- Home
- Hiking & Camping Gear
- Backpacks
- Weekend Packs (3000-4500 cu in)
- Arc'teryx Bora 65 Backpack - 3720-4330 cu in - 2007
- Weekend Packs (3000-4500 cu in)
- Backpacks
- Hiking & Camping Gear
Arc'teryx Bora 65 Backpack - 3720-4330 cu in - 2007
2007 Model No Longer Available
Arc'teryx Bora 65 Backpack – 3720-4330cu in >
Research other out-of-stock versions:
Image
Detail Views
Be the first to upload your photo of the Bora 65 Backpack - 3720-4330 cu in. >
Arc'teryx Bora 65 Backpack - 3720-4330 cu in - 2007
The Arc'teryx Bora 65 Backpack keeps gear in place and organized for multiple days on the trail. Arc'teryx uses their V-stay suspension to gently handle heavy loads. Signature Arc'teryx effects including kangaroo pocket with drain hole and WaterTight zippers. Laminated internal pocketing and a dedicated sleeping bag area combines with the removable top lid that can be used as a fanny pack, to insure that gear stays organized. The Arc'teryx Bora 65 is built with the breakthrough suspension technology and ergonomic design of Thermoformed straps. Travel over rugged and irregular terrain with a Bora Backpack on your back will be a comfortable affair.
Bottom Line: Ingenious engineering brings comfort and convenience to the trail with the Arc'teryx Bora 65 Backpack.
Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.
Change me.
Tech Specs:
- Material:
- 420D WaterTight, 420D ripstorm
- Volume:
- [S] 3720cu in, [M] 4030cu in, [L] 4330cu in
- Suspension:
- HDPE framesheet, 6061 aluminum stays, Thermoformed straps
- Hydration Compatible:
- Yes
- Torso Adjustment:
- No
- Detachable Pack:
- Yes, lid
- Sleeping Bag Compartment:
- Yes
- Rain Cover:
- No
- Access Types:
- Top, side, bottom
- External Pockets:
- 2 Lid, 1 front, 2 side want pockets
- Snowboard Carry:
- No
- Ski Carry:
- No
- Gear Loops:
- No
- Ice Axe Loops:
- Yes
- Shovel Pocket:
- No
- Weight:
- [S] 6lbs 3oz, [M] 6lbs 10oz, [L] 6lb 13oz
- Recommended Use:
- Overnight backpacking
- Warranty:
- Lifetime






Comment on gamewarden's review >