volcanoes in northern Japan. It will be plenty warm enough for a fall Euro trip.

By:
September 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Have you considered the Marmot Precip?

By:
May 7, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

I think the Rain Shadow and an R2 would be plenty warm. With a capilene/or wool baselayer underneath it would be warm enough to ski in, so I'm sure it would do well enough for a fall Euro trip. The Patagonia Houdini is another cool option. Super, super lightweight, not as wind or waterproof, but it packs down very small and is great for travel

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
April 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

My most favorite clothing item

By:
May 30, 2009

This fleece is basically the softest and most comfortable jacket I've encountered. It is super breathable and dries really fast. Wind cuts through it, which is part of why it's so breathable. So if you need a windproof fleece go with the lightweight R4 or some other model. I normally wear patagonia small, but went with the medium for this because it fits tightly. If you're going to be using it exclusively as a technical layering piece I would not size up. It will be tight, but it is somewhat stretchy, and breathes well. Otherwise, if you want to wear it for a wider range of purposes, go one size up and it will fit more like a traditional fleece. Even with the medium, I can comfortably layer it under my normal shells. Considering how long these are rumored to last, and how great of a product it is, I think $150 is a really good price.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

R2 Perfection

By:
April 14, 2008

The R2 is a great fleece that is extremely comfortable and warm. It fits me perfectly and was designed really well. It also is light weight, but still affords a good warmth. A great fleece and well worth its value.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

I am a perfect medium, is the R2 a size up item? I am not looking

I am a perfect medium, is the R2 a size up item? I am not looking to do any heavy layering under it at most a wool or cap base layer. I do plan to layer above it when the weather gets nasty, an ul down inner (large) and above that a shell if weather is wet. So should i size up or is patagonia on target with sizing I'm 5"9.5 and 160lbs. Thanks!

By:
March 15, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Too late for you, I know, but the medium will fit perfectly. This jacket is a layering piece that is designed to go *under* other layers (thicker insulation and/or shell) and it should only go over a baselayer.

It's supposed to be form-fitting to perform its function: keeping you warm, keeping you dry.

By:
September 8, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I"m about 5'9" and 145, with quite long arms, and the medium fits me great. It is a bit form fitting, which isn't a problem because it's such a light jacket, but if you don't want it to fit as close, I'd size up. The sizing is on target, but only if you want it to fit close like that.

By:
March 15, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Patagonia quality

By:
August 11, 2008

Once again you can feel the quality - well done Patagonia. Of course, you pay for it. The R2 is well designed and constructed but it is pitched at people who like a snug fit, so you may prefer to order one size larger than normal. Maybe it's the fleece equivalent of a muscle shirt? It feels great and is both warm and light but I'd give it an extra star if they slipped the sizes up one notch. Once you get the fit right -add a wind breaking outer shell and you're set.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Amazing

By:
September 4, 2009

Probably my favorite fleece that I own. The R2 is uber comfy and wicks away sweat well. It is my go-to fleece while starting out hikes in cooler temps and have used it as a layer while snowshoeing. Not very windproof but thrown on under my acteryx beta AR it is the perfect match. Bomb proof construction is what I expect from patagonia and I was not disappointed.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I want more of a layering piece that is warmer than the R1.

I want more of a layering piece that is warmer than the R1. The R1 fits under my jacket nicely but it's just not enough. I'd even go with something over the R1 to add insulation, but still under my jacket. This would mean that it would have to be thin and function with the R1 - as in not bunch up and things.Any ideas, insulation... but very light to go over the r1 or even by itself like the r1 is now?

