Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Close
Flag This
Close This Window
Marmot Alpinist Jacket - Men's

Marmot Alpinist Jacket - Men's

Item #MAR1221|26 in Stock – Ships Wicked Fast & Free
On Sale: $237.48 - $399.96
50% Off, Regularly: $474.95 - $499.95
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

Black/Fire, S (237.48)
Rocket Red / Fire, L (399.96)
Rocket Red / Fire, S (399.96)
Rocket Red / Fire, XL (399.96)
Vapor Blue / Deep Blue, L (399.96)
Vapor Blue / Deep Blue, M (399.96)
Vapor Blue / Deep Blue, S (399.96)
Vapor Blue / Deep Blue, XL (399.96)
Quantity:
Gift Bag it: More Info
Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List
  • Pass It On

Marmot Alpinist Jacket - Men's

You really put your equipment and clothes to the test on mountaineering, rock climbing, and backpacking treks, which is why the Marmot Men’s Alpinist Jacket is right up your snow-filled, high-altitude alley. The Gore-Tex Pro Shell blocks the elements, and Marmot’s Angel-Wing Movement design gives you a full range of arm motion without the torso of this jacket riding up (no more mid-section exposure while you climb). A zip-off powder skirt reduces bulk when you’re not waist-deep in the white. Besides the heat-venting pitzips (with water-resistant zippers), the Alpinist boasts laser-drilled pocket backings and hood vents for increased breathability when you’re on the move. Pull this shell over your fleece or softshell.

Bottom Line: Climb higher.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 5

One of the best Gore Tex Pro Shell Jackets

By:
January 30, 2009

This jacket is pretty big. I usually wear XL but the marmot XL is bigger than other brands. The hood is huge and I really like it because I can wear it over any helmet I want. The collar literally comes up to your nose so you can tuck in your chin or even cover most of your face if you need to but you can adjust the hood. Nice pitzips, chest pockets, removable powder skirt and zippers. Very high quality and great attention to detail.

Marmot Alpinist jacket is definitely up there with flagship jackets like Norrona Lofoten, Arc'teryx Alpha SV, Haglofs Spitz and TNF Free Thinker jackets.

I will enjoy jacket for many years to come.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Does the jacket have hand gaiters? Cant find any info on the

Does the jacket have hand gaiters?
Cant find any info on the subject.

By:
6 days ago

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This jacket has asymmetrical cuffs with a Velcro tab for closure. It doesn't has wrist gaiters.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
5 days ago

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Best equipment

By:
5 days ago

I own an earlier version Alpinist Jacket which now has hundreds of days on it, mostly mountaineering, winter backcountry, and heli skiing. The construction is absolutely reliable. The long length, hood, sleeves are excellent. Pockets, powder skirt excellent. Marmot still keeps a slight flap over the front zipper, a smart design for redundancy even in this day of waterproof zippers. Having once damaged a zipper on a lesser quality jacket on a climb, I refuse to go on serious remote trips with the modern arcteryx style single zipper with no flap. The zip out powder skirt on the new version is a nice feature, as the skirt adds warmth in high winds not to mention keeping snow out, absolute necessity if you are stuck out somewhere or in an emergency bivouac situation. The gore-tex should be washed regularly, and the finish periodically re-newed with the repellency treatment sold by gore. With that, my jacket has worked wonderfully even though the original fire engine red fabric has faded to a pastel.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

hi there, im about 5'6-5'7 and weigh about 145 pounds.

hi there, im about 5'6-5'7 and weigh about 145 pounds. i dont have a too slim build but not big either. im a rock climber. what size should i get? i was thinking medium. any suggestions or advice? i wear a medium patagonia jacket.

By:
October 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I would measure your chest and base your sizing decision on that measurement. I'm 5'9, 170 pounds with a 40" chest and Marmot's size medium shells fit me well with room for a fleece layer underneath.

By:
October 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Full coverage

By:
February 4, 2009

Pro: Burly fabric, big hood that actually fits a helmet, great face coverage, pockets are nowhere near pack straps.

Con: a little heavy. Sleeve pocket is difficult to open and close with one hand

Comments: This jacket is long. The other dimensions are on the big side too, but not as dramatic as the length. It is a perfect jacket for long torsos, nasty weather and deep snow. If you have a short torso it will hang down below your ass.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Hi, I'm 5'9" and weigh about 155-160. I'm

Hi,
I'm 5'9" and weigh about 155-160. I'm looking at buying a medium, would that size fit me well or would I be better with a small.

By:
October 7, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Write your answer here...
I have the exact build and I always go medium!

By:
October 7, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Very nice jacket

By:
January 16, 2009

After having my last Marmot jacket for 14+ years, I decided to splurge and get a new one. I found the Alpinist on sale and decided to go for it.

This jacket is much more 'fitted' than my last jacket, and significantly lighter. The lining that protects the gore-tex is very thin and breathable, and it is bonded to the outer fabric. This makes this jacket significantly lighter in weight and warmth than my old Marmot and less bulky. I find that I wear a light fleece layer underneath when it's cold outside to stay warm.

Since this jacket is not as roomy, you can't pack on a lot of layers under it. I have a heavy Marmot polartec liner from my old coat that does work (better than I expected!), but it seemed kinda tight in the arms. However, I did still have plenty of range of movement due to the design of the arms, and it wasn't uncomfortable once on. (Size note: I'm 6'2", 195lb - I got the XL and it fits perfectly)

I really like the new hood design Marmot is using. It gets pretty windy here in Colorado. My old coat would catch the wind and blow off when up (which sucks when it's raining), or turn into a giant balloon when down. The new design stays put and comfortable when adjusted.

This has been a great coat for me over the last month or so. We've had a nice variety of cold, snow, and warm days, so it's been put to the test (No rain yet). Breathability is great - I don't feel like I'm sitting in a sauna when I start heating up. I haven't tested the durablity, but it seems well constructed.

Final Verdict: An awesome all purpose jacket, but not a warm one. That's a plus for me since it's going to be my all purpose jacket.. It's all about layering. This is the one and only outer shell you'll need. Light enough for spring storms, tough enough for skiing or hiking. It looks great wearing it around town (not the baggy loose look at all) and is easy to handle.

Downsides:
Sometimes I do wish it had a little bit more warmth to it so that I don't always have to carry an extra layer, but I'll be glad it doesn't come spring.

Price. Watch for sales. SAC FTW

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I really want to buy this jacket. It seems like a bugger to

I really want to buy this jacket. It seems like a bugger to fit though. I'm 6'0" and 220, long torso. I don't think I have terribly long arms, but I have good sized shoulders and arms (former farmer). I also have a beer gut that comes and goes like the tides. I doubt I will ever wear any mid layers more than a hoodie underneath. I'm leaning toward XL just to be safe. Do you think that sounds right? For what it's worth, I have a TNF Free Thinker II in XL that fits me perfectly.

By:
March 31, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am 6'3" and about 210-215. I ordered both the L & the XL. Neither fits well. The L is decent if a little snug through the chest & torso, but waaay too small in the shoulders and sleeves.

The XL is sufficiently roomy in the chest/torso to allow good layering, and doesn't hang too wide when worn without layers. But the shoulders in the XL are too narrow -- ok when standing with arms at my side but if I cross them in front of my chest the jacket pulls very tight. And then there are the sleeves. I am no Popeye, believe me, but the sleeves are form-fitting. When I cross my arms in front of me the fabric pulls tight against my biceps and in the crook of my elbows. Absolutely too tight. I feared for tearing the jacket. Sent both back.

Also, the Napoleon pockets are a PITA. Perhaps they're a good design for alpine work & hiking, but I also want to be able to get my hands in there for some shelter & it is impossible.

The hood, though, is the pinnacle example of hoods. Absolutely perfect.

By:
July 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I saw them up on SAC, and ordered a large and XL. The XL is perfect. The large is too tight in my shoulders. Thanks for the advice Ryan.

By:
April 8, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'd say go with the XL. If it doesn't fit, Backcountry is fantastic with their return policy.

By:
April 1, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Tight Fit

By:
March 26, 2009

I currently have an XL Alpinist jacket I got in 1999 that still looks brand new and performs great except for 2 things. Its big & heavy and the sleeves leak between the elastic cuff and the rest of the sleeve. I just got back from a trip where we backpacked for 10 to 12 hours in a constant 35 degree rain and I stayed completely dry except for my forearm.

Now that they have gotten rid of the elastic cuff, cut out the lining, and have more breathable fabric on the market its time to upgrade. After reading the sizing chart and some reviews I got this new model in a size L from SAC on a sick deal. The fit is great with a microfleece or similar underneath. Its a little tight over my XL Patagonia R4 jacket which by itself fits perfectly. The sleeves feel a little tight, as others have mentioned, mostly in the shoulders. I think this is because of the cut for the angel wing movement (that works perfect) and the stiff zipper on the pits keeping the pit pushed up further than normal. I am confident that once I get some break-in time, the stiff pits and extremely high collar will get more comfortable. I got this for backpacking so I need the cut to be tight to prevent the excess baggage I experience under my hip-belt with my old Alpinist. I am 6'4" & 215 and if I were looking for an around-town jacket to pair with a 200 or 300 fleece I would have to up-size.

