We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
Built to tackle the unpredictable conditions and challenging lines of its Cascade Range namesake, the K2 Mt. Baker is the Alpine Touring Ski of backcountry legends. Lighter than an alpine ski, but certainly no flyweight, the Baker's appeal lies in its terrain-conquering downhill versatility. An 88mm waist and 121mm tip provide no-hook float in soft snow, but the twin Titanal sheets in the core also let you bust crud with authority. You can crank down the burliest four-buckle touring boots and take your favorite bowls on like a gate-basher, then tackle a sketchy, no-fall zone thanks to the Mt. Baker's smooth, predictable progressive sidecut. It's that go-anywhere, ski-anything capability that places the Mt. Baker in a class all its own, and it's the reason Andrew McLean straps a pair on his pack. *Available for US shipment only.
Bottom Line: Turn pucker-country into your playground with the K2 Mt. Baker AT Ski.
Think the 181 is a better bet for you on this ski...I am 5'8, 138 lbs, and ski tested the 174 and that was the right size for me. If you are planning to ski powder and tour as well, the longer length would also definitely be the better fit.
The Mt Baker while best-suited for soft snow performs very good on the groomed. While the turn radius is fairly large at about 20 meters for the 174 cm ski, these skis will carve nice GS turns. With an 88 mm waist, the Mt Bakers are best categorized as an All Mountain ski. I've skied these in knee-deep powder the skis were a lot of fun. The Mt Baker could be consider a light weight sibling of the alpine "Outlaw." This is a very forgiving, easy to turn ski. I have the Diamir Freeride Plus and this is a very nice set up. These are my patrol skis for powder and crud days. K2 does size these on the long side. The 174's total length is just over 180 cm.
Yes, except if they have an asymmetrical sidecut, like the rapid transits from G3, but not many "tele skis" actually have anything that makes them different from Alpine skis, other than low weight for touring.
Rented a pair of these from REI last year when I was taking my Avy 1 course. Decent ski that can handle crud. Pretty lightweight, although my coombas are more of a pow ski at 102 and lighter, these handled moguls and adverse conditions better
I'm trying to figure out why I would choose the Mt. Baker instead of the Work Stinx for an AT setup. The Work Stinx are 124-88-111, so they have a bit deeper sidecut. It looks like they weigh about the same. Any thoughts on this decision? BTW, I'm also a tele-skier and love my World Piste's for all-mountain. I got to ski the Mt. Baker in a 174cm and loved them, but I need a 181.
I've got a similar Q. Have considered both skis, and also the Karhu Spire. I see the upside of converting the Work Stinx, is that when my A. Kailas tele set-up dies or I want a fatter AT set-up, i could convert the Work Stinx as tele w/o re-drilling. Anyone ski the Work Stinx as AT? Any comparison between these K2 skis and the karhu spire? Thanks. AC
I'm trying to figure out why I would choose the Mt. Baker instead of the Work Stinx for an AT setup. The Work Stinx are 124-88-111, so they have a bit deeper sidecut. It looks like they weigh about the same. Any thoughts on this decision? BTW, I'm also a tele-skier and love my World Piste's for all-mountain. I got to ski the Mt. Baker in a 174cm and loved them, but I need a 181.
I've got a similar Q. Have considered both skis, and also the Karhu Spire. I see the upside of converting the Work Stinx, is that when my A. Kailas tele set-up dies or I want a fatter AT set-up, i could convert the Work Stinx as tele w/o re-drilling. Anyone ski the Work Stinx as AT? Any comparison between these K2 skis and the karhu spire?
I'm trying to figure out why I would choose the Mt. Baker instead of the Work Stinx for an AT setup. The Work Stinx are 124-88-111, so they have a bit deeper sidecut. It looks like they weigh about the same. Any thoughts on this decision? BTW, I'm also a tele-skier and love my World Piste's for all-mountain. I got to ski the Mt. Baker in a 174cm and loved them, but I need a 181.
I am looking into getting an AT setup to conquer 14ers in Colorado, couloirs, and do hut trips. I have decided on a dynafit binding. Any good recommendations on boots and skis? I'm 6'3" and 220 and want something that will handle my size and aggressive ability.
if i were you i would look at a BD or a G3 ski (i think k2s are to soft). as for boots go with a 4 buckle boot that fits your foot. if you are going to buy a boot from backcountry.com than i would take a 12 pack of good beer to your local shop and get fitted. having a boot that fits your foot is super important.
I bought these skis and I am planning to mount telemark bindings on them. It seems however that they are "recommended" for AT. Any hint why these skis would not be as good for telemark (like its flex, ...)?
They're a bit stiffer, since alpine turns put all the weight on one ski and tele turns distribute it over both. They'll be fine though, just a bit more aggressive.
Comment on Skipatrol61's review >