By:
March 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This R2 could be the right jacket for you. Similar fit to the R1, so you might want to size it up to wear over the R1. It would be a super warm combo for you to wear under your jacket. The R2 is a sweet piece to wear on its own as well.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
March 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Warm, Soft, and Stylin

By:
April 20, 2009

Far and away this is the most versatile fleece jacket that I have ever owned. It doesn't do much to cut down wind but it is super breathable and doesn't restrict movement one bit. The sleeves have a narrow cuff so you can slide into your shell without any annoying cuff bunchage. If you are looking for a great fleece for both high performance layering and casual wear this is it. A note on fit: this bad boy runs slim. I am 5'9" 190 and a size large is stretching it for anyone looking for a more casual fit.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Decent Jacket

By:
May 20, 2009

A nice jacket that can be used in a layering system pretty effectively. However, this is not the jacket to wear everyday as i would have liked. The wind cuts right through like your wearing nothing at all. Nice and fashionable but i would have went for another stand alone fleece instead of just a layer.

Was this helpful? (1) (3)

Flag

Write your question here...Is the R2 warmer than the R1, I am

Write your question here...Is the R2 warmer than the R1, I am freezing in the R1 this winter.I ski with the r1 and a gortex shell, that's it unless I add a vest for really cold days.Can you wear the r2 as a base layer or would I need a really thin capillini or what ever it's called underneath. Would my r1 work underneath?20* feels like 0* now!

By:
March 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I agree with Babak's answer. Try upgrading your underwear first. Don't wear the R1 or R2 as your base-layer and go for thicker outer layers, first try the Capilene 3 or 4 (or wool equivalents if you can afford it). I go snowshoeing in Capiline 4 + R2 + shell and I'll take the shell off if i'm too hot and it's not windy.

By:
September 8, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

oh yeah R2's warmer...the R1 isnt much of a jacket but more of a layering piece, this is more of a fleese jacketIm in the same boat but want something warmer than the R2 which is what I currently use. I want to go to 3 layers instead of 4. I was just in NH skiing and found that it's tough to get away with less than 4 layers including the shell. I did try on a ARCteryx HERCULES which i think would be perfect. Warm long underwear, the Hercules, and the shell may help. Otherwise, currently im wearing thin long underwear, Cap 3, R2, shell which also works well.In skiing in anything from -10 to 20 F, I wear a baselayer (usually Wool 2 or 3), R1 (preferably Hoody) R2 and a shell and I stay perfectly comfy. The wool creates a microclimate around your body, and the R1 allows for prime heat exertion while the R2 breathes and retains heat like its nobody's business. The Shell is to keep the wind and elements out.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
March 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Not quite what I expected

By:
October 2, 2008

This seems more like a really heavy shirt to me than a really light jacket. The fit is very tight, I usually wear a M and the L in this still inhibits movement when I climb, so order up a size and don't expect to be doing anything too flexible. The sleeves are too tight to be pulled up without cutting off circulation at the elbow, which for me is a problem because when cooking or climbing, I like to have my sleeves up. And finally, it is not windproof at all. I didn't expect it to be, but it really has no windproofing whatsoever, to the point where if you are wearing it at a comfortable temperature and a breeze kicks in, you will be too cold. All that said, it is a great fleece for day to day, walking to class, not too cold, urban environments, etc, it's just not practical enough for me to want to take it anywhere.

Was this helpful? (3) (8)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Solid

By:
July 26, 2009

Perfect for what it is, I am 6'4" wear an XL in patagonia and this is very fitted which is awesome. Breathes like a champ and wicks fairly well. This is my go to layering piece when it is too warm for my mountain hardwear monkey man. R2 is one of the lightest and warmest peices i own and it packs down fairly small. hope that helps

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Could you ship to Japan?If you could, please let me know the

Could you ship to Japan?If you could, please let me know the shipping cost to Japan.I will order 2pcs of R2 JKT.Regards,

By:
February 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

First, add the item or items to your cart. Then proceed to checkout (don’t worry—proceeding to checkout doesn’t make you obligated to purchase anything). Enter your address in the billing and shipping fields. Once you change the country, the page will show you the shipping charges.

By:
February 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

What I was looking for

By:
November 17, 2008

This fleece was exactly what I was looking for. If you are looking for a wind proof heavy duty fleece look elsewhere. However, for a cool weather low wind fleece this is perfect. This is the type of fleece you can leave on when you go indoors. Its also about as good looking a fleece as I've seen. Some fleeces are extremely warm and windproof at the expense of comfort. The insides are sometimes rough and uncomfortable. This one is not. This is the most comfortable fleece I've worn.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

a reason to look forward to the wintertime

By:
November 7, 2008

a couple of years ago I bought this jacket for rowing and hiking in the colder months. it has served the purpose (and plenty of others) perfectly, and has lasted well over 2 years of nearly daily use four months out of the year. it's just roomy enough to fit a layer of capilene and/or R1 base underneath, and streamlined enough to toss a vest and shell over without feeling like a pufferfish. i realized today that i need a fresh jacket - this one will be relegated to outdoor chores. and i also realized one reason i enjoy getting up on cold mornings is the pleasure of tossing this thing over my shoulders. buy it!! you'll be happy.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

How warm is this for under a shell? I am replacing a worn our

How warm is this for under a shell? I am replacing a worn our NF Denali, and would like something at least as warm. I am considering some of the down/synthetic options, such as the MH Lodown or SubZero, but would prefer not to look like the Stay-Puff man.

By:
December 21, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

It is a warm layer. If you are considering a down and you don't want to look like a puff, I would recommend the Patagonia Down Sweater. It is about as thick as this fleece and much warmer. http://www.backcountry.com/store/PAT0359/Patagonia-Down-Sweater-Jacket-Mens.htmlAdded: The Patagonia R2 is not at all like the NF Denali. Firstly, the cut is significantly slimmer. The R2 is cut very slim, and the NF Denali is designed to be an outer layer, or for the larger individual. Secondly, the R2 is a thinner layer. If you want something as warm as the NF Denali go for the more-regular-cut R3 and layer it, or the windproof R4 (which I love) and also layer. Depending on the level of activity, the windproof R4 might be too warm or stuffy. If you're not going to move around a whole lot then DEFINITELY go for a down or synthetic insulation material. The Mountain Hardwear compressors are great and Patagonia have some excellent options in that area too, especially in the down jackets/hoodys...Note to above: the Patagonia down sweater - while thin - is significantly thicker than the R2 and significantly warmer. I would not recommend it for high activity as it will get sweaty and useless *especially* if you're wearing a backpack.

By:
February 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Fleece

By:
July 14, 2009

I have to say that I didnt purchase this fleece from Backcountry I got it off ebay a year or so ago. I got it in red which is the best color I think. Anyway; its a great fleece. Same as others have said; on a windy day it will cut through but its a GREAT layer under my Mt Hardwear Typhoon jacket (plenty warm in 10F or so). The fit is a little tight; if you have a coller'd shirt on you will choke! But with a nice base layer and a nice shell its the perfect mid layer. And it looks great as a spring/fall coat too. I get compliments on it all the time!

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Cozy

By:
May 12, 2009

Good warm fleece. I wore it all winter under the Ascentionist and I never had complaints. I was a little put off by the fuzzy exterior at first, but I still wear it because of the performance.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Are their any R2 jackets available in blue ?

Are their any R2 jackets available in blue ?

By:
November 26, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yarrgh!! A bit late for your question but Patagonia has changed it up and added "Pirate Blue" to their collection of cool colors. It's a pretty bright blue, but I still think it's super dope. Hope this helps.

By:
April 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Patagonia doesn't make this one in blue -- the closest they have is a color called "North Sea," which is sort of grayish... See here: http://www.patagonia.com/web/us/product/product_focus.jsp?OPTION=PRODUCT_FOCUS_DISPLAY_HANDLER&catcode=MAIN_FA_US.CLOTHING_GEAR.MENS.JACKETS.FLEECE&style_color=25135-767&ws=

By:
November 26, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

LOVE LOVE it!!

