We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
Go from the park to the backcountry on the Nordica Enforcer Alpine Ski. Burly yet lightweight, this Nordica ski takes advanced-to-expert skiers for a wicked ride.
As part of Nordica's new Supercharger Line, the Enforcer Alpine Ski aims to blur the line between freestyle and big-mountain skiing. Using strong, durable, and lightweight materials and a shape that's as curvy as Marilyn Monroe, the Enforcer takes on the mountain. The Enforcer Alpine Ski's 98mm waist and smooth sidecut dominate absolutely any kind of terrain, from the park to the pow.
Bottom Line: Lay down the law in the resort or the backcountry with the Nordica Enforcer Alpine Ski.
This is the one ski quiver (for most people). This ski is much like the Volkl Mantra but more snappy and playful. The Mantra feels sluggish compared to the Enforcer. This ski will do it all, groomers, soft bumps, pow, crud, and mash potatoes. The tip is slightly softer than the tail which is a very good thing (unlike the Mantra). This allows the tip of the ski to hook up quick and makes for snappy turns in all conditions. This also allows extra float and slice in the pow, crud, and bumps. At mach speeds (super-g or downhill turns on a 35 deg groomed pitch) it does get slightly jittery. But if the only thing you want to ski is groomers fast, look for a race ski. This ski is all about versatility and does it well!!!
This year they are no longer a twin tip so im not sure what BC is thinking(No park for these bad boys unless your not landing switch). Maybe they put the 09' ski with the 08' description. Either way sick set of sticks. If you want to go OB or backcountry get your self a pair of skis that are ment for off piste. These are ment for all mtn, everyday use, ripping groomers, and stable skiing on everything else.
Can anyone shed some light on the stiffness of the ski and its edge hold on some firmer N'Eastern groomers? I know these aren't ideal conditions for the ski, but just curious as to how they hold up if put in the conditions...Thanks.
These would make a great East Coast groomer ski. They really can bomb anything and blast through mank with great stability and dampness. I'd say medium-stiff.
i don't have these skis exactly, but from the year before. i do not know if they are made differently, but i am 6'0" 175lbs and these skis were way too soft. they would be great for smaller of less aggressive skiers I'm sure, but for any person who only knows how to charge big lines and go mach loony no matter what, these skis are not for you, go get something stiffer. they are a good in-bounds ski if conditions are nice, but don't do very well in crud, and they are awesome for ripping down groomers, they turn real nice, but who wants to do that all day???
it seems the tips are soft and the tails too stiff in the 08 model. would moving back the binding help. it seems like they are mounted in the middle for park instead of powder and trees.
I'm 5.4, 120 pounds ripper chick used to ski atomic sugar daddys 173 for the last 4 years...having thoughts on wether I should get the 169 or 177. I'm in Fernie BC and ski pow and trees all the time! What do you think?
I'm 5'9" and 145, do a bit of park but mostly all mountain and a little racing, and I ski 169's on both pairs of skis I own. The more competent and aggressive a skiier you are, the more length you can handle, and the extra length does give you more carving, more speed, and better float in powder, but a shorter ski is easier to control and turn fast for steep trees, moguls and such. Honestly, I like sacrificing a little float in the powder for the extra maneuverability, and with a ski this fat the float isn't really going to be an issue anyway. I don't know what exactly these skis come in, but I'd go with something in the high 160's to low 170's.Christophe V.- go 177cm, that way you will get good float in pow and still have maneuverability in the trees. 169cm is really on the short side for your height (I'm the same height).PS. These are no longer twin tips and I found them to be fairly stiff, unlike what Will stated.
Comment on CB's review >