We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
The G3 Rapid Transit Telemark Ski floats the pow, kills the crud, and holds a tight line with its innovative asymmetrical shape. The Rapid Transit gives big mountain float a serious dose of versatility with its asymmetrical shape – the outside skis’ two outside edges have a tighter turn radius than the inside edges for more inside ski control, more precise transitions edge-to-edge, and crisper turns. The fat 92mm waist provides both float and stability for playing in the powder or destroying the crud.
Bottom Line: The G3 Rapid Transit Telemark Ski is a powder train. Come on ride the train, and ride it.
Write your question here... What size of Rapid transits should I go with being a strong agresive tele at 5'8" 165lbs. The salesman says to go with the 171 but I have never skied on that short of a board and am concerned it may not be enough ski.
I would at least go with the 178 (this will be the most versatile length, good for glades, and bowls, and hiking, and just about whatever you want). that will be a good all round length don't go with the 171 as i assure you if you are a strong skier you will be disappointed. if you want a big mountain ski go with something longer and wider.
I absolutely love this ski, in fact, I just bought my second pair. It blasts through crud, carves on groomers, floats decently in powder and man-handles the bumps. I'm 6'4" and about 210 lbs, and I get away with skiing 178s. I ski mostly in bounds in CO, and I have found nothing that I wouldn't want these for. Oh sure, for an epic powder day you might want something a bit wider, but for a one ski quiver for tele, I would highly endorse this ski.
I am 5'10 150 lbs and love skiing in the trees, bumps and carving in tight quarters. Am trying to decide between the G3 rapid transits or the BD Havoc what would you recommend?
This is a versatile ski. It has enough float to handle powder and bowls. It has enough carvy enough to handle moguls and bombing groomers. I never found it to really hop or push me from turn to turn.
At the resorts I just load up the tip and it will go. It has done me well on Colorado and BC hut trips.
I ski 50/50 between Utah and New England, ~30 days/season. Looking for a good all mountain telemark ski that I can mount some hammerheads on....What are the benefits of a ski like the Rapid Transit vs. mounting tele bindings on like a Volkl Mantra or something?
i see many reasons to go with the rapid transit over the mantra. first it is a better made ski. i think when volkl moved their operation from Germany they quality went down hill. next the RT side cut is better for tele turns. the RT flex is a more progressive flex, the mantra is more like a board the whole way down. i am sure you will be happy with the RT. enjoy!
Hello, Can you tell me how to ski this ski. I hear that you have to change your style a bit, but the article did not explain the statement. Because the asymmetrical rail on the up slope side, does that mean that you dig the uphill ski more or equal to downhill ski? I’m use to digging my down slope ski and floating or sliding the uphill ski unless I’m digging in to square off quickly and then hop turn, like in thing trees and such. From what I read (very short), it sounds like you rail on the up slope ski and let the lower ski follow.Also will be my widest, unless I pick up a pair of Watea 101’s. Is there any need for the Watea’s if I have the Transits? I see powder less than I do hard and crud. One due to my location and two do to my budget. Ski Mt Baldy Area Southern California most, maybe next year I’ll have funds and can travel north or East to CO again.Thanks for the input.Ed
I demo-ed these last year, you do have to weight your rear ski more (I assume to get it to flex along the shorter radius sidecut, although I'm no scientist). These skis definitely have a different feel than any I've skied before, but I disagree with some of the reviews on the site, I found them a little slow edge to edge...They just didn't fit with my style, which is quick short-radius turns.
I now own Transits in both AT and Tele setups. It is my go-to ski for Colorado snowpack. For wide underfoot, it is extremely quick edge to edge. I can keep up with the entire crew through the bumps. All the float you need, been waist deep Silverton, Anton, etc., although working harder obviously than if you had the pow gun. Very light swing weight, medium flex, loves to run trees, especially with a couple inches of powder+pillow drops.
Complaints: Shovel can get deflected in crud. Partly flex, partly b/c I could probably ski it in something a little longer. Will hold an edge on anything, but will not rail a carve on hardpack/ice like a Volkl with metal underfoot, can get it to chatter.
An excellent all-round ski mountaineering board for anything short of big Alaska lines.
I have been skiing this ski on hills and in the backcountry, I find it a bit skinny for simply backcountry excursions but as a on hill/off hill ski it has the best of both worlds. Size is decent for backcountry skiing yet will also carve up the groomer. I don't notice the asymmetry of the ski, which I imagine would make more sense with teles as the uphill ski would be a little shorter ;helping them finish their turns.
I have heard from folks that the transit might be a better all arounder, with enough shovel to plow through the crud and powder. It definitely turns better than the reverend on the hard pack.
I can never decide which is my preferred all-mountain ski - Rapids or el Hombres. If I had to pick only one it'd likely be the Hombres because they work better in crud and chopped-up powder. But I'm a big guy and don't have any trouble carving with the Hombres, and the Rapids are lighter weight. G3 has a new ski for 2009-2010 that's basically an Hombre in a lighter weight. For lighter skiers that might be the all-mountain master. You can't go wrong with either.
it depends on your skiing style, for me it is a perfect all mountain ski, it is my narrowest ski (el hombre and megawatt are the others) -- i'm sure you will love this ski!
Comment on theuberbrit's review >