We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
Mount the Look PX 12 Ti Jib Wide Ski Bindings onto your fatties when you need bombproof durability and dependable release. With 100mm-wide brakes, these bindings are destined for big hits and deep pow. The PX 12 Ti's mounting platforms feature 3mm-thick shock absorbers that give awesome cushioning when you're stomping rails and crushing the pipe and park all day long. The spring-loaded heel piece creates a boost effect as you launch out of the pipe and ups responsiveness from every ounce of power you put into the binding.
Bottom Line: The Jib Wides? Yeah, your mother probably wouldn't approve.
You'll need to bend the brakes some to get around the waist of the JJ, but the performance of these bindings awesome. You can't go wrong with Look. Simple, tough, and they hang on tight!
I have had four pairs of this binding, either the look px 12 ti or the dynastar px12 jib. Each pair have broken at the toe piece, if your someone who likes to charge it in every condition and actually listen to shop guys telling you that these are burly and will hold up think again. I would recommend going with the px 15 or 18 series bindings. Metal toe and heal piece you wont break!
So i have been looking at the Look PX 12 Ti Jib and the Look PX 12 Jib. The Ti jib seems to be cheaper which seems weird b/c i thought titanium was expensive, but the really confusing part is that these too bindings have basically the same description and weight. What am I missing? And i know that look/dynastar are basically the same so is there any difference in the dynastar px 12? Thanks
I have a set of K2 Disorderly skis and i was wondering if this would be a good binding for me to get. I would say i am an internediate skier i do mostly park smaller boxes and smaller jumps.
Mounted these up with my Dynastar Big's and absolutely love them. They feel very solid on your feet and give really good leverage when on the groomers. Haven't hucked them off anything too big yet, but overall they feel pretty damn durable and are a sick deal...definitely one of the best 12-din bindings out there.
I just bought High Society FR Twin-Tips as my first pair of freeride skis. They are 179cm and have a 92mm width. I've been researching bindings and it seems like these would be ideal for me, but I'd like some reassurance.
I'm an Intermediate/Advanced skier. I'm comfortable on blacks and comfortable at high speeds on blues. I've never messed around in the park, but I guess now I'll give it a shot, probably keeping it to smaller jumps and rails. I'll mostly be on trails though I assume. It seems like these would be versatile and ideal for the riding I'll be doing and could advance with me through the park if I get into that stuff. What do you guys think?
I must admit - my bindings are actually Look Ti Wide "Lifters", but the mechanics are the same. These bindings are EXTREMELY difficult to get in and out of. I'm a fair sized guy (~200 lbs) and I have to STOMP on these things to get my boot in. Getting out isn't a whole lot easier as I have damn near bent poles trying to release the heels. This is not killer unless you are trying to get in or out in deep snow, then while you are digging for your ski you'll be begging for a new set of bindings.
No these are good for everything. The only thing is they are flat mounted with more elastic heel travel than most bindings. If you don't ski park, then the Lifter version of this same binding will be a better option. It lets you transfer more power into the carve, but is awkward in that park. And it depends on how wide your skis are for them to be too wide and drag. If you have something under an 80 mm width for a ski then they will probably be too wide. If you are an all-mountain free ride skier than these will be great for you.
Whats the max sole length on this binding??? ive got some new atomic urban punx and im looking for a sick binding that will fit my 364mm boots...anyone have some advice??
This is a two part question.1) I'm thinking of buying some K2 Hellbent's and I'm wondering if this binding would be a good choice. I'm an advanced/expert level skier and I ski all over the mountain. From chutes to cliffs to bumps, you name it, I ski it. The Hellbent's would be my powder-only skis for the deep days.2) Since I'm looking at some super-fat boards, I'm gonna need some super-fat brakes. I've looked at the wide brake selections and it feels like the ones that would fit (125+) might only work with Marker Bindings. Any thoughts/suggestions?
The best choice bindings for this ski would be the Marker Jester or Griffon with a 132mm brake, sold separately, (this is the binding K2 suggests) or the Rossignol Axial2 Freeride 200 wide XXL (120 mm brake). The Rossignol SAS2 150 Wide is also a good choice but you would have to purchase a 120mm brake separately to fit your skis. You could also buy a the Rossignol Axial2 140 Ti Pro XXL (even though it says the brake is 140mm I'm pretty sure it's only 120mm but check with a Backcountry gear expert and they may be able to tell you for sure). The Rossignol Axial2 140 Ti Pro XXL is basically the same as the Look PX 12 Ti Jib Wide binding but with a higher din or 14 and it comes with a wider brake that will come close to fitting over the waist of a pair of Hellbents if not you can make up the rest by bending the brakes out a little bit. I ride a pair of Line EP Pros mounted with Marker Jesters.
What differences are there between the Look PX 12 Ti Jib Wide and the Rossignol SAS 2 100? I've skied a version of this style of binding since they were the Look-Nevadas back in the late 60s. Currently on the Rossignol Power 100s from 2004. Still love them, but getting new skis. Thanks.
What differences are there between the Look PX 12 Ti Jib Wide and the Rossignol SAS 2 100? I've skied a version of this style of binding since they were the Look-Nevadas back in the late 60s. Currently on the Rossignol Power 100s from 2004. Still love them, but getting new skis. Thanks.
What's the main difference between Look PX 12 Jib Wide Ski Bindings and the Ti version of the same binding? I'm a Advanced-Expert Skier and I can't decide. I usually spend most of my time skiing backcountry and park. What should I get?
They would do the job fine. If weight is a concern there are some lighter bindings out there that would work just as well, but that being said you should not have any problems with these.
Comment on steezysteve's review >