Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Unconditional money back guarantee – Welcome to gear gluttony
Close This Window
Dynastar Huge Trouble Ski  - 2008

Dynastar Huge Trouble Ski - 2008

Item #DYN0203|Out of Stock

2008 Model No Longer Available

Add this to my Gear List  
This product has been added to your XX List

Dynastar Huge Trouble Ski - 2008

Make the mountain your own personal park when you ride the Dynastar Huge Trouble Ski. Mega fat dimensions let the Huge Troubles nuke over everything in their path and provide crazy floatation in the pow. A low camber profile makes this ski responsive, surfy and playful in soft snow, and eliminates tip dive. This Dynastar ski’s wood core maintains rock-solid stability when you need to point it, and the super-raised tips and tails help you stomp powdery landings regular or switch. Vertical sidewall construction offers durability and solid edge grip on hard pack and mank.

Bottom Line: Forget going big. Go enormous on the Dynastar Huge Trouble Ski.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 5

dynastar makes a pow ski

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
March 9, 2009

so ----- i spent the majority of my last season on the XXL then I moved to the Huge for some cat-skiing at Baldface in interior BC-- ie-- pow skiin'... it was incredible. As in- wow dynastar made a powder ski. I would disagree with the comment that they aren't so good anywhere else (other than the powder) -- I was just on them the entire time i was in Chamonix-- snow was great however there were many-a-day where the conditions weren't optimal- I was comfortable in the Huge's the whole time-- plus I shred them around in-bounds Alta all the time in the crud on the backside or over rockier steeper stuff that calls for technical skiing as well--?? I think they're great? It's the ONLY ski that I took to Europe this season? BUT THEY DO kill in in the backcountry-- they're sweet. I found them to be more rigid than I thought they were going to be! (cool)-- I thought they were going to be really soft-- they aren't what you think if you've never flexed them--- give them a shot... they're more versatile than you think.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: November 15, 2009 by:

By:
November 15, 2009

Is it worth it to put a touring binding on this ski? Or would that just make for a ridiculously heavy set up?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

I'm moving to Alaska and looking for a one quiver backcountry

I'm moving to Alaska and looking for a one quiver backcountry set-up. Leaning towards Gotamas with Barons. Demo'd both the goats and Rossi S6s. The S6s were fun, but the goats ripped--felt powerful, dampening, fast, and responsive. BUT I haven't been able to demo the Line Sir Francis Bacons or the Dynastar Huge Troubles. Has anyone had experience with these such that they can compare? (I'm 150, so I expect the 183 goats would have enough float for me in deep pow, but didn't try)

By:
April 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Sir Francis Bacons are floppy and soft, and won't do well in variable conditions. If you are looking for a one ski quiver, I'd vote against the SFBs.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
April 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

First off, the Big Trouble is a pretty good ski, but maybe not the same as the Gotama's. My personal favourite of the bunch you named is the SFB's, super playful and responsive. I feel that the 183 seems to be long for your size, it's a ski I would ride being 195, but that's up to you and extra float is always nice. Another suggestion for you is the K2 ObSethed, which is a really nice big mountain ski, my facourite of the season. It handles the deepest conditions I have ever skied, and rips steep lines. Just a extra option.

By:
April 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

One of Dynastar's Best!

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
February 10, 2009

The Huge Trouble is one of my favorite skis Dynastar has made in years. It is a great ski for just about anything. I have skied this ski all over resorts, the backcountry and the big mountains of Alaska. It is an amazing powder ski but will hold up to the hard pack and crud. The little camber allows the ski to be playful, and easy to ski in most situations. The construction is built tough and the ski will hold up to most challenges.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I am just wondering if anyone has Tele'd on the HT's.

I am just wondering if anyone has Tele'd on the HT's. Any suggestions as to mounting position. I typically mount my skis 3cm in front of measured mid-cord, but skied the Volkl Katana at boot center and loved it. Thanks for the input.

