Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Close
Flag This
Close This Window
Osprey Packs Atmos 65 Backpack - 3800-4200cu in

Osprey Packs Atmos 65 Backpack - 3800-4200cu in

Item #OSP0140|29 in Stock – Ships Wicked Fast & Free
$238.95
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

Green Apple, L (238.95)
Graphite Gray, M (238.95)
Green Apple, S (238.95)
Aspen Gold, S (238.95)
Aspen Gold, M (238.95)
Graphite Gray, S (238.95)
Green Apple, M (238.95)
Aspen Gold, L (238.95)
Quantity:
Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List
  • Pass It On

Osprey Packs Atmos 65 Backpack - 3800-4200cu in

The Atmos 65 Backpack has been a popular choice among serious backpackers for a few seasons now, and Osprey just upgraded it with a new back-panel design. Now the Atmos sits even closer to your back for better support when you really load this pack to the gills. Of course, Osprey kept the vented back panel and mesh straps to let cool air flow during hot summer backpacking trips. You also get a healthy helping of pockets to keep everything organized.

Bottom Line: And you thought it couldn’t get any better.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 5

Pack Perfection

By:
4 days ago

This is a truly great backpack. I'm 5'8", about 180 lbs and I use the medium, which fits perfectly. I've loaded it up to 40 lbs, and done 15 miles comfortably. I bought this to replace a much heavier Gregory Pallisade which I've had for years, because my knees aren't what they used to be, and I'm trying to cut down on the weight. I opted for the Atmos 65 because it has the sleeping bag compartment, but if that's not important to you, you can save a few ounces and go for the Atmos 50, which doesn't have the sleeping bag compartment and is slightly smaller/lighter.

Suspension: Super comfy Air-Speed mesh backpanel, for max air flow. Soft but suprisingly rugged waffle-foam for the shoulder and waist straps. The frame does cut slightly into the pack, but this is LIGHT YEARS ahead of the 2008 model. The 2008 model had a 3" thick air space, and the 2009 has a 1.5" space. The result is much more internal pack space. If I have a full load, I usually hang my 100 oz. camelbak inside the air space (the pack comes equipped with special clip designed for this purpose, and can be used to hang items inside the main pack, or in the air space). Keeping the water in the main pack takes up space, whereas keeping it floating in the air space 1) means you can pack what you need without worrying about a bulky hydration bladder, and 2) keeps the weight closer to your back (easier on back and knees). The air space is also great for stashing dirty clothes if you have too.

All of the other features are extremely well thought out, durable, and pretty damn cool. Love the zippered waist stash spots, the backpanel access points, and I've even used the trekking pole elastic cinch on numerous rock scrambles, and once when I snapped a pole. Plus, I've used it as a carry-on to Italy and Seattle...and this baby looks good everywhere!

Bottom line: Awesome pack.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Does anyone have any issues with the hip belt of this pack not

Does anyone have any issues with the hip belt of this pack not being sufficient? It seems to have very little padding.

By:
July 30, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I don't have any problems with the hip strap pads or the shoulder strap pads. Both are made with a honeycomb foam design and compress very well, and very comfortably.

I attached a pic of the hip strap construction.

By:
November 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

There isnt much padding at all the way I would rig up my bag if you didnt want to get rid of it would be to put the heavier stuff up top and then you put more of the weight on the shoulder starps and the sternum strap

By:
August 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

killer pack

By:
June 2, 2009

I was a little hesitant buying this without ever trying it, but my fears were calmed after the first trip with this bad boy.
The shoulder and hip belts are extremely comfortable, and the little holes in them help from getting too sweaty under the straps. Super durable material, sheds water well too.
My only vice with this pack is that it's not very expandable, the pack material doesn't stretch much, so if you have a big load, you most likely will be strapping stuff on the outside. It's nice though because it makes you cut back on unnecessary items. overall, excellent pack, lightweight, bomber construction. buy it with confidence

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Has anyone found any issues with the back-panel design moving

Has anyone found any issues with the back-panel design moving the weight to far back and having the pack not be very stable and/or uncomfortable?

By:
April 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Just try to keep it under 40 lbs. Any more than that and no matter how well you pack it you're going to feel the weight in your shoulders.

By:
July 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

not to be redundant, but this pack does an excellent job keeping the weight in close to your body. the curve and position of the stays in the pack make it seem like the weight would be further back, but it stays right on the hips.

By:
June 2, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Like Shane said, Absolutely no issues ... I also feel it puts the weight in a better position ... i don't slump, pack doesn't "bounce" with load lifter's slightly tighten .... I found it very stable living in pennsylvania with the boulder and rock hoping i need to do along the A.T ... Hope that helps.

By:
May 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

No not at all, this pack is super stable and had no issues for me with comfort. The panel doesn't push the weight out any, more like suspends it off your back and for me puts it in a better position for long hauls.

By:
April 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Everything but the...well maybe that too

By:
4 days ago

The Gist Of It ::
I purchased the Osprey Atmos 65 Pack to replace an old Osprey pack. I was simply looking for larger capacity & function - I gained quite a bit extra. The Atmos 65 pack fits all my needs; the Medium fits like it was made for my 5'7" 115lb frame, holds all I can imagine & then some. Every inch of this pack was well thought out, made to be very convenient & common sensual, all the attachments are there for a reason (you actually use them! what a concept). Even down to the color choices... thank you Osprey for not assuming all women love baby blue & purple!

*The first test - out on a 3 day 27 mile backpacking trip to the San Rafael Wilderness, I was nothing but impressed. I nearly forgot about it due to its forming comfortably to my back & the all the possible adjustments available to lighten the load on my shoulders & hips. In the high heat of mid-Summer, the air-core ventilation was a life saver.

*My second test was a week long road trip (CA to CO) - no hotels, all camping (car/light trekking) & it doubled as quite the efficient luggage, simplifying the packing & unpacking process with it's many handy zipper compartments. I over packed just a bit & never really noticed the extra bulk with use of the compression straps.

Bottom Line::
The Osprey Atmos 65 is that one in a million pack that has everything you need & nothing you don't - I have zero complaints. Big enough for weeks of trekking & compressible for a weekend trip, this one was intelligently designed for sure!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Can I get this pack in Graphite Gray, size Medium.

Can I get this pack in Graphite Gray, size Medium.

By:
April 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

We currently have 6 of these in Graphite Gray, size Medium on vendor order that are scheduled to arrive on May 17th.
Keep your eyes peeled for them to pop up on the site sometime after that!

By: Backcountry.com Employee
April 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Nope, what you see is what's available.

By:
April 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (5)

Flag

Space Saver

By:
3 days ago

If your pack gets too stuffed, try hanging your hydration in the air space. This is a 100 oz, Camelbak reservior, and it fits great.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 3

Adequate but maybe not the best for my use

By:
April 28, 2009

I got this for use as a summit pack and got this for the ultralight weight, although it barely fill the role. Construction is top notch as is all Osprey packs, and it will definitely last forever. Zippers have great pull loops that stay open and are easy to use with gloves. I will probably replace it with something else later as the curvy back might be great for hiking in the heat, but it just collects snow on Alpine runs. I would also point out that although it says 65 liters, it feels a lot smaller because of the curve pushing into the bag space. Makes packing more difficult. The 2009 version have changed this by having far less curve, so maybe it's better. I wouldn't plan on doing more than 3 days with this pack unless it's warm and you aren't packing many layers. Only Osprey pack I have owned that I regret at the moment. If I had it to do over I would probably buy the Osprey Variant but then again I wanted a summit pack and that didn't exist at the time. Too bad Osprey won't let me trade up.

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

Flag

Is there external access to the sleeping bag compartment, or

Is there external access to the sleeping bag compartment, or does it have to be accessed from the top?

By:
March 31, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

External, below the main compartment.

By:
March 31, 2009

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Nice Pack!

By:
June 10, 2009

As usual, as with all Osprey packs, attention to detail and construction on the Atoms 65 is excellent. For me, Fit was a little bit of a problem. I'm an "in-betweener". My waist is now all the way up to a 35 (winter was brutal on my figure!) and my torso length runs 19 to 21 depending on how I'm measured. AFter exchanging packs a couple of times, I decided the Large was my best option.
I just recently did a 3 day trip and found the pack to be good, but not great. For me, the pack became uncomfortable when loaded above 33 lbs. The belt just doesn't seem to be enough... above 33 lbs the pack transfers more weight than I like to my shoulders. The ventilated back mesh does its job; No sweaty back with this pack! I found the bag allowed better organization through the use of it's many pockets! I especially liked having the option of hanging my reservoir either directly behind the back mesh (where it takes up no pack envelope space), or in the traditional spot inside the bag. Nice Pack... might have been a 5 star pack if I wasn't an in-betweener. Note: This pack is NOT an adjustable torso length type.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

How big is the sleeping bag compartment? Is it meant for a top

How big is the sleeping bag compartment? Is it meant for a top dollar down bag that compresses down to a golf ball, or will it fit a synthetic ~$100 bag with decent compression?

By:
February 18, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am able to just barely fit a 0 degree synthetic (Thermic-Micro which is more similar to down then anything else) in there, so as long as you have a synthetic that is fairly modern it probably will fit fine.

By:
April 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have this pack with and my 20deg down bag fits in there with enough room for 4 more, so I imagine your synthetic bag should be alright. The top of the sleeping bag compartment (bottom of main) is adjustable

By:
February 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Uber Comfy

By:
May 3, 2009

Recently got this bag for spring and summer. Its very comfortable and hauls gear for three or four days. I wouldn't go much over forty pounds, but thats not what it was made for. Really like the trekking pole feature and the outside pockets are perfect for rain gear.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Confortable but limited space

By:
August 29, 2009

Very comfortable and light. Has a lot of useful pockets and features. Only complaint is the curvature of the back makes the main storage compartment a limited. With a sleeping bag, pad and bear canister inside, there isn't much room for other stuff.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great Pack

By:
April 2, 2009

I bought this pack for extended trips. I love the weight, suspension, numerous pockets, hip pockets, and mesh back. I have used a 2L camelbak bladder in it and it works great. Sorry to Osprey move their productions overseas, but I guess it had to happen to keep costs in line with competition.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: July 18, 2009 by:

By:
July 18, 2009

I was interested in a Medium in Green. Any idea when those might be in stock? Thanks!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Change me.

Tech Specs:

Material:
210D double ripstop Cordura nylon, 210D broken twill high-tenacity Cordura nylon, stretch woven nylon with Lycra 
Volume:
[S] 3800cu in (62L); [M] 4000cu in (65L); [L] 4200cu in (68L) 
Suspension:
10mm aluminum frame, twin titanium struts, thermo-formed harness & hip-belt, ventilated back panel 
Hydration Compatible:
Yes 
Torso Adjustment:
Yes 
Detachable Pack:
No 
Sleeping Bag Compartment:
Yes 
Rain Cover:
No 
Access Types:
Top, left front zip pocket 
Pockets:
[External] 1 lid, 2 front, 2 side, 2 hip; [Internal] 1 lid 
Snowboard Carry:
No 
Ski Carry:
No 
Gear Loops:
Ice Axe Loops:
No 
Shovel Pocket:
No 
Weight:
[S] 3lb 6oz (1530g) [M] 3lb 9oz (1630g); [L] 3lb 8oz (1570g) 
Recommended Use:
Overnight, weekend backpacking 
Manufacturer Warranty:
Lifetime 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: