Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50*
Memorial Day SaleMemorial Day Sale
Detail Pics

Description

The Trollveggen won't slow you down.

No pant hollers versatility like the Norrøna Men's Trollveggen Warm2 Stretch Tight. It's outerwear in cool temperatures and a base layer when the temperature really dives. the stretch fabric won't limit your range of motion. And comfort? Forget about it.
  • Backcountry.com is the exclusive US retailer for Norrøna products

Share your thoughts

What do you think of the

Norrøna Trollveggen Warm2 Stretch Tight - Men's

? Share a...

No file chosen

Rather attach a photo from another website?

Rather attach a photo from your computer?

  • Product review:
  • Share a video
  • Share a photo

How familiar are you with the product?(optional)

Invalid filetype.

Save

Here's what others have to say...

5 5

hkh

Member since 

I didnt think I would keep these because they were so bright but I needed a pant that would function like these and the day they arrived, I was going hiking, looking for pants and there they were in the box. I ended up loving them because they are so very comfortable

5 5

Michael L

Member since 
  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

I'm 6'1 and 180. I wear a medium in these. They aren't too tight and not too baggy, just right for me. No worries with the length either.

I got these to trek during winter in the Himalaya under a soft shell. They're too warm if it's bright and sunny and you're working hard but if it's windy and cold, these pants protect you really well. They provide excellent warmth under a shell and increase the wind resistance if layered under a shell.

A worthwhile addition to your kit if you're out in the backcountry during winter. I can imagine these pants being very useful for climbing in cold weather too.

Highly recommended.

5 5

Johnathan Rambo

Member since 

Just got them and I was a little taken aback because I was not expecting the weight. They are a lot thicker than I had anticipated. Though thicker, the fleece is super plush and they do feel super warm. I think they are a little warm for me to do most of my winter trail running unless the barometer really drops. I wear a pair of Salomon Momentum tights that are much thinner and I am ok with those down to about 10-15 degrees. I think these might do well 15 and under. I got the lake blue and the color is true to the pic above. Make sure you look at the sizing chart. The small would be what most true mediums would wear and a medium is what most larges would wear. I am 5'10 155 and I wear the smalls which fit great and a little extra room in the waist. There is no cinching these down, no adjustments so you have to size them to your waist. Other than that the length is spot on, and the tights are not completely blue in the lake blue, behind the knee is a lighter elastin material which is charcoal. Overall these are pretty dope, and will make a great colder weather layer in the winter time.

5 5

alep161195

Member since 

super warm and super flexy. I guess the only thing that would beat this is 4 layers of 100 weight merino wool (so it would fit like skin). But who wants to do that?

5 5

mikp36276

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

Great as an outer layer for running, or as a base layer. The fit is perfect. They are close to the skin like tights should be, but not so tight as to be uncomfortable. I'm 5'8 160 lbs athletic build and the small fits just right. I love them so much I'm getting another pair.

3 5

Jesse

Member since 

They seem pretty awesome. Nice material, stretchy, good range of motion, warm, sweet little pocket on the side, good fit to legs and waist. The deal-breaker for me was that the crotch had no extra material, its just a straight shot, so they are a little constricting there.

4 5

Isaac Rogers

Member since 

I have to disagree with the previous reviewer. These tights are better for active use on frigid days but are not nearly as warm, stretchy, or soft as the RHO AR. They are built anatomically and fit very tight with nice highly permiable fabric on the back of the knee to make movement easier.

Johnathan Rambo

Member since 
Responded on

Could you explain "built anatomically". Are you saying they are built to conform to the natural contour and articulation of the body, or are you saying that they are built for certain anatomies (and might not work well for some builds?)?

Isaac Rogers

Member since 
Responded on

They are tight and stretchy so they should fit any body type but I would say the RHO AR is more stretchy. I said they were anatomical because they have a thinner fabric behind the knees that allow for easier movement if you were skiing or doing something active. I would say these are better for active use but the RHO AR are warmer.

does it have a fly? Also, would it fit a...

Anne Victoria Lee

Member since 
Posted on

does it have a fly? Also, would it fit a tall person to the ankles? 6;3" , he always complains long underwear hit him at mid calf right where the boot is and rubs the wrong places and do not cover his ankles and feet. please help!!

Jesse

Member since 
Responded on

No fly, no opening at all. I am 6' with a 31 waist and went with the mediums. Decent fit down to the ankles.

catiecoo

Member since 
Responded on

These are very long, but no fly. My other half is 31 waist, 6'2", fits great length-wise

5 5

tdudnyk

Member since 

I am an avid outdoors person in the winter (I train Schutzhund dogs). You have to handle the cold for about a dozen hours at a pop. These long underwear make it happen. I never thought I would say this, but they beat the Arcteryx RHO. They are stretchier, and are anatomically made to better conform to your body. These are a bargain.