Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Close
Flag This
Close This Window
MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoe

MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoe

Item #CAS0488|22 in Stock – Ships Wicked Fast & Free
$259.95
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

Green, 25in (259.95)
Green, 22in (259.95)
Orange, 22in (259.95)
Quantity:
Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List
  • Pass It On

MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoe

Thanks to serrated edges along bottom of the frames, the MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoes provide 360-degree traction on hardcore, steep terrain (let's face it—slippage doesn't always occur in a straightforward manner). MSR also knows that snow kick-up and heel drag are lame, so they made the Lightning Ascent's tail with a rocker design. The aerospace-grade aluminum frame is super light for all-day hikes, and MSR's ergonomic Televator heel lifter minimizes calf fatigue so you can climb longer and farther. True-Hinge steel crampons provide stability, and the reinforced decks add durability. *Please see sizing chart for size tips.

Bottom Line: The serrated bottom-edges on MSR's Lightning Ascents won't double as kitchen knives, but they will give you crazy traction on snow.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 4

Design masters.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 30, 2009

Rarely do you put snowshoes on in the parking lot and keep them on the entire time. If you plan to access backcountry, especially to ski, climb, or ride, you have to expect that these puppies will eventually go on your back. (see image) Therefore, weight and size in a snowshoe is also super important, beyond performance. On the flat stuff most snowshoes work pretty much the same. But with the Lightning MSR has created a fluff flotation device that climbs hills with ease, busts windcrust, spares posthole nightmares, and bites in on side-hill traversing slogs- all in a lightweight design.

Was this helpful? (4) (0)

Flag

How do the Lightning's and MSR shoes in general handle traversing

How do the Lightning's and MSR shoes in general handle traversing of hills? I've heard that MSR shoes don't pivot laterally, just fore and aft. If that's true are the Atlas' any better?

By:
October 31, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The MSR Lightning and Lightning Ascent snowshoes are designed to bite into the side of the hill when traversing. Because of the thin frame, you get much more penetration into the snow (even hard snow) than the tube of the Atlas snowshoes. Because of this, Atlas decided to allow their binding some movement. MSR felt that a more stable, solid pivot was important and to allow the snowshoe's frame to sink deeper into the snow.

One unique feature of the Lightning snowshoes is that the whole frame articulates allowing some movement to occur, kind of like a suspension for your snowshoes. This is far different from a standard tube-style snowshoe which doesn't flex at all. So, essentially, MSR has moved the flexing from the binding and pivot (no flex) to the frame (flex), unlike Atlas which engineered their snowshoes to allow the binding to flex but not the frame. I personally feel that it is a huge benefit that the binding and pivot are solidly set into the snowshoe without movement vs. it moving or flexing. This makes controlling the snowshoe much easier (i.e. side stepping, backing up, getting up after a fall, etc.).

Also worth mentioning is the incredible traction you get with the Lightning snowshoes when compared with any other snowshoe on the market. Because it mimics a cookie cutter when slicing into the snow, you simply don't slip. Rather than relying on a couple of sets of crampons riveted on to the bottom, the Lightning's frame acts as the crampon. Nothing compares! So for traversing a snowy slope and climbing up a steep hill, even in powder snow, there is not a better snowshoe on the market!

By:
November 1, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Grippy vertical gainers

By:
October 24, 2009

These are light, they have a heel elevator, they have mini steel crampons = they rock. I have the 30" I am 5'8" 155 lbs. Good float with a day pack on in dry fresh powder. The best thing about these is I barely notice they are there until the mountain gets steep and I flip up the televator and notice my friends are exerting themselves more for the same vertical gain. These really shine on icy hard pack and steep terrain. For flat land I'd get something cheaper.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I have never snowshoed before, but plan on starting this year

I have never snowshoed before, but plan on starting this year because i just moved to Montana. I don't really know what snow conditions i will be in but i assume that there will be some deeper powder, which seems to be the only issue with these shoes. Never been through a winter here so not sure what to expect here, i plan to be mostly in the Beartooth-Absaroka mts and Yellowstone. From all the reviews ive read, in any conditions other than deep powder, these shoes are unrivaled. For now, i only want one pair of shoes. Im 6 ft 3 in and 225 lb with out gear. Are the 30's the right shoes for me?

By:
October 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Thanks, i think ill get em.

By:
October 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm kind-of a big guy too and I've found the 30's to be the answer for me. In any condition you can only hope for maximum flotation from a snowshoe. I backpack too so I need to account for the weight of a winter-stuffed-backpack too.

By:
October 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Simplicity + Quality = Good Stuff

By:
February 20, 2009

These are good snowshoes (made in USA). Simple design, quality materials, light. The frame perform well on steep slopes and are versatile. You might have some concerns about the bindings that are somewhat archaic, but the are easy to use and i never had problems with, only make sure you have good boots (got the old version with only 2 front straps). The painting scales with use, but who care. Highly recommended. I'm 6" 155lbs and got 25".

Was this helpful? (6) (0)

Flag

I notice that the crampon on the Lightning Ascents has less teeth

I notice that the crampon on the Lightning Ascents has less teeth than that on the Denali Evo Ascents - does this translate into less traction whilst climbing? Would be grateful for some feedback to help to decide between these two shoes.

Also - in terms of performance, apart from the weight (and the price) what are the main differences between these two pairs of shoes?

By:
August 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Matthew,

There are a lot of differences between the Evo Ascents and the Lightning Ascents.

As far as traction: the Evo Ascent has the crampon under the front of the foot and rails down the sides. The Lightning Ascent has a crampon under the front of the foot, two side-to-side serrated pieces, and the entire frame is serrated. So no, the Lightning Ascent definitely does not have less traction.

In terms of differences:
The Evo Ascent has plastic decking. The Lightning Ascent has an aluminum frame and urethane decking.
The Evo Ascent has sold-separately tails that can be added for more float. The Lightning Ascent doesn't, so make sure you get the appropriate length for the conditions you're going to be using it in.
Basically, they're a completely different design.

The only similarities that come to mind are the binding system and the fact that they both have a "televator" system for climbing.

Hope that helps...if you need more info, feel free to ask about specifics. Check out the MSR website too (www.msrcorp.com). It has more detailed info and specs on the two models.

By:
September 2, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

why look at anything else???

By:
July 8, 2009

lightweight, unparalleled traction, simple binding system, tackle steep stuff easy, and extremely durable. Been using these for several years now. Had the 2 strap binding version before and switched to this one in '08. Love them! The 3 strap bindings are great because I can get a real custom fit and not strap my foot down o hard it flattens my arch. The bindings don't really hold any snow either which is a plus. I am 185lb and usually have a 30lb pack on-I have tried all three sizes and went with the 25". Mostly wear them in the Utah backcountry powder. 30" was better flotation obviously but wasn't worth the extra length on the tail.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Please help me choose. I'm 6'2" - 220-230 pounds

Please help me choose.
I'm 6'2" - 220-230 pounds with a pack.
I need snowshoes for mountaineering.
I'm trying to decide between the 30" Lightning Ascents or the Denali Evo Ascents with flotation tails. I have heard so many mixed feelings on these I was hoping to hear more for my exact needs. Thanks

By:
July 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Write your answer here...I have the denali evos with 6 inc tails and am of the same height and weight. They are great have used them in all conditions and abused them alot and they have preformed great ! hope this helps you

By:
October 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

makes me feel like a tank

By:
January 12, 2009

I'm not overly experienced with snowshoes... only other ones I used were a pair my dad made in boy scouts as a kid... but these things are great from my perspective. I took them up in the mountains after our last storm to try em out, and while it was not ideal snow (not especially deep and pretty unconsolidated), they worked great. I was motoring up steep hills to try out the heel lifters, climbing over felled trees, scampering along partially exposed boulders, and these shoes didn't falter once. they are not nearly as bulky as I expected, and they are amazingly light the serrated edges were rock solid with every step, I was never once worried about slipping. I took these well off what I would consider a trail, and I didn't even begin to push their potential. I can't wait to get these into some serious back country.

Was this helpful? (5) (0)

Flag

Will my standard Ski Boots Fit into the Bindings? Are they able

Will my standard Ski Boots Fit into the Bindings?

Are they able to Handle a 300 pound total man/gear load in a steep back county hill climb senerio?

By:
April 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I don't think a ski boot would be very comfortable. Although the bindings will work which is your question I am with the other reviewers-look at an AT set up. Hit the chat button and the BC gear heads can direct you to what you need.

By:
July 8, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I say get a touring setup also. Although these will "work" you will be miserable. At the 300# range, get the longest ones available. These are very high end snowshoes.

By:
May 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

These bindings are very versatile and will work with a ski boot no problem. But why? If you are packing skis, you might as well skin up. Invest in an AT or Tele setup instead, you will be much faster uphill and will exert less energy than with Snowshoes.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
April 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great, but not for the gals.

By:
January 2, 2009

These snow shoes are really well made, I was very happy with the quality. I actually bought these at another outfitter where their "gear expert" told me that the men's 25 would work for me since they were out of the women's 25... NOT SO! They were to wide for my stride, and I could not use the ascent feature because my foot is to small. Needless to say, I returned them and let that so-called expert know that he was quite mistaken. Nonetheless, my love was very happy with his. They were light and worked well for a 4 mile in fresh pow.

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

I've been using a pair of the Denali Evo's and they have

I've been using a pair of the Denali Evo's and they have been working great, however my buddy has some Lightning Ascents with the televator. I just ordered a pair and noticed that the front teeth under the toe are a lot smaller on the lightning vs the denali. I think this may make a big difference with traction when climbing steep sections, however, the 360deg traction frame on the lightning ascent is a plus also. Now I'm thinking about going with the Denali Evo Ascent. This would give me the televator, 2 long traction bars on either side, and I would maintain the large front teeth. Does anyone have any recommendations or personal preference on these features or shoes over the other?

By:
March 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Thanks! I think I will go with the Evo Ascents. The Evo's have been working well for the downhill, so I'll just add in the televator with the Ascent. Hopefully someday MSR will take this information and update their shoes to make the ULTIMATE shoe!!

By:
March 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Dude, you are in a bind. The large crampon teeth are crucial (evo ascent), but the 360 traction is big money when traveling down hill after a long climb. You are not going to get both unless you frankenstien two pairs of snowshoes to make the perfect pair. That being said, I would rather slip/glisade down that fight my way up with crappy crampons. Stick with the Evo Ascents and then you can add tails to them for deep snow or when you have a big pack on your back.

By:
March 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

MSR Lightning Ascents (25")

By:
July 8, 2009

Snow Cave - Above Alpine, UT

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 4

Ready for Duty in Alaska (Lrg)

By:
December 29, 2008

Took them out Christmas week to snowshoe Winner Creek trail in Girdwood, AK. This is a five mile round trip hike to the gorge and back. We did both on trail and off trail hiking. The snow shoes provided excellent traction on icy grades. Flotation suffers slightly due to the shoes being relatively narrow. Keep in mind that I am six feet plus and with my pack on I'm weighing in at about 215 pounds. I didn't hike anything steep enough that required me to use the ascent bar yet. I wouldn't trade them for another style unless I was doing all deep powder where I expect significant air pockets in the terrain. In my opinion, I don't think anything will help with air pockets. The other or standard style of snowshoes did have better flotation, but my wife was more prone to sliding down little hills where I step down the sides. The bindings are huge and I believe they can accommodate snowboard boots if I tried. My rank of 4 out of 5 is due to the compromise in flotation and the straps can be a little cumbersome to hook in. I would recommend these if you are expecting to traverse varying terrain.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I'm a 165 pound, 5'9" gal. I'm torn between

I'm a 165 pound, 5'9" gal. I'm torn between the Men's 25" Lightening Ascent Snowshoe and the Women's 25" Lightening Ascent. Any input on how much difference the Women's design makes? Have tried the Women's but not the Men's. thanks!!

By:
February 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

It all depends on where you find yourself snowshoeing. If you think you will be in powder consistently over 30" then I could see you going with the men's 25s. However I think you would be best served with women's shoe. When the development of the snowshoe was underway, Cascade Designs hired a doctor who's specialty was how women walked. What she discovered is that it was a mere inconvenience for men when it came to the width of the snowshoe, but anatomically uncomfortable for women. The most important attribute of a women's snowshoe, she discovered, was how narrow it was, allowing women to walk with their legs closer together. The MSR Women's Lightning and Lightning Ascent snowshoes are the narrowest on the market currently but still offer excellent float capabilities. They also offer the best traction of any snowshoe and are super durable. My recommendation would be the Women's Lightning Ascent 25s for you...

By:
February 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

An Ascential Snowshoe

By:
February 11, 2009

I love these snowshoes!!! They are bombproof... really well made. I use them on a daily basis from climbing the local mountain (2000ft in around two miles) and boarding down to romping around in deep fresh powder... They take me where I want to go in the winter and haven't let me down yet. Where my friends are using other shoes I'm leaving them in my dust (Or powder for that my matter). Highly recommend!

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

HI, I am a snowshoe virgin. I plan on buying some snowshoes for

HI, I am a snowshoe virgin. I plan on buying some snowshoes for ascent of my local mountain so I can board down. from 7,500' to 9,000. I'm 5'11 and 185 lbs. I want something packable for the descents. Any Help would be much appreciated.

By:
February 14, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

My brother uses these for the same thing. He has the 25" and is 5'10" about 180. With all his board gear the 25" do great. He packs them down on a Dakine Poacher pack. The televator heel lifter on the Lightning Ascents works very well for this. These are lighter than the Evo's especially since you may want to add the tails to the Evos.

By:
July 8, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

The perfect snowshoe for this is the MSR Evo Ascent. The reasons include the binding will accomodate the large snowboard boots, has a bigger opening in the front of the shoe so the top of the boot won't hit it while walking up, it has the 'Heel Raiser' feature which makes climbing tremendously less stressful on the legs, it packs flat, and it's nearly indestructable when hiking over rocks and dirt. It will also give you an amazing amount of traction and will respond to every movement of your foot. I personally don't know of a better backcountry snowboarding snowshoe currently.

By:
February 14, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Long walk in deep pow...

By:
January 14, 2009

Without these snowshoes this walk would be impossible.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Never had a better pair!

By:
January 9, 2009

I used my MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoes for the first time today. I climbed up the Wellsville Mountains in Northern Utah, I was totally surprised how well the shoes handled the steep terrain...I would recommend these shoes to anyone who values quality gear.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

22 or 25? I am a male, 6'0" and 160 lbs. I like to

22 or 25? I am a male, 6'0" and 160 lbs. I like to run the descents and on the flats. Terrain will vary some but for the majority of my trekking I'll be on the trail. Which size?

By:
January 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm about the same height and weight and I usually go with the 25s. The lightnings don't give you quite as much flotation as a regular snow shoe so I would go with 25s.If you are spending the majority of the time on the trail then I would go with the 22's. Plus if you are a runner then you really want the shorter/lighter shoe. Now if you go off trail you will sink more, but if you are spending 70% of the time on trail the 25's will not benefit you that much

By:
January 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Snow Flipper!

By:
January 2, 2009

These are great all-around snow shoes but will flip the snow up your back when in deep stuff and when trans versing hills. The ascent feature is nice for steeep grades but not necessary for most everyday use.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

If I weigh 215 naked , is that the wight I should go by when

If I weigh 215 naked , is that the wight I should go by when buying snowshoes? Should I definitly buy the 30 inch?

By:
January 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Buying snowshoes that are shorter than you might need is NOT like buying a sleeping bag. You can always line a bag, put it in a bivy sack, etc., to increase the temp. range, but you CANNOT add to a snowshoe that is too short or lacks flotation (MSR flotation tails are the exception). Unless you buy MSR plastic shoes, then you're stuck with the size you have.....and I know from experience it's no fun post-holing backcountry all damn day - it's tiring and slows everyone up. Can't go wrong with the MSR plastic shoes, but I've seen two pairs break - one of them mine!

By:
February 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

MSR Lightning Ascent @ Minerett Vista, Mammoth, CA

By:
January 14, 2009

Inyo National Forest, Mammoth, CA
9,265 feet elevation
4 feet fresh pow

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Best All Around Snowshoe

By:
December 31, 2008

I purchased a 22-inch pair (currently 160 lbs) after renting a number of different brands. Clearly the best I've tried. I have the first model out with 2 strap bindings and they are great. I can only imagine the 3 strap binding will be as good or better. On hard pack and there is nothing better this side of a crampon. In deep powder everything is a challenge and there is little difference between climbing on these and my powder tele skis - descending is a different story! If you enjoy snowshoeing, grab a pair. They will really add to your experience. Durable? - I'd take these things anywhere.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Write your question here...Do you sell any snow shoes equipped

Write your question here...Do you sell any snow shoes equipped with a step in binding?

By:
December 12, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The closest I know of to a step in binding is the TSL Snowshoes

By:
December 12, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

MSR Lightning 22

By:
April 6, 2009

I have been snowshoeing for more than four decades, beginning with wood and leather snowshoes, then aluminum tubular-frame snowshoes with a variety of deck materials and bindings. I recently bought some MSR Lightning 22” shoes (two-strap model without the Ascent heel support) and would like to report that they are by far the best snowshoes I have ever used.
I weigh 165 lbs., and by the time I’m outfitted with my day pack and gear the total weight is probably about 185 lbs. I live in Colorado and regularly hike a steep trail, usually untracked, and the snow can vary from a few inches deep to a few feet deep over the ~1500 foot climb. The Lightning snowshoes were extremely stable on flat areas, steep slopes (up, down and sideways), crusty snow, powder, packed, powder over crust, rocks, uneven slopes, tree roots, ice, you name it. With the vertical outer rim the Lightning shoes are so much less prone to slipping and sliding than the tubular-frame shoes, the difference is like night and day. They even were decent in deep snow, although the 25” model would have been better under those conditions, and 30” would be better yet for a large person with pack.
If a person were cruising in relatively flat terrain (5% grade or less) with deep snow and a heavy pack, a more conventional snowshoe would probably be as good a choice. Once the terrain and snow becomes more steep and varied, though, these snowshoes really shine.
I would recommend these snowshoes highly. The bindings are simple to use and secure. The 22” shoes are very light weight so they are barely noticeable when strapped to my pack. If I were in deep snow more frequently I would prefer the 25” model, but everything is a compromise and what would be gained in flotation with the longer shoes would be offset by less maneuverability and more weight (on your feet or on your pack). Plus, the short shoes also have the advantage that my dogs are less likely to step on the tails!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey im looking at the 25 inch model but does anyone know if these

Hey im looking at the 25 inch model but does anyone know if these will work with ski boots too?

By:
December 11, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I wish they had teh 25 inch also, I chatted with BC and they said they did not have any on order. Using snowshoes with ski boots sucks more than anything I can think of.

By:
December 13, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Ready for Duty

By:
February 11, 2009

Girdwood, AK (Winner Creek Trail)

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Work with big feet!

By:
December 29, 2008

30" of new champagne snow in the past two days here in NH. These floated just fine with 175 pounds on board. Just upgraded to these shoes after ten years of Tubbs. Binding is superior to Tubbs for anyone with big feet. I'm a size 14.5 and was surprised that my Koflach double boots worked at all with these snowshoes. In fact, they worked superbly! The three straps hold my big feet exactly where they need to be. Rotation is not hampered at all. Was expecting to need to cut the deck per MSR's instructions for people with big feet, but did not need to. The elevator is a nice touch. I've survived years without it, but I survived years without electric windows and air conditioning too. Now I have all three and will never give them up. Don't waste your money on other snow shoes -- buy these!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Write your question here.... do they work with snowboard boo

Write your question here.... do they work with snowboard boots?..

By:
December 9, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

These shoes will fit any size snowboard boots from women's size 4 to men's 14. Very versatile.I have put someone with a size 16 street shoe .and it had room to spare. Most snowboard boot will fit in this binding. I have seen some people have problems with size 14 SB boots that are really bulky. Like DC's or Vans.