I have a lot of marmot and the Gore-tex proshell is a no brainer so quality and waterproofness/breathability is a non-issue for me with this product.

Also, as someone else already mentioned, the Terra color is sweet and not as represented on-line. Its a burnt orange/rust color with black zippers. Great for those wet Virginia Tech football games!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I just bought this jacket and really want to love it, but I can't

I just bought this jacket and really want to love it, but I can't quite understand the cut of it. I'm 6'3", 210, with a 43" chest & 36" waist. Basically tall & slim. I have the "XL", and the arms are quite snug, but the body of the jacket seems to have much more room in it than I can fill out. When I sit down it looks like I'm pregnant. Would the "L" fit me any better? The sleeves on the XL are right about perfect length and I wouldn't really want to sacrifice the 1" stepping down a size...Other than that the features are great! Awesome hood, chin coverage, really long in the body, removable powder-skirt and it looks very durable. The lack of hand-pockets is kinda weird though.

By:
February 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm similar in size - 6'2" 200lbs - and have the Large. It fits great. The sleeves are just right for me (both length and width) and there's enough material in the torso to fit my choice of fleece, softshell, or down underneath it without getting tight. Without a jacket underneath I don't feel like I'm wearing a tent either.

By:
March 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Marmot Alpinist JAcket

By:
February 10, 2009

I've had mine for 3 weeks now. During the recent east coast wintry mix it has been dry as a bone and no issues - pit zips vent well and quality appears to be everything I would expect from a $425 jacket.

Fit is a little strange but on me it hasn't been large as others describe. Mine is a bit slimmer than I'm used to - at first I thought it might be constricting but the "angel wing" construction actually does allow full range of movement (went cragging for a day and had no major issues). I'm 5'11", 170 lbs and certainly couldn't have gone down a size. I could have gone up a size, but M is probably the right one (I wear M in all other Marmot stuff). As others mention, It IS long, but not large (that's what she said).

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Whats the difference between this jacket and the marmot exum

Whats the difference between this jacket and the marmot exum jacket?

By:
February 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The outside material on the Alpinist is much heavier/thicker/stonger. The Exum is very thin material, a bit heavier than what you would find as an inside nylon liner on some jackets. The Alpinist is also much longer and has a powderskirt. The cut is the same as are all other aspects.

By:
March 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This one has a powder skirt. Other than that not a lot.

By:
February 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Best Shell Ever

By:
January 27, 2009

I've had this jacket for two weeks- It's seen a mountaineering trip, a couple days of skiing and some major time in the rain. I'm super impressed with it's breathability and waterproofness- Stays dry on the inside no matter what I'm doing. The forest green color looks pretty pro on the slopes, unfortunately I haven't been able to test out the powder skirt :p My only irk is the high collar- brilliant when it's howlin but a little annoying when things are calm. Book it!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I agree, this jacket is HUGE! I'm 5' 11" around

I agree, this jacket is HUGE! I'm 5' 11" around 165 and usually always wear a medium, but I'm thinking I need to send this one back for a small.

By:
January 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Even if you did make your purchase from S&C, you can return it for a different size, or even color, for the same price. So you won't have to stalk S&C waiting for it to go on sale, they'll just apply the sale price to your exchange. I've done it before. You'll have to pay for the return shipping, but they'll get your new jacket out to you free of charge. So no upped price, and no shipping fee. BC kicks arse.

By:
June 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Ugh, same here. 6', 160 lbs and the medium is enormous on me. Got it on steepandcheap.com so it looks like I dont have the option to exchange it for a small. bummer, because it seems like a nice jacket.

By:
March 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Do it.

By:
February 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

wait..... what the.....

By:
March 13, 2009

My only complaint of this jacket has been the zipper pulls. they are just all cord, not metal with cord extensions as they are in the pics. small complaint but why is this?

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm in the middle of two sizes (L-XL) according to the chart.

I'm in the middle of two sizes (L-XL) according to the chart. I'm 6' and 205 lbs. Athletic build. What size would you recommend?

By:
January 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Definitely go for the L. These jackets tend to run a little big so there's enough room to layer underneath it. The L is on the verge on feeling big for me at 6'2", 200lbs.

By:
March 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I went with a large- I'm 6'2 and 170. The sleeves are plenty long and there's plenty of room in the chest and gut if you need it- I'd probably drown in the XL.

By:
January 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Awesome!!!

By:
March 13, 2009

I love this shell. soo light. well made. hood is money. no hand pockets is a little odd but you understand why when you have a pack on. the sleeve pocket is a little hard to open but holds my iphone perfect! $$$ tag is a little high but I got this on SAC for under half. looks like its worth every penny. Ohhh... the terra is not as dark as it looks in the fotos, its a little brigher and more orange which I like even more.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

What is the length of the jacket and the weight?

What is the length of the jacket and the weight?

By:
January 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Large center back length= 32" and medium is 31", which is pretty good length for any men's medium. This jacket weighs 1.46lbs.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

Mixed Feelings

By:
March 23, 2009

I really wanted to keep this shell when I got it but it was way too small for me in the Large. For Reference I'm 6 FT 220lbs. The arms and shoulders were way to tight for me. I think an XL would have fit better but the length would have been too long and clumsy. I liked the fabric and am considering the Marmot Torre for my next ski shell purchase.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Where is this jacket made? I can't find any info here or

Where is this jacket made? I can't find any info here or on the dealer site. Thanks!

By:
December 30, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

SteveKuhn,My Forest/Dk Cedar Alpinist says Made in Vietnam as well. Just received it a few days ago.

By:
January 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Very good pro shell

By:
February 12, 2009

It is a very very well constructed jacket and breathable. I haven't tested it out every winter condition, but so far it seems great. Good for slim people. I find the chest pockets a bit odd. Would have liked it to be a little lower and towards the outside just in case I want to warm/rest my hands.

I usually fit well into an XL, but this XL was massive. Had to get a large which is snug.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

cut and paste

By:
March 20, 2009

If we could take the body from the medium, and the arms from the large, it would be the perfect jacket for me. It has been showing up on steepandcheap pretty often, so I would watch that before purchasing here directly. Haven't been out in it yet, but looks good so far. The pockets, as mentioned below, don't make sense for around the town use, but I am excited to be able to access pockets when I use this for some hiking in the next few weekends.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great design, pity about the material

By:
August 25, 2009

I've got an old, old model of this jacket (late 90s). Absolutely bombproof design, great quality of execution. A very rugged, functional piece.

The only downside is the choice of fabric. Marmot seems to be locked to WL Gore, and having owned both Goretex and eVent jackets, I can confidently say that eVent blows Goretex away. To the extent that my new purchases a driven by fabric rather than clothing brand. I used to buy exclusively Marmot/Patagonia, now I buy Montane or RAB.

If you're not fussed about fabric, the Marmot is a good quality choice.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Bomber Jacket.

By:
March 13, 2009

I do a lot of backcountry skiing and work at a ski resort. I have had this in 65MPH winds dumping snow and up severial 14ers. Amazing jacket NO complaints.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Works if your skinny...

By:
February 10, 2009

This is a great coat, I have two complaints though. First, the arms are a little narrow. I'm not a muscular guy (6'2" 170lbs) but when I layer my fleece underneath things get a little snug in the biceps/forearm regions. Guess I'll need to find a thinner fleece. Second, I understand its more waterproof without hand pockets, but as the coat is a little long it is annoying to have to lift it to get my frozen fingers into my pants pockets. Such is life.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Definitely large fitting

By:
March 31, 2009

The jacket quality is top notch. Can't argue about that.

Given the opportunity to try one on in a store I would have bought a Medium. I did however follow the sizing guide on the Marmot website as well as Steep and Cheap when I bought it. I fit into the Large category, and the jacket fits, but it is definitely LARGE.

I am 6'1" and 180 lbs. I would definitely liked to have been able to try on a Medium, though, given the charts I have a feeling a medium would have been too small.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Tech Specs:

Material:
Gore-Tex Pro Shell 
Waterproof Rating:
Gore-Tex guaranteed 
Breathable Rating:
Gore-Tex guaranteed 
Core Venting:
Pitzips 
Pockets:
2 Front pack, internal zip mesh 
Seam Taped:
Yes, fully 
Powder Skirt:
Yes, removable 
Hood:
Yes 
Zip-in Compatibility:
No 
Recommended Use:
Mountaineering, rock climbing, backpacking, hiking 
Manufacturer Warranty:
Lifetime 
Country of Origin:
China 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: