Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Close
Flag This
Close This Window
Osprey Packs Variant 52 Backpack - 3000-3400cu in

Osprey Packs Variant 52 Backpack - 3000-3400cu in

Item #OSP0151|11 in Stock – Ships Wicked Fast & Free
$198.95
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

Pyro Red, M (198.95)
Pyro Red, L (198.95)
Pyro Red, S (198.95)
Quantity:
Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List
  • Pass It On

Osprey Packs Variant 52 Backpack - 3000-3400cu in

The three-point haul system of the Osprey Variant 52 Backcpack makes lugging your stuff up a wall easy. The big volume and convenient pocketry of this Osprey winter make your gear easy to access, and the removable hipbelt and framesheet shed weight when you need to go light. Stash your crampons, ice tools, and wand or probe in their own locales for quick gettin’ and puttin’ away. A water-resistant zippered front pocket keeps maps dry, and dual ski loops carry your sticks.

Bottom Line: For extreme winter assaults.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

Does the Variant 52 have enough space to carry a sleeping bag

Does the Variant 52 have enough space to carry a sleeping bag along with other needed gear? It doesnt say whether or not there is a sleeping bag compartment..I am stuck between the Variant 52 or Osprey's Aether 70. Anyone have any suggestions or input?

By:
August 31, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey Chris,

If you're looking to compartmentalize more in terms of your sleeping bag or other gear you'd want to go with the Aether 70. The Variant series doesn't do an individual compartment.....it's pretty much a tube with some great tool attachments on the outside. There are also a few pockets on the outside. Speaking with both Backcountry.com and Osprey about the Variant it's meant more for technical type activities instead of backpacking. The Aether is quite a bit bigger which would be nice for a multi-use pack. With that said, I love my Variant! They're incredibly comfortable, move well with you and don't feel bulky at all when they're loaded down and strapped on. Plus they still have the cool whistle on them just in case you run into some Ligers on the trail:)
Hope that helps!

By:
October 26, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

First Trip Feedback

By:
April 8, 2009

I used this pack to summit Mt. Shasta via the Casaval ridge. In general, I prefer this pack to my osprey atmos and gregory triconi packs and will continue using it. I'm glad I bought it.

The framesheet/aluminum suspension is flexible - mine got bent after cramming gear into my trunk. I bent it back into shape by hand. It is the only component that I feel is a bad compromise for weight reduction. The aluminum tube should have crossmembers or stiffners. There is a shovel/hydration pocket inside that is wide and tall. Loading the bag takes some care to prevent asymmetrical bending from the shovel head. This bag has 2 collars to close the top before the well-made lid goes on. I found that filling the pack much beyond the lower collar makes it feel unbalanced side to side. The side pockets are shorter than any other pack I have seen - the side compression straps are needed to hold nalgenes in place (could be improved). There are gear loops for skis on each side below the pockets that I used to secure snow shoes, also using the upper side compression straps. This worked great. The front ice axe/tool holders work well. You will still need something to carry your crampons in to protect the pack. The outer pocket forms a pouch between itself and the main bag, which is convenient for easy access. I loaded ~39 pounds of gear (no rope) in the pack and was very comfortable taking it to horsecamp.

I stripped the lid and framesheet to reduce weight for summit day. The framesheet is NOT easily removable, and I will never remove it in the future. I easily fit all my gear inside the pack. The pack carried well even without the framesheet. The cushioning of the shoulder straps and hipbelt is the best I have used. I liked the feel of the back cushioning better than the airspeed suspension for climbing and descending. It is also warmer. No hipbelt pockets. Didn't miss them.

After glissading down a several thousand feet, I noticed that the fabric on the bottom of the pack had started to fray in 6 small spots. There are 2 layers of fabric, but the outer layer will probably need a patch after the next trip. This fabric should be replaced with something more abrasion resistant.

I give this pack 4.5 stars because it carries weight much better than my other packs, even though I think the bottom fabric and suspension will wear out relatively quickly. I think this pack does an excellent job, and I hope it is improved.

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

Control Tower Alaska

By:
October 14, 2009

While everyone was rocking their bulky 90 liter bags I had this thing and rocked the schnitzel

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

can this be cinched down small enough for resort skiing? in other

can this be cinched down small enough for resort skiing? in other words do you think i could fit on a ski lift with this pack on with only some water, food and extra clothes inside?

By:
August 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

You might be able to, but Osprey Packs actually makes a line of backpacks specific for 'snowplay.' I think the Kode 22 or 30 bags would be perfect for what you're looking for. Although backcountry.com does not offer these new packs at this time, you can find them for sale elsewhere online. In the meantime, check out the different models at Osprey's website:

http://www.ospreypacks.com/Packs/KodeSeries/

Osprey makes great packs and you'll like yours, whatever you decide. Hope this helps!

By:
August 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Excellent versatile pack

By:
June 30, 2009

I use this for ski mountaineering, backpacking, and even as a day pack (when I'm packing lots of layers). I've carried ski boots and other gear in the pack for long dry approaches and it was much more stable and enjoyable than hanging the boots off the bindings. The pulls on the pack are great, very easy to manipulate. Seems very well designed and rugged.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

is the pack waterresistant or should i get a rain cover with

is the pack waterresistant or should i get a rain cover with it?

By:
August 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

you need a rain cover or at least a trash bag if you expect sustained rain on the pack. for light drizzle and very brief light showers, you can get away without a cover.

By:
August 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The only thing water resistant is the zippers. I would get a packcover it says they have one you can buy but it doesnt come included with the pack

By:
August 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Perfect For Climbers

By:
April 20, 2009

Great pack for hauling gear i would also use it backpacking. Especially designed for climbers.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Tech Specs:

Material:
420D Matrix nylon, 315 & 210 High Tenacity Nylon 
Volume:
[S] 3000cu in (49L); [M] 3200cu in (52L); [L] 3400cu in (55L) 
Suspension:
Removable HDPE framesheet w / aluminum tubing 
Waist-belt:
Yes, removable 
Hydration Compatible:
Yes 
Rain Cover:
Available, not included 
Access Types:
Top 
Pockets:
[External] 1 front zip, 1 crampon compression, 1 wand; [Internal] 1 underlid 
Snowboard Carry:
No 
Ski Carry:
Yes 
Ice Axe Loops:
Shovel Pocket:
No 
Weight:
[S] 3lb 9oz (1620g); [M] 3lb 12oz (1700g); [L] 3lb 15oz (1790g) 
Recommended Use:
Skiing, ski mountaineering, hut trips 
Manufacturer Warranty:
Lifetime 
Country of Origin:
United States 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: