We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
We guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time - now, next month, in 30 years - you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked. Need help returning an item? - Click Hereclose
Due to contracts with the following brands, we are unable to ship any of their products outside the US.
more...
Int'l Shipping
Backcountry.com uses UPS Worldwide Express or Worldwide Expedited
for all shipping outside the United States. We have found this method to be quick,
secure, and cost effective.
On those glorious mornings when there’s a double-digit number in the snow report, the super-fat, powder-addicted Black Diamond Megawatt Ski begs for untracked lines through bottomless fresh. This zero-camber beast returns this year with a fresh design for added pop and stability regardless of conditions. When the snow stacks up though, the Megawatt’s long rocker tip and massive underfoot width keep you floating along in a snorkel-puff nirvana.
Long rocker tip, wide platform and zero camber provide unparalleled performance in deep powder
Internal Wall Core Technology uses poplar with birch sidewalls for more pop and better edge hold
Formula One geometry features three internal ribs for hard snow performance and improved turning
Bottom Line: Megawatt’s the name, powder’s the game.
Some people like the Megawatts but they are just too big and sloppy for me, dont get me wrong they are loads of fun on deep days but I just all around prefer the new Zealots with a slight rocker tip. Without camber and side cut they just skip all over the place, I like a ski that cuts through the snow, not one that slides sideways when you try and turn. It is also a bit too wide for landing airs and is heavy for touring. Fun but not my favorite. Unless you can afford to have a full quiver including the megawatts for those 3ft utah days I wouldnt recommend it them. I have narrowed my quiver down to the kilowatts for groomer and bumps and hard resort days and the zealots for everything else. When traveling light to ski I would only bring my zealots, they preform surprisingly well on groomers and resort.
awinstanle#: A friend who skis them says that they are so wide that you don't even have to worry about the landing, "because you're taking it with you."
The same old trusty powder slayer with a fresh coat of paint. I still feel the way about them as I did when I first posted a review two years ago.
"Warning, this may read like a bad infomercial, but I'm really in love with these skis. How do you make 4" feel like 8", 8" feel like 16" and over 2 feet of snow the most fun you've ever had. Behold the Megawatt! Hands up, or hands down the best powder ski I've ever had the pleasure of playing with. We've had some really deep days this winter and it's nice to finally be on a ski that I can say is fat enough. No more wallowing and poling your way out when the slope flattens, these boards bring the fast flotation. The front rocker helps in several ways. The ski turns quickly, it eliminates the classic tip dive tele tumble and makes crusts, upside down pow, and variable snow a pleasure. Accidentally ended up not skiing powder one day and it was a big surprise to find they actually rail on the hardpack as well. They have acquired the nickname "Mega-what", due to all the questions folks ask when they are seen touring around the backcountry. With big skis comes more weight to lug around and I'm down with "light is right", but these are worth every pound and they come with me whenever there's fresh snow on the ground now. If I wasn't clear, I like them very much and highly recommend them if you ski powder often."
okay here's da' deal heading to alaska in feb/march Haines to be exact I'm 5'8", 165-170 with pack/gear on, but I am an Eastie Maine/Vermont. Should I go for the gusto and snag the 188 in anticipation of 40+ degree 2000 ft AK. faces or should I snag the 178's for my return to East coast, strong,agressive skier fattest pair of boards i have now are pre rocker Coomba's sz 174 and on some days railing a open face high speed G.S. turns I get a little softness in the tips with chatter. I'm thikin' with the big rocker of the mega i can size up and still be good back east comments appreciated
Are you firmly set on the megas? Looks like you might be able to find something in the 110mm waisted big mountain class that can still deliver back home. BD zealot and the like.
Tough to say. You might want to ski haines first to figure out what kind of ski you want. Overall, this is a rad ski for AK, but for your height, it may not be right.
Assuming you're a strong skier, I like the 185cm JJ for your size. It skis short, and you won't sacrafice a whole lot of float. AK is big lines, not 3 foot pow (usually).
You're going to lose some versatility w/ zero camber (and 125mm at the waste is getting up there). The megawatt still rocks though. Sadly, skiing it back east on-piste could be UGLY.
The S7 would be very similar to the J also, both good choices!
These skis are incredible. I can not say enough good things. The tip rocker make these skis very turnable even in the 188 length. So do not be afraid to buy them as long or a little longer than you are used to. For telemark skiers the dreaded "tip dive" is virtually eliminated by the unsinkable rockered tip on the Megawatt. The progressive flex gives this ski a nice tail that can handle hard charging skiers no problem yet this ski still seems to be the most user friendly fat ski I have ever skied. 5 stars really doesn't do it. As far as powder big-mountain boards go this ski is 6 stars for sure!
I used the Megawatt's the past two years and filming for Greg Stump's, Legend Of Ahhhs. This shot was in the Lost Lake Cirque on the west face of Lone Peak, Big Sky MT. I love the Megawatt's but at the end of this day my knee was so swollen that Mike Mannelin had to carry them out or I'd still be back there! It was obviously worth it! Greg and I spent a lot of time talking about the influence of his movies on the development of skis and ski areas. It was in 1988 Schmidt and I stood on top of Lone and encouraged Johnny Bad, the owner to put a tram to the top. Now it is guys pushing the same limits out here that make this the future terrain. Despite the size of the ski I have been totally confident on almost every condition except steep bulletproof. I'm 51 so strengths of days long ago are gone and yet these skis breathed new life into the sport for me! My son and I were able to try the new mega's last spring and it was fun to watch him take right to them as well. So, I'm not crazy, these are a ski for the quiver IMHO.
i have gotten two days on the megawatts. the first a 10" day at alta and the following day with left overs. as for powder you cannot bury the tips and they are super floaty, almost if you are a mini trampoline bouncing through the snow.
i have the 178 and they made skiing powder almost effortless allowing me to charge all day. however i would not ski the watts unless there was 6" plus on the ground. they are big and the tips get sloppy. if you can rock this on deep days pull the trigger, but dont expect to make them your everyday ski.
I have skied them at +2, which is where I always ski unless I'm in the park. They handle really well, especially since it shortens up the swing on them, and makes trees slightly easier. +1 wouldn't make a big, noticeable difference in the performance I don't think though.
These sticks aren't like other early-rise or reverse-camber models. The shovel rises up like a fire shovel, and looks like it could be used as one. The sudden upturn is unusual, unique, and effective at keeping tips from sinking, even if the sticks are short. Sure, this early rise shortens the effective edge, and with such a dramatic rise, it will not hook tips into the groomers like other moderately rocked skis would. Other skis like the ObSethed, Gotama, Anti Piste, or Sir Francis Bacons which have 'rocker,' can carve into hard snow like a regular cambered ski, because a regular cambered ski is de-cambered in a turn. The 'rocker' is accentuated when the ski is further de-cambered. The Megawatts don't really have camber but have 'early-rise,' so when the ski is de-cambered it does not really raise the ski tip anymore. The main thing that I like about the Megawatts is that the tail is stiff. This is especially good for telemark skiing because you don't get the 'wheelie' effect like you would with Hell Bents or JJ's, which have early-rise tails, too. With tele-skis, you don't have a back-seat like you do on Alpine setups. The Megawatts' stiff tails give a more stable feeling behind you, so you don't pop a wheelie and land on your ass. This tele-friendly stiff tails is what sets these whips apart from the rest. Even with the early rise tips, the M'watts handle pretty well on the hard-pack back to the lift, but they are far from a one ski quiver. These are a great ski for people who look at groomer days like vegan looks at bacon.
I love these skis but the mounting point is way old school/tele. Get them mounted a bit forward (3 to 6cm) for maximum pleasure. Nice and floaty, kill crud and are stable on groomers. I am remounting mine with Dukes. I'm told that the rocker is okay for skinning with these, especially if you aren't going for 6k vert on an icy track.
What kind of bindings work with this wide a waist? I cannot find a binding with brakes that span 125mm. Additionally, will the brakes need to be greater ( > ) than 125mm or greater than or equal ( ≥ ) to 125mm?
Also, if you get the Fritschi Freerides with the Super XL brake size, the shop where you get them mounted can bend the brakes (slightly too skinny stock) to make them fit.
You can get marker royal family bindings with brakes that are 130mm wide. So either the griffons or jesters or baron or duke. You might have to purchase the 130mm brakes separately though.
These skis are a blast on big pow days and even on days when the slopes have tons of tracks. The Megawatts the crud skiing from bump to bump. Not for all mountain skiing, but I still enjoyed them on front side trails while working towards the back country.
First, this is an awesome powder ski. It floats up high in fresh snow and busts through crusts and crud like they're not even there. In deep, heavy or wet pow, these are my go-to ski.
On that note however, that's where the fun stops with these skis. You really have to swing them out wide to carve down any sort of packed snow. Instead of laying trenches, you just have to make big, surfy, skidded turns on the groomers and packed stuff. In the bumps, they're a bit burly, tankish, and while you can easily get through them, it's just not the most fun I've ever had. For instance I skied about 6 inches of fresh over some decent-sized bumps in the Wildcat area of Alta and the skis just felt slow and heavy. Still, these are my first choice for fresh deep snow conditions.
I am about 5'10" and 160 ... right on the line for either length. I got to ski the 178's last year on several deep days and loved them. I unfortunately never got to take out the bigger size. I didn't feel like the 178's were floppy or not enough ski for me, but wonder what I am missing on the bigger boards, I ski a 178 Legend Pro most days. I am not really into going as fast and straight at all times. What size should I get??? With the giant shovel what does the larger size really feel like?
The general rule of thumb with rockered skis is to go 5 to 10 cm longer than you normally go, because the rocker makes it more maneuverable and you have less edge contact on harder snow. This make it easier to ski in both pow and on the groomers. I would go with the larger size, you will get more floatation in the pow, and more stability in all conditions. The ski is really nimble, fun and easy to ski. The 188 is the way to go. I skied this ski for a little bit last season in the 188 and really enjoyed it. I would feel like a little awkward on the shorter version. I'm 5'8" 160, so roughly the same size as you.
I would say go with the bigger size. I am pretty much the same size as you and have skied the 188 and because of the long rocker and the shorter base contact they actually ski shorter than their printed size. Be ready to go fast and get buttery with those turns.
Write your answer here...I would probably say get the larger size, the shovel tip allows for easy turning and the surface area actually is alot smaller than the length. If your going for the megawatts you may as well go big right.
Comment on Noah Howell's photo >