Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
Forget fanciful names inspired by Himalayan peaks; the Montbell Men\222s Extremely Light Down Jacket tells it like it is. At a wispy 5.7 ounces, this ultralight down layer provides high-loft warmth for demanding climbing, skiing, and backpacking applications. Stuffed with feather-light 900-fill goose down, the Extremely Light Jacket packs down to nearly nothing and fluffs up easily when a frigid gust hits the belay. A DWR-coated Ballistic Airlight shell brushes off snow and light drizzle, and the included stuff sack helps it disappear into your pack when you\222re on the go.
Bottom Line: Extremely light and filled with down, hence the name.
The jacket itself is unbelievably light, while offering an admirable level of warmth. Initially I was concerned with the strength of the 7-denier, not 15-denier as BC lists, but after inspection that fear has dissolved as long as care is taken. The jacket lofts up nicely once it is taken from the package, shaken out, and the fabric stiffness has worn off. It packs down to nearly nothing, and again weighs even less than you can comprehend.
Now to the potential negatives, but not enough to warrant a downgrade in my opinion, is the fit. Torso length on the jacket falls right around the normal waistline for pants/shorts, if not just above, while the arms are slightly long and baggy. Keeping in mind this is meant as a mid-layer, and that it is down insulation, the short torso makes sense for wearing underneath outer layers, so as not to be exposed. Moreover the function is to heat the body's core, which it does well. Sleeve length is, again, slightly long and baggy, but not to the point of being cumbersome or incurring down compression reducing insulation.
All in all it fits and wears comfortably while offering my expected level of insulation; neither the sleeve length or bagginess impeded wearing it beneath a shell. As long as care is taken with the fabric, i.e. not bushwhacking through underbrush without a shell, it should hold up respectably. It then is the perfect piece for its intended application.
Does anyone know if the gunmetal is less shiny than the other two colors shown above? It appears to be in the pictures but wasn't sure if that was just lighting, Thanks.
It's funny because the stock picture of the gunmetal looks very matte finish. This isn't new for '12 is it? I would like one of these if they could make it a matte finish.
The gunmetal is a cool color (I have it in the Ex Light Vest), but make no mistake, it looks exactly like a Hefty trash bag. I posted a couple photos for you and anyone else who might be interested.
As previously stated, the calendered fabric will be shiny in the Ex Light and UL Down lines (at about the 30-denier Ballistic Nylon shell, or Alpine Light stage, the shine tones down considerably), but certain colors look better shiny.
And just info, Dave Marcus and the BC sidebar are incorrect, the Ex Light has a 7-denier Ballistic Airlight calendered nylon, not a 15-denier, which is the shell fabric used in the UL Down line.
And if I bought one of these, I would have to go for the Sunset Orange or Sax...
Unfortunately, the 15D fabric is going to be shiny, no matter the color. MontBell uses a process called calendering that flattens the individual fibers. It makes the fabric more downproof, but also has the side effect of making you look like you're stepping out of a fetish ball. Form over function, right?
This is one of the best investments of all my gear! It runs a little short on length, so you may not wanna wear it "out and about". I'd recommend going up a size with this. For 20 degree weather all I need is a shirt underneath and this and I'm good. For windy days or rain use this bad boy under a waterproof layer/jacket and your good to go! Packs away into a small stuff sack, saving you a lot of room and weight. You'll think twice about packing a bulky fleece when you have this as an option. You will not be disappointed.
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
I have The North Face Diez 900. But it is a bit too puffy to wear over a rain jacket. Is Montbell less puffy? And how about warmth vs the Diez? I dont want to get too similar of a jacket.
Just to confirm, you wear it OVER your rain jacket?
The Ex Light is less bulky and not as warm as the Diez. They aren't as dissimilar as that makes them sound. The MontBell is about as light as down jackets get, but the Diez isn't much heavier. I would suggest complimenting the MontBell with something heavier than the Diez.
Just a comparision between the two pieces, mostly for purposes of luster and size. Some folks say the Nano Puff is shiny, but it is clearly pretty low-key next to the Ex Light Vest in Gunmetal, even though it's a black Nano. Also for size. The Nano on the left is a size Medium; the Ex Light Vest on the right is a Large, and they are almost identical in size and fit.
I'm 6'1" ~155lbs (an athletic build in other words) and the medium was a perfect fit.
This jacket is a revelation - weight, including the stuffsack, was an even 5.7oz on my digital scales after a couple of moderate trips. How often does an item measure up so exactly? It's warm as can be - temperatures close to freezing and I was still warm as toast at camp. When compared next to my old zip neck thermal L/S top - it's nearly half the weight for multiple times the warmth. This jacket is a no brainer for those wanting freedom from weight.
People asked about all sorts of different jackets that are in different categories, but between the Patagonia Down Shirt and this, which is warmer? And how do they compare in general aside from the obvious weight difference?
Well, the weight difference is 0.2 oz in favor of the MontBell.
The MontBell has 1.8 oz of 900 fill down inside 7D fabric.
The Patagonia has 1.99 oz 800 fill down inside 10D fabric.
Despite a slightly higher amount of down in the Patagonia, there should be more loft and more warmth in the Montbell because of the larger baffles and higher fill power.
I really like that this jacket is so light, that the fabric feels great against the skin, and that it packs up incredibly small. I'm 6'1" & 175 lbs and based on the comments below I ordered size Large, thinking it might run a little small. Based on how it fits me I'd disagree that all MontBell item runs small, I feel this is true to size and sometimes wonder if I should have ordered a Medium. I've been using as an insulating/layering jacket for the most part, except on dry, low wind days it's good on it's own, although that's when I wish it had pockets. The fact that it has no pockets or loops of any kind actually makes it a bit challenging to use on its own. Overall I think the quality is good and I like this jacket.
I'm surprised. I'm 5'10" 185 and it fits me perfectly, although it is on verge of being too short in the torso. I'd think it would be too short for you.
No way. This has less than 2oz of 900 fill. If you have a windproof shell, that's enough to get you down to 20F. Maybe. Try a heavier jacket like the Mostbell frost or Outdoor research megaplume, Mountain Hardware sub-zero. If you run warm, perhaps the Marmot Ama Dablam would work. However, I suggest you get a jacket that works for 90% of the weather you encounter, not spend over 200 for those 5 days when it's that cold (not from NY so I don't know how cold it gets). The above jackets will make you sweat in anything above 20deg and if you do anything active. Get the Marmot AD, wear a shell over it, a light fleece and a wool long sleeve under if it gets that cold.... Or stay home. Hope that helps some.
I got this jacket as an insulation piece for a long term hike starting Feb. However, I went snowboarding and I left my gear at my parents house so I used this. I had this jacket, a waterproof shell, and a simple cotton long sleeve shirt on and was WARM even at 14 degrees F. If I laid in the snow without moving for an hour I am sure I would have gotten cold, but I was very happy and even surprised with the amount of warmth. Incredibly light weight, isn't bulky but is a little puffy (which gives enough dead space to keep you warm.)A few feathers have come out but that would happen with any down item I presume. The only one semi small issue I have is there are no pockets. That is fine since I would use it as insulation underneath something anyway.
I am 5'5" 128lbs. Will the jacket and its sleeves for a Men's Small be too long/baggy? I tried on a Thermawrap and it was a little baggy and more importantly, the sleeves were 1.5" too long. Thanks for your help!
My mont-bell Ex Light Down Jacket in size Large, in a 2-liter Sea-To-Summit Ultra-Sil dry sack (0.8 oz.). No real effort or excessive compression is needed to get it in. This protects my jacket and prolongs the life of the down, as well as keeping it dry in my pack. The included stuff sack is smaller and lighter, but is not waterproof. On a bluebird trip, I'll take the stuff sack, on all others, the dry sack.
I love this thing. Best midlayer I've ever worn. Warm enough on it's own to wander around Telluride at night in February (you might need to stop into the Last Dollar for a warm up.. but hey.. it's a down sweater!), and just perfect under a shell. Dries quickly, and holds it's loft well. The fabric is delicate, but then again, that's why it is so light and packs up so small.... 100 percent recommended. Fits fairly trim (I am 5'-10", 185 lbs and the medium is just barely big enough)
I've read about concerns/issues with durability with this jacket. I'm looking to lighten my load from fleece midlayers and it doesn't get any lighter than this.
I would like to use it as a summer alpine/desert winter insulating layer for in camp and a light bring along to wear at the top while peak bagging, and possibly as added warmth under a soft shell to/from work on colder days. So given those requirements, will this ultralight hold up, or should I move up to the slightly heavier MontBell jackets?
It will be ok if you plan to use it around camp and under other layers. Its just not a heavy enough fabric to withstand rubbing on rocks and sharp branches and the likes
5'9 150 size small is a nice fit. This jacket is a great layer with icebreaker 260 in very cold weather. I don't know why people wear baggy jackets that don't look fitted. You should get this just for the ease of packing/weight. You will stay warm and if you start getting hot, easy removal and storage.
I've camped out with big agnes sl1, western mountaineering alpine light, icebreaker 260 top and bottoms, MONT BELL ex light in 13 degrees, windy, snow and did not get cold. 5:30 am tear down, paddle trip was early, but not cold. This jacket is a great layer and performs well in all situations
The Thermawrap shells are either 12-denier or 30-denier, depending on which one you choose, vs 7-denier here, but the Ex Light will be warmer and several ounces (or more) lighter.
Ex Light hands down. Its 5.7oz with 900 fill down vs. 8.8 oz and the outer material is the same. The down will give you much more loft, and therefore more insulation.
Super light, warmer than you would think based on weight (5.7oz.) The medium fit my 5'10", 160lb. frame perfectly with enough room for a mid to exp. weight base layer. Length is fairly short but that's the way I like it. Do be careful around campfires and overhanging branches though as this seems to be a fragile jacket (actually, I would call this a sweater). Who needs pockets anyway. A great garment as I continue my quest to lighten my load in the woods. Top shelf MontBell!
I am going to say no. For me, all the mont-bell stuff fits one size smaller than it lists, that is, a Large fits like a Medium, a Medium like a Small. And most of it has a slimmer cut to it as well. I'm 5'11.5" and 178 lbs, with an athletic build, and some of their Large stuff is too snug on me through the chest and back. The problem for me sometimes is that the arm length on the XL is too long, but the overall fit on the Large is too tight.
With short-sleeve shirts and clothing with elastic cuffs I can sometimes make do, and outside layers like my Rain Trekker jacket are OK in XL, but some of their other stuff just doesn't work (and I am a HUGE mont-bell fan). You sound like a pretty big dude, I'm doubtful that this would fit you in an XL. Mont-bell's sizing chart lists the chest size for an XL at 44-47, so that's probably where you will hit your snag.
Backcountry has such a great return policy, if you don't mind the potential inconvenience of returning it, you could give it a shot. Good luck.
Outstanding jacket and good value. It weighs (and packs to) almost nothing and kept me warm on a trip to the Alps with temps in the 20's. Pair this with a lightweight waterproof shell and you probably won't need anything else for most endeavors.
I am 5'11.5", 174 lbs., and the XL was a bit too big--too baggy in particular, and the sleeves were too long, but the large was a little tight through the chest and back, just enough to restrict my movement and make me think that sleeping in it, if necessary, wasn't going to be comfortable. A great jacket that I dearly wanted to love and to keep (to have and to hold), but I had to return it. Good luck, I went with the Patagonia Nano Puff Pullover in size large, and it fits perfectly.
Collar, logo, zipper, zipper garage, and shell fabric detail on the MontBell Ex Light Down Jacket in Dark Navy. It should be noted that the BC sidebar is incorrect; the shell fabric is a 7-denier Ballistic Airlight calendered nylon, and not 15-denier, which is the shell fabric on the UL Down Inner Jacket and Parka.
Hello How would you compare this jacket with the patagonia nano puff and arcteryx atom lt or mx? I'm looking for a mid-layer under a shell for winter skiing in temps 10-20C.Thanks.
This jacket is far lighter than either the Nano Puff or the Atom Lt or MX, largely because it is down fill instead of synthetic insulation. You'll probably do better with the Atom or Nano Puff if you're resort skiing, as this jacket is quite fragile and requires special care. This is more of a jacket for ultralight pursuits like through hiking.
Took this jacket to keep warm in camp and supplement a light wieght sleeping system. When the weather started to turn chilly at night I threw this jacket on and watched the stars come out. Combined with MontBell's Down inner pants, WM Megalite bag and short Z-Lite pad I slept really warm the entire trip. I would trust that sleep system down to the lower 20's. This jacket suited my light weight backpacking trip perfectly, but I would avoid putting it through much hard abuse (ie., skiing, climbing, schwacking...)
It should be fine, if you get it in the right size. This is going to be more of an athletic cut, because of its function. You might be able to get away with a large. Just remember Backcountry has a phenomenal return policy, so if it doesn't fit, send it back!
Overview shot of the mont-bell Ex Light Down Jacket in Dark Navy. The jacket in Men's Large weighed 6.1 ounces on a digital postal scale, including tags and stuff sack. Very impressive piece; the warmth-to-weight ratio is astounding.
Bought it over Christmas. Solid piece. Very warm. Looks good. Light as hell. Short in the body, arm length (I'm a 34.5) is perfect. If it's just going to be worn as a mid-layer, no probs. I won't be wearing this halter-top out to the bars though.
Can you layer a down jacket? if its used as middle layer, moisture from the base layer will kill the insulation right? I mean the moisture from base layer has to go thru the middle layer to get to the breathable shell .. no ?
My .02 from a hiking perspective...regardless of my mid-layer, i try to manage my sweat levels. In a hiking situation going uphill, i usually have my base layer and hardshell on. If i start to get hot, i open the pitzips or front-zips. At rest at the top of a climb, i break out my insulation. Downhill, depeding on temps and exertion, i manage my sweat through the zips or adding/removing my layers.
I agree that your sweat might hinder downs effectiveness, but you're talking about quite a bit of sweat to wet out your inner jacket to dampen the down. Before it gets to that point, i would open my zips or even remove the down if possible.
agreed, I am 5'11 170 and average/large build and use a medium and it fits just fine. All montbells are a little short, but in terms of the shoulders and arm length, its perfect.
Nice piece, obviously one of the lightest on the market. Has no hand pockets, as others have mentioned, but why would you need hand pockets on a piece that is meant to be layered? I am in love with my Montbell Alpine Light Down Parka, which, with and XL seems perfectly tailored to my body (6'1", 185). However, this jacket in XL did not fit. I listened ad read that the jacket was short, so I was expecting that, however the sleeves are just giant! There seems enough excess material in the sleeve that they could have had a longer, better fitting jacket than what the final product was, at least for me anyways. IMO, I would try on before you buy so you know how the fit will be. On a positive note, the 900-fill down is superb and the outer layer of fabric is durable enough to withstand a decent amount of abuse.
This jacket is a no frills insulation piece. Outside of the front two pockets and zipper to keep it closed, this jacket is for ultralight enthusiasts. That said, the cut is not baggy. At 5.7 ounces, MontBell uses only enough materials to cover your body and keep it warm.
If its used as a true midlayer (i.e. under a larger puffy jacket/parka or a shell), your pockets are going to be on those garments. Also, because of the lightweight nature of the jacket, anything you put in the pockets may compromise the insulation (by smashing it).
Ian's right - if you want to cut ounces and don't mind the lack of pockets, this one is great.
Howdy, I've used this basically every day for 4 months on my Appalachian Trail thru-hike. I will say, it was unfortunate that there aren't any pockets, but if you want pockets, the therma-wrap has them and is a tad bit warmer. It's not as light, but thats the one my buddy uses and he loves it.
As for durability, I've stuffed it in the sack and pulled it out everyday and there hasn't been any issues. The only issue was a little burn hole -- but that was my fault.
Awesome jacket, I HIGHLY recommend it if you need to save some ounces and don't mind no pockets.
I use it for backpacking, making dinner and sleeping on cool summer nights ~ 8000'. A hood would be nice sometimes. Got it before the flood of cheaper down sweaters. Construction superb. Runs small. Large fits me without binding: 170, 5'10", 40" chest
do you have any Short-sized down jackets? I wear a Medium, but the inseam on this jacket is 34" which is too long for me...I wear around 30-32" only...thanks.
i agree with the review that this is an amazing sweater. sweaters don't have pockets and sometimes zip. it's not ever going to be your end-all be-all jacket in the winter backcountry and perhaps at that weight it can't be. this jacket is now an integral part of my layering system only. also if you have any gut at all, go for the larger size.
This is a great piece, but in a different category, I think, than the Patagonia jacket. The Patagonia Down Sweater has 3.0 ounces of 800-fill down covered by 22-denier ripstop polyester, while the mont-bell has 1.8 ounces of 900-fill (equivalent to 2.1 ounces of 800-fill) covered by 7-denier Ballistic Airlight calendered nylon. The Patagonia lists at 13 ounces, the mont-bell at 5.7 ounces. Neither is necessarily better, just different jackets for different purposes, needs, and preferences.
Interestingly enough, though, BPL did an in-depth test and analysis on down jackets, and this tested within one degree of warmth of the Patagonia Down Sweater, which is an imperceptible difference. Very impressive, given the weight difference between the two pieces. They also concluded that, contrary to popular conception, there is not necessarily a direct correlation between fill weight and/or loft, and jacket warmth. Down quality, jacket materials, design, and construction all play into the warmth factor. Lesson: don't judge a book by its cover. Find out how a jacket actually tested for warmth, and the Ex Light did extremely well.
Also, Patagonia does not publish their fill amount for the down in the sweaters. This makes comparison more difficult, but just based on sheer weight comparison the Pat. is going to be warmer. Sorry, no hard numbers for you.
Montbell uses 900 fill, while Pata uses 800 fill down. Montbell is probably not as warm - it weighs 1/2 the amount. Its also a tight fit and has no pockets, and utilizes sewn through construction. I use the ex light as a summer alpine jacket where it will probably dip to 40 degrees. Size up - I wear a M in most montbell jackets and I needed a L in this jacket.
How is the jacket with the Mountain Hardwear Windstopper hat? I have the hat, and I'm considering going with this ultralight jacket, but I keep reading that I should upgrade to the one with the hood. How does it work out for you?
First the good: the size L is 5.7oz by my scales. It feels like nothing. Also, it packs into a tiny ball about the size of a baseball. I'm 175lbs and the L had enough space to layer but was more fitted than most larges. However, I am 6'6" and it was way too short. The bottom of the jacket hit right at my belly button. For an emergency jacket to carry when doing serious trekking, it would be great. However, my purpose was as a lightweight jacket to always carry when traveling. I wouldn't feel comfortable going out in "public" with a couple inches of mid/base layer showing. A real shame -- I'm now going to have to go with something that weighs twice as much, although at least I'll get a hood.
Perusing Montbell's website, the following Montbell down jackets use box construction: Alpine down jacket; Permafrost down parka; one-piece expedition suite. The rest use sewn-through construction. If you are worried about it, go with one of their synthetic insulated parkas. I recommend the U.L. Thermawrap Parka.
The MontBell is a lighter weight jacket than the Marmot Zeus. It does pack down smaller & is as durable. The Extremely Light Down Jacket does fit a little more snug so you might want to consider ordering up one size.
About as warm and light as you can get. Full on packable warmth at virtually no weight. Size Large 6.3 oz on my scale (6.5 oz in the stuff sack). Stuff sack can be used as a perfect patch to fix any holes. Which is why it gets 4 stars...
Super Light, but needs to be looked after as durability is not the highest. Under a parka awesome but as an outer layer tread lightly.
On the AT recently with my sons. Temps were high 20s at night and mid-50s during the day. I layered a poly-T, Capilene 3, and MontBell Ex light Down jacket. Got cool, though not cold, while sitting around on the cabin porch not too far from the fire. I was wondering about the 900-fill down! If I had been on Mt. Rainier or Shasta, I am afraid that I would have froze the during summer climbing season. Seemed above average to good on the AT in moderate temps, but I am skeptical about climbing. Fit very well--true to size. Layered very well over aforementioned clothing and under a tech. shell. Good movement. Personally, I would only wear in the back country--looked like a shiny bag in certain light.
Regulates temperature amazingly. To those -15 degree days on the lift, to that 90 degree hour inside the lodge waiting for your girl friend to suit up when stupidedly you suited up as soon as you left the car.
Get lots of compliments on the looks, and I love the lightweight feel.
This jacket is incredibly light. It comes with a stuff sack that seems to be made out of the same material as the jacket. It is feather light. I wore it at camp in the morning and nights, with only a base layer underneath. The temperature was in the mid-to-high 30's and low 40's. I stayed very comfortable. No complaints what so ever from this product. Mont-Bell hit the nail on the head with this one.
Fist things first, I an not a sedentary nor skinny guy and I keep my metabolism up if possible.
My test run was with two layers of IceBreakers and this down jacket.
That said, I took the jacket out for a whorl, it was about 7 C or 45 F. It was so light I hardly knew of it. It broke a hard wind around me, and twas extremely comfortable.
The temperature dropped to near 0 and after driving 20 miles I noticed I didn't have any heat in the car. The only reason I noticed this is because I did not have my down shoes on. "/
The color red does draw the attention of those in camouflage, those on harleys and depraved womem all smiling sharply as I walked by.
they appear to have shaved an ounce off of their previously light weight jacket....this one is down to 5.7 oz! No pockets, no frills...perfect for winter desert belays or Canadian Rockies summer belays....of course you would not want to try and climb in it....I love the weight in terms of strapping its self contained bag to my harness, would also consider it a mid layer ski and ice climbing opt.
i'm reviewing the men's but i have the exact same jacket for myself in women's. we live in EXTREME cold and need any advantage we can get. this jacket's superlight/superthin yet warm qualities are goign to be a stellar leg up. it will fit under anything without bulk. wore it recently during a freak snow at 12,000 feet under a windstop fleece and was nice and toasty.
This jacket is amazing. It doesn't weigh anything ( I know it says 5.4 oz technically, but it doesn't feel like it weighs ANYTHING!). I picked this up as part of my sleep system for hammocking. The first night out the temps dropped down to 34 degrees and I had my arms and torso out of my sleeping bag all night long and was completely comfortable. I also sported the jacket around camp at temps slightly above 50 and it was comfortable then as well! The downside, it is very apparent that it is not durable...you wouldn't dare go bushwacking with it. It's made to be UBER-LIGHT and it does that, but be careful with it....I gentle fondle and caress mine, but hey, that's just me. Happy trails.
Pros: Waterproof,um yea waterproof because I lost my coffee all over this thing and it rolled right off. So they say it is waterproof yea well OK sounds good, I believe it. Nice loft, a wind dead stop, so light you forget that its winter, sorta, NO pockets as in the garment, the material is too light to support a pocket anywhere on it. Excellent emergency wear 4 da backpack. This jacket is the perfect base layer if you don't need a hoodie, that's a for sure and built as such, the Alpine light has a hood go there if needed.Cons: the brick red is not brick red just Red, so beware boys don't get labeled.
Sunset Orange, S (189.95)
Sunset Orange, M (189.95)
Sunset Orange, L (189.95)
Sunset Orange, XL (189.95)
Sax, S (189.95)
Sax, M (189.95)
Sax, L (189.95)
Sax, XL (189.95)
Gunmetal, S (189.95)
Gunmetal, M (189.95)
Gunmetal, L (189.95)
Gunmetal, XL (189.95)
The jacket itself is unbelievably light, while offering an admirable level of warmth. Initially I was concerned with the strength of the 7-denier, not more...