We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 (excluding kayaks) shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
The Extreme Alpine Ski is K2's tribute to all things radical, dudical, and totally gnarly. Modeled on last year's do-it-all frontside freestyle weapon, the Public Enemy, the Extreme borrows a killer topsheet from the late 80's icon to boost your retro steeze off the charts. Recent modifications like triaxial-braided, torsion box construction mean this wood-cored plank will perform consistently in variable conditions, from East Coast ice rinks to Sierra slop and most everywhere in between. And much like a neon one-piece or a 3-foot-tall mohawk would, the Extreme's graphic radness allows unabashed exploitation of the old school trick catalog…although its directional twintip design will work fine for modern takeoffs and landings as well. We think they're called “switch-eroo” and involve something called a “terrain park” but that's all new to us. Now, if they just came in 210cm…
Bottom Line: K2 tha Extreme, it rocks the slopes like a vandal.
These are literally the exact same ski as the Public Enemies. The same width, same flex pattern. You want a big mountain ski, look at the ObSETHed's from K2.
I just got this ski about 1/2 through this season, and have them set up as an all-mountain ski (I'm not into park/pipe). I've put about 10 days on them. Each day had different conditions. I must say that I was impressed with the way these skis handled all conditions. Whether it was hardpack, ice, slush, crud, packed powder, corn, or even a little powder (didn't get to try them out in anything over 6"), these skis did the job. This was my first twin tip and I must say that I really enjoy the ease at which I am now able to ski backwards. I would highly recommend these skis!!
hey where i live there is a very small ski hill with not much all mountain so lots of the time i'm skiing park and pipe i am an intermidiate skier and i was wondering if there are any good skis for a low price if so please tell me also what binding would you suggest for k2 silencer's and extremes that have a reasonably good price please speak up
I think these skis would be a good ski for you. They are soft, have a nice raised tail, and perform well in all conditions. They also have a nice size waist on them that allows them to float fairly well in a little pow pow!!
Oh yeah, I have Head LD 12's mounted on them and they have been great.
You might be able to get a good deal on some Look PX 12 bindings or some Rossi SAS2 120. Both are reasonably good priced bindings that work well with either the Silencers or the Extremes, which are both priced well for the end of the season.
Before you make a choice based on the post by maestroejd100103519, keep in mind that he is talking about a ski from 20 years ago, these are not the same skis as twenty years ago. The only real resemblance is the graphics.
This is a great ski. It has a nice even flex which is great in all snow conditions and excels in all terrain. It is fun to carve on the groomers, kicks butt in the bumps, and is fun for jumps. The turn initiation on this ski is so easy it seems like you are skiing on autopilot. The only reason I haven't sold my other skis is don't wish to wear out my Extremes this year. I could easily ski these every day!
I'm an advanced skier who skis in Vermont. This ski will be versatile enough to take on trips out west. I mainly ski in the trees and bumps and the Extremes rock. If you are between sizes on this ski, don't be afraid to take the longer size. I mount mine as an all mountain ski toward the rear of the mounting zone. If you ski mostly park, you probably should center mount.
By the way, there is not a better top or bottom sheet graphic on any ski this year!
Should I hold on to my light, flexy skis or try to go with heavy, stable ones????I'm a European 5'11", 190lbs skier. Can anyone come up with guesses to which eventual differences there will be between my old pair if Völkl Dogens (05/06) and these K2 Extreme? I loved the lightness and spinability the Dogens had in the park because I'm a beginner on that area, but on piste and in powder they sucked. Which advantages/disadvantages/differences will there be for me in the terrain park and on BC kickers with these K2 Extreme? Thanks.
These skis are so awesome, I wish I had purchased them earlier in the season. First day out was on groomed and hard pack and they worked very very well on both. Minimal top speed chatter on hard pack. They went through the crud and handled the bumps extremely (excuse the pun) well! Next time I had them out was after 9â of powder in Northwest and here is where they shined the most. Skis floated well. I cant wait to try them out in some real deep stuff to see where their depth limitation is!
Which is a better all around ski??I tired the K2 Extremes in whistler so goooood i wanted to try the volkl bridges but i didnt have time. I am a ski who does everything to the bumps to the park so i need a good all around ski what do you think is better for the skiing im in too. K2 Extremes or Volkl Bridges..??
I demoed these in Mammoth a couple weeks ago and man, they rocked. Since it was still early season I was mostly on the groomers and they were fast and stable. I did manage to find some pow in the upper mountain and they were fantastic...don't how they would work in a full on powder day but I suspect they'll be just fine. I liked them so much that I owned a set by the time my trip was over...
I am considering several skis and would like some advice.I want a twin tip, I ski mostly groomers on bad snow days, 1 or 2 black on bad snow days, all mountain on powder days (but I still love groomers), I'm just getting into the park, hitting waste-high jumps, but planning to progress quite a bit still in all areas. I'm 5'7", 138 pounds.Here is what I've been considering:1.) K2 Extreme2.) Armada AR63.) Line Blend4.) Line Prophet 905.) Volkl Bridge (if price is comparable)
If your gonna be doing everything I would probably go with the extremes or possibly the volkl. Line and aramda tend to be park based skis and are flexier and wont hold up as well off in the bowls.
I just bought these last week and took them out west. The entire time i was up there i skied crud, powder, moguls, park, trees, and groomers. These skis handled everything with ease. Held up great in the trees with 3 feet of powder and were very responsive. Take hard landings very well in the park and off cliffs. Only con was that the topsheet scratches and chips easily but other then that they were great.
I skied 40 days on this ski in australia. I loved them good in any condiions crud ,bumps ,powder ,hardpacked,steeps. only down side they dont like ice but who does and the tops sheets cracked up a bit. but a alot of fun.
I am looking for an upgrade in the future for an eastern all mountain ski. Really liking the Volkl bridge. how much of difference is there weight wise and stiffness?
I believe this is going to be a little lighter and not quite as stiff as the bridge. Any difference is not going to be THAT noticible though. This would be a better park ski; the bridge would succeed more as an all-mountain rig.
These are the replacement for the public enemy, with a little more park focus. They softened up the tip and the tail for pop but left the middle stiff. The sidecut is a little less directional, and they reduced the chatter you would sometimes get with the PE.
The top edges do, as in the topsheet edges. This is almost the exact same ski as the old PE's, no real change. Don't let this scare you though, it happens to all sandwich construction skis, and has no effect on the performance.
Just back from JH...demoed the Extreme, Mantra, Mythic Riders and Obsethed...I'm 6 ft, 185 advanced...The Extreme is really responsive and stable...was great in 20 inch pow trees...blasts thru tracked pow, boarder tracks and crud...it was my fav...I'm going to get the 174's.
I really love the Extreme, but sometimes I wish it had more width underfoot. Can anybody suggest a ski that has a similar flex, but is wider? I want a ski that will float well in powder, but versatile enough for east coast bumps and trees and an edge hold like the Extreme that will bite into ice if it needs to. I also prefer something around 165cm long.
salomon lord, line prophet 90 and 100, volkl bridge,KUNG FUJAS, last years line blend,moment tahoe and ruby ect.........---adding--- Check out the K2 ObSETHed! They tear it up. Rossi S5 has similar specs with a wider waist, they are also way light. Rossi cut material from the tip/tail so rotations are easier (its crazy) they are maybe a tad more flexy
These would be my first twin tip skis I have ever purchased they are great. Im a pretty heavy guy and these skis react with everything I can throw at them reccommend for bigger people if they want good flex and will still be able to hit the park up!
I am an intermediate skier started to become more advanced...I like hitting jumps but nothing crazy like x games not yet atleast...i still like to carve on the mountain whether it be groomed or powder...would these be good skis if im started to hit the terrain park more but still carve down the mountain? Im about 5'9" and over 200lbs so what size should i look into getting? Any tips and recomendations would be greatly appreciated...
For the price, you can't go wrong. I was a little disappointed in the shape the top sheet was in after 2 days of skiing but beyond that, a real solid ski that will treat you well in the bumps/woods.
Ya, but K2s measuring is interesting.They measure to about 184 in skis from any other company.Most companies measure the bottom of a ski, which means they are measuring the longest distance on the ski. Since the ski tips up in tip and tail the are also measuring that area that is off of the snow. K2 measures the length of the top sheet of the ski including the tip and tail. The difference between the top of the ski and the bottom of the ski is a few cm, which means that 179 in K2 is really about a 184 in other brands.
i have last years pe's and i absolutely love them. love them, particularly because i live on the east coast, and these work well in ice/powder, whatever the day brings. out west where powder is more reliable, I would go for a wider powder ski like kung fujas or hellbent. i do wish, that i had waited a year as i hate the pe's graphics, and love these, but what can you do.
I recently received a pair of these somewhat by accident. I wanted a pair of twin tip tele skis to mess around with in the park and also mess around with skiing switch tele. I was looking at the K2 Sodo and K2 Piste Pipe when a family member picked up a pair of 169 Extremes for me. My question for this board is if it's reasonable to mount these with a 7tm binding and use with my existing T2 boots. I have been skiing on a pair of 179 Tua M3's for a number of years now and those have serviced me ok, but as stated above I want to mess around in the park a bit while also having a general purpose ski that handles powder and crud a bit better than my old setup.
I have skiied four days on my k2s, and i have put them through a solid workout. They held up perfect in the trees, did well in the moguls, and they even can keep up with my friends who race. They are a solid ski all around. The only issue that i have noticed with them is that the top sheet is very soft and scratch easily around the edges. The scratches has no effect on the ski, and is purely cosmetic.
These are like the old PE, so if you have skied them and liked them I would get these. I think these are a little stiffer than the Armadas and they are a little wider.
So these skis are very similar to the traditional k2 ski. Heavy, stiff, chipped topsheet. If you like that type of ski go for it. I have fun on them and I don't weigh that much.
The extremes are close to the P.E. of past, fairly stiff and heavy but good all mountain, The AR6,s are awesome, their softer and very playful, they kill it in the park and do well all mountain and quite abit lighter, and have a smooth even flex. Go armada
I got suckered into buying these skis back in the 80's when they were being touted as the ultimate extreme ski(for hucking cliffs, mashing moguls, shreding couloirs,etc.)with input from Scott Schmidt and Glen Plake. I can honestly say they were pretty much absolute crap! The tips delaminated within a couple of weeks and had to be returned. As for performance they pretty much had a mind of their own(this from someone who skied proffesionaly every day of the season). Bottom line, demo before you buy and never believe the hype!
No, you are not limited to the Jester. This ski is compatible with any non-system specific binding.Any of these bindings will work:http://www.backcountry.com/store/group/26/Alpine-Ski-Bindings.html
Comment on David W's review >