Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Close This Window
Marker Duke Ski Binding - 2007

Marker Duke Ski Binding - 2007

Item #MRK0005|Out of Stock

2007 Model No Longer Available

But don't stress, we have the latest model in stock.

Marker Duke 16 Ski Binding >

Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List

Marker Duke Ski Binding - 2007

You could say the Marker Duke is an Alpine Touring binding, but if you’re being honest, it’s really an alpine binding that just happens to include touring capability for dipping out-of-bounds. It’s heavy, it only offers two hiking positions in tour mode, and to switch from touring to riding, you actually have to take your ski off, flip the locking lever under the boot, then put your ski back on. But here’s the upshot: the Duke is as tough and responsive as any alpine clamp, it has a higher DIN than any other AT binding, and it’s designed specifically for expert skiers who go big, need high retention, and demand a setup that can withstand true double-duty resort and backcountry use.

  • Locking system totally guarantees against ski-to-tour-mode switching.
  • Connection brackets mount to the ski directly to increase power without ruining flex
  • Wide mount points facilitate power transfer on modern big-mountain skis
  • Adjustable toe height gives you an incredibly solid connection with your boot.
  • In tour mode, the binding moves backward 30mm for greater efficiency
  • 6 and 12 degree climbing modes

Bottom Line: The Duke puts the Alpine in Alpine Touring.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 4

An Alpine Binding you can tour with

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
February 3, 2009

I got a pair of Marker Dukes for resort skiing and kite skiing as I wanted a binding that I could ski bumps with, use with any boot (alpine, AT, whatever) and had excellent release characteristics in all situations. I dont really plan on touring with them as they are quite a bit heavier than Dynafits, but I like the idea that if I had to tour, I could. For instance if I skied out of bounds at a resort and had to do a short tour back, or if the wind died while kiting and I had to get back to the car the Dukes would be WAY better than walking.

For kiting and resort skiing, being able to step into the binding is a big plus and the Marker Duke does that very well. It also has excellent return-to-center abilities, which is nice for chattery conditions.

They are fairly easy to do a home-mount with, although the instructions are geared more for a shop mount and require some reading between the lines.

The swap-over method from skiing to touring is a bit janky (have to remove your ski), but not that big a deal, especially considering the beef of the binding.

Was this helpful? (7) (0)

Flag

I have a pair of marker duke bindings. I am looking for a good

I have a pair of marker duke bindings. I am looking for a good powder ski (Mid to fat) that I can mount them on. Do you have any suggestions?

By:
October 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Volkl Gotamas.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 26, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Almost Perfect.

By:
November 7, 2007

Just Used these bindings A couple of days ago(11-3-07) in the AK backcountry. They worked great on the way up, and down. way more solid than the freerides. never noticed the weight. only complaint I have is they are a pain to put into alpine mode(locked) from the touring mode(unlocked) It took me forever once, and then no time at all one time as well. They get snow caught in them. And I wasn't in that much snow at all. I still like them better than the freerides though. OH, I've got them mounted on dynastar pro rider legends. 186.. love those things too.

Was this helpful? (82) (0)

Flag

I just got the Bluehouse Mavens, which are 139 underfoot. Is

I just got the Bluehouse Mavens, which are 139 underfoot. Is bending the marker 130 brake out to fit a 139 fairly do-able?

By:
July 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

they will probably fit without bending them.

By:
November 11, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Bomber

By:
July 20, 2009

The only negative which has been said plenty is the weight but these things are very high quality. Not always the easiest to get hooked up in steeps but when you are coming down they are simply the best. I take this same mentality when biking. I am okay if it takes a little longer to get up if I have the added reliability when charging, and these things definitely give me that. I have dropped cliffs in the 20 to 50 foot range on these and they have held up. Absolutely love them. They work best for sidecountry... for long tours get a different setup.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Looking for tips on a home mount for the marker duke using the

Looking for tips on a home mount for the marker duke using the paper sticker jig?

By:
July 1, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Best tip I have for you is if you are not qualified, take it to a shop. Sorry if it doesn't seem helpful, but this is how guys blow out their bindings and potentially wreck their skis.

By:
July 1, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Marker Duke help subdue winterlust

By:
July 12, 2009

Marker Dukes look very nice in their box on the shelf in my closet. When it gets too hot I open the box, turn on the fan, and look at them to help get me through the summer. It is July and I bought them in June, and all the snow melted VERY early this year. I hope they live up to their hype after all the winter-lust.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Size small duke and a size 27.5 garmont endorphin boot will they

Size small duke and a size 27.5 garmont endorphin boot will they fit? Im unsure of the exact boot length of the 27.5

By:
June 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm pretty sure that the sole length is 306mm on the 27.5 Endorphin, so you can definitely grab the small Dukes.

By:
June 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

holding firm

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
November 11, 2009

For me, its all about the ride down. The dukes help me feel safe, no matter the terrain. If you need a touring binding and don't want to compromise your safety for the ride down, get the dukes.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Adequate uphill / Excellent downhill

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
November 4, 2008

I toured roughly 120+ miles in the Duke last year and have been very pleased so far. This was my first touring binding, so I can't compare to others unfortunately. Throughout the long season, I didn't experience any durability or mechanical issues with the Duke. Some have criticized its uphill performance, but I've done 8-10 mile trips without much trouble. Sure there are lighter options out there, but very few will match the downhill performance which will be great for those looking to get into the sidecountry as well as short backcountry trips with the desire to have a more bomber binding.

Was this helpful? (10) (0)

Flag

Hi there.... I want to put this bindings to a pair of Scratch

Hi there....

I want to put this bindings to a pair of Scratch BC 2004 1.82m will they fit ok?

thanks...

By:
June 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yeah they should fit just fine. The Duke have a brake that will fit anything up to a 110mm waist, and take any length ski.

By:
June 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Bomber

By:
November 17, 2008

Great side-country bindings. Super bomber alpine bindings with the option to release the heal. Ignore the reviews stating that they are a hassle as you have to remove your skis to switch from ski to tour mode as you have to with
AT specific bindings such as Dynafit too. Also, have you ever tried to put your skins on without removing your skis? Slightly finicky going from tour to ski as you have to ensure that the binding is clear of snow and interfacing correctly with the base plate however not a deal breaker.
A bit heavy and the incompatibility to accept non DIN type boot soles make these not great for an AT specific setup for me but make a perfect down hill setup with the ability to hike off the resort.

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

Flag

Haven't decided between this and the Black Diamond Fritschi

Haven't decided between this and the Black Diamond Fritschi Diamir Freeride Plus Binding. Any recs?

By:
May 31, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Get these. The freerides are not even close, if you want to do long tours look into Naxo's. These are the choice for steep sidecountry!

By:
July 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you ski aggressively, buy the Dukes. The Freerides are lighter, but have a tendency to prerelease when skied hard. Additionally, I've seen a couple of cases of components breaking on the Freerides. Now, if all you're using the bindings for is touring, and you have another pair of skis for resort days, the Freerides are a great choice, but if you plan on using the skis for resort skiing a fair bit, or for really aggro touring runs, the Dukes are bomber.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
June 1, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Better workout

By:
November 21, 2008

If you are looking for the ultralight setup or a Dynafit person, this is not your binding. But, for most these are the perfect all in one binding. I use them on a Mantra and they are great for touring, but you give up nothing in resort. Unlike a Freeride where you feel high and wobbly, this instills complete confidence on the way down. It is easy to kick off skins with other setups, so losing that ability will cost you a few minutes in the transition (having to take the ski off), but the run down is so much better. If they are a heavier binding - well think of it as a better workout!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I need a pair of bindings for my K2 Hellbents for a touring set

I need a pair of bindings for my K2 Hellbents for a touring set up. How will these perform on my K2's? any info would be appreciated.

By:
May 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

They are the most solid AT binding you can get when it comes to charging. They are a little on the heavy side, and the hellbents are as well, so I wouldn't plan on touring for more than a few hours. More like backcountry/sidecountry jolts. And you have to take them off to get into touring mode. Another downside, but other than that they are great!

By:
May 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Bomber touring/resort binding

By:
December 29, 2008

If you are looking for a binding to use inbounds and out, you couldn't ask for a better binding than these. Bomber bindings! Weigh about as much as any high din alpine binding, but you can tour with these. Tour mode is super easy to switch in and out of. Some people complain that you have to take your ski off to switch modes, but this a moot point. A) You don't have to worry about accidentally switching into tour mode. B) You have to take your skis off to get your skins off, and to test the snow anyway. These bindings ski way better than other touring bindings, and with the exception of dynafits, the touring mode on these is on par with other touring bindings. Very rigid and stable bindings. They feel very solid undefoot. Couldn't be happier.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I want to put the Duke on my 08 Big Daddys (125mm under boot)

I want to put the Duke on my 08 Big Daddys (125mm under boot) are there brakes available?

By:
May 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Marker does sell brakes for up to 130mm skis.

http://www.backcountry.com/store/MRK0016/Marker-Duke-Jester-132mm-Brake.html

By:
May 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

SICK FOR SHREDDIN' SOME KNAR!!!!!!!

By:
January 16, 2008

I got these bindings in November and have used them for both front and backside skiing. I have them mounted on K2 Mt. Bakers. I will say that they are just about the ulimate for someone who doesn't mind carting a little extra weight up a hill, to get a bombing ride down. I used them to skin up some steep inclines for several hours with no problems. My only complaint is that you have to unclip to free the heel. This is a bit of a pain in deep powder, but not a huge difficulty. All in all I have to say they are about the perfect set-up for my style of skiing; frontside mixed with short tours and back country descents.

Was this helpful? (5) (0)

Flag

I am looking to get a Pair of Armada JJ and was thinking of getting

I am looking to get a Pair of Armada JJ and was thinking of getting the Duke but I was told that sense the Duke is on a rail it will change the way that the JJ skis. I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on this?

By:
April 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The rail really isn't that noticeable in the sense that it disrupts the flex pattern. It will though, because it is mounted as a plate against the ski. I see no reason as to why you wouldn't buy these, as they won't change how the JJs ski.

By:
April 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Adequate for the job

By:
January 8, 2008

These bindings are great for going down but the freeride definitely wins on the uphill.The Duke's heel lift has two settings. Both settings are short and the biggest one is at least 2 inches shorter than the freerides heel lift. The short heel lift makes it hard to hike on steep AT trails because you have to lift your heel that much more each time thus making you tired from keeping up with all the Fritschi riders. Also you have to take your skis off to lock the bindings down which means more time and more energy. Bottom Line-The Dukes are for the skier who hikes once a month. If your not that guy/girl get the freerides!

Was this helpful? (11) (7)

Flag

I ski a 312mm shell alpine boot (27.5 mondo)...large or small

I ski a 312mm shell alpine boot (27.5 mondo)...large or small Duke?

By:
April 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I had the same problem. I'm a 316mm boot with Scott Punisher 191's so I figured if I ever try and sell them later on it will be easier to sell a bigger ski like that with large bindings. I plan on running them into the ground but just in case I do need to get rid of them I opted for the slightly heavier larger bindings. You might consider that if it is possibly an issue.

By:
July 2, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Go for the small the smaller size will be lighter and the small fits a boot up to 320mm

By:
May 2, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Definitely go with a small. I ski a 314mm BSL (27.5 mondo) in a small and I know other people who have been on this same grey area in between sizes that have gone large and broken thier Dukes on big landings. The small can also go all the way up to around 325mm BSL.

By:
April 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm gonna say the large will give you more binding adjustment capability.

By:
April 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Solid performer

By:
January 12, 2009

The duke does what it is meant to do, provide a solid platform for off-piste skiing and allow some AT performance. This is not a weight shaving all day touring binding. If you're taking lifts to the top and then making long traverses to reach chutes, it's a great binding. A friend and I went off-piste and took these off some big drops. His traditional alpine bindings kept blowing up on hard impacts; even with my dins set low, the markers held on and gave a solid platform. The extra height, because of the AT design, actually helped with carving by acting like a riser plate. I skied these bindings hard on and off-piste for 5 days and never had a problem... always lift serve though. I used them just to make long traverses.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

If I currently have Jesters mounted, can I put the dukes on by

If I currently have Jesters mounted, can I put the dukes on by drilling the extra two holes? In other words, do the other holes line up (minus the extra two)?

By:
April 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Personally, I will always recommend taking it to a local shop that can do this for you, because then you have a guaranteed set-up that you won't have to worry about.

By:
April 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

perfect for slack country

By:
December 15, 2008

these bindings are solid. they are perfect if your looking to ski slack country and short day tours, absolutely indestructible. if your planning on longer tours i'd step up to dynafits

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Does the Duke have the same mounting points as the Jester?

Does the Duke have the same mounting points as the Jester?

By:
April 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

No they are different. The Duke and Baron have additional mounting points for the pivoting plate and the rear clamping plate.

By:
April 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

oh yea

By:
December 1, 2008

the only thing i dont like is the climbing wire need to be larger on both settings

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have an alpine boot with 315mm sole length. Which is better

I have an alpine boot with 315mm sole length. Which is better size for duke binding, small accepting up to 320 or large accepting down to 305?

By:
April 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Definitely go with a small. I'm a 314 mm sole length and I ski the Duke in a small. The small can go up to around 325 mm and I know people in this same grey area who have gone with a large and broken thier Dukes on big landings and switched to smalls and had no problems.

By:
April 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

It is better to have more play in the sizing, so I would say the large gives you more of that room.

By:
April 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

good clampers

By:
December 1, 2008

i love these bindings. i was fortunate enough to ski a volkl sumo mounted with a Jester, and then re-mount a Duke on it. I barely noticed a difference on the ride down, if anything the extra millimeters in height difference gave me more leverage to flip the 125mm waist of my skis edge to edge. i'd recommend them to anyone. i ski 60/40 resort/backcountry in montana.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Will the Marker Duke work with Scarpa Skookum?

Will the Marker Duke work with Scarpa Skookum?

By:
April 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

It will work no problem.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
April 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes, this will work with any AT or Alpine boot.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
April 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Bomber!!!

By:
November 21, 2008

Been a Marker hater for years, but these bindings came out and I had to give em a try. This is my second pair I have ordered and that is because they are awesome. This is a burly binder that will allow you to rally inbounds but head to the slack-country and smaller back-country tours. If you are a hard core BC guy prolly stick with something light, but I do ride the chair a lot and these will keep you locked down when gettin after it inbounds.
On a side note I am actually gettin a set of Jesters for my everyday resort ski switching from salomon 914, they are lighter and have a higher DIN than the salomon.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I've got a pair of Fritschi Free Rides on my Havocs and am

I've got a pair of Fritschi Free Rides on my Havocs and am now looking at buying a pair of Armada JJs. Would you suggest the Duke or another Free Ride? Thanks!

By:
April 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Get a tele binding and free the heel for real!

By:
April 11, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (3)

Flag

Definitely the Duke. The Freerides are good bindings and all, but the little bit of weight you save with them doesn't compare to the downhill performance of the Dukes. With JJs, the downhill is the main part of touring I am assuming, so the Dukes definitely win out.

By:
April 11, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

FANTASTIC BINDING

By:
January 9, 2008

The most solid binding I've ever had mounted- Holds you in tighter than, well, you get the point. An added bonus from the free heal mode in comparison to the Jester is the added height that it provides, making it easier to lay out fatty carver turns on wide skis. only downfall is the weight, which on the positive side you definitely don't notice while skiing down, however you will notice a bit when they are on your shoulder, however id say thats a fare price to pay for the best bindings no question about it.

Was this helpful? (3) (1)

Flag

I definetly do more inbounds then out bounds would these be fine

I definetly do more inbounds then out bounds would these be fine for every day skiing and would the brakes fit over my skis there 95 at the foot

By:
March 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Dynafits are way better Unless you cant afford new boots I have over 200 days on my current pair with zero problems. While i dont jump cliffs over twenty feet (how many people really do) i do ski hard pack, ice, bumps, and powder. Why buy the heaviest, most cumbersome binding out there.

By:
May 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

These would be a great option. They are heavier than other AT bindings, but since you will be inbounds most of the time they will be great. Since they are heavier/burlier, they will hold up well to inbounds skiing. The lower profile is great for inbounds as well. The brake will fit over your skis (i have BD Kilowatts, 95mm) with the 110mm brake arms.

By:
March 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 1

dukes suck

By:
May 3, 2009

If you want the heaviest and most cumbersome binding go ahead. If your never gonna huck a cliff over 50 feet which 99.9% of you never will, buy a pair of dynafits which are lighter and better and probably will allow you to get more runs in a day which is the point after all. Also they now make some pretty burly boots to match(Garmont)

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

How would these work on Bentchetlers as opposed to Barons? I

How would these work on Bentchetlers as opposed to Barons? I want to be able to tour but if the barons are a lot heavier than griffons i just might get a dakine backpack and lug my skis like that. What is the weight difference between griffons and barons? oh and can you ski park/switch on barons or would it be really weird?

By:
March 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yo! You'd add about a pound to the binding weight by going with the Baron. They are heavy for a touring kit, but if you want the higher-DIN, it's worth it. Definitely easier than bootpacking! Skiing switch doesn't feel weird at all. I have a pair on my JJs and cruise just the same. Pick em up!

By: Backcountry.com Employee
March 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great Backcountry Binding

By:
February 20, 2008

Loved the Marker with my Black Diamond Havocs. Great going up, lift at medium with the Black Diamond skins will go up a wall. Deep powder and crud felt like a great downhill binding. Ditto on the change over, not fun to get the snow out of the back of binding with the wind blowing at 40-50 above the tree line. But once done, well worth the cold hands...

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

I am new to AT gear. My typical day will be ridding a lift,

I am new to AT gear. My typical day will be ridding a lift, and then touring out to a spot to get fresh shots, and ending up on the lift again. So probably more Alpine than touring. So I'm not too concerned about weight. Is the Marker Duke better for me than the Dyna?

By:
March 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Joe If you can also afford new boots buy dynafits.They actually have the best boot to ski interface of any binding alpine or touring. So again why buy the heaviest most cumbersome binding out there.

By:
May 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I would say yes! The Duke skis more like a traditional binding. It is also easy to use and doesn't require a dyna-fit compatible boot.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
March 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Iron Vise for your Feet

By:
May 3, 2009

I really love these bindings. After the proper adjustments i have never released when I shouldn't have. they are great all around, in bounds and out. The only flaw I could possibly point out is their weight compared to other
AT bindings.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Looking to buy a Volkle Mantra 184cm. do you have Marker Jesters

Looking to buy a Volkle Mantra 184cm. do you have Marker Jesters or another suggestion?

By:
March 15, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Iron Vise for your Feet

By:
May 3, 2009

I really love these bindings. After the proper adjustments i have never released when I shouldn't have. they are great all around, in bounds and out. The only flaw I could possibly point out is their weight compared to other
AT bindings.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

i have skis that are 103 underfoot, will the breaks fit? and

i have skis that are 103 underfoot, will the breaks fit? and i have a boot sole length of 305, would the small bindings be best?

By:
March 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes the brakes will fit and the small would be best for you.

By:
March 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Marker Redeems Themselves

By:
February 26, 2009

Amazingly solid AT! These ski as well if not better than many binders that I've used in the past. While I wouldn't suggest long tours on these, slack country and short tours to lines that demand a solid platform are where these bindings shine. Marker while they've received a bad rap in the past has completely redeemed themselves. Salomon better wake up cause the Duke and Jester are here. Pick these up if you want a solid AT setup that skis like an alpine binding if not better. You won't be disappointed.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

My Rossignol skis have a 70 waist, will the Dukes fit on these

My Rossignol skis have a 70 waist, will the Dukes fit on these skis or are the bindings too wide for my skis?

By:
March 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

why do you need a touring binding on a ski thats 70 underfoot

By:
March 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

The Dukes/Barons and Jester/Griffons are designed for a minimum ski width of 76mm.

By:
March 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great AT binding but you need to be weight conscious

By:
January 4, 2009

If you are an aggressive skier and are looking for a stronger and higher din AT binding, this your binding. Had a pair of freerides for six years and loved them except for the plastic components and low din. The Duke seemed like the best upgrade, but they are definitely heavier and more of a pain to switch to touring mode. Make sure you put them on a lightweight ski or you will be running too heavy for a good tour in my opinion. Also, be careful of ice build up underneath the boot as it can make switching to the touring mode a pain. Other than weight or switching to touring mode, this is a great AT binding with the enough strength to ski it aggressively in or out of bounds.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Will a regular downhill boot, for example (Nordica speed machine

Will a regular downhill boot, for example (Nordica speed machine 10), work with the Marker Duke binding?

By:
February 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes.

By:
February 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

So F'ing Good

By:
November 13, 2008

Prior to the Duke, the 916 was the undisputed "king of bindings" but now the tide has changed. I've got the Duke's on my 07/08 Seths and they work awesome for everything. I ski the resort about 50 days a year and toured in them about 10 days last year. They are perfect for what I do. I can't imagine skiing any other AT binding (until Salomon comes out with theirs...if that ever happens).

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Do you have to use AT boots with AT bindings or can you get away

Do you have to use AT boots with AT bindings or can you get away with regular alpine boots if your not picky

By:
February 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

You can use regular alpine boots. AT boots are usually lighter for hiking, but sacrifice some stiffness and aggressiveness.

By:
February 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Just what I needed

By:
November 13, 2008

I ski 50 days at the resort and resort and in resort sidecountry. Last year was my first year going AT. Went about 10 times. I prefered these on 07/08 K2 Seth's over my 06/07 Volkl Gotamas with Salomon 916s in every condition. If you care about weight I would disregard my review. If you're a 916 loyalist like myself...give these a try!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Why won't My Marker Duke bindings release?. I have been running

Why won't My Marker Duke bindings release?. I have been running Marker Dukes with Scarpa Denali AT boots for a few months but they will not release. I dropped the Din to 6 from my usual 8 to test them with no luck. The boot also takes lots of force to lock into the binding. I just blew my ACL on my last backcountry trip because of this problem. Any suggestions out there?

By:
February 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

so is shaving the boot the only real option for making this boot/binding combination more compatible?

By:
April 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I to have the same problem (not toe release), same bindings and same boots. With the front plate wide open (to prove the point) and with a big gap the toe will still not release (DIN=8). IMHO... The binding design drives the whole boot forward when you clip in, with such force that the boot tip is driven into the binding toe. The friction between the boot tip and binding toe stops it releasing. My binding toe wings barely touch the boot toe. I plan to shave the front of my boots so the wings hold the boot in and not the boot tip. take a close look at yours. Any feedback?

By:
March 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Check the toe height on the binding...if the toe of the binding is coming down on the boot too much, then your rubber sole will definitely NOT be able to release because of too much friction

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
February 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Touring riser issues

By:
January 4, 2009

An issue that has been raised by friends who have put a season on the dukes is the metal riser in the back for touring. After a lot of use, the riser on some of the bindings would slip out of the groove that locks it in. It looked like the metal riser had worn out that groove after a lot of use. Don't know if this is a common issue or not and if Marker is aware of it.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have a pair of Head world cup boots size 307mm should I get

I have a pair of Head world cup boots size 307mm should I get the small or large marker duke's ski binding

By:
February 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Grab the smalls. You'd rather be in the middle of any sizes and settings than near the ends.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
February 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Really Pleased

By:
March 5, 2009

Pretty much as everyone has said, super bomber in ski mode really smooth in touring mode. They are heavy and a little tough to get back into ski mode after a long tour but very very happy with them. Definitely a a stout alpine binding with touring capabilities.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

My boot size is 27.5 / 315mm. Should I get the large or the

My boot size is 27.5 / 315mm. Should I get the large or the small bindings?

By:
February 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

get the large 305 to 370 if you get bigger boots like the gramont shaman 327 sole length in your size the small wont go that big then you will be angry

By:
February 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Marker Redemption

By:
April 1, 2009

Went away from Marker for years because of poor product/quality issues. The Dukes have permanently changed my opinion. Used 25 plus times this year so far in Utah, Oregon, and Chamonix. A/T setting is perfect for short treks, but I probably would want something lighter for all day stints. Yes they're heavy, especially on Gotama 190s, but they are a solid binder with no flaws other than weight. Best suited for your 75/25 inbounds vs. out of bounds skier.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Does anyone know of any NTN boots that will work with the Duke/Baron

Does anyone know of any NTN boots that will work with the Duke/Baron setup as well?

By:
February 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Nope, the Baron and Duke aren't tele bindings, and you can't use NTN boots (or any kind of tele boots) in them.---------------The only AT bindings the NTN boots will fit in are Dynafits.(You can jam 'em in but I guarantee a pre release when the sole bends - I know I have tried)----------------Both the Crispi EVO and Shiver reportedly work with the Duke/Barons.

By:
March 2, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

it you like going down....

By:
November 13, 2008

These are the only touring bindings that I have tried that instilled enough confidence in me to replace my trekers. I hate to come out of my skis and these hold on better than any other AT bindings. I use them with a Alpine boots.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

will a t1 tele boot fit in amarker duke binding

will a t1 tele boot fit in amarker duke binding

By:
February 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

nope, this won't work and you could hurt yourself.

By:
February 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

Not so BADASS

By:
May 13, 2009

I have the Dukes on Volkl Mantras and they worked fine for half the season, then the toe piece broke. I was skiing East Vail and fell which caused my skis to cross and broke the plastic that holds the AFD in place. It took Marker 10 weeks to send out a new pair and by that time Colorado snow was melting. I would be cautious if you are hard on your equipment like I am.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

can you use a tele boot on the marker duke

can you use a tele boot on the marker duke

By:
February 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Nope,

By:
February 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

Not so BADASS

By:
May 13, 2009

I have the Dukes on Volkl Mantras and they worked fine for half the season, then the toe piece broke. I was skiing East Vail and fell which caused my skis to cross and broke the plastic that holds the AFD in place. It took Marker 10 weeks to send out a new pair and by that time Colorado snow was melting. I would be cautious if you are hard on your equipment like I am.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Looking for compatible crampons for the Marker Duke binding with

Looking for compatible crampons for the Marker Duke binding with Scott P4's... any thoughts?

By:
February 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Ya, Marker sells a crampon made specifically for the Duke and Baron.

By:
February 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

heel lifter needs work

By:
January 29, 2008

I like the bomber pro on this, but the heel lift needs more options as I find my buds in freerides continuing up the fall line as I struggle for traction. Also, they are difficult for the user to adjust between the low and high lifter once in the binding. Also very heavy...so a side-country binding, not a back-country binding. However, for the first year from marker, I have hope for future year improvements. If for sidecountry/in bounds skiing...they get a 3.5 star. If for this site ...they get a 1 star.

Was this helpful? (4) (5)

Flag

Looking at the specs it looks like the weight difference between

Looking at the specs it looks like the weight difference between the duke and baron is 238 grams. Is that accurate?

By:
January 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

You looked at both, did the math, and still had to ask?

By:
January 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Holy Grail, (for some).

By:
May 29, 2009

If you want bomber retention with tour-ability, look no further. I wouldn't want to do the Haute Route with these, but if you're accessing the side country from your resort, the Dukes are the ticket. I've been using these for 2 seasons now and not 1 problem. They work great with either my alpine or AT boots. Make sure you get the right size for your boots as the Dukes, unlike the Barons, come in 3 sizes. The only drag is the need to take off your skis to change to touring mode and back. Would buy them again in a heartbeat. Cheers.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I've got a pair of 25.5 Salomon Gun's Boots it says the

I've got a pair of 25.5 Salomon Gun's Boots it says the sizing goes from 26.5 - 320, I take it I can't use these boots with these bindings?

By:
January 18, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

These bindings will work with your boots no problem. Just go with the "Smalls".

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

diesel bindings

By:
April 30, 2009

i just mounted these on my k2 shuksan at skis. so far so good. theres not discernible difference between these and a true alpine binding. i only weigh 175 but for some reason popped out of them with the din at 10 so i bumped them up to 12. so far so good. the overall construction of the thing seems totally bombproof. i've broke a bunch of pairs of bindings but these are holding up so far.

the heel release is a bit clunky to use. there are two climbing positions however the low angle one is so low that i never user it. i might have preferred a higher angle, however thats getting into the territory where you skins will no longer adhere to the show, i think.

they're the the heaviest thing on the market, but it hasn't stopped me from hauling like 50 pounds uphill, and my k2s are light enough that it hasn't been a problem yet. i haven't done any lengthy multi day tours yet, so take that with a grain of salt.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Considering mounting these to a funshape like a JJ (if I can

Considering mounting these to a funshape like a JJ (if I can get it) or an ARG for BC booterage/cliff dropping/short tours. I'm 5'10 160, and my friends call me Ragdoll for blowing up a lot out of my looks (set at 12). Am I retarded for pairing it with those type of skis/will these work for me?

By:
January 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

i would not put this on an ARG, think about how much base contact an ARG has with the snow, with its reverse sidecut, reverse camber profile, then think about how bad it would suck trying to skin uphill with only a small portion of your base touching the snow, where as most people have full tip to tail contact. The JJ would be a pretty decent idea though, not as good as a regular camber ski, but i can imagine the ride down being totally worth it, and its pretty light, that it could work pretty well, you still wont have full tip to tail contact since it is rockered, but it would be way better than the ARG.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

I will ski anything on these bindings!

By:
March 18, 2009

I love these bindings for touring. They are sturdy and great to skin with. Unlike other AT bindings I feel comfortable skiing all terrain on them. I've got a lot of mileage on them and have had no problems!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm thinking of getting a pair of these to mount on some

I'm thinking of getting a pair of these to mount on some 165cm Dynastar Legend 8000s. Found em on craigslist for $300. I've never done any touring, but would like to. Initially I'll be doing primarily lift serve, but eventually will be doing short tours, & some backcountry off the lifts at smuggs & Jay peak in Vermont. Also initially w/ my regular alpine boots but eventually will get AT bootsMe? 190 5'10"Wondering if I'm going to be sacrificing any downhill performance with these compared to regular alpine bindings... They would be used primarily inbounds. Should just wait & get a true back country setup rather then mounting these to the Dynastar legends...?Any advice most welcome, THX!

By:
January 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This binding was made for you! it is a true sidecountry, light backcountry binding, also you are not sacrificing anything, it is one of the burliest bindings on the market. if your backcountry endevors grow you may eventualy switch to a true AT binding like a freeride or dynafit these would be lighter and built more for long tours. and 300 bucks is a good deal. enjoy and ski safe. remember if you are going in the backcountry you will need ALL the tools - (beacon, probe, shovel, skins for the skis, a buddy, and most of all knowledge of the snow.) Or just skins cause its Vermont!!

By:
January 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Back to Marker

By:
January 27, 2009

I just got these mounted up and put one day on them, so far so good. I was a marker hating solomon guy, but after a day of 3" of dust on top of boiler plate at the resort these may convert me. They're solid underfoot, and feel substantial when you step in. I haven't climbed in them yet, but my flat land trial was great. My only concern is the amount of plastic, I may be too much of a racer still, but a metal frame would have gone a long way toward piece of mind for my 220 lbs.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Does anyone have a pdf or other documentation on these and the

Does anyone have a pdf or other documentation on these and the setup. AFD setup, forward pressure, etc. I've been using some Fischer equip, and they were nice enough to give me a link to the actual tech sheets. Marker will not do that, they will only send it to dealers. I need to adjust for my boot size (335mm), and then Forward Pressure and AFD height. DIN I'll play with from 8.25-up as needed.Thanks

By:
January 7, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Work In Progress

By:
April 24, 2009

If you only (or mostly) consider the downhill aspect, the Duke (and I'm assuming the Baron as well) easily beats the Fritschi Freerides. I swapped out my Freerides with Dukes on a pair of skis and the improvement in control and power transmission was huge.

However, if taking into account the touring part, things get more mixed. In addition to having to take off your skis when going from touring to skiing (and back), the Duke's risers are much more limited and finicky to adjust vs. Freedrides. Also, as others have mentioned, there's a tendency for ice to build up in the Dukes making it hard to convert from touring to ski mode. I once accidentally bent the (somewhat wimpy) metal piece that slides the binding between settings. Got a warranty replacement but now I always use my poletip (or some other tool) to scrape out any snow/ice that hinders free movement.

Also, I can second that you'll need to increase your DIN by 1 or 2. Don't know why but these bindings release easier than standard alpine bindings.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Considering a pair of Megawatts with Dukes for mostly IB but

Considering a pair of Megawatts with Dukes for mostly IB but some slackcountry. First question: Marker indicates 110 mm brake while Meagawatt is 120 at thge waist. Can these be used together? Second question: Can Scarpa Spirit 3 be used with this binding?

By:
December 24, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

They will not fit around the waist of the ski as is. You can attempt to bend the brakes if you would like, or you could purchase a pair of wider brakes (they come 132mm). Scarpa's product description says they "are compatible with all AT bindings" so...that setup will be heavy as all hell. unless you only want to do short stints into the sidecountry, that setup will kill you

By:
March 2, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

bomber

By:
January 13, 2009

these things rip, torsionally stiffer than a lot of alpine binders I've skied.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm 5'10", 195 lbs and an aggressive skier. Should

I'm 5'10", 195 lbs and an aggressive skier. Should I go with the Duke or the Baron?

By:
December 13, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

It all depends what you normally have your alpine DIN set to. If it's set under 10, I would go with the Baron. If your DIN is usually set at 10 or higher, then I would buy the Duke.I agree with this answer. I am 185 and aggressive and the Baron's have been awesome this season for me.

By:
February 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Solid

By:
February 25, 2009

Great bindings. Bought these mostly for charging woods with some occasional touring and I have them mounted on a pair of Katanas. Im 6'3 220lbs, ski agressively and have the DINs cranked up to 14. There is a fair amount of plastic in the Dukes, which had me nervous at first, but so far so good as far as holding up. I haven't released at all and the bindings have a good, solid feel when skiing hard and landing drops. No complaints either when having to ski groomers with them. Only toured in them a couple times and no complaints there either. Did have a little of the ice build up mentioned by others, but nothing that bothered me too much. All it all, a great downhill binding that is totally sufficient for some light tours.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

does this binding match up with the frichie free ride?

does this binding match up with the frichie free ride?

By:
December 12, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Duke is better for skiing performance, worse for climbing performance. If you do short tours from the lift, duke is great. if you mostly do backcountry tours, the freeride might be a better option, depending on several other factors of course

By:
December 13, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great for touring!

By:
May 10, 2009

I used these on a 15 day backcountry trip this past winter on a pair of original 180 Seth Pistols. Everyone else was on light weight tele set-ups and was sure I was going to dragging behind, but to there surprise it was never so. We had skins on for at least a few hours everyday and sometimes all day, but the Dukes took it like a champ! These things tour really well have, they have two elevator settings, and the switch between touring and downhill is more work but not that big of a deal as you will be getting down first anyways. If you want a super light weight set-up get something else, but if you want a bomber set-up for charging hard in the backcountry then look no further. And let's be serious which one sounds more fun???

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Will this binding work with the Garmont Summit boot?

Will this binding work with the Garmont Summit boot?

By:
December 12, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you are talking about the 3 buckle AT boot and not the Garmont Summit GTX hiking boot, then you have a match. this will work just fine.

By:
December 21, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Holy S***

By:
March 13, 2009

These are sick.
Pros: Simple, durable, providing lift to get on the edge of your fat-waister stick.
Con: Release lever for A/T to standard function has sharp edges that are unfriendly to frozen fingers.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

is there a difference in weight between the '08 and '09

is there a difference in weight between the '08 and '09 Marker Duke?

By:
December 9, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Nope! No changes were made between the two seasons. You know the old saying: If it ain't broke... . If you're looking to save on some weight, check out the Marker Baron. Same idea, lower DIN range and about a pound lighter per pair.http://www.backcountry.com/store/MRK0010/Marker-Baron-Ski-Bindings.html

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 9, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Really Burly!

By:
January 29, 2009

After three seasons of pre-releasing out of the fritschi freerides I was willing to deal with the extra weight of the Dukes. I mounted them on some K2 seths and use them both at the resort and in the backcountry. They ski very close to a traditional binding and tour pretty well too. Overall, a very solid "slack-country" set-up for a skier who demands a high din binding.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Going to get my first set-up. I will probabley use them about

Going to get my first set-up. I will probabley use them about 50/50 in resort/back. Because I am a first timer, wanting some opinions on whether to go Duke or save a few bucks and go Barons. Thanks for the input. P.S. Ski and boot recommendations would help too. Was thinking the Insane

By:
November 25, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Most people will be just fine with the Barons. How do you ski? Any park/large cliffs? Weight? Height?If you normally ski with a DIN under 10 on your alpine bindings, go with the Baron. If you normally ski with a DIN of 10 or higher, go with the Duke.

By:
December 12, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

The "be all you can be" binding

By:
November 3, 2008

I toured on these all winter last year. Loved them. No complaints. I also skied them in the resort (alta) a lot. They are on the only pair of fat skis I own, so I used them a lot. They ski just like an alpine binding. You can be confident hucking too. I've even taken then in the park and hit the big booters at Park City and never once felt sketchy on them. Great buy!!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Will this binding work with the new Scarpa TX Pro?

Will this binding work with the new Scarpa TX Pro?

By:
November 20, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The TX Pro fits the NTN tele binding and NOT a Black Diamond 01. The TX Pro also works with dynafit and regular AT bindings. The duke is adjustable to fit thin alpine boot soles or thicker soled AT boots, so the TX Pro should work without a problem.

By:
November 27, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Sick Bindings

By:
December 15, 2008

These bindings will climb and descend anything you can handle! I don't notice the extra weight on the way up but love the stability they provide on variable conditions on the way down. The carve powder up like a dream and can easily be skied in the backcountry or in the resort.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If I am mounting these on a pair of Line Sir Francis Bacons that

If I am mounting these on a pair of Line Sir Francis Bacons that are 115 at the waist, do I need to upgrade the brake or can they be adjusted (read: bent) slightly to accomodate the extra 5mm?

By:
November 20, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I mounted a set of last years on a pair of PM Gear Bro Fats (114 at the waist) without any bending. You should be all set to go.

By:
December 12, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Binding!

By:
November 29, 2008

Climbed a couple of 14ers with this binding. The Duke handled great. I found switching between regular and ski touring mode to be very easy. It was smooth in touring mode when walking and worked outstanding on the descents. They are mounted on Nordica Enforcers.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Will this binding work with the Black Diamond factor or Method

Will this binding work with the Black Diamond factor or Method boot?

By:
November 12, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes it will as long as you use the alpine sole. Yep you don't need to use the alpine sole with the Duke either will work.__________________Any AT or Alpine sole will work.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
November 29, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

BEST AT/RANDO BINDINGS

By:
January 19, 2009

These bindings are tanks. Yes, they are bit heavier, but they will last you. The naxo bindings seem to blow out, and can't take the stress that I deliver. I really love this pair and use them in the backcountry as well as on the slopes. If you have issue on weight, rethink because there is nothing more annoying than blowing your bindings when skiing through deep snow.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hello, I'm buying the duke but I can't use the 110 brake.

Hello,
I'm buying the duke but I can't use the 110 brake. Was wondering if it's posible to lower the biding price and send it with no brake, or pay the difference for the fatest brake. I ride the Ep pro's...so it should be at least 132mm
thanks

By:
November 2, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I dont think that Backcountry.com will change the sale price...to tell you the truth I have never seen a 140mm brake im sure you can find them i have only see the 100mm 110mm and 120mm. I would just llok around for a new brake.pretty sure they have a 130mm brake

By:
November 19, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

not all they are hyped up to be

By:
February 10, 2009

These bindings are fairly good, feel solid and definitely are way better than trekkers. However, they have several short comings. These bindings are still touring bindings, and cannot withstand the abuse of alpine bindings.

On the skiing side:

The rivets that attach the binding to the climb/ski latch are pretty weak. Mine have become lose and I get significant for/aft play in the binding in ski mode.

The toe piece has a pre-release problem. This may or may not be due to the fact that the height adjustment moves around a lot making my toe creak a lot while I ski.

This makes me feel like the bindings are neither strong enough, nor reliable enough to be have dins springs that can be cranked to 16.

On the touring side:

Pretty good. However, they can get clogged up with ice really easily making them very hard to change from ski-climb mode if you do not skin with your heel lifts up.

Was this helpful? (3) (3)

Flag

say you hike into back country and build a huge booter...will

say you hike into back country and build a huge booter...will the ski mode handle big impacts?...im a pretty big guy to and im thinking of getting a pair of these... is there something better for that out there? never owned touring bindings

By:
October 24, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

You will not find burlier touring bindings. Especially if you are a big guy, these are the choice for you. 16 din. The switch to go into touring mode is under your boot when you click in, so you are never going to "insta-tele". I've done it on friche's and it sux. Won't happen with these. Going big in the backcountry? Look no further my friend.***2nd OpinionNothing is bulletproof, but this is the burliest touring binding available and better than many alpine bindings. Personally, this is one of the better DH bindings I've skied. If you go through DH bindings on a regular basis and need something even beefier, you'll have to go with the trekker...****3rd OpinionI have used these bindings in the Freeskiing World Tour competitions and have experienced little to no problems with their stompability. Ask anyone at these competitions, and they will tell you that big moves are made, and I've been able to stay competitive with Marker Dukes on my skis. I am not a big guy, by comparison, but I ski pretty strong and have skied out of many bindings. I can tell you confidently, that these bindings live up to their hype.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
February 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

best skiing touring binding

By: Backcountry.com Employee
April 23, 2009

ok so it isn't super light and it only has one elevator setting, but if you want to go fast up then get some Dynafits, if you want to ski without any hesitation on the burliest stuff then this is you binging. I have used mine for over a week now an I love them. got rid of my trekkers forever. These ski better than any other AT binding period end of sentence, yes you have to click out to go from walk to ski but I have to take my skis off to get my sinks off any way don't you?

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have a size 26.5 Alpine ski boot (305mm) and would probably

I have a size 26.5 Alpine ski boot (305mm) and would probably go up a half size or full size in a new boot and was wondering what size binding to buy, Kinda right in the middle and having trouble deciding??

By:
October 23, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Going even a full boot size up only brings your sole length up to about a 315mm, still within the Smalls range. I suggest sticking with the size Small.Smalls weight less too!

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 24, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Solid Binding

By: Backcountry.com Employee
September 17, 2008

This is the most torsionally rigid AT binding that I have ever used. Great for skiing beefier boards. Though this binding is HEAVY it does tour very well, but when it comes down to it, I use my Dukes as a resort tourer, opting for a lighter Tele setup on extended treks.

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

How do these bindings work in resorts? I wanna use them in bounds

How do these bindings work in resorts? I wanna use them in bounds on moguls and on-piste but also use them for backcountry? Will they stand up?

By:
October 16, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yep, that's pretty much the whole point behind these bindings--no slop. They'll behave just like alpine bindings when in ski mode.

By:
October 22, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

great all-around binding

By: Backcountry.com Employee
September 25, 2008

I've got these mounted on some 183 Gotamas and love them. They are great at the resort and in the backcountry. I did not notice the weight as much as some other reviewers, but agree that it's less than ideal to need to remove ski to lock (only downside). I didn't have any issues with icing-up when switching to the lock position. Overall, a good, solid binding.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

will it work with a size 255mm boot sole?

will it work with a size 255mm boot sole?

By:
September 30, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I doubt it. The limits are a bit conservative, but probably not by 10 mm.

By:
October 22, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Tech Specs:

Material:
Plastic, stainless steel, aluminum 
DIN Rated:
Yes, up to 16 
Boot Compatibility:
AT and alpine 
Brakes Included:
Yes 
Brake Width:
110mm 
Heel Elevators:
Yes, 6- and 12-degree positions 
Weight:
[1 binding] 2lb 15oz (1334g) 
Recommended Use:
Backcountry skiing when downhill performance is paramount 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 Year 
Country of Origin:
Czech Republic 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: