We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
We guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time - now, next month, in 30 years - you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked. Need help returning an item? - Click Hereclose
Due to contracts with the following brands, we are unable to ship any of their products outside the US.
more...
Int'l Shipping
Backcountry.com uses UPS Worldwide Express or Worldwide Expedited
for all shipping outside the United States. We have found this method to be quick,
secure, and cost effective.
The Arc'teryx Men's Alpha SL Jacket provides bomber weather protection at a weight low enough to put a smile on the faces of ounce-counting climbers and backpackers. Waterproof breathable Gore-Tex Paclite fabric makes this shell jacket versatile enough to take on a single-push alpine climb, backpacking trip, or even a long-distance ski tour. Arc'teryx made the Alpha SL Jacket with minimalists in mind, adding only essential features like Underarm zips, two hand pockets, and a helmet-compatible hood. *Only Available for US Shipment.
Bottom Line: The Arc'teryx Alpha SL Jacket allows you to go light in the mountains and on the trail without sacrificing much-needed storm protection.
If you're looking for a minimalist, very light rain jacket that will keep you extremely dry, then look no further. With the entire body made of Gore-Tex Paclite & the only frills being pitzips (waterproof zippers, so no flaps to add weight), and 2 hand pockets (also waterproof zippers), this jacket is incredibly light. However, unlike other lightweight jackets I've had in the past, this one really stands up to normal wear without realling showing it and without sacrificing useful features. For instance, the pockets aren't lined with cheap mesh, but instead are simply an additional layer of Gore-Tex Paclite layered over the body, allowing me to leave the pockets open without getting cold (although there is the downside that they can't be used for venting). This also means that if I do accidentally leave the pockets open in a rainstorm, that I still stay completely dry. The only downside I found was that when wearing the hood without a helmet, the hood requires a lot of cinching down, which creates very long lengths of cord on the back of the hood (where the hood volume is adjusted), which can flop around and hit you in the head in heavy winds. Also, it should be noted that the zippers are a little stiff when first used, but gradually become easier to use with use.
This jacket goes with me everywhere. On 40 mile mountain bike rides, skiing in the backcountry, hiking and fits into a small pack of fanny pack and I know it would save my life. incredible how light and perfect this garment is. Can almost not feet it when it is on as it weighs nothing. I would recommend it to anyone. Arcteryx is simply THE BEST
I'm trying too chose between the Alpha SL (paclite) and the Alpha LT (pro shell). Price is not a consideration and it will mostly be used in backpacking. What are the pros and cons for each? Thanks!
I think the SL is a little easier to live with backpacking. The cut is slightly longer and the pockets are much easier to live with if you ever plan on putting your handsin them. The pockets on the LT are a little awkward to access. The LT is heaevier by a very small amount and will be a little more weather resistant, but if you really need that extra protection you've probably got bigger problems. Either one would work great, but for backpacking I like the SL a little more than the LT.
---As Mike said, the Alpha LT is a tougher jacket due to face fabric and the backer material. As for freedom of movement, I'd say they are equivalent, but breathability is better with the Alpha LT. Also, the LT uses the Vislon watertight zip which is easier to use and more durable. It's my favorite lightweight jacket that Arc'teryx makes.
The paclite will be a little less weather resistant in harsh conditions but you will have slightley more freedom as far as movement goes while pursuing your activies.
The pro-shell will add burleyness as far as wear and tear goes without that much of a weight penalty.In the long haul it will be a tougher jacket!
The paclite will be a little less weather resistant in harsh conditions but you will have slightley more freedom as far as movement goes while pursuing your activies.
The pro-shell will add burleyness as far as wear and tear goes without that much of a weight penalty.In the long haul it will be a tougher jacket!
Seemingly impenetrable to rain, I wouldn't test it too much to abrasion though. If you're going to get Pac-lite, or just can't afford Pro, Arcteryx is the only brand to trust I think. Medium fits with loads of movement but snug enough to still be comfortable at speed on the planks (I'm 5'11" 160lbs). Why alpha you say? Its a bit longer and has a bigger hood for helmets. Otherwise identical to Beta.
I love this jacket. It's probably the most diverse item in my closet. I currently use it for skiing in every condition imaginable and I can't to use it for backpacking this summer in the MUGGY and RAINY Smoky Mountains. It breathes well but it is completely impenetrable.
hey guys, is the durability of gore pro (in the alpha LT) worth the extra money? how would you say this jacket holds up to winter elements? again is it worth it to get the alpha LT for winter use? I do want a nice jacket for summer use too. Thanks.
------overpriced? It just depends on if you appreciate attention to detail, fit, and fabric choices, which is why they cost what they do. The Pro-shell is much more durable due to face fabrics, and the backer on the Gore, it's woven, which holds up to a ton of abuse. better performance, durability and breathability, than Pac-lite, or other brands.
I feel all they shells they offer are way over pricedcheck out mountain hardwear shells cheaper and nicer made--------------------------------------------------hey they may be overpriced but the difference between packlite and PRO shell is huge, pro shell is way more durable, and the most breathable, the only place packlite excells in is weight...so i think it it worth it...ive read lots of accounts of peoples packlite shells ripping easily, and ive heard the same countless numbers of stories of how amaizingly durable PRO shell is, and the breathablility will help in summer, and winter...its just better
I can't decide between this and the backcountry stoic. I'm kind of a sweaty guy but know how to layer. Is this Alpha SL for me or is the Stoic a better choice
It depends what youre using it for. The Alpha SL is 2oz lighter, but as far as ive heard, eVent is more breathable than Gore-Tex. I am a huge arcteryx fan, and my older bro had this jacket and loved it so i would recommend it to you.
Im trying to decide between the Alpha SL, Beta SL and Theta SV jackets. Want a hardshell that can serve multiple purposes from occasional skiing to rain and wind on spring/fall camping trips. Plus I'm 6'6"/240 athletic build and need a jacket with the most coverage. Any advice from among these three jackets or otherwise?
In terms of coverage, the Beta SL is a waist-length coat (the other two are longer), so it is going to provide the least coverage of the jackets that you listed. The Alpha SL is a Gore-Tex Paclite material, which is great for backpacking because of how light-weight it is, but I would not say that it is particularly durable for skiing. The Theta SV is at the other end of the spectrum - designed for severe conditions (this is what the SV means).Personally - I'd go with something like either the Alpha LT or the Theta AR for your purposes. The Alpha LT is similar to the SL, just with a slightly heavier Gore-tex material, and the Theta AR is going to be a little heavier than the Alpha LT. Either of these would be good for most outdoor activities, and are a good compromise between being light-weight and being durable - the Alpha LT leaning towards lighter and the Theta AR leaning towards more durable.-----------I would go with the Alpha LT for an all-around jacket. I have the Sirrus SL (now the Alpha SL) and feel that it's durable, but is also minimal in it's construction. I would also consider the Westcomb Cruiser Hoody. The reason is it's got the same quality construction as Arc Teryx, the fit is spot on, and it uses eVent; the most breathable of all w/b materials. The Cruiser is Westcomb's best all-around shell which includes pit-zips and weighs in at about 15oz. It's durable where it needs to be, but also lighter weight than their expedition hardshells. It's got length that extends down to about mid rump and the hood is helmet-compatible (one of the best adjustable hoods out there). It won't be available for another month, but it might be worth considering or checking out if you're not in a hurry.
This is one bomb ass jacket. Light and strong, entirely wind, water, and weather resistant. Hand pockets are perfect when you are backpacking or wearing a harness. When layered, awesome for temperatures down to freezing or solo when you are encountering some rain or on a breezy day. It is also way more durable than people give it credit for, I have snagged brush and taken some whippers into sharp walls and its held up perfect. Looks fly as hell too.
So I'm going on a one week backpacking trip to Isle Royale in the beginning of May. It's going to be pretty cool and a bit on the rainy side. I figure that instead of buying a regular rain jacket that i would spend the money and buy a hard shell. I want to be able use this for backpacking, rainstorms, and all around winter use ( I know I will need to layer in that case). However when i go backpacking I need something extremely durable and waterproof, windproof. I have also been looking at the Mountain Hardwear Terra jacket or this the Arcteryx Alpha SL jacket. Can anyone give me some advice?
Picked up this jacket in November while in Spain for big wall and some skiing and has surpassed all my expectations. The shell is completely wind and water proof, and when properly layered can take you to single digits. High pockets are perfect while wearing a harness and hood is plenty big for any style of helmet. Two of my favorite features are the high neck hood which protects you against the wind, and the lightweight velcro wrist adjustment. Consistent with other reviews, fit is athletic. The seams are bomb and jacket is so light and packable, I couldnt imagine going ANYWHERE without it.