By:
December 21, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

MSR Lightning Ascent = Bentley of Snowshoes

By:
March 5, 2009

Hands down, the best shoes Ive ever had in the snow. Incredibly light-weight design yet very stout in terms of grabbing on steep or packed terrain. Simple binding system with very stout straps. The icing on the cake for me is the heel bar. I frequent the same snowshoe area that has lots of buttes and hills and they are "leg-killers" with my Atlas 1025's (no heel bar and fewer crampons). With the MSR LA's, I absolutley flew up the hills that usually take quite a while. For other peoples reference, I am 5'8", 179 and I use the 25 inch version, primarily for backcountry outings with 25-30 lb loads. The 22" version is perfect for daily outings. Pricey they are, but worth it when youre out in the snow. If you can find them on sale, dont let them get away. Highly recommended.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Do they come in 25 inch...I didn't see it listed. Also I

Do they come in 25 inch...I didn't see it listed. Also I understand that the women's version is narrower? I didn't see that there was a men's or women's version?

By:
December 6, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Mike: I'm looking for a MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoe in the 25 inch size. It says your out..do you know if any more will be in soon?Brie: Hello MikeBrie: Let me check on that for you, just a moment pleaseBrie: we are not getting any more in, unfortunately.Mike: bummerMike: like forever? or just in the near future? Brie: for the time being atleast. we may be getting more in the new year but I can't guarantee that

By:
December 8, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Warm Spring

By:
February 12, 2009

My 3 year old son and I found this spring on a hike we went on with the MSR Lightning Ascents, even with the extra 35 lbs. they worked great

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 4

Not quite perfect

By:
August 1, 2009

Okay there are a lot of things that are great with these snowshoes. They are light, the traction is superb, the frame and deck are durable and stiff, easy to get on and off, narrow enough to walk like a normal human and the length is perfect for holding you up in the fresh pow pow of Utah's light snow. The bad, they rust if you don't dry them off, the straps don't stay under the hook device and the straps tend to snap after about 10-15 uses.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

will you get the 30's in green? or do they make them in

will you get the 30's in green? or do they make them in green?

By:
November 6, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The 30" are only available in orange.

By:
November 11, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Heel lift makes the difference

By:
February 4, 2008

Climbing on steep terrain, you can feel the big difference on the heel lift, much more grip than others.

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Snowshoe

By:
February 11, 2009

Jeff and Karen love these awesome snowshoe's. Never lost traction in Utah's steep backcountry! A must buy for anyone wanting to go out and not have any Issue with gear failure...

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

The best on the Market

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 15, 2008

Great construction, durable, frame and deck, better traction, and the highest ascent bar out there all combine to make these the best snowshoes on the market. Plus, they're made in the USA!

Was this helpful? (7) (2)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

No clodhoppers here...

By:
February 26, 2008

These were my purchase of choice after trying out several pairs...sweet. Light as a feather, grip like a bear paw, and not wide as a pontoon boat (I really hate stompin on my own feet). Not to mention they float pretty well in the deep stuff and climb. If you're lookin for a pair of shoes for the long haul, worth the extra investment.

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Stop post holing for turns!

By: Backcountry.com Alumni
May 5, 2008

These are so light, and they have a four way crampon for maximum traction. The step in on them will fit a snowboard boot easy. The straps are so easy to use. Most snowshoes make you feel awkward when you hike in deep snow in them, but not these, I could get a good pace going and not have to stop or worry about my feet. The climbing bars works great on the steeps. Great over all snowshoe.

Was this helpful? (1) (2)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

30" Lightning Ascent

By:
March 20, 2008

These snowshoes work great for what they were designed for. They will climb up steep slopes with ease giving you great protection from any slipping or sliding. However, these shoes are fer less than efficient in extremely deep powder. If there isn't a proper crust on the snow you are walking on they tend to sink. But overall I think that if you choose more carefully where you walk that can be worked around, as these shoes are unmatched for their ability to climb and slip resistance.

Was this helpful? (0) (5)

Flag

Change me.

Research out-of-stock versions:

Tech Specs:

Frame Material:
Aerospace-grade aluminum 
Crampon Material:
Hardened steel 
Deck Material:
Urethane 
Binding System:
3 Strap step-on 
Recommended Weight:
Less than 250lb 
Weight:
[22] 3lb 10oz (1644g); [25] 3lb 12oz (1701g); [30] 4lb 4oz (1928g) 
Recommended Use:
Hiking, backcountry trekking in show 
Manufacturer Warranty:
Lifetime 
Country of Origin:
United States 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: