- Home
- Hiking & Camping Gear
- Tents
- Bivy Sacks
- Outdoor Research Aurora Bivy
- Bivy Sacks
- Tents
- Hiking & Camping Gear
More
Outdoor Research Aurora Bivy
Use the lightweight, waterproof Outdoor Research Aurora Bivy when you travel solo in the backcountry. The Aurora Bivy features Gore-Tex Respiration+ fabric, a waterproof, windproof, vapor-permeable material that Gore-Tex made for sleep systems. The snow or rain can't get into your bivy, but the moisture from your breath and your perspiration can escape. Outdoor Research gave this bivy mesh netting, so bugs don't bite you after you've gone to bed. Loops on the Aurora let you stake it down or use guy lines to hold it down in high winds. An internal mesh pocket near your head lets you stash small items such as your headlamp or pocket knife. This bivy sack, which has no poles, weighs about 1.5 pounds—ideal for traveling light.
Bottom Line: Travel light and stay dry in the backcountry with your Outdoor Research Aurora Bivy.
Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.
Excellent bivy
By: Neil Provo
3 days ago
The Aurora bivy has treated me well, keeps me super dry and adds a bit of warmth when sleeping in the snow. I have never had issues with condensation, though i have never slept in it with the storm flap fully closed... I used this bivy last winter during a massive snowstorm in montana, for 3 nights, and my sleeping bag stayed dry and warm the whole trip. Gotta love that bug net for summer skeeter's too!
Change me.
Tech Specs:
- Material:
- [Body] Gore-Tex Respiration+ fabric; [floor] Hydroseal-coated waterproof nylon
- Poles:
- None
- Doors:
- 1 zippered opening
- Floor Space:
- 84 x 21-25in (214 x 53-64cm)
- Interior Height:
- 17.5in (44cm)
- Seam Sealed:
- Yes
- Ventilation:
- No-see-um netting
- Packed Size:
- 13 x 4in (33 x 10cm)
- Weight:
- 23.5oz (666g)
- Recommended Use:
- Ultralight backpacking, climbing, mountaineering, camping
- Warranty:
- Lifetime
- Country of Origin:
- China






Comment on Neil Provo's review >