Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
The La Sportiva Trango S EVO GTX Mountaineering Boot received a 2004 Backpacker magazine Editor's Choice Award. This boot, weighs in at a super light 2lb 10oz, one of the reasons it's won favor with mountaineering gurus worldwide. The Gore-Tex membrane is guaranteed waterproof, while remaining breathable. La Sportiva took their climbing shoe background to heart when they created the snug-fitting Trango's lacing system with lace lock. Another feature that sets the Trango apart from the competition is the 3D Flex ankle-hinge system. This support system remains flexible from side to side while providing stability when front pointing in crampons. The Trango is compatible with neumatic crampons. *AVAILABLE FOR NORTH AMERICAN SHIPMENT ONLY.
Bottom Line: Lightweight, waterproof support. Get everything you've ever wanted in a mountaineering boot in the Trango.
About 3/4 of my Search and Rescue team colleagues have Trangos. They are light, comfortable hikers, yet have the support for moderate crampon work and high angled environs. The seem to excel on moderate rock and scrambling, making them a great boot for the mountain rescue application. The Trango S are not insulated, so extended periods in snow my result in cold feet. These boots are constructed with cutting edge design and materials for unparalleled weight and performance, so they're a bit vulnerable to wear and tear. If you're looking for more durability, I suggest the Glacier or Glacier Evo, but if you're looking for performance, look no further.
These boots are light and relatively warm. They run a little narrow for my medium-wide foot. I take care of that by bringing them to my local cobbler who throws them in the stretcher overnight and then I am good to go! They are so light that they wear faster than heavier boots. If you want a super durable boot then get something else. But if you want "the" boot for climbing peaks in Patagonia or many other places, you can't do better then this boot.
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
The boots are compatible with crampons - just not full auto models. Crampons either come with plates or are compatible with plates. Heck, you could even make your own out of milk jugs and zip ties! So, the answer is yes.
This boot is the best light weight climbing boot around, unbelievable summer alpine boot. Comfy, light and versatile. Definitely lacks in the ice climbing department, due to the 3/4 shank, but they will get you through an ice pitch if you need them too.
I have not found them hot. It depends on where you hike I suppose. I hike primarily in high forest and above timberline in Colorado and never had a problem. I mostly get off the trails wander the high country so I appreciate the all around competence.
They would work fine, but you would be crazy hot below the tree line. Save these for Alpine pursuits and look elsewhere for your backpacking adventures. These are overkill. I wear Merrell Perimeter GTX when it is too cold for vibram5fingers
I bought these boots for a spring climb up Mt. Shasta in 2009. Right out of the box they were comfortable and plenty warm for 3-season climbing and hiking. My pair has seen me to the top of Mt. Shasta (twice), Mt. Whitney (twice), Mt. Dana, Mt. Lassen, South Sister, and dozens of lesser peaks and they are still going strong. They work well with crampons and won't teat your feet up. I can't recommend them enough.
The G12 New Matic (with heel bail) is a great crampon for the Trango S Evo, and would provide a bit more stability over the G12 New Classic 'strap on' model that you currently have. Hope this helps you, Slick.
This is a great lwt boot for alpine rock and long trails into the mtns. Makes a reasonable boot for a quick dry ascent of Rainier as well with the right crampon system.
Super sticky soles which you'll notice on rock. Shallow lugs though whih you'll also notice (not in a good way) in the right mud or snow conditions.
I have an opportunity to pick up the Asolo Fugitive for 105$. I am planning a trip to Kilimanjaro in Sept as well as many practice hiking trips in the Northeast till then. I am torn between Trango which I was told below would be 'perfect' for Kili or the Fugitives that have amazing reviews and are 70% cheaper.
Write your answer here... I love sportivas for their performance and comfortable fit, they ONLY thing is the durability. they tend to wear out faster than other brands. That being said they will be awesome until the moment they die
These are great mountaineering boots. Very stable in rugged conditions and a comfortable fit for backpacking, minor ice climbing, and extreme mountaineering. I climbed Vestal Peak's Wham Ridge (5.3) in these boots with no problems.
After wearing my last pair of La Sportiva boots for 10 years, I was finally forced to replace them this year. Having been quite impressed by La Sportiva's durability, comfort, design and narrower fit, I wanted to show some brand loyalty in selecting my next pair of boots. So, back in January, I bought these La Sportiva boots. Unfortunately, the boots were a full size larger than my foot, but I tried them on anyway, and much to my surprise, they fit great (albeit slightly large).
The boots I found were La Sportiva's Trango S Evo Gtx Mountaineering boots. They were some of the most lightweight boots I'd ever laid my hands on, and seemed to be quite sturdy. What impressed me even more were the fully gussetted tongues lined entirely with Gore-Tex. These boots, on first appearance, seemed that they would hold up to full submersion in a stream or snowfield - just what I needed for a spring, summer and fall full of climbing mountains in Colorado.
Per the product information page off of La Sportiva's website, these boots were for serious mountaineers, and could even withstand some minor ice-climbing, something I was planning on trying out in February.
After putting these boots through 7 full months of abuse, I feel that I'm ready to write an honest review of them. At the time of this report, I've subjected the boots to 137 miles of hiking and mountaineering, with over 54,000 feet of elevation gain. I'm happy to report that they are still in one piece and performing wonderfully. The boots withstood the abuse I threw at them, from ice-climbing (although the boots probably would not be great for full-time ice-climbing), snow-shoeing, crampon use, long backpacking trips, up a Class 5.3 multi-pitch climb and up 24 mountains. The tread still has another year or two left on them, and the structure of the boot is still fully intact. The leather on the front part of the boots near the toe is starting to get thin, but overall the boot looks great still.
I think the best part of these boots is the Vibram rubber lining going up along the side of the boot, protecting your foot in hard-core conditions. When navigating up large boulders and rugged rocks, the extra protection is quite noticable, providing peace-of-mind when selecting crucial foot-placements.
All-in-all I would highly recommend these boots to anyone looking for a great mountaineering boot that is quite lightweight and durable.
Pros:
* Durable for the weight * Fully lined in Gore-Tex * Super Lightweight * Awesome colors * Great grip for insane conditions * Well-constructed * