Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Close
Flag This
Close This Window
Marker Duke 16 Ski Binding

Marker Duke 16 Ski Binding

Item #MRK0025|196 in Stock – Ships Fast & Free
$449.99
Suggested Retail: $495.00
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

White/Copper, L (449.99)
White/Copper, S (449.99)
Quantity:
Gift Bag it: More Info
Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List
  • Pass It On

Marker Duke 16 Ski Binding

Built from the ground up for the modern freerider, the Duke Ski Binding is the burliest AT binding ever created. This badass AT binding is all about, well, being badass. To switch from touring mode to ride mode, a rider must take the ski off, pop up the underfoot lever, then put the ski back on. This system guarantees the binding WILL NEVER INADVERTANTLY OPEN IN SKI MODE, a nice thing to know when you're 50 feet in the air and coming down fast. Connection brackets mount to the ski directly to increase power transfer without ruining the ski's flex. The Duke binding's burly heel and toe piece have wide contact points to facilitate power transfer, and the DIN goes up to 16 to prevent premature release when going big. An adjustable toe height feature gives you an incredibly solid connection with your boot. In tour mode, the binding moves your center of mass backward 30mm for greater efficiency. There's also a choice of two hiking positions, either 6 or 12 degrees.

Bottom Line: The Duke is a full-on freeride binding with touring capability, not a touring binding with a freeride marketing plan.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

I've seen some comments about AT-soled boots not releasing

I've seen some comments about AT-soled boots not releasing well with these binders. Apparently the toe height squishes the soft rubber outsoles causing too much friction and hence, unreliable toe release pattern. Anyone care to elaborate on this?

By:
October 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Well, whoever told you this didn't set the binders up correctly. These binders have an adjustable toe height which should be set by a qualified tech who is familiar with AT BINDERS, not alpine binders. If you do not set toe height correctly, then it is possible to have issues with releasing. 90% of the time, this is due to some jackass who claims he knows how to set these binders up then does it the wrong way. I have three pairs of Dukes and have not had an issue with them yet. If you have a rockered sole on your boots (like some AT models such as the Spirit 4) then you need to be even more careful setting them up.

All in all, they will work fine with ANY AT boot as long as you dont have a chimp setting them up.

By:
November 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Confidence

By:
October 1, 2009

AT rigs are all about compromise. With these bindings on you won't be winning any rando-races but you will have all the confidence you need in them when it counts. Big airs, straightlines, no fall zones, the bindings won't give you an excuse to turn back. I have 2 pairs of dukes and 2 pairs of dynafits. They each have their place. The duke is for charging hard, if you are doing anything else go with something lighter. I have not had durability issues but know people who have.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

So I skimped out last year and got a pair of griffin's on

So I skimped out last year and got a pair of griffin's on my new lines (they were on sale for 99 bucks so i couldn't pass it up). I rode them all last season but this year i'm planning on some backcountry with some friends out west. will the holes that were drilled for my griffins match the duke holes? i guess the bigger question is can you redrill skis?

By:
October 15, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes, you can re-mount bindings.
No, the holes do not match.

By:
October 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Marker Dukes

By:
4 days ago

I have mine mounted on Volkl Mantras. Very solid attachment which is nice on a wide somewhat heavy ski. They feel solid with either my Alpine or AT boots. Excellent in-bounds performance, no worries about performance there. They climb ok. They are heavy though. For anything with a lot of climbing I'll take my lighter skis (Volkl T-rock with Fritchi or Volkl Mountain with dynafit)

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I've got boots with a sole length of 315. I know the small

I've got boots with a sole length of 315. I know the small Dukes go up to 320. Seems to be cutting it close, but will that work fine? Is there any reason I should get large Dukes?

By:
September 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

As long as your BSL is in the range you should be fine. Remember however that there is a large range of BSL's for various boots of the same foot size. Just make sure you don't limit your boot options in the future if you want to go with a larger boot of if you want get a boot that has a long BSL for its size.

By:
October 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 1

AFD breaks EASY

By:
October 1, 2009

So hopefully they figured something out for the AFD. I broke both mine within a month of use. My freind also broke one of his. I spoke with the local shops in town and right now they are totally out of the AFD peices and have become jerks about warranting them without proof of purchase. For the Burliest AT binding on the market they sure do break easy.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

3 Comments Last Comment: October 15, 2009 by:

By:
October 15, 2009

AFD = Anti-Friction Device

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
October 7, 2009

the peice under your toe that allows for an easier side to side release....the dukes is on a track with an alpine or touring mode, adjusted with a philips bolt. Easy to replace and or fix if they didnt break so easy and the manufacturers were out of them. Last year I had to put duct tape on it to hold it in place, didn't want to warranty them(wait 2-3 weeks) and miss out on the late season powder.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
October 4, 2009

what's afd?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Besides the change in color, what, if any, changes were made

Besides the change in color, what, if any, changes were made to this binding to warrant a $450 dollar price tag? I dont know why the ski industry has been raising the prices of their equipment so much in the last couple of years. You might as well tell ski bums like me, "f-off because we dont want your kind on the slopes."

- The Disgruntled Skiier.

By:
September 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I stand corrected. We took a look for ourselves at last year's vs this year's Duke bindings here in the BC.com Mega-Core Office and Margarita nailed it....SS, DD. So yah, despite the claims we heard at SIA, there is no structural change (height from ski). Just the new color. I've checked a Green Thumbs Up on Margarita's answer and given my original "nah dude it changed" answer the dreaded Red Thumbs Down. Still a kill binding. I love my Barons.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Whoa not so fast there Margarita! There have been two cosmetic 'updates' to the Duke and one key structural change. As you can clearly see, the colors have been changed up. What's harder to see is that the toe of the binding is less stubby than last year's. It kinda curves back towards your boot instead of being straight up and down. That's all pretty-points though...the important thing is the structural change. The new Duke/Barons sit lower on the ski than in years past. There is less lift and a closer-to-the-ski feel.

This binding's price hasn't changed for this year. If you've seen smaller prices in the past...they were on sale. These are mad expensive. I work here and I can't even afford them! I picked up the Baron last year, saved around $100, and lost a pound/pair of weight. You could also try my ski bum plan: work nights at a resort part-time for a (free) half week pass and tour the rest of the week. There's always a way man!

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 9, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Easy answer. There aren't any changes, aside from the new copper and cream color scheme, you buy binding for the binding, not the year it was made. You probably already know this, but ski companies only design a binding once. They sell essentially the same binding with very minute modifications every year until the system is outdated or a flaw is discovered. There is no difference in this year's duke from last years, or will be from next years. Buy a used pair if you can, its the same binding.

By:
October 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

When DH Matters

By:
October 21, 2009

The Dukes are (finally) an AT capable downhill binding. If you ski hard then these are for you. I've toured for years on numerous bindings, but I never realized what I was missing until I got a pair of Dukes.

The compromise is they don't tour as nicely. The climbing bar is pretty weak, I've bent one and no longer use the high position when on a sidehill. They are clunky on the flat, but not too bad when ascending. They are obviously heavy, but after being out a few times your legs get stronger and you're fine. I still use more touring oriented bindings for multi-day tours, but don't hesitate to grab my Dukes for day trips (under 5000-ft).

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hi I have Garmont Radium boots size 27,5 do I need bindings size

Hi I have Garmont Radium boots size 27,5 do I need bindings size small or large thanks

By:
September 9, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

27.5 puts you into 315/316 mm boot sole length, which means that you will just fit into a small size duke. you will save a few grams too!

By:
September 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I wear size 27.0 ski boots & had to get the large Baron, you'll also likely need the large Duke. To make sure, check your boot sole length - it should be printed in mm somewhere near the bottom of the boot shell.

By:
September 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Beefy clamps

By:
October 20, 2009

I've only skied them 2x but I didn't notice the extra weight. I used them briefly in the AT mode(WOW is that strange to be able to freely lift your heel up) I got them late in the season so I'm hoping to use them much more this year! So far I cannot tell any difference between regular high performance alpine bindings. I've got them on 183 K2 Coomba's

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Anything new for this white 2009 model? Or is this the same as

Anything new for this white 2009 model? Or is this the same as the older 2007 black model?

By:
August 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

See above. Love your name...

By:
October 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Research out-of-stock versions:

Tech Specs:

Material:
Plastic, stainless steel, aluminum 
DIN Rated:
Yes, 6 to 16 
Boot Compatibility:
AT and alpine 
Brakes Included:
Yes 
Brake Width:
110mm 
Heel Elevators:
Yes, 6- and 12-degree positions 
Weight:
[1 binding] 2lb 15oz (1334g) 
Recommended Use:
Backcountry skiing when downhill performance is paramount 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 Year 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: