We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 (excluding kayaks) shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
We guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time - now, next month, in 30 years - you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked. Need help returning an item? - Click Hereclose
Due to contracts with the following brands, we are unable to ship any of their products outside the US.
more...
Int'l Shipping
Backcountry.com uses UPS Worldwide Express or Worldwide Expedited
for all shipping outside the United States. We have found this method to be quick,
secure, and cost effective.
Built from the ground up for the modern freerider, the Duke Ski Binding is the burliest AT binding ever created. This badass AT binding is all about, well, being badass. To switch from touring mode to ride mode, a rider must take the ski off, pop up the underfoot lever, then put the ski back on. This system guarantees the binding WILL NEVER INADVERTANTLY OPEN IN SKI MODE, a nice thing to know when you're 50 feet in the air and coming down fast. Connection brackets mount to the ski directly to increase power transfer without ruining the ski's flex. The Duke binding's burly heel and toe piece have wide contact points to facilitate power transfer, and the DIN goes up to 16 to prevent premature release when going big. An adjustable toe height feature gives you an incredibly solid connection with your boot. In tour mode, the binding moves your center of mass backward 30mm for greater efficiency. There's also a choice of two hiking positions, either 6 or 12 degrees.
Bottom Line: The Duke is a full-on freeride binding with touring capability, not a touring binding with a freeride marketing plan.
I've seen some comments about AT-soled boots not releasing well with these binders. Apparently the toe height squishes the soft rubber outsoles causing too much friction and hence, unreliable toe release pattern. Anyone care to elaborate on this?
Well, whoever told you this didn't set the binders up correctly. These binders have an adjustable toe height which should be set by a qualified tech who is familiar with AT BINDERS, not alpine binders. If you do not set toe height correctly, then it is possible to have issues with releasing. 90% of the time, this is due to some jackass who claims he knows how to set these binders up then does it the wrong way. I have three pairs of Dukes and have not had an issue with them yet. If you have a rockered sole on your boots (like some AT models such as the Spirit 4) then you need to be even more careful setting them up.
All in all, they will work fine with ANY AT boot as long as you dont have a chimp setting them up.
The Dukes are (finally) an AT capable downhill binding. If you ski hard then these are for you. I've toured for years on numerous bindings, but I never realized what I was missing until I got a pair of Dukes.
The compromise is they don't tour as nicely. The climbing bar is pretty weak, I've bent one and no longer use the high position when on a sidehill. They are clunky on the flat, but not too bad when ascending. They are obviously heavy, but after being out a few times your legs get stronger and you're fine. I still use more touring oriented bindings for multi-day tours, but don't hesitate to grab my Dukes for day trips (under 5000-ft).
So I skimped out last year and got a pair of griffin's on my new lines (they were on sale for 99 bucks so i couldn't pass it up). I rode them all last season but this year i'm planning on some backcountry with some friends out west. will the holes that were drilled for my griffins match the duke holes? i guess the bigger question is can you redrill skis?
AT rigs are all about compromise. With these bindings on you won't be winning any rando-races but you will have all the confidence you need in them when it counts. Big airs, straightlines, no fall zones, the bindings won't give you an excuse to turn back. I have 2 pairs of dukes and 2 pairs of dynafits. They each have their place. The duke is for charging hard, if you are doing anything else go with something lighter. I have not had durability issues but know people who have.
I've got boots with a sole length of 315. I know the small Dukes go up to 320. Seems to be cutting it close, but will that work fine? Is there any reason I should get large Dukes?
As long as your BSL is in the range you should be fine. Remember however that there is a large range of BSL's for various boots of the same foot size. Just make sure you don't limit your boot options in the future if you want to go with a larger boot of if you want get a boot that has a long BSL for its size.
I've only skied them 2x but I didn't notice the extra weight. I used them briefly in the AT mode(WOW is that strange to be able to freely lift your heel up) I got them late in the season so I'm hoping to use them much more this year! So far I cannot tell any difference between regular high performance alpine bindings. I've got them on 183 K2 Coomba's
Besides the change in color, what, if any, changes were made to this binding to warrant a $450 dollar price tag? I dont know why the ski industry has been raising the prices of their equipment so much in the last couple of years. You might as well tell ski bums like me, "f-off because we dont want your kind on the slopes."
I stand corrected. We took a look for ourselves at last year's vs this year's Duke bindings here in the BC.com Mega-Core Office and Margarita nailed it....SS, DD. So yah, despite the claims we heard at SIA, there is no structural change (height from ski). Just the new color. I've checked a Green Thumbs Up on Margarita's answer and given my original "nah dude it changed" answer the dreaded Red Thumbs Down. Still a kill binding. I love my Barons.
Whoa not so fast there Margarita! There have been two cosmetic 'updates' to the Duke and one key structural change. As you can clearly see, the colors have been changed up. What's harder to see is that the toe of the binding is less stubby than last year's. It kinda curves back towards your boot instead of being straight up and down. That's all pretty-points though...the important thing is the structural change. The new Duke/Barons sit lower on the ski than in years past. There is less lift and a closer-to-the-ski feel.
This binding's price hasn't changed for this year. If you've seen smaller prices in the past...they were on sale. These are mad expensive. I work here and I can't even afford them! I picked up the Baron last year, saved around $100, and lost a pound/pair of weight. You could also try my ski bum plan: work nights at a resort part-time for a (free) half week pass and tour the rest of the week. There's always a way man!
Easy answer. There aren't any changes, aside from the new copper and cream color scheme, you buy binding for the binding, not the year it was made. You probably already know this, but ski companies only design a binding once. They sell essentially the same binding with very minute modifications every year until the system is outdated or a flaw is discovered. There is no difference in this year's duke from last years, or will be from next years. Buy a used pair if you can, its the same binding.
So hopefully they figured something out for the AFD. I broke both mine within a month of use. My freind also broke one of his. I spoke with the local shops in town and right now they are totally out of the AFD peices and have become jerks about warranting them without proof of purchase. For the Burliest AT binding on the market they sure do break easy.
the peice under your toe that allows for an easier side to side release....the dukes is on a track with an alpine or touring mode, adjusted with a philips bolt. Easy to replace and or fix if they didnt break so easy and the manufacturers were out of them. Last year I had to put duct tape on it to hold it in place, didn't want to warranty them(wait 2-3 weeks) and miss out on the late season powder.
I wear size 27.0 ski boots & had to get the large Baron, you'll also likely need the large Duke. To make sure, check your boot sole length - it should be printed in mm somewhere near the bottom of the boot shell.
Comment on flan-man's review >