- Home
- Men's Clothing
- Men's Pants
- Men's Ski Pants
- Oakley Rocco Pant - Men's - 2009
Community Rating
Oakley Rocco Pant - Men's - 2009 BCS
Available Colors / Styles
Be the first to upload your photo of the Rocco Pant - Men's. >
The Rocco Shell Pant brings solid construction and unmistakable Oakley style to your next session. Critically taped seams and 10K-rated waterproof fabric keep out all but the heaviest storms, while the loose fit and invisible inseam vents keep you cool under the midday sun.
Bottom Line: Get maximum style without maxing out your credit.
Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.
I'm 5'7 with a size 32 waist. I think a small would
I'm 5'7 with a size 32 waist. I think a small would have to small of a waist, but a medium would be too long. Am I wrong? Any suggestions?
By: joh100711487
January 13, 2011
Are these pants waterproof enough to get through a weekend at
Are these pants waterproof enough to get through a weekend at a place like snowbird
By: al62171160187
October 7, 2010
Definitely! I know guys who skied week after week in these puppies..def can hold up to 'da bird.
By: SkiierchicElise
October 8, 2010
Solid
By:
Justin Cody Griffin
June 5, 2010
Since it's the "Rocco" option I wasn't expecting much as it is Oakley's cheapest/entry level pants... I got the lava design in the pants and jacket to have a matching suit and wow. I have 4 pairs of Oakley pants and it seems they do not correlate price and performace. Although it is the cheapest I've purchased from oakley it is the same quality as the most expensive... good insulation, fleece pockets, waterproofing, leg gaiters, etc... I would HIGHLY recommend these pants to anyone. NOTE** It is "loose" fit though so buyer beware they generally run one size bigger than claimed... ** ALSO, these pants DO NOT have a waist tab set for adjustments so be prepared to use a belt if you order true to your size or larger... **
I am 6'3" Tall and 205 lbs. I am between a 34 and 36
I am 6'3" Tall and 205 lbs. I am between a 34 and 36 size waist. Any recommendations on size? I want them to be comfortable but I don't want to be swimming in them either. Thanks!
By: Ken
August 22, 2010
You want them to be loose; you want them to be a bit baggy for different weather conditions. Depending on what you wear under them (shorts, thermals, or even just boxers for when its hot) you want to be able to make adjustments...Good Luck, oh and I would get an XL for sure. I am 6'1 205 lbs and I have a size 33 waist and I get an XL so go for it...
By: Flip254
August 24, 2010
They are a loose baggy fit so you should be goo in a large.....But a 36 waist is on the cusp of being xl....
By: Mike Traslin
August 23, 2010
Are these pants red or pink I can't tell with my compute
Are these pants red or pink I can't tell with my computer.
By: Alex
May 16, 2010
neither. they are reddish pink... i have them and they are "lava" ... a mixture of red and pink, they're pretty sick looking. hope this helps.
By: Justin Cody Griffin
June 5, 2010
While not baby pink, these are definitely not red. I would go for a bright magenta if I had to name the color. Hope that helps, computer color distortion can be so annoying.
By: EliseGuruess
May 16, 2010
Sick pants
By:
Nick
October 12, 2009
The oakley Rocco Pants are so warm. The inside of the pants are all fleece lined and are garanteed to keep you warm in any condition. They are also nice and baggy. Being loose fit they are bigger than a normal size. They are the best pants ive ever worn.
Could you reccomend these for climbing Kilimandjaro? or are
Could you reccomend these for climbing Kilimandjaro?
or are they too uncomfortable/heavy to spend 6 days walking in.
Am looking for water resistant pants as rainstorms occur daily on the mountain, ski and snowboard pants seem to be the only ones.
By: gjv3774302
March 12, 2010
No I would definitely look for some gore-tex shell pants and layer underneath them. These are not nearly substantial enough in terms of waterproofing and durability for high altitude mountaineering. If you are going to be doing this kind climbing I would look to mountain hardwear or arc'teryx and find something with gore-tex pro shell. You won't be sorry you spent the extra money when you stay dry in a rainstorm.
By: James Molnar
March 20, 2010
anyone know how to make these slimer like bell bottom style!!!
anyone know how to make these slimer like bell bottom style!!! these would b dope, hook a brutha up if anyone knows how to!
By: joe3715144
February 14, 2010
You could bring them to the local tailor if you have one near your house if you want to spend the extra money.
By: Alex
May 16, 2010
needle, thread and brain.
By: lucas
March 5, 2010
Steezy fo sheezy
By:
Jonathan Hackbarth
January 13, 2010
These pants are great. Super comfy and warm thanks to the fleece lining. The only thing i wish they had were ankle slits to "bell bottom" them out a bit. I personally don't like the way they bunch on my boots. Other than that, these are great pants.
1 Comment Last Comment: April 1, 2010 by: Tidezealot
By: Tidezealot
April 1, 2010
Contrary to the listed features, these pants have no waist adjustment tabs. This is the only negative. They seem to be excellent, typical of Oakley outerwear.
I am a girl who is interested in buying these pants. I'm
I am a girl who is interested in buying these pants. I'm about 5'5 130 lb, do you think i would be able to wear a medium?
By: snowbunnnyyyyy
February 5, 2010
A small would probably be better. My brother has these in medium and he's is like 5'7 or 5'8
By: James Molnar
February 15, 2010
Im almost 5' 9" what size should i get??
Im almost 5' 9" what size should i get??
By: Matt
February 1, 2010
Matt,
you should get a Medium.
By: Ed Ayres
February 15, 2010
baggy? im 5'9 i want a baggy pant but not too huge...medium
baggy? im 5'9 i want a baggy pant but not too huge...medium or large
By: seth
September 27, 2009
Go big or go home...get xl
By: Nick
October 12, 2009
This is a loose fit opposed to a regular fit.
By: kgenzler2382385
October 5, 2009
large 511 and large is a little small to be baggy
By: jamie
October 3, 2009
Change me.
Out of Stock
2009 Model No Longer Available
We have a lot more Men's Ski Pants than that
Men's Ski PantsSolid
Since it's the "Rocco" option I wasn't expecting much as it is Oakley's cheapest/entry level pants... I got the lava design in the more...
Sick pants
The oakley Rocco Pants are so warm. The inside of the pants are all fleece lined and are garanteed to keep you warm in any condition. They are also nice more...
- Insulation:
- None
- Waterproof Rating:
- 10K
- Breathable Rating:
- 5000g
- Fit:
- Loose
- Side Zips:
- Hem gusset zips
- Venting:
- Inseam
- Pockets:
- Hand and rear
- Seam Taped:
- Yes, critically
- Waist:
- Belt loops, adjustable tabs
- Gaiters:
- Yes
- Recommended Use:
- Skiing and snowboarding
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 30 Days