Hey, I'm 6'5" 230lbs, which jacket should i get? I have the Gamma MX in an XL and it's kinda short on length, but i see these posts about 6'4 people having them fit perfectly in a large. Anyone have any advise for me?
Packs easy and keeps the rain, sleet or snow out. I use it for hiking, trail running, etc. Good athletic fit. Generous hood that adjusts well. Have not had it long enough to know about durability. Very well pleased.
You can - although this jacket is billed as a lightweight rain jacket. Paclite is the most breathable gore-tex but pro and performance shells are more durable.------------------------------------------I have used this for downhill skiing in ALL kinds of conditions. It works flawlessly as long as you know how to layer well.-------------------------------------------------------------------- Key correction: paclite is not the most breathable gore-tex. Pro shell is the most breathable. Paclite is laminated with Teflon on the inside, which clogs some of the gore-tex pores making it a little less breathable than pro shell. The Arc'teryx rep told me this so I'll take his word. I hope this helps.
Had this jacket for more than a year and so far it has survived every alaskan test I can throw at it. From it raining sideways is seward to dumping snow at alyeska to bushwacking in the middle of freakin nowhere. Completely waterproof and not a scratch so far. Definatly worth the money
I do not think one could ask for a better jacket. I do a lot of trail running in the cold rain and such. So it is imperative that I have a waterproof jacket of some sort to adequately shelter me and enjoy my run. Sure, I could have settled for a mediocre jacket, but I am glad I spent alittle extra. Sometimes you pay for what you get and with Arcteryx that is exactly the case. This is one great jacket. It is a sleek and minimalist kind of jacket. It is probably the most practical of all the Goretex jackets out there. The weight is unreal. The zippers are smooth. The pitzips are great. The pockets are perfectly positioned. When I go on a long cold and wet run, I place my hands in the pockets and they shield them just fine. Plus the pockets are are Goretex so no wetness is getting inside the jacket. The jacket is feather-light, but once you get over the idea that it is so light you realize that it is actually a very durable jacket. The jacket certainly does not have excessive bells and whistles, but that is the great part about it. Minimalist does not mean bad in this case, instead, it means great. This jacket has everything that I need and performs great.
Have a question on size... I'm 5'9" 165... I wear 16.5" / 32-33 dress shirts, and medium in pretty much everything. That said, looking at the above sizing chart, it's pointing pretty clearly to a Small. I plan on using a thin layer system underneath this jacket: good thermals, very thin half-zip fleecer, etc. However, I'm worried that even a few thin under-layers will be too tight underneath a Size Small. Can anyone similar size to me shed light on this?
I have the alpha sv, I know it's not the same jacket, but similar. If you'd like to layer and not have it be too tight, I'd suggest the medium. The sleeves are a better length for me with the medium. I'm also 5'9".------------------------I am 6'0, 140 lbs. and I wear the medium. It layers perfectly at that size.
This Jacket is Top of the Line ... light weight .. great to carry around and water proof.. i cant say enough good things about it ... it was on sale too maked down from 299 to 260 .. so what a deal ! Plain and Simple you need a nice light rain coat .. look no further
Chicago being the windy city, this will be a great jacket for the winter since the Gore-Tex membrane is not only waterproof-breathable but also windproof. Do note that the jacket has zero insulation. I think that's great because it makes it a lot more versatile. You can use it as a technical shell with insulating layers in the winter and as a rain jacket in the summer.
For the price, this is the best shell Arc'Teryx makes. Super durable and lightweight Gore-tex Paclite feels really nice next to skin. Closer fit than the Beta or Theta jackets.
I wore this jacket on ONE HIKE 12 miles, and when I returned it was ripped on the back! Nice material, but made for delicate people! Won't hold up to a beating! I like how light and small it is, but I'm going for the gortex pro.
If you feel that it's a manufacturing defect, contact Arc'Teryx customer service. they have a lifetime warrantee on their jackets; they might be able to help you out.I prefer my Gore-Tex Pro also. It's just twice as expensive.
I bought this to replace a TNF waterproof jacket. The exact name escapes me right now. Anyway, this jacket has a much better fit. It is tighter around the body, but that is preferable. The major differences include the waterproof zippers, the lack of exterior draft flaps for the core vents to reduce weight and make more effective, the higher hand pockets to facilitate use while wearing a pack, the use of actual Gore-Tex material, and the fully adjustable hood. This jacket is far superior. It is super light and does not let anything through. I don't think it would breathe too well in a hot and humid climate, but in Northern Utah this jacket works perfectly.
Hi. Comparing Gore-Tex Pro vs Gore-Tec Paclite, and I'm a little worried about the durability of the Paclite. Specifically, I'm concerned with the potential for puncture by prickly bush and scrub. Does anybody have any experience here that can help?Thanks
It's way more durable then people give it credit for. It's light, but I've brushed tress while skiing pretty fast- I've ripped several other jackets the same way; the paclite held up fine.I went with the pro shell based on numerous accounts I've read about paclite wearing and tearing.
Nice touring jacket, only thing missing is a powder skirt. As always Arcteryx makes great stuff, maybe over priced but the quality is there. If a powder skirt is a must, consider Cloudveil Koven plus.
If you want an ultra light, high tech, top quality minimalist shell, this is it. mine has one pocket, and it is enough to stash your ID and keys, the rest is only what you need. This years has two pockets, a nice add i thought. I have taken it through West coast downpours and skied Colorado Backcountry in it. Gore-Tex Paclite shaves weight and keeps you nice and dry. and the styling is typical Arc'teryx, subtle but kick @$$. I have it in grey, and my bro has the Wasabi, I like his better.
This is a great jacket its very light, and comfortable. I'm 6'3", 180lbs and a medium fits great with enough room to wear a thick fleece under it. This is prob one of the best arc'teryx jackets for the money. The pac-lite is only a little bit thinner than the pro-shells, and will hold up just as well. I would def recommend this jacket to anyone, the only problem i have with it is the lack of pockets, but the two side pockets are well placed and will hold just about anything.
This is an excellent jacket!!! It surpassed my expectations, but that's no surprise for this companies attention to detail and quality. It keeps you very dry and works great as a hard shell (I'm using it with a fleece for skiing). Please NOTE the big hood, I was taken by surprise how large it was, it's made to be helmet compatible. Although there are multiple draw cords to fix this. Although, this would not defer me from purchasing it. I enjoy the pocket placement. I enjoy the fit, it's a very good, athletic fit. I would defiantly recommend this to everyone!!!
I think they must have read my review of the last version of this jacket they put out. It now has two waterproof hand pockets on it. This is very packable, and light and has pit zips for venting. Will keep you dry in a downpour. You will need to layer if you are looking for warmth, this is only Gore-Tex Paclite.
This jacket is sweet. My friend took it fly fishing and fell in the water. He had his his cell phone and camera in the pockets! Both stayed dry not an ounce of water gets through the seems. Keeps you dry no matter what the weather.
I am super hard on my equipment and in the few months I have had my Alpha SL I have not been impressed. I am actually on my second jacket in three months, my first one I had a full seem tear out but my second one has been better.
Pros: Lightweight, athletic fit, high collar
Cons: Poor construction, price
It use to be that you got what you paid for with Arc'teryx but since selling out to Columbia a few years back their quality has suffered while their price has continued to go up. Don't waste your money buying the Arc'teryx name when all you're getting is Columbia quality.
Recommendation: Buy the OR Zealot or a Marmot. Better quality and you will pay about half the price.
Not true AT ALL.. In January 2001 Arc'teryx was purchased by the Adidas owned Salomon Group.[1] In May of 2005 Amer Sports purchased the Salomon Group from Adidas. Amer Sports is the largest manufacturer of sporting equipment in the world. The company's global headquarters are located in Helsinki, Finland, with manufacturing and sales locations worldwide.
I believe you are mistaking Arc'teryx with Mountain Hardwear, which was sold to Columbia.
arc'teryx lovingly replaced my old '06ish Alpha SL after it started ripping on the front zipper due to bad design. they sent me this one ('08 model) in return. 1. ok it's made it china now... therefore arcteryx should decrease their list price by half.
2. wore this from paradise to base camp at mt. Rainier and after a few thousand feet the jacket, inside and out, was dripping wet and basically ruined my life. There was no heavy rain, at all, only cloud mist.
3. all zippers are hard to operate, besides for the zipper pull strap snapping on the first or second day or wearing, just try to close one of the pit zips when youre juggling other gear. they require 3 hands. i do not have 3 hands.
4. this jacket is great for about 15-20 minutes of light rain. then prepare to get wet.
Comment on Russell Griggs's review >