We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
We guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time - now, next month, in 30 years - you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked. Need help returning an item? - Click Hereclose
Due to contracts with the following brands, we are unable to ship any of their products outside the US.
more...
Int'l Shipping
Backcountry.com uses UPS Worldwide Express or Worldwide Expedited
for all shipping outside the United States. We have found this method to be quick,
secure, and cost effective.
The low-rise Ex Officio Men's Give-N-Go Sport Brief air-dry within a couple hours so you can wash as you go and carry fewer pairs of underwear on your next journey. Ex Officio made the briefs from moisture-wicking Give-N-Go stretch nylon and gave them an antibacterial treatment to keep them fresh after a few days on the road or trail. A terry elastic waist in these low-rise briefs provides a comfy fit.
Bottom Line: Wander a new city or hike a burly trail in the comfy, wicking Ex Officio Sport Briefs.
Agreed about appearance in grey. A really nice change from geeky white. I'm sure my waistline shrunk by 2" just putting them on. My comment to wife was that these are perfectly adequate as "swimming trunks" during backpacking in public areas. The legs tend to stretch out a bit during wear, so if you like 'em snug these might feel a bit loose. NOTE these are very different from the regular Ex Officio brief which has an "access port" in front, is much larger overall, and not nearly as studly looking. Dang, if they'd just lower the price a bit - - but I bought enough for daily wear anyway 'cause I liked them so much.
Definitely. Backcountry.com has a great return policy. Check it out:
Unconditional 100% Guarantee We guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time -- now, next month, in 30 years -- you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked.
I am surprised I'm the only one who's had this problem (at least among the reviewers), but there just isn't enough material up front, in the crotch, to make these comfortable. The material is fantastic and the cut is otherwise great, but there's a definite effect of compressing and pushing down the goods with this product. I'd be all over these if they had some more room in the front.
Outstanding briefs. I recently used several pair on a rim-to-rim hike across the Grand Canyon. No chafing. No irritation. Just comfort, support and rapid drying times. I'm ditching the Calvins and FOTLs and will go to these for day-to-day wear.
Much like everyone else, I too would have to agree that the fit makes you look slimmer. These briefs are great and totally wick away the sweat, keeping you dry. The only thing that I would have to say is that they are definitely not fitted around the legs, which does not allow total frontal coverage. For those well endowed, I would consider purchasing the regular style briefs.
These things are great. I have spent several days in them at a time and they have always performed well. They dry really fast and they do a great job at wicking moisture away from your skin. They are also much more comfortable than boxers or traditional cotton underwear. Do not go without these!!
I normally wear cotton boxers. I purchased one the boxers, boxer-briefs, and sport briefs to give them all try to see which ones work best with work/travel/hiking/concerts...I found the boxer briefs to work the best, they did not bunch up at all and keep me dry and cool. These have no fly in the front and not much material either, seems like it would fit better if I was hung like a light switch. Just purchased 3 more pairs of the boxer-briefs. I think the regular brief would be a better choice.
Comment on Scott Barger's review >