Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Close
Flag This
Close This Window
Marker Jester 16 Ski Binding

Marker Jester 16 Ski Binding

Item #MRK0026|151 in Stock – Ships Fast & Free
$339.99
Suggested Retail: $395.00
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

White/Copper, 110mm (339.99)
White/Copper, 90mm (339.99)
White/Copper, 130mm (339.99)
Quantity:
Gift Bag it: More Info
Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List
  • Pass It On

Marker Jester 16 Ski Binding

The Marker Jester 16 looks like no other alpine binding because it is like no other alpine binding. Its shorter, flatter, wider mounting footprint gives increased lateral control, improves switch riding, and concentrates the swing weight for easier spin initiation. Its compact footprint also allows the ski to flex naturally, decreasing the stiff, plate-like feel associated with high-DIN alpine bindings. Marker placed the Jester’s mounting points under the sole holder axis for direct power transmission, and gave the binding just 2mm of forward ramp angle so your boot sits almost level on the ski. These features, combined with one of the safest, most technical release mechanisms in the industry, literally enable you to seek new heights whether you’re dropping cliffs or launching out of the pipe. *Skis must be at least 76mm wide to accept wider mounting pattern.

Bottom Line: The Jester is built for pure big-mountain freestyle performance.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

Griffon VS Jester? (Light Vs Durable ? ) I am thinking which

Griffon VS Jester? (Light Vs Durable ? )

I am thinking which to buy? I don't need the din of the Jester and I don't want the extra weight compared to the griffon.. but on the other hand I am worried about the durability and power transmition of the griffon because it's all plastic..
Is the griffon going to have a worse power transmition than the jester?

Which should a buy?

PS: is there any binding lighter than the griffon?

Thanks!

By:
November 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have a pair of the marker griffons on my armada t-halls and just love them. Super durable and not flimsy. I have already over 50 days on my griffons and still as good as new. Even though there is a fair amount of plastic the important parts are metal. When you click into them they fell really solid.

By:
November 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

At 4lb 6oz, how do these bindings compare to the weight of other

At 4lb 6oz, how do these bindings compare to the weight of other like bindings?

By:
October 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

sth16 weighs in almost 1.5lbs heavier, same with px 15/18
they ski a little lighter too because of the short mounting length

By:
October 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

These Jesters Are No Joke

By:
November 12, 2009

Like I said in my review of my Atomic Snoop Daddies, before last season I was an OK holiday skier without much knowledge of skiing equipment. But since last November when I moved out to Utah, I have pushed myself to progress and learn as much as possible about snowsports. I think I can speak confidently for those of us who aren’t claiming to huck 20ft+ cliffs when no one else is around…

When I got my Snoops I mounted a pair of Marker Jesters on them and really let rip for the season.
Skiing in Park City I was trying everything, groomers, park, trees, switch, learning to butter, but also bailing, hitting knuckles, hitting said tress, you name it.

When I first got my skis I actually broke a pair of Rossi bindings knuckling the first jump in Jonesy’s Park in PCMR but I did exactly the same again with my Jesters and they soaked it up.

I found them to be a light binding in comparison and couldn’t believe the control I had. Quick turns, accidental bails, I felt secure in that my Jesters somehow knew I could either recover and stay on, or think; “Sorry dude, we are outta here”.

Even though the binding can go all the way up to 16, I never have mine higher than 10, and this is because I like hitting the jumps in the park. I am 6’2” and around 80kgs/180lbs and these babies are perfect, even if you think your skiing is not.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Can you change the brakes from the 90 to 110? May move the bindings

Can you change the brakes from the 90 to 110? May move the bindings mid season to some fatter skis. Was thinking I can just get new brakes?? Thanks

By:
October 11, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes, you can change your brakes.

By:
October 14, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Most people will just bend them a little to accommodate the larger waist.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

I am going to get the K2 Hellbents, and it said that these would

I am going to get the K2 Hellbents, and it said that these would be the best bindings for them. Are there any that would fit the 122 mm waist and be a little bit cheaper but just as good of quality?

By:
October 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Jesters are the way to go...if you arent gonna be charging super hard the griffons might also work fine. But if you want something with a din of above 12 the jester is prolly the best option. As for price...look around for a pair from last year...they didnt change anything but the color, or at most insignificant things.

By:
October 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I like the Look PX line quite a lot, good reliable bindings, and a bit cheaper than the Marker Royal family. Mostly though, nothing quite compares to the Royals. You can get the PX 18 which has a higher DIN set, for cheaper, but they are long, so the flex is hindered, and they weigh a ton. Take a look if it interests you, but the Jester is probably the best.

By:
October 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

hi i just got the armada ARG'S and saw that these would go

hi i just got the armada ARG'S and saw that these would go up to 110 mm on the break. how could i make em work for a 133mm waist ski??

By:
October 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I think you can get brakes for these at about the 130mm area, but it doesn't really matter. Bending the brakes is the best, cheapest bet. Any good ski shop should be able to do this, or you can do it yourself.

By:
October 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

hi i just bought the volkl bridge 169 and am looking into binding

hi i just bought the volkl bridge 169 and am looking into binding currently, these are my top choice, but i was wondering how well these binding work all mountian as opposed to just in the park

By:
August 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The jester is a great binding for someone who skis anywhere on the mountain. If you ski park a lot, the binding works great. If you are stomping cliffs, the binding works great. If you are skiing trees, the binding works great. The wider platform of this binding means they transfer energy really well, and add to the stability of the ski. They are great for all mountain use. However, on a ski that small, it makes me think that you are a lighter weight person. This is a pretty beefy binding, with a high din, meant for heavier or very aggressive skiers. You might want to consider the Marker Baron. Almost identical binding, but with a lower din, meant for lighter riders.

By:
September 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

These bindings are great for all mountain. I have them mounted on my 166 K2 Extremes, and theyre an excellent all mountain binding. No early releases and no embarassing double ejections on the mountain. Solid all around Binding

By:
September 8, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Jesters are constantly used as a Big Mountain, Park & Pipe binding by high quality skiers. They are a very stable, consistent all-round binding.

By:
August 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I was reading that the 2007 version of the Jester had issues

I was reading that the 2007 version of the Jester had issues with compatibility with the Dalbello Krypton shell and inadvertant release. Does anyone know if this newer version would be compatible with Dalbello Krypton Rampage boots?

By:
August 26, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The only difference between the dalbello 3-piece shells is the type of the plastic used (pro being stiffest, rampage being softest). The toe height problems people reported were mostly due to worn soles, and kryptons came up a lot b/c they already have thin toe lugs. When set correctly the forward pressure seems like it is very tight - that's normal. Jesters have worked great for me and my kryptons.

By:
October 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The issue is that the jester (unlike the duke) does not have a toe height adjustment. So for boots like the dalbello krypton series boots which have a slightly lower profile sole, there is tiny little gap in the toe, which allows for some play and at times premature release. You just have to make the sure that the forward pressure is set perfectly. So make sure you take it to a reputable shop when you get them mounted and set. As far as changes, they are some minor changes, but nothing with regard to this issue. The changes are mostly cosmetic. I use the dalbello krypton pros, and with the exception of touring bindings, I use some variation of Salomon 916s on all my skis, and have never had any trouble. I would go with the sth16s personally. They have an all metal heel, and I think overall, they are more bomber (less plasticy), and less prone to issues with fit and pre-release. There's a reason, they've stuck with pretty much the same format for over a decade. It works! And it works well.

By:
September 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

DIN is DIN... the standard tab size, dimension, and durometer has a very small tolerance for the DIN spec and regulations for adult ski boots. The forward pressure indicator was a bit different than on bindings preceding it, and that was probably the hang-up people mis-named. This binding is awesome.

By:
September 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hello, I had the same kind of problems with the heel part of a 2007 Duke Binding with my Dalbello Krypton pros until I augmetnted the forward pressure of the heel in a way the heel of my shoe is really locked, seems to need a lot of forward prssure? are there any changes in the 2009/10 Marker Jester/Duke heel part? I'm thinking abôut putting a Jester on my new skis for this year but this issue is a bit of a problem. Perhaps a Salomon STH 16 would be more reliable? Had no problems with Salomon Bindings an the Dalbello shoes.

Any opinions?

Greetings from Switzerland

JF

By:
September 14, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Works fine with my Krypton Pros

By:
August 26, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Research out-of-stock versions:

Tech Specs:

DIN Range:
6-16 
Recommended Skier Weight:
130+ lbs (59kg) 
Brake Width:
90mm, 110mm or 130mm available 
Weight:
[Pair] 4lb 6oz (2000g) 
Recommended Use:
Big-mountain freeride, park and pipe competition 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 Year 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: