We offer Free Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States...that's the lower 48 to you and me. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free Shipping into account when comparing prices.
Free Shipping (Economy) must be selected inside the shopping cart.
Alpina's BC 2050 Backcountry Boot takes care of you when you plan on running into mixed conditions out on the frozen reaches. The BC 2050 Boot tackles long days off the beaten path with its NNN BC outsole and supportive, yet comfortable fit. This Alpina backcountry touring boot combines rugged construction, cushy comfort, and the warmth of Thinsulate insulation to help you get deep into the backcountry. The BC 2050 Backcountry Boot's plastic cuff, plastic heel counter, and power strap closure give you the stability you need to cruise through mixed conditions and power through sketchy spots. The wide and beefy NNN BC sole provides even more stability and strength for all-day touring, no what kind of conditions you run into.
Bottom Line: Find solitude in the deep country in the Alpina BC 2050 Backcountry Boot's comfort and dependability.
Ok first off the inital out of the box fit was so so, until I adjusted the ankle strap, then the fit like a well broken in running shoe. I changed the laces and added a bit of closed cell foam under the laces (as well as swaped the stock laces for thicker boot laces) and now they are very comfortable. Keeping in mind that they are not tele boots the provide great support, as it says above fits NNN bindings, I will post again once the snow starts to fall and I get to give them a trial run
Do these Alpina BC 2050 Backcounty Boots come in womens sizes? I need a boot that will be good for turns. I cannot turn in the simple Alpina lace up boots that I bought. I did about 15 face plants yesterday... help!
Ok first off the inital out of the box fit was so so, until I adjusted the ankle strap, then the fit like a well broken in running shoe. I changed the laces and added a bit of closed cell foam under the laces (as well as swaped the stock laces for thicker boot laces) and now they are very comfortable. Keeping in mind that they are not tele boots the provide great support, as it says above fits NNN bindings, I will post again once the snow starts to fall and I get to give them a trial run
Is anyone aware of a backcountry ski boot that comes in a wide size? I pull up lame after a couple hours in regular width boots and it is making long trips virtually impossible.
I contacted Alpina, and was told very nicely that they do not make a true "wide" boot. I am trying to contact all of the manufacturers, but suspect that I already know the answer. If you find one, let us know.
Have you thought about stretching the boots? If the boots are tight in the area behind the toes (wide part of foot), a professional stretch could help. Provided there is enough leather there. Use a shoe or leather repair place or a skate & ski shop. Price 10 - 20 per boot. Worth asking about. Dan
No answer, but I have the same problem. My Rossignol BCx11's size 48 (the largest I have found) are killing my feet due to the narrow forefoot to the point where I'm considering giving up skiing and just resorting to snowshoes. I wish there was some way we could communicate to the ski boot manufacturers that there are skiers out there with big/wide feet. Keen has done a great job of this in the shoe/hiking boot market.
I've used these boots a few times now and I'm impressed with their comfort and ankle support. They tend to run slightly large in size, so if you fall in the middle in sizing, you might waant to go with the smaller size boot. I'm a size 10.5 and went with a size 45 (11) and should have went with a 44 (10) being they run slightly larger in size. The one negative is that you really need to lace these boots tightly in order to keep your foot tight to the boot, but this may also be in part that the boot is slightly big for me as well. Also, there isn't much, if any at all support over the top of your foot, being the fabric tongue is lightweight vinyl and foam. The plastic wrap around cuffs need to be deburred breaking all inner sharp edges too, otherwise they "might possibly" cut into the fabric portion of the boots. Sand paper or a stout nail file will work for this task. I also replaced the thin laces that came with the boots with larger tubular laces. All in all the 2050 Boot is a good match with the Fischer Rebound Skis that I also purchased for light duty BC adventures!
Deb - will let you know if I find something. Frustrating - many many kids have size 15 so the market seems to be there - hiking boot in that size are relatively common and available so why not BC boots.Ken
I put on the boots thinking I needed to wear them around the house for a little break in time, boy was I wrong! They fit perfectly, no tight spots and in the back country very warm and after the first day of skiing, about 5 hours, my feet were not sore at all. Very happy with the boots and the help from the people at your company.
No, these are not 3-pin compatible boots, these are NNN (New Nordic Norm) compatible.For a 3-pin boot try:http://www.backcountry.com/store/ALP0195/Alpina-Blazer-Touring-Boot.html
These boots are extremenly comfortable, they are downright slipper-like in their comfort. They are great in track or making your own tracks. Great support for the downhill parts. I'm 6"3" 225, and they are plenty stable. They are well made, and it seems like they will last several years. I have used them about thirty times since I purchased them, and they look and feel brand new. More than I can say for the Rossignol's I had, which lasted one season. I really like the lace cover, it keeps the laces from icing up when in the deep snow. They are warm, but not too warm. I did 10k in 0 degrees, with wind, one pair of wool socks, and was fine. I've found the boots run true to size, I have a size Euro 47, and I wear a size 12 US shoe, size 13 running shoe. .
My wife and I each bought a pair of these on the basis of the wonderful reviews focusing on how comfortable they are. They felt very comfortable when we first put them on, but they were very painful (around the ankles) when skiing. I wish we had experienced the high level of comfort that the other skiers did because these are well-made boots with great ankle support. But, in our case, it was precisely that superior ankle support that made them painful.
I encourage you to try these boots. If the ankle support works well for you, I'm sure you will be very happy with them.
Did you try adjusting the length of the ankle strap? Mine were uncomfortable - verging on painful until I adjusted the velcro at the end of the ankle stap. Hope this helps
After having been on the sidelines for more than 10 years, I finally decided to put together a new backcountry touring rig. My Alpina 1550's (size 41) are partnered with a pair of Rossignol BC90 waxless skis (169 cm), and Rossignol BC Magnum NNN bindings which appear to be almost indentical to the Rottefella BC Magnums. I took this gear out for the first time yesterday, to Burstall Pass in Kananskis Country west of Calgary. About 8" of fresh moist snow had fallen the previous day and air temp was about 0C/32F.
The boots were extremely comfortable, and pretty much felt like slippers compared to the single leathers I had skied in in the past. Sizing seems to be on the large size. I'm a solid size 8 in street shoes and these 41's felt like 8.5 US size. They are also quite roomy over the instep and in the heel and are medium wide at the ball of the foot. I intend to add a thin insole to raise my foot a bit and also go with thicker socks. These mods should make the fit just about perfect.
The boots were a dream along the flats and low-angle rolling terrain. The skis gripped very well up to at least a 10 deg. inclination (guessing here) and even more in the untracked fresh stuff. I put some skins on for a steep wooded "headwall" that lead up into the alpine. After slogging up to the pass, I started down the rolling terrain with 5-15 to occasional short 20 deg slopes and tried some tele turns. The first few turns were a little disconcerting - think telemarking in slippers! These boots have excellent lateral rigidity/stiffness because of the plastic frame but almost no forward stiffness. This makes it almost impossible to apply any pressure to the skis by pushing forward in the boots. It seemed to me that carefully balanced application of weight using the balls of the feet was the key to turning. A delicate touch is definitely required. And possibly a little more of an upright stance than I had used in the past. Having said that, I'm confident that with a bit more practice, I'll be turning these skis just fine. It could be that the NNN bindings were partly reponsible for the "loose" feel as well - I'm new to these also.
I'd have to disagree with some reviewers who found that these boots have good ankle support. Laterally yes, longitudinally no. They felt very soft to me.
I hope to get up on some of the local glaciers this spring and see how this setup performs. To be honest, I'm a bit leary about the stability of these boots/bindings going downhill with a heavy pack on. We'll see.
I want too know how much more support is there in this boot than in the 1550 I have the 1550 but I want a boot that will give me more support so I can make turns so is this a better boot for that?
These boots are fantastic. I was surpised that they fit me so well given that they were unisex and I have very small ankles, but fit great. What a difference the NNN system makes over the SNS. I am able to make tight backcountry turns in them because of the extra support. I did not find that they ran large in size.
Comment on zapmaster321's review >