Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Close
Flag This
Close This Window
Marker Griffon 12 Ski Binding

Marker Griffon 12 Ski Binding

Item #MRK0028|134 in Stock – Ships Fast & Free
$229.99
Suggested Retail: $295.00
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

White/Gunmetal, 90mm (229.99)
White/Gunmetal, 110mm (229.99)
Quantity:
Gift Bag it: More Info
Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List
  • Pass It On

Marker Griffon 12 Ski Binding

The Marker Griffon 12 Ski Binding features the wide, powerful mounting footprint of its elder sibling the Jester, in a lighter, lower-DIN formula that’s ideal for smaller skiers.

  • Compact mounting pattern reduces swing weight for fluid spins and flips
  • Flat ramp angle results in a neutral stance that is ideal for both switch and regular skiing
  • Composite toe and heel cups minimize overall weight for a light, nimble feel on snow and in the air
  • Mounting configuration requires skis at least 76mm wide

Bottom Line: Don't carry around more binding than you need.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

Griffon VS Jester? (Light Vs Durable ? ) I am thinking which

Griffon VS Jester? (Light Vs Durable ? )

I am thinking which to buy? I don't need the din of the Jester and I don't want the extra weight compared to the griffon.. but on the other hand I am worried about the durability and power transmition of the griffon because it's all plastic..
Is the griffon going to have a worse power transmition than the jester?

Which should a buy?

PS: is there any binding lighter than the griffon?

Thanks!

By:
November 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm 6'4" and weigh 180-190 and I ride the Griffon on 3 different pairs of skis (S5, S6, S7). It comes more down to what DIN you ride. I ride a 9 and therefore didn't see the need to pay more to have the option of cranking my DIN up to 16. I beat on my skis and put in over 100 days in each season. That being said I've never had any problems with any of my Griffons. The only wide ride binding problem we've ever had in the shop was actually with a pair of Dukes and the AFD came off while riding at Steamboat.

Like with ski lengths and DIN settings people often go longer or higher because their friends are riding it or they see a girl "can handle" a 14 DIN or a 189cm etc. No chart in the world will ever recommend riding a 14 DIN. Our shop uses Marker branded charts and the highest it goes is 13 and you have to be over 6'5" and 210 pounds. I'm including a picture of the exact charts we use in our shop so you can have a look

By:
3 days ago

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This comes down to a question of weight, strength and skill. If you are over 175lbs and push hard, then by all means choose the Jester. If you are lighter, and are a "subltle" skier, then the Griffon works just fine. At 6'1", 180 I ski the Jester. My wife, at 5'7" 115 lb does just fine on the Griffon. Another factor is how much you bang around equipment, traveling or otherwise, if that is a concern, go with the Jester. That said, I have yet to see a smashed up Griffon. I doubt you can go wrong with either, and I hope this answer does not just confuse the matter!!

By:
November 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey i got ninthward Le comtes would these bindings be good for

Hey i got ninthward Le comtes would these bindings be good for them? an which size 90mm or 110?

By:
October 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The le comptes are 80mm underfoot right? So then you need the 90mm breaks.

By:
November 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

I Own 3 Pairs And Love Them All!

By:
3 days ago

These bindings are awesome. I've got them mounted on all 3 pairs of skis I currently own and haven't had a single problem. I'm 6'4" and weigh 180-190 and ride a 9 DIN with them. I've never had any "premature ejections" with them nor have I ever wished they would come off and didn't.

Don't fall prey to thinking you're tougher than you are and need to ride the Jesters cause they go up to 16. Marker doesn't even recommend going higher than a 13!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am 6'2 and an athletic 236 lbs. I am looking at a few different

I am 6'2 and an athletic 236 lbs. I am looking at a few different skis for 10; would this be a good match for either the snoop or shogun? Or do i need to up the din?
Thxs

By:
October 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Depends on what DIN you ride. Pros, very large men, and people overcompensating on their DIN ride the Jesters. Due to you being over 6' and 236lbs you could certainly qualify as a large man. You may be towards the higher end of the 12 maximum but depending on what type of rider you are you may be fine. It really just depends on your DIN. Durability has never been an issue for me and I own 3 pairs of Griffons, in fact the only pair of Marker royal family bindings I've ever seen break were a pair of Dukes (the 16 DIN AT version).

By:
3 days ago

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

It really depends on how hard you charge...you might wanna go with the jesters so that you can have a DIN of 16 but they are practically the same as the griffons except more metal and a higher din.

By:
October 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Bindings

By:
October 27, 2009

I have a pair of the 2008 bindings and just love them to death. So reliable and solid build. Absolutely no complaints and the price to quality ratio is great. :)

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

so i'm getting the volkl bridge skiis which are 92mm underfoot...

so i'm getting the volkl bridge skiis which are 92mm underfoot... should i go with the 110mm width or just get the 90mm?

By:
October 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The 110s might be a bit big and might actually touch the snow when carving. If you're going to ride switch they might even hook. You're better off adjusting the 90mm ones with some plyers.

By:
October 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm about 5'11 180lbs and do alot of park and groomer

I'm about 5'11 180lbs and do alot of park and groomer skiing. Is 12 din going to be enough retention for big landings?

By:
October 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Here is a Marker DIN chart Andrew. The highest it even goes up to is 13 and that's if you're over 6'5" and 210lbs.

Anyone claiming they need the Jester because of the higher DIN is either a professional, a pretty big boy, or completely delusional.

By:
3 days ago

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

yeah the din of 12 should be fine. I im about 6'2 and 180 and i have my din at 10. okay im not the biggest park ripper in the world. I still get pretty scared about jumps that are over 30 feet. But I have never had this binding release prematurely. Highly recommend it and the other guy is right...your knees will thank you, plus you want your skis to pop off if you slam hard.

By:
October 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

YES. the people who think that they need 18 din are compensating. your knees will thank you later.

By:
October 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Love it

By:
5 days ago

Great binding. I'm using this on Line Anthems and i must say it's perfect. It's light so great for park ride and all round skiing, Wouldn't using for of piste and pow, low din settings but depends on skier weight and hight. I'm 5'8 and 165lbs and my settings is 11.5 so top end.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I was trying to find a binding to put on my 09 armada el-reys,

I was trying to find a binding to put on my 09 armada el-reys, i ski about 60/40 park/all mtn. Are these a good choice? Any recomondations? Thanks for answer.

By:
October 18, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you never set your DIN over 12, then they are some of the best out there. IF you run at about 12, it is recommended that you go for the Jesters, since you shouldn't have your DIN set at the full extent of the binding.

By:
October 18, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey I got a pair of k2 hellbents, their waist is 122, do you

Hey I got a pair of k2 hellbents, their waist is 122, do you think that I could be able to get the brakes to fit over that monster waist?

By:
October 14, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

132mm is the biggest brake I've seen out there

By:
3 days ago

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

You have to buy the 130mm brakes that marker sells. I think they are about $50...yeah I know, complete rip off. Some stores sell the binding with the 130mm brake already on so look around cause then you dont have to pay the 50 bucks. Have fun on the bents...they are sick skis. I got a pair this summer and cant wait to use them.

By:
October 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

You can definitely get wide enough brakes- I have these on a pair of EP Pros, 127mm under foot.

By:
October 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am pretty sure that you can find some brakes that fit up to 130mm, but you would have to order them separate, and that means paying extra.

By:
October 14, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Just wondering if this will ever make its way to Tramdock?

Just wondering if this will ever make its way to Tramdock?

By:
September 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Great price...doubt these bindings will ever be on tramdock...maybe in the middle of summer. but not in the next few months

By:
October 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Very Unlikely since tramdock is usually just overstocked/discontinued items and Backcountry will almost certainly sell out of these bindings.

At $229 this is an awesome binding, especially if you don't need to push your din's past 12 (not many people do).

By:
September 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Ok, so ive been doing some research on bindings to slap on my

Ok, so ive been doing some research on bindings to slap on my new pair of line blends. Right now Im in between Rossis SAS 140 and Markers griffon. I Ski mostly 40% groomers 40% park and 20% Powder. (not much out on the east cast)
Would the griffon be a better fit?

By:
September 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Griffon is a better park and all mountain binding in my opinion, I know some guys that have some problems with the Rossi stuff, and some people straight up love it. The Griffons have a low swing weight, and are super grippy, so you don't have to worry about premature ejection, but still drop you if need be. Mostly the difference is in weight, and DIN. Griffon is 12, SAS 140 is 14.

By:
October 14, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Write your question here... Does the Marker Griffon binding

Write your question here...

Does the Marker Griffon binding available with a brake that will fit a Volkl Kuro ski? If not, what binding does?

Thanks

By:
September 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

They can be bought with a 130 brake, this should be wide enough to fit the Kuro (might require bending - this is easy); however, im not sure if Backcountry sells them with the 130 brake (brakes can be bought separately and attached to the binding)

By:
September 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Change me.

Research out-of-stock versions:

Tech Specs:

DIN Range:
4 - 12 
Recommended Skier Weight:
80-250lb (36-113kg) 
Brake Width:
90-110cm 
Weight:
[Pair] 4lb 3oz (1900g) 
Recommended Use:
Park, pipe and all-mountain freeskiing 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 Year 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: