Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Close This Window
Gregory Z Pack - 3300cu in - 2006

Gregory Z Pack - 3300cu in - 2006

Item #GRE0025|Out of Stock

2006 Model No Longer Available

Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List

Gregory Z Pack - 3300cu in - 2006

The Gregory Z pack 3000-3550cu in subscribes to the theory that light is right, but that there is a right light. Stick with what you need, and get rid of what you don't. But if the pack can't carry its own, it doesn't matter how light it is, now does it? This way of thinking earned the Z Pack Backpacker Magazine's Best Weekender Award in their 2004 Gear Guide. The Z Pack shrinks down for the shortest of trips, and even sheds an additional 9 ounces with a removable framesheet and stay. But it also handles a 40-pound load with ease during a weeklong trip through Utah's Wasatch Mountains. With a sewn-in Sport harness and Gulwing Plus waistbelt, it's not just a lightweight sack. Instead, the Z Pack is loaded with these lightweight conveniences: top and side access for easy access to every nook and cranny; a generous front bucket pouch; and a second front pocket and top pocket, both with water resistant zippers. Stuff this pack full, but don't be surprised if you forget you have it on. Three different sizes available.

Bottom Line: This pack might be light in weight, but it's no lightweight.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 4

zipper issues

By:
November 30, 2006

I like the pack and use it for shorter tips. Lately I've been having a problem with the back zipper jamming. I would try to stay below 30 lbs. A bear can really maxes it out. I have put some of my gear in the can. I am 6'2" w/21" torso. The large pack seems a little short at times.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Gregory Z Pack

By:
August 9, 2004

I have read several reviews of the z pack, most of which have been positive.
Well, I've tried the "z" (men's medium)and here are my likes and dislikes:

Likes:
1. Nice sized main compartment, held most of my 3 season gear.
2. Bucket pocket and rear zipperd pouch.
3. Roomy top pocket
4. Weigth, 3lbs. 2oz.
5. Hydration sleeve
6. Materials seem solid enough for its weight
Dislikes:
1. Suspension can not be adjusted
2. Too many staps, but no bottom compression straps
3. Overall fit and comfort

Do to the lack of adjustment, I could not find a size that fit me comfortably. I normally wear a size medium, but the med. Z was too small and the large was too big. Both sizes were basically uncomfortable in the my lower back, and shoulders. I could not effectively transfer the weight (30lbs.)to my hips without feeling alot of pulling on my shoulders.
I ended up returning the Z pack and found what I was looking for in the Granite Gear Nimbus Latitude. In my opinion, this pack is far superior to the Z pack. It weighs 1/2 lb. more but sports a wonderfully comfortable suspension, user friendly pack system, and bomber construction.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Good pack

By:
May 24, 2005

I just used this for a two day, 20 mile hike in humid Missouri. I carried 30 pounds. The pack was comfortable. I had a little soreness on my hips, but overall it was very comfortable even at heavier weights. The size is nice, too. Fit everything nicely with room for maybe a four day. There was a little abrasion on the waterproof zipper. Gregory's zippers are simply not as good as Arc'Teryx's. But the design of Gregory packs, and this one in particular, is simply better than the others. This pack has the awesome front Shovit, and the side zipper, and everything else I want. Weight is right too. For an ultra-light pack there are no sacrifices. I like it.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Lightweight Pack

By:
April 2, 2004

I took this pack with about 29 pounds overnight in the Timpanogoos. It was great. It held the load nicely and it allowed me to take what I needed. This is one of the finest lightweight packs out there that can carry a large load.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

A Pack for 30 lbs.

By:
September 17, 2004

I used my Z Pack on a four day 36 mile trip in the Rae Lakes loop in Kings Canyon Nat. Park. The biggest problem I had was getting the mandatory Bear canister into the pack along with everything else that had to go into the pack. I don't think that any of the pack manufacturers think about getting a bear canister into the pack. Also, I am 5'8" tall and the Med. size pack seemed to have too small of a frame for me. I think I should have bought the large size. Gregory claims that the pack can carry up to forty lbs. but I feel that would over load the hip and shoulder pads. 30 lbs. seemed to be the max I would want to carry in the pack.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Gregory Z Pack

By:
September 22, 2004

Nice product. Used it everyday as a day pack on a two week trip in Utah. Fits well. Holds gear nicely. Comfortable and well constructed. Only time will tell if it will hold up and if I will still like it a year from now.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great pack, inexpensive

By:
November 22, 2004

Well, I finally recieved a size medium after returning a small because it didnt fit me. The pack fits my frame really nicely. It distributes weight comfortably to the waist. It has a lot of compression straps, side access is sweet. Price was a plus. The only reason I didnt give it a 5 is because I have yet to use it on an extended trip.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

A Very Good Pack

By:
April 19, 2005

This is my second backpack. I own a Gregory Shasta for the long hauls, but wanted a weekend/3 day bag, as this is the usual trip nowadays. I have used this pack on a half-dozen outings so far and love it, combining it with lightweight sleeping bag, pad, tent, and stove. I come in at around 30lb with water and a few extras. I love the freedom a light pack gives me. Last fall, when I used this pack for a rainy adventure in the south Siskiyous of Oregon, I pushed the weight a little over 40lb and I met its limit. The pack was uncomfortable. Otherwise, within its design limits, the Z-pack is a great, versatile pack. I love the lid compartment, side entry and outer cargo netting. A rugged, practical, comfortable pack that got me where I was going in style, with energy to spare at trails end--something this 57-year-old backpacker finds increasingly important when sharing the trail with mates 20 years my junior.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Tech Specs:

Material:
[body] 140D Dyneema, [reinforcements] 210d HT nylon fabric 
Volume:
[XS]3000cu in (49L); [S]3175cu in (52L); [M]3300cu in (54L); [L]3550cu in (58L) 
Suspension:
Internal FOAM-X hourglass framesheet, removable single, hollow 1/2” 7075-T6 stay 
Back Panel:
Chimney ventilated 
Hydration Compatible:
Yes 
Torso Adjustment:
No 
Detachable Pack:
No 
Sleeping Bag Compartment:
No 
Rain Cover:
No; external pockets have water-resistant zippers 
Access Types:
Top lid and side access 
Gear Loops:
External Pockets:
Snowboard Carry:
No 
Ski Carry:
No 
Recommended Use:
Light and tight backcountry travel 
Weight:
[XS]2lbs 13oz {1.3); [S]3lbs (1.4kg); [M]3lbs 3oz (1.5 kg); [L]3lbs 8oz (1.6 kg) 
Warranty:
Lifetime 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: