Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50*
Memorial Day SaleMemorial Day Sale
Available Colors/Styles
Detail Pics

Description

A must for your sidecountry setup.

The Marker Duke EPF Ski Binding strengthens its dominance even more in the freeride binding kingdom with its new Extended Power Frame that widens the frame chassis by 28% from the original for solid power transmission. This cliff-stomping, powder-slashing machine features a 16-DIN design, rock-solid uphill hiking mode, and a new toe and heel design that absorbs energy effectively so you don't kick a ski when you need it most.

  • A DIN range of 6-16 enables you to slip out the sidecountry gates and hit pillow lines, slash pow turns, and maneuver down steep chutes
  • Triple Pivot Elite toe with a horizontally oriented spring provides the highest energy absorption to reduce the risk of early release, while its secure purchase on the boot lug optimizes power transmission and allows for durable, high-energy use
  • Inter-Pivot heel delivers superb holding power for all types of freeskiing, focuses power in the direction of the boot sole for increased elasticity, and creates optimum power transmission
  • A moveable stainless steel AFD (anti friction device) allows precise release unhindered by dirt, snow, and ice buildup
  • Height-adjustable AFD accommodates alpine and AT boots
  • Magnesium and stainless steel components deliver a lightweight, super-durable binder
  • New EPF (Extended Power Frame) features a screw pattern that is 10mm wider than before for unbelievable leverage, better holding power, and quicker edge-to-edge contact
  • EPF is 46mm wide and is designed for skis 89mm and wider
  • Power Width Design uses wider connection brackets to create better power transmission
  • Backcountry Technology features an integrated climbing lever that gives safe, secure transition from ride to hike mode and back
  • Climbing levers are protected from unwanted releases in ski mode
  • In tour mode, the entire interface moves back 4cm for better balance while you climb and make kick turns
  • Climbing Aids offer three positions—flat, 7˚, and 13˚—which can easily be accessed with your ski pole even in unstable standing positions
  • Integrated elastomer padding on climbing aids dampens the impact, reduces the irritating clacking sound, and allows for more comfortable hiking
  • Recommended Skier's Weight: 130+lb
  • Stand Height without Ski: 36mm

Share your thoughts

What do you think of the

Marker Duke EPF Ski Binding

? Share a...

No file chosen

Rather attach a photo from another website?

Rather attach a photo from your computer?

  • Product review:
  • Share a video
  • Share a photo

How familiar are you with the product?(optional)

Invalid filetype.

Save

Here's what others have to say...

4 5

Todd Kehoe

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

I have these, they are good for the shorter Jackson Hole skinning trips. If you want something for bigger trips (i.e. Grand Teton National Park) I would suggest a Dynafit setup or the up & coming CAST system (google it, it looks awesome) coming out 1-2 years from now.

They are heavier than the Dynafit system, but good for me stuff off places like Jackson Hole Mountain Resort, Teton Pass,& shorter Grand Teton National Park trips. I plan on eventually Dynafit bc setup, but this is good starter set. I don't try & use Dukes as everyday resort bindings (I like P18 & STH 16 bindings), I had a previous black pair I cracked the AFD on when skiing JHMR too many days on them. You don't want lose your ability to access the bc because of that.

4 5

NJS

Member since 

I have the Duke EPFs on a pair of 195 Super 7s. I switched from using Fritschi Freerides due to prerelease issues with resort boots (never any issue with Fritshchi/AT boots). The Dukes have been extremely solid and I have not had any release issues with either resort boots or AT boots. I have about 8 days touring on them and 10 days at a resort; so far, they have worked well. All complaints I have with them were known when I bought them (they are really heavy and you have to take them off to transition to ski mode).

2 5

Ralph

Member since 
  • Gender: Male

I returned my first pair to Marker after 10 days of side country use, due to excessive lateral heal movement in the tour mode.Marker replaced them under warranty. I now have 2 days use on my new pair and I am back in the same position. I can not fault the binding in ski mode, but I have zero trust in their durability in tour mode and therefor can not take it anywhere I can not boot pack out from.

I wish I had not brought these .

Bill Porreca

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

These always had that wiggle in the binding while touring! Many a day I thought they were going to explode on the way up somehow mine made it for 5 years with countless days on them only to shatter in the parking lot. So much happier with a pair of tech bindings, have yet to pre-release, I am 200 lbs and ski bumps with them fairly hard when in the resort, expected some kind of release by now especially since I do not lock down the toe piece. Have not sent any kind of sizable airs but, do not doubt their ski ability in anyway.

I need the 130mm brake, but the only option...

Dan Kasali

Member since 
Posted on

I need the 130mm brake, but the only option i can find anywhere is 110mm. Does anyone know how to either bend the current brake to fit or do something other than spend 70 bucks on markers website for a new brake (total bs they wont just exchange for the right brake). Thanks in advance.

Mark Parrett

Member since 
Groups:
Best Answer Responded on

Dan - any shop should be able to bend this for you, or you can do it yourself. Copy and paste this link for a quick video of how to bend ski brakes with nothing but an old bike handlebar (or pipe, or whatever you have around that is the right length and hollow).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk6yIKnLqKc

4 5

Sean S.

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

Strong and stable, switching settings requires you to remove your boot, everything must be cleaned off reasonably well or the binding will not lock back in. I'm still pretty new to them, I'll update if my opinion changes.

6'1, 185lbs; mounted on Blizzard Cochise

2 5

Bill Porreca

Member since 
Groups:
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

The duke is definitely a burly binding that skis well. There are other bindings of similar stature on the market that have fixed 2 of the main problems I have with this binding. The first issue is getting from walk to ski mode. Taking your boot out of the binding is not only annoying it can definitely be a safety issue on some tours. The second issue is that when you leave the ski binding combo in your car the water within the binding rails will freeze, bring a whippet to pry that open, or a strong leather man. I have had mine for about 5 years now and still use it on occasion just think there are some other options out there that offer similar retention and ski-ability that are a little more functional when touring.

4 5

Andrew

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've used it several times

Broke the plastic connection between the toe section and the rail testing the tour mode in an awkward situation. Replaced, and since have worked great. It'd be 5 stars if I didn't have to worry about something breaking on a longer tour. Then again, I suppose there is no true alternative to dynafit in that realm. For my first serious back country season, they seem like they'll get the job done.

Andrew
5 5

Mark Travers

Member since 
Groups:
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

I've got a pair of last year's dukes on my all mountain skis, and a pair of this year's models on my powder skis. Both have been solid bindings, and I've had zero issues with them. In terms of skiing, I don't notice any difference between last year's dukes and this year's model. They definitely are heavier than your dedicated AT bindings, but they are super solid in the resorts and in skiing big lines, which makes the weight worth it for me. I've done short to full-day tours with these - I definitely notice the weight compared to a lightweight AT rig, but it isn't such an issue that I can't keep up. The heel riser is easy enough to adjust with a pole, and the flat/ mid/ high positions seem just right on the skin track

In terms of these vs. Guardians/ Trackers, I can say that I've had no complaints with the dukes, and they have the benefit of being on the market for several generations.

hi just want to know if this new dukes fit...

alfred

Member since 
Posted on

hi just want to know if this new dukes fit in the ski holes of the old dukes .

Chris Wilke

Member since 
Responded on

No sir! The new duke has a wider platform so therefore has a wider mounting platform as well...

4 5

sam gillin

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

They get the job done but I feel like they are a bit high off the ski.

My skis are 112 underfoot- are there...

Kassia

Member since 
Posted on

My skis are 112 underfoot- are there different sizes? If so, what size should I get?

stuart smythe

Member since 
Responded on

EPF is 46mm wide and is designed for skis 89mm and wider...the brakes come standard as 110mm, so you'll need to buy the 130mm..depending on your BSL, there are two sizes:
Small 265-325mm or large 305-365mm

Does this binding ski like alpine...

Bear

Member since 
Posted on

Does this binding ski like alpine binding?
Does it give the power you need to charge big lines and stomp big landings?

KC Deane

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

Hey Bear,

I would say that it does feel rather solid when you are in the binding. However I feel that the height of the binding creates different feel than a regular set of bindings. The other issue I have with these bindings is the toe plate breaks.... a lot. I broke 3 in a month which is a pain in the ass to fix. I would suggest getting the Salomon guardian/Atomic or the new Tyrolia.

watp20191

Member since 
Responded on

Bear, I haven't skiied these myself but a number of my friends use them as their everyday binding at Telluride. They're too heavy to do full touring but they're not really built for that. They're truly a sidecountry binding. Great for everyday resort skiing with some hikes or shorter tours. They are raised off the snow a little more but you get used to it and the advantage gained in versatility makes up for the different in height. You can stomp in these just like a regular alpine binding. I've seen it. You certainly can't tour in these like a Dynafit or Fritschi though so don't buy these expecting to tour more than an hour or two at once.

One thing to add to KC's recommendation is that (from what I've read online and been told in local shops) this binding can work with either an AT boot sole or a DIN-sole and the boot brand does not matter. I'm looking at buying a pair for that reason. In contrast, according to the manufacturer the Salomon/Atomic (same binding just different sticker) only works with certain boots (of course made only by Salomon/Atomic). I have not seen torque tests on the Sal/Atomic binding with any boots so I can't tell you if this is BS or true. It's probably similar to Fritshi saying you can't use a DIN sole with their bindings but I've seen plenty of people do it. But just beware. It has to do with the release range so even if the boot-to-binding looks good to the eye it may fail a true torque test and not release reliably. As far as the new Tyrolia this is their first year. I would let them get some of the bugs out for a season before investing $400-$500 in something that hasn't been put through a winter of consumer use.

stuart smythe

Member since 
Responded on

Bear,
I have these on a pair of K2 Petitors (and last years version on K2 Coombacks) and have tracked all day in them for the last 15 days. Hikes ranging from 6km-12kms hiking with respective skiing in JaPow in the Japan Alps in Hakuba. First point to height - yes they do feel taller, but are incredibly solid re transmission tho. Re big landings, these are solid! You won't have any issues hucking 40 footers. I haven't experienced the plate issues (hopefully i don't). I use Scarpa Hurricanes and Scarpa Maestrale RS boots and have had no issues re DIN/torque with setting at 12 (choose of which boot depends on the aggressive hike and length of time skinning - the RS's have greater walkability). hope that helps.
ss

5 5

Jamie Preston

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

Marker revolutionized the side country binding with the Duke, and it just continues to get better. A little wider, but still with the same performance of the regular Marker Jester, and corresponding confidence as you head down. The tradeoff for beefy alpine performance is weight, and this is certainly not the long tour option. I have Dynafits for long tours, but when it's a quick hike or three out the gate, or single short ski tour run, the Duke is the choice. The bonus is you can run this as your everyday binding, and you won't know the difference, aside from a little extra weight.