By:
January 16, 2009

I didn't get it for 50 bucks..BUT I'm used to paying for clothes in NYC & I usually shop online..but MISSED that deal....but I got a size larger and just layer away ...This is the fIRST time in my life that I haven't worn a winter coat yet but it does take time to get the look...AND I do not like the snow so don't ski...but I have gotten so many compliments on this jacket ,I can't tell you how many and it's so comfy , I don't want to take it off....but those layers I learned you have to take extra when they get wet...while walking to the gym(like 1/2 mile)..just the bottom two...I have had about 5 thin layers and just this jacket at temps in the 20s and it works...now the legs is a WHOLE other story..

if you can get it for 50 bucks get it in all colors..I want the RED!!

Cheers..
Tony(NYC)

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

LAYERS NEEDED???

By:
January 19, 2009

The layers I wear underneath are NOT cotton t-shirts...they are all very thin wicking, heat insulating materials they have out now...so 3-5 layers...

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Lightweight R4 and R2 which one should I get?

Lightweight R4 and R2 which one should I get?

By:
November 10, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Well this is $75 less and lighter. The R4 is 300 weight fleece while the R2 is 200 weight but lacks the chest pocket of the R4. The R2 will be stretchier but the R4 will block wind better (thanks to the Polartec). It depends on what you want to use the jackets for. If you want a midlayer, the R2 is probably better, but if you were hoping for a heavier duty outer fleece, the R4 is your best bet.Update: The questioner is asking about the "Lightweight R4" which is a windproof version of the R2, as far as I can tell, and I have both. The cut is slim, like the R2, and the material is light too, like the R2. So really it's the windproof aspect that's the main difference and this makes a *massive* difference if you're out in the snow or where there's a chilly breeze.It's difficult to say which one you should get as you don't lay out what you want it for, but here is my advice:-R2 - great mid layer, or outer layer in benign weather for high activity. If you're hiking up a hill in spring or fall and it's not raining, this is the fleece I would wear. The Lightweight R4 will quickly get sweaty and you'll be busy venting it the whole time. The Lightweigh R4 is also less packable as the windproof laminate prevents it from squishing together as well as the R2.-Lightweight R4 - walking around your neighborhood in spring or fall and it's a bit windy. OR, you're out snowshoeing in 25F+ weather. Combine this lightweight R4 with an R1 pullover underneath + R2 T-shirt and you'll be toasty but have venting options. Take a down jacket to slip over it when you stop for lunch. The slim cut gives great mobility, and I'm also led to believe it's waterproof due to the windproof laminate, but that's a backup plan, as if this thing gets wet, it gets WET and soggy, and therefore colder.

By:
February 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

cool stuff

By:
December 12, 2007

You need a good piece of fleece to wear under a shell? Then this one is your choice! This fleece jacket offers a perfect weight to performance ratio which keeps you really warm when worn under a shell. Unfortunately it is not windproof, but somehow that is made up for by a very high breathability which might be preferred especially when skiing or hiking with a waterproof jacket. The touch of this fleece is very cool, it feels just like a sheep!

Was this helpful? (1) (2)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Amazing fleece jacket!

By:
April 2, 2009

I own at least half a dozen fleece jackets, but this particular Patagonia is by far the best! I'm 5'6" and 145 lbs. and the small fits me just right. I could wear the medium, but I like especially like the way it hugs my body as an sublayer. My other fleece jackets are loose, so they're too bulky as an under garment. The R2 is perfect alone as a warm jacket, or fantastic as an insulating layer under a softshell jacket like the Backcountry Shift Welder Hoody. I purchased the pirate blue which is an awesome color. My next one will be black. I really like the high collar which keeps my neck warm, yet lays out of the way when unzipped. Great stylish jacket!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

sweet

By:
January 9, 2009

I love my R2. Just took it skiing in Canada. It works great as a mid layer or outer layer on days when it isn't windy. This is a very athletic jacket as it breathes well and insulates well when needed. However, I would never pay 150 for it. I copped this badboy on Patagonia's website on closeout for 54 bucks. Great jacket, bad price, super breathability.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Mc'Lovin it