By:
February 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have not Tele'd on the Huge Trouble but I know a few people that do. I would mount you ski right on the suggested center mount. The HT is a sick ski.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
March 14, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great job Dynastar

By:
December 3, 2008

Dynastar nailed it with this ski. Mount em right on the normal line for all/big mth riding. Awesome swing weight for spinning, ect... they feel very balanced under foot. I recommend the p15 on these skis unless you actually set your din to 15 or above. This binding feels great on the ski, and you save some weight over the p18. The construction is bomber- typical Dynastar. Well built and with an amazing feel underfoot, I have no reservations saying this ski is Dynastar's hottest ski this season.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

How are these skis on groomers? I've been on k2 Recons for

How are these skis on groomers? I've been on k2 Recons for a couple years but really want a fatter ski because I feel I am good enough to put a 100mm ski on edge now.Yeah, no kidding. I realize that...I know its gonna kill the pow and be a sick backcountry ski. I guess my real question is will it be good enough on groomers that I can use it as a one-ski quiver?

By:
February 11, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you're wondering about groomer performance then you're clearly looking at the wrong ski. "Good enough" isn't the issue. You need to be asking yourself what you ski and find a ski to suit your interests more than your abilities.

By:
February 11, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

great ski

By:
February 17, 2009

I demoed this ski at at Alyeska AK the other day. It is such a sick ski. The only other big ski experience I have is a pair of last years 189 Seths with dukes, and though they bust crud and anything else like a steamroller they just seem huge and clumsy lengthwise a lot of the time. When the demo guy handed me the 185 Huge Troubles, I was worried the same thing would be true. Instead, the skis felt light, nimble, and fun. The width is too much if all you do is ski groomers (the ski doesn't lie flat if you aren't bowlegged), but it handles them satisfactorily. They float great over any soft snow, and if you like air, these skis will help you stop anything. I took an air I thought was like 10-15 feet and it turned out like 30, but these skis are stable enough to pull out anything. A heads up I'm 5'10", 135 pounds.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

whats to say about center mounting the bindings on this ski?

whats to say about center mounting the bindings on this ski?

By:
February 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Depending on your size it is an option, but unless you plan on skiing and landing switch the majority of the time there is no reason to go true core center on them. They are meant to big a big mountain powder ski and should be mounted accordingly.

By:
February 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Amazing ski

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 4, 2009

Amazing ski, did well everywhere I took it, powder, crud, packed snow. Absolutely loved it.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

how do these compare with legends pros? in terms of flex...how

how do these compare with legends pros? in terms of flex...how much more playful are they?

By:
February 1, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Huge Trouble is softer, wider and has less camber. I find them much more playful than the legend pro. The low camber makes them more forgiving but you can still charge on this ski. It is one of Dynastar's best powder skis and can still hold up in all conditions. I ski the ski just about everyday in all conditions. From the resort to Alaska...you have to try it.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
February 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Awesome Ski

By:
October 25, 2008

This ski is AWESOME!! I have a Marker Duke binding mounted on them. Dropping cliffs and stomping tricks in park or off piste is no prob. This ski feels very surfy in the pow and very racer on hard pack. I do suggest a lighter binding if your all about doing tricks, try the Marker Jester.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Its a ripper

By:
November 7, 2008

The caption is spot on! I Took these up today for opening day at the bird (Nov 7th not a bog deal) They were super playful for their size and flex, but you have to point it their right there underneath you runnin. Best ski in the Dynaster Big mountain line up. I have px18 on them so they are a little heavy, but certainly bombproof! Ski fast, take chances, and let the snow keep falling this seasons.

Was this helpful? (0) (3)

Flag

Change me.

Tech Specs:

Lengths:
185cm 
Dimensions:
150 / 115 / 130mm 
Construction:
Vertical sidewall 
Core Material:
Wood 
Tail:
Super-raised twintip 
Binding System:
No 
Binding Included:
No 
Recommended Binding:
No 
Recommended Use:
Backcountry freestyle, big mountain freeride 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 Year 
Country of Origin:
France (Includes Monaco) 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought: