The cold just got more enjoyable.
Terms And Conditions
This Usage Agreement (the "Agreement") governs your conduct while using various services on the web site Backcountry.com and its affiliate web sites (collectively, the "Site"). All references to "we," "us," and "our" shall mean Backcountry.com and all references to "you" and "your" shall mean the user of the Site and Site Services. This Agreement applies to various services and activities on the Site as well as to gear review and product ratings (collectively, "Site Services"). Please read this Agreement carefully.
BY ACCESSING, BROWSING, AND USING THE SITE, ANY SITE SERVICES AND OTHER SERVICES THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THIS AGREEMENT AND ITS TERMS. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION THEREOF, DO NOT ACCESS, BROWSE OR OTHERWISE USE THE SITE OR SITE SERVICES, INCLUDING THE SUBMISSION OF ANY REVIEWS OR COMMENTS.
Any comments, reviews (including gear reviews and product ratings), posts, feedback, questions, answers, notes, messages, images, video, audio, materials, documents, data, graphics, ideas, suggestions or other communications (collectively, "User Content") you submit on the Site are not private or proprietary. By submitting User Content on or through the Site, you grant, assign and transfer to Backcountry.com all of your rights, title and interest, including without limitation, all intellectual property rights and moral rights, in and to such User Content. To the extent the preceding assignment and transfer is ineffective, you hereby grant Backcountry.com an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, perpetual right and license to use, copy, modify, adapt, display, publish, archive, store, distribute, reproduce and create derivative works based upon such User Content, in any form, media, software or technology of any kind now existing or developed in the future.
By submitting such User Content on or through the Site, you are confirming that (a) you are the sole author of the User Content and the User Content originated with you and not copied in whole or in part from any other work; (b) you have obtained all necessary permissions associated with the User Content, including without limitation permissions relating to copyrights, trademarks, rights of publicity and/or rights of privacy; (c) the User Content does not contain hate speech or profanity and is not unlawful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, libelous, obscene, racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable, an invasion of another's privacy, or otherwise in violation of this Agreement; (d) that you are not a minor and have the legal right and capacity to enter into and comply with this Agreement; (e) such User Content does not and will not, in any way, violate or breach any of the terms of this Agreement; and (f) Backcountry.com shall not in any circumstances be required to pay or incur any sums to any person or entity as a result of its use or exploitation of the User Content.
With respect to your conduct on the Site or while using the Site Services, you agree not to: (a) attempt to disguise the origin of any User Content transmitted to the Site Services whether through the Site or any third party site; (b) act in any manner that negatively affects other users' ability to use the Site and Site Services; (c) impersonate any person or entity, including without limitation, a manufacturer or owner of any product, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (d) interfere with the Site or Site Services, or servers or networks connected to the Site or Site Services, or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies, or regulations of networks connected to the Site or Site Services; (e) upload, post, or otherwise transmit any User Content that with respect to the Site Services: (i) is not relevant to the product, service, person or entity being reviewed; (ii) you do not have a right to transmit under any law or under contractual or fiduciary relationships (by way of example but not limitation, inside information, proprietary and confidential information learned or disclosed as part of employment relationships or under nondisclosure agreements); (iii) contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; or (iv) is unsolicited or unauthorized advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam," "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation.
User Content does not reflect the views of Backcountry.com, and Backcountry.com does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, integrity, quality or reliability of any User Content, nor does Backcountry.com endorse or support any opinions expressed in any User Content. In no event shall Backcountry.com have or be construed to have any responsibility or liability for or in connection with any User Content, Any gear reviews and/or product ratings submitted on the Site, if displayed, are displayed for entertainment and informational purposes only. Under no circumstances will Backcountry.com be liable in any way for any User Content, including but not limited to, any errors or omissions in any User Content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any User Content posted, emailed or otherwise transmitted via the Site or Site Services.
If Backcountry.com determines, in our sole and absolute discretion, that you or any User Content you submit violates this Agreement, we reserve the right, at any time, without notice and without limiting any and all other rights Backcountry.com may have under this Agreement, to: (a) refuse to allow you to submit further User Content; (b) remove and delete your User Content; (c) revoke your registration and right to use the User Content Submission Features; and (d) use any technological, legal, operational or other means available to enforce the terms of this Agreement, including, without limitation, blocking specific IP addresses or deactivating your registration, access to the Site and Site Services using your e-mail address, and your user name and password. Without limiting the foregoing, once User Content is submitted to the Site, Backcountry.com may take any or no action with respect to such User Content, including without limitation, deleting, editing, modifying, rejecting, or refusing to post such User Content, but is under no obligation to offer you the opportunity to edit, delete or otherwise modify User Content once it has been submitted. Backcountry.com shall have no duty to attribute authorship of User Content to you and shall not be obligated to enforce any form of attribution by third parties.