By: Backcountry.com Employee
March 4, 2008

this jacket is warm when it needs to be, breathes when it needs to, and it always looks cool. the best part about the R2 is that it is so comfortable. i've been everywhere in this thing, in the same day. skiing, dinner, bar, it's awesome and performs well in all circumstances. buy one, you'll feel the same!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Incredibly comfortable, technical fleece.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
February 17, 2009

I have recently been turned onto Patagonia gear, and I must confess it lives up to the hype. This particular fleece is absurdly comfortable and lightweight, utilizing variable length fibers that mimics 'fur' for maximum warmth.
The weight to warmth ratio is fantastic, quickly replacing my TNF Denali fleece. With a BC.com Merino Crew underneath, I could wear it down to the mid 20s. With a shell of sorts, you could certainly meander about in temperatures near zero. however, like the Denali, it is not windproof. Hence, if there is wind or precipitation of sorts, a shell is necessary.
The R1 interior material is very comfortably against the skin, and stretches very well. The pockets are conveniently snag-free due to the use of supplex around the zippers. At roughly 15 oz, the R2 is very packable and relatively lightweight. Honestly if you want only one midlayer, for most of you, this is would be it. But for frigid regions, a Polartec Windpro fleece would be better suited (like the Patagonia R3 or Mountain Hardwear Windstopper Tech Jacket).

I have only two gripes: first, is the lack of internal pocket (just one for an iPod wouldn't hurt!) Secondly, the material, like all fleece, attracts pet hair. This could be a problem for some, which would make a softshell jacket a feasible alternative.

Was this helpful? (2) (1)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: September 8, 2009 by:

By:
September 8, 2009

Review says:

"But for frigid regions, a Polartec Windpro fleece would be better suited (like the Patagonia R3 or Mountain Hardwear Windstopper Tech Jacket)."

The R3 is not windproof. It's warmer than the R2, but the windproof product is the R4. Patagonia's product names are confusing.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

Can you smell what Patagonia's cookin?

By: Backcountry.com Employee
November 25, 2008

TARZAN LIKE!!! this thing is fitted nice and slim, with an extra long external fleece which performs like a thug on the inside of a shell. assuming no wind, it is a great outwear peice which looks like a classy version of the MH monkey man jacket. granted, this puppy aint cheep, but if you see it at a patagonia outlet or steep/cheap, snatch it up. you will look smoking hot, your lady will love snuggling to it, and you dog will love leaving his hair all over it.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Great Insulation Layer

By:
November 28, 2008

I was lucky enough to get one of these issued at work. As a layer under a shell, this is fabulous...lightweight, stretchy, and breathable. As an outer layer, it does not do so well...the slightest wind goes right through it. Traditional old Polartec 200 fleece is more windproof than this making it a better outer fleece, but not as good as the R2 under a shell. I also would never pay $150 for this thing. Bottom line... great if you want to invest in a very high quality, but expensive layering system, look elsewhere if you want a versatile fleece usable as an insulation or outer layer.

Was this helpful? (0) (2)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Nice lightweight jacket

By:
January 4, 2009

I bought this as a gift for my boyfriend. He loves it and the the bright green looks really great on him. However, I tried it on and took it for a test run. It's not very warm, probably better for layering. Wind was coming right through it and I was cold. I think $150 is quite a lot for such a lightweight jacket.

Was this helpful? (0) (3)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: September 8, 2009 by:

By:
September 8, 2009

Maybe try a windproof product next time? The lightweight R4 and regular R4 are both windproof. The R2 is specifically designed to be highly breathable, which inevitably means that wind can come in too.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Change me.

Research out-of-stock versions:

Tech Specs:

Material:
R2 fleece, R1 stretch panels 
Fleece Weight:
200 
Windproof:
No 
Pockets:
2 Hand 
Recommended Use:
Skiing, riding, cold-weather hiking, mountain biking, climbing 
Manufacturer Warranty:
Lifetime 
Country of Origin:
China 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: