We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
K2's Piste Pipe Ski is more than just a halfpipe jibber—it's an all-mountain master. Even if you don't plan on exploring switch tele turns, the twin tips make it easier to land your 540s, and the turned-up tails throw a huge rooster tail that will impress (or tick off) old-school, crunchy pinners. The beefy dimensions eat up powder and crud and give you a solid landing platform when you find yourself spinning around in the air. The Piste Pipe Skis' stiff flex provides the precision you need to carve up the pipe or dice through manky March conditions. With ABS sidewalls and thicker, more durable edges than K2's freeride offerings, the Piste Pipe can take on any rock, rail or hard landing. Three sets of inserts allow you to quickly change the binding position depending on the conditions. Center your stance for the pipe, move it back for the powder. *Not available for shipping outside US.
Bottom Line: Smoke the park, pipe, or the entire mountain with the K2 Piste Pipe Skis.
now i'm an intermediate-advanced freeheeler and have only been touring once but would like to do some more in the future, i mainly do limited hiking to access birch stashes like 1/4 mi -1 mi. i need a ski with a twintip so i can get out of some of the situations i've been caught in i'm 5'9" 140lbs would a 169 be best or would a rossy dirtybird or black diamond havock work better
I've been skiing on my Piste Pipes for 4 seasons (since 2005). Great ski for learning to telemark. Great rebound. Fun on groomers, bumps, terrain park and light powder. Plus with the twin tips, you get respect from the knuckle draggers. And since the top sheet gets scratched up easily, you look very seasoned.
Cons Noisy on icy conditions Too Heavy for backcountry and epic powder days Skins don't like the twin tips Twin Tips create a large rooster tail that can be bad for followers
I have not telemark skied in quite a while. Last skis were phoenix skinny tele's. I want to tele again . Not back country, NE USA ski arears Blue & black crusing type skiing. Are these skis any good for me. If not can you reccommend. 6' , 200 lbs. Thanks
These skis will work well for the kind of skiing you described. They are stable and you won't get tossed. They are heavy (the weight listed is per ski) so keep that in mind. Also, as we've all learned, the topsheets will get chewed up. Some other stable skis with waist closer to what you used to ski are the G3 Tickets and Volkl T-Roll, those skis might also be better at biting the ice we ski here. At this price ($263) the Piste Pipes are a great deal, though 159cm will be too short for you.
these skis are sick, ive had mine with some 7tm bindings on them for almost a year.they are definetly the most versitile ski i have skied.i got them cause i couldnt find a womens tele ski that would suit my style of skiing,and at first i was a little worried,but they work perfect...only downsides are that the sidewalls and topsheet look like my rock skis alredy,not what i wanted,and the weight issue,they are definetly a "resort" ski,so i have kept my k2 rip chicks for the backountry...other than those issues,great ski.
I am 14, 5'3 and 118 pounds. I live on the east coast and I was wondering what size would be better 159 or 169 I also like to ski the moguls/bumps a lot and I was wondering which size would be better.
Depends how long you want to keep them. The 159s will be way easier to throw around in the bumps, but they'll be too flexy for you once you gain another 15 pounds or so. If you ca afford to replace these when you grow out of them, go with the 159, it'll ski way more nimbly than the longer ones.
I have used the Piste Pipe for a while now and really like it. It does have problems though, the top sheet looks like it has gone through a world war. The skis have huge sections ripped out of the top. I do not think it would have any real effect but if I buy new skis I would like them to look new for a while. Also, the ski is set up to have the boot center at the center of the ski. So even if you move the binding back to the farthest back position you are still pretty far forward. This makes powder skiing a little more difficult. But in this skis defense it is not suppose to be a powder ski. It is really set up for the park. Overall I have liked the ski, it turns quick and has been a lot of fun.
Am thinking about this ski for a 5'5" 105 lb. growing 14 year old, incredible telemarker? Looking for input, is it too much ski for his weight?kjkeeffe
Certainly not, just keep in mind it is essentially a park ski so the bindings will be mid-mounted and if he is more into big mountain, this probably isn't the best choice. Also, I'd go for the 169 cm's so he can grow into them a bit, 159's will be too flexy as soon as he hits 120 pounds.
This ski crushes in the park and on the bumps. The bindings are pretty much center-mounted, so you always know where your ski is in relation to your foot, always land the moguls perfectly, and can carve like nobody's business. I have to agree with paulsinger though, the top sheets are a bit, shall we say, delicate. I was trying to perfect a 360 last season, and I'm *ahem* not very good at it, so I often landed a bit off-kilter. Combine that with crossing your skis occasionally on jump turns and in the steep stuff, and the top sheet looks like it was put through a wood chipper before they glued it on. It doesn't affect the performance of the ski at all though, and when you get in the singles line and ride up with strangers that keep eyeing your ratty boards, they'll be even more impressed when you get off at the top and shred out of sight.
im 5'7 145, i've ski about 25 days a year since i was 6, i am thinking about size. i will ride these skis in the park exclusively. should i get the 159 or the 169. my current park skis are 170's but they are pretty slim and there is not much ski there. they are also much lighter, but i intend to put a heavier binding on (BD 02) I feel like i should get the 169, but since speed has never been a problem i kind of want the 159, are they for teenagers and kids?
I am 5'11'' and 145 and ski the 169. I use them in the park and big mountain with BD 02's with rid stiff cartridges mounted center. Super fun. I would say that if you are going to use them completely in the park, get the 159. Spin fast and don't have that extra weight. You'll have plenty of tail to stomp your tricks with. Hope you figure it outLuke
Comment on Jay's review >