If, despite the foregoing assignment and transfer of rights in the User Content, it is determined that you retain moral rights (including the rights of attribution or integrity) in the User Content, you hereby declare that: (a) you do not require that any personally identifying information be used in connection with the User Content or any derivative works of or upgrades or updates thereto; (b) you have no objection to the publication, use, modification, deletion and exploitation of the User Content by Backcountry.com or its licensees, successors or assigns; (c) you forever waive and agree not to claim or assert any entitlement to any and all moral rights of an author in any of the User Content; and (d) you forever release Backcountry.com, and its licensees, successors and assigns from any claims that you could otherwise assert against Backcountry.com by virtue of any such moral rights.
You are prohibited from violating the security of any system or network compromising the Site or the Site Services, including but not limited to the following: (a) unauthorized access to or use of data, systems, or networks, including any attempt to probe, scan or test the vulnerability of the Site or Site Services or to breach security or authentication measures; (b) unauthorized monitoring of data or traffic on the Site or of the Site Services; (c) interference with the Site or Site Services including without limitation, any type of flooding technique or deliberate attempt to overload the system such as denial or service attacks; (d) forging of a message header or any part of a message header; or (e) using manual or electronic means to avoid any use or access limitation placed on this Site or the Site Services. Such violations may result in criminal or civil liability.
Backcountry.com reserves the right to report any activity or persons that Backcountry.com suspects has violated any law or regulation to appropriate law enforcement officials, regulators, or other appropriate third parties (including the disclosure of appropriate subscriber information). Backcountry.com may also cooperate with appropriate law enforcement agencies to assist in the investigation and prosecution of any illegal conduct. Indirect or attempted violations of this Agreement and actual or attempted violations thereof by a third party on behalf of any user shall be considered violations of this Agreement by such user.
BACKCOUNTRY.COM DOES NOT ENDORSE THE USER CONTENT, IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE USER CONTENT AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON OR ENTITY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, PERSONS WHO MAY USE OR RELY ON SUCH USER CONTENT) FOR ANY LOSS, DAMAGE (WHETHER ACTUAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR OTHERWISE), INJURY, CLAIM, LIABILITY OR OTHER CAUSE OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER BASED UPON OR RESULTING FROM ANY USER CONTENT PROVIDED THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.
Share your thoughts
How does this jacket compare to the North...
How does this jacket compare to the North Face APEX Bionic jacket or does it? I'm looking for something a little warmer. I've found with my limited daily outdoor exposure in the winter the APEX has been enough for me for the most part. But now I'm getting into birding and I really want to spend some time outdoors in the winter.
One issue I have with the jacket I got is that the collar sits unevenly. The problem is caused because of the extra layering/protective matieral, guarding the neck from catching in the zipper is sewn onto one side only. This made one side of the collar to be heavier, causing it to open wider than the opposite. I wouldn't say it is fashionable, I think its more of a design fault (my opinion)...it may have just been on the jacket I bought...but since I needed it quickly, and I loved the feel and fit of the jacket (plus I lack fashion sense) I just put up with it. I will post a pic of what I tried to described in the text soon.
Had to return two
I purchased two Compressors. While the jacket was very warm and light, both were defective. On the first, the threading of the sleeve logo was coming badly unraveled. Exchanged it for a second, and after a few days I noticed that the second one had a bizarre series of pinholes all over one sleeve and beneath the collar, as though a tiny needle had gone haywire. So I returned this one, too, and purchased the comparable Redpoint North Face jacket.
I should say as well that the exceptionally light and silky nylon shell of the Compressor was nice to the touch, I found myself worrying constantly about its resilience and that something would snag on it and tear it. The Redpoint uses a bit heavier nylon in which I have greater confidence, but which seems not quite as warm.
I would recommend this jacket but for what appears to be quality-control issues.
Compressor at Mt. Washington
The Compressor on a December summit of Mt. Washington!
I have an older version of this jacket (maybe '08?) that is top-notch. Very lightweight fabric, very packable, impressive build quality despite the intentionally minimalist construction.
This newer version? Ordered from BC.com and couldn't wait to get it. I was immediately disappointed in the seemingly much cheaper, less packable construction compared to the older jacket. Seconds later, the FIRST TIME I TRIED IT ON, the waist cinch bungee ripped out on one end, complete with the cloth patch it was anchored to. To be clear, this has NEVER, EVER been a problem with my older compressor jacket, and I was not overly rough with the newer one.
Thinking that this was an isolated incident, and needing a belay parka, I bought a ($$$$$) Mtn Hardwear Alcove jacket. The exact same thing happened to the waist cinch in the first day of ownership.
Mountain Hardwear quality seems to taken a nosedive in the last few years, though prices remain as high as ever.
P.S. BC.com did take the returned item no problem, so as always they get 5 stars!
I have had this coat for over a year and wear it about 9 mo out of the year. Living in Chicago I have found that this in combination with a hoody or fleece + base-layer are all that are needed for all but the coldest of days. When climbing or backpacking it holds up surprisingly well, but I have also been extremely cautious because the material seems like it might rip easily. So far so good, though.
I'm about 5'11, 155 lbs and a medium fits perfectly with a bit of room for additional layering underneath. The pockets are also quite toasty and warm. Probably worth it to pick up a stuff sack to go along with the coat. I use the medium sized stuff sack here (tight squeeze but works): http://www.outdoorresearch.com/site/ultralt_ditty_sacks_set_of_3.html
Light-weight effective insulation
I got this jacket as an alternative to the Nitrous jacket. The Nitrous was cool, but not for people with short torsos or people who might wear the jacket without a shell over it. The Compressor fits people of a shorter torso very well and provides shocking warmth for being so light. If I'm active and wearing this under a shell I can be toasty warm in temperatures that would otherwise require my Sub Zero SL jacket to keep me comfortable sitting still. It's also comforting to know that if I were to get wet in this thing I'll still be insulated. I'll take that assurance over a few saved ounces and compressibility of a down sweater.I'd love to see this thing come with a napoleon pocket and stuff sack, though. It does have an internal breast pocket, but it's a pain to unzip the jacket (let cold in) to get something out of that pocket. This kind of compresses into its own hand pocket, but buying a stuff sack would be wiser as to not wreck your zipper or pocket stitching. Still 5 stars, IMO.As you can see from the picture the "Jungle" color isn't super loud in some light. Under indoor lamps it is, but it's not weird enough for me to exchange it.
How does this compare to the Marmot Baffin...
How does this compare to the Marmot Baffin jacket?
Jules. From what I can tell, the Baffin Jacket has much less insulation than the Compressor Jacket. They both use a similar shell material. The Compressor Jacket is made with a 15D Nylon Ripstop Shell and is insulated with 120grams of Primaloft ECO. The Baffin weighs 10oz. and the Compressor weighs 19oz. (M''s Large... some say this is high and the specs are wrong) and this difference is probably due to the amount of insulation in the jacket. I hope this info helps!
Has anyone applied an aftermarket waterproofing...
Has anyone applied an aftermarket waterproofing product to this jacket? Results? As stated previously, great piece of lightweight gear but doesn't handle moisture, even heavy mist.
srp. I would say that the first thing you need to do is wash your jacket. You may have washed it recently but if not the cleaner the jacket the better the DWR will perform. Dirt, Oil, Smoke... all affect DWR performance. For washing I would use any of the down wash products (Nikwax etc.)... even though the jacket is not down insulated the down wash is a gentler kinder detergent that treats insulation better than a standard Tech Wash or something. The DWR on the Compressor fabric is a good DWR but like on all jackets it gets dirty and begins to 'wet out.' To re-treat, once clean I would try the TX-Direct Spray. I have used this stuff before to refurbish DWR with decent results. I hope this info helps!
Your other problem is that 15 Denier nylon is simply really thin, so even with the DWR working at it's best, your compressor is not going to hold off water for long. On the bright side, the wetness doesn't affect the performance of the jacket, it's simply annoying.
Hi, I'm told MHW jackets run on the small...
Hi, I'm told MHW jackets run on the small side. I'm 5'8" 150lbs and would like to order the dragon and compressor. Usually I wear a size small shell, but now I'm thinking ordering a medium in both. Any thoughts?
I bought the Windstopper Tech jacket in medium for just the reason you mentioned. The medium came and it was way too big for me at 5'11" 155. Returned it for a small and it fits perfectly. I think you'll be just fine with the small unless you prefer looser cut jackets.
I recommend the medium. I am 5'7"" 155lbs and also wear a size small in most things but find that MHW jackets do run a bit smaller especially in length. I have both this and the Sub Zero SL down jacket in medium and they fit perfectly. A medium would be good especially if you want to throw it on over other layers for rest stops / belaying.
If it helps, I'm 6'5" and about 205lbs and fairly skinny. I always wear a Large in North Face and Marmot jackets, but I tried on a L in the Compressor and it was much too tight. The XL was a perfect fit.
How would you compare this jacket to the...
How would you compare this jacket to the REI Spruce Run?
frankmuscara. The Compressor PL jacket and the REI Spruce Run are very similar jackets. The Compressor PL utilizes 120g of Primaloft Eco. I am not sure how much insulation is used in the REI jacket. The sleeves zip off on the Spruce Run and do not zip off on the Compressor. The Compressor Jacket uses a 15D ripstop nylon for it's shell. I am not sure what denier the REI jacket is made with but I bet it's slightly heavier. The REI jacket is 1 ounce heavier in weight than the Compressor PL Jacket according to our websites. I hope these comparisons help!
They are very similar jackets. The Spruce Run has 100g of Primaloft Eco inside it, and the Compressor has 120g. The Spruce Run has zip off sleeves which means it converts into a vest as well, which is nice to some, but I find the zippers make it more uncomfortable. The compressor is very light and compresses (...) well. The one area where the spruce run really comes out on top is actually the material. It is made with super light, durable, and windproof Pertex Quantum, I believe it is also 15D but is more durable than usual. It's only heavier because of the sleeve zippers. If you're an athletic build, the Compressor fits better than the Spruce Run, I would recommend sizing up however.
Hot Jacket, no weight
I bought the compressor as a backup insulation for hiking in the White Mountains in October '10.
I testet it for two weeks and I am extremely pleased with the jacket. It packs extremely small, weights next to nothing (XL: 453 grams (exactly 1 lb) including an ultralight 3.5 liter stuff sack). I weighted it myself, the weight in the Backcountry specs is far to high.
Especially the insulation impresses me. I was wet of sweat, when I reached the peak of a hike, which was an exposed spot at around 4000 feet elevation, exposed to wind and temperatures in the mid 30's, I just got the compressor out of the backpack and was toasty warm in literally seconds.
I am so pleased, that the compressor is now my favorite backup isolation. It replaces my fleece layer, as it is warmer, lighter and far more compressible.
Tip: Get a lightweight stuff sack for it 3 to 4 liter will fit great.
alpen glow in the city of rocks
a good light layer for a fall morning sunrise.
good lite weight and minimal jacket. packs small and keeps you warm as long as it's not super cold. great for spring, summer and fall outings when it's not quite cold enough but you want that furnace feeling.
what is this garment equivalent to in down?...
what is this garment equivalent to in down? 650,700,800 fill.
need an everyday parka for wyoming that will keep the person warm. And length, will it go past the waist?
Jill. Unfortunately, there is not a way to compare a fill weight of down with the 120grams of primaloft in this jacket as it relates to warmth. Think of it this way, I could make a jacket exactly like this using 650, 700, 800-fill down... as it is not the number that dictates the thickness (warmth) of the jacket it's the amount of down you put in the jacket to start with. I am assuming that you think a higher number = warmer? This is not the case. A real easy way to think of it is... the higher the fill weight the closer to the goose. Therefore, the higher the fill weight the more downy feathers there are in the make up of the down and the lighter and more lofty the down is for a given volume. Clear as mud? The best way to get an idea of jacket warmth on a website is to look at its weight. The heavier the weight the more insulation is being used and usually the warmer the jacket is over all.
As far as warmth is concerned for an everyday jacket in Wyoming? I would say this would work well for spring summer and fall. You'd probably want something warmer for the coldest of the winter months. And the length comes right down to your waist... not passed.
I hope all this info helps!
Hey Jill-- I'm sure @ this time-- Nov 2010--you've already made decision but I'm writing here in hopes I might help others. I had the predecessor to this jacket for 3 yrs, this would be the 4th winter if I hadn't retired it to the back of my car as an "emergency" stash. The primaloft has gone thru 2 revisions since mine-- Primaloft one and the eco now. I've lived in Wy, and now live in Helena, Mt. The jacket astounded me-- I broke ALL the rules with it, out of curiosity. I could wear the jacket with a long-sleeved (high quality) COTTON tee under it,--nothing else-- all day around town, @ 30* overcast days, and I was perfectly warm. And I tend to be a little "cool", not warm. Properly layered with wicking tee and/or a polartech micro, 100, or 200, you'd be toasty unless there's a fair wind blowing. I wore it to work every day, 5 days a week, at my (then) call-center job, over just a shirt, no tee. Weekends I wore it out kicking around. Only con-- by end of 3rd winter, I'd worn it out, and the insulation was starting to work thru the shell. But, I nearly Lived in the thing for 3 winters ( and I was tired of the color,lol). I bought the jacket as an alternative. I had a full leather bomber jacket, with mutton collar and removable wool insulated full lining, including sleeves. The retailer, Jos A Bank, labeled it "our warmest winter jacket". It IS slightly warmer, esp in a strong wind, and probably weighs about 6 pounds (this one is exactly 1 #, according to a reviewer). The reason I'm on this website tonight is to replace my worn out one. :) nuf said.
Here's a link to a very useful forum on Backpackinglight.com where a bunch of people have privately tested down and primaloft to find their CLO values. It becomes apparent very quickly that Primaloft is still a long way from being as warm as down, but because of the warm when wet properties, it's insanely useful stuff.
Primaloft One with convexion (which is now standard to all primaloft products) has a CLO/oz. value of .92, which is almost exactly the same as 625 fill power down. 800 fill power down has a CLO/oz. value of 1.68, which is why the stuff is so warm. Just don't get it wet.
Was Expecting Better
I bought this jacket with high hopes of getting a warm light-weight jacket that would function in everyday use as well as technically for skiing and backpacking. I didn't get a chance to test it out technically but it is not cut out for everyday use. I took this jacket on a two week back packing tour through Europe and wore it pretty much everyday. Initially, I really liked the jacket. It is warm, light weight, zips-up high to protect my face from wind and cold, and the hood is very wamr. However, after a couple wears I started to notice the main double zipper was difficult and did not zip correctly without careful attention. Then I started to notice the zippers on the pockets, they too were difficult and often caught the material around the zippers, the outside chest zipper actually got caught in the material so bad it riped a hole on the inside. Also, I wore a typical daypack/book bag carrying a camera, food, water, etc. About a week into the trip my friends noticed the back of the jacket started to show wear. I am greatly disappointed in the jacket and will be returning it shortly. For almost $200 I was expecting much more.
I'm pretty happy with this jacket. I'm 6'3", 240# and the XL fits nicely. It's a nice, lightweight alternative to my SubZero Parka if it's not bitterly cold. Wear a sweater underneath, and you're good for your commute on most winter days in Chicago. I haven't spent an extended time outside yet.
Bought this jacket to use around town. I'm 5"11 , 175, with a very small spare tire and the large fits perfect. If it's in the 20's or lower there is plenty of room for a R2 base layer for extra warmth. This jacket is not shinny like a trash bag. I was worried about that because I read a review saying it was, but when I pulled it out of the bag it looked great!!!! My only knock on it would be the collar, it's just a bit flimsy for me but that is me being Manny. Bottom line, if you want a nice mid-weight jacket that performs and the ladies will notice, look no further!!! GO METS!!!!
much better than fleece
Layers under a shell really well as the exterior is slick sort of slippery nylon. This thing is lighter, warmer and more compressible than almost all fleece, get one to replace your old fleece and you won't regret it. For anyone serious about getting into wilderness where they will need some warm layers this is a good purchase. Minor issue for backpacking, handpocket zippers are right at hipbelt height.
I suggest you try it on before ordering if possible. Fit is great, I'm almost 6' and 175 lbs (I'm atheltic and not overweight at all) and the large really fits well. I have some other jackets from popular outdoors brands (patagonia, cloudveil) and their mediums fit me perfectly. So if you're my size you may want to try both a medium and a large on somewhere or cunsult with backcountry customer service who sometimes can help with getting you sized on internet or help with ordering both sizes and getting mailorder returns (they have been great).
While I haven't bushwacked with the jacket, I would suspect the shell fabric wouldn't hold up. Be warned and wear something burly over it before getting into anything thorny.
light on weight, not on warmth
This was my main source of warmth on my recent Autumn ascent of Mt. Whitney. The warmth to weight ratio is outstanding for a synthetic, and the Primaloft shell provides top performance regardless of temperature (i.e. I feel like the jacket is appropriate whether it's 65 degrees or 35 degrees (F)). It's comfortable at temperatures even lower when I'm engaged in strenuous activity, and it has superb breathability once I've broken a sweat.
Like other Mountain Hardwear gear, the fit is probably not geared toward the tallest of folks. Otherwise, this jacket is a sure bet for good insulation with featherlight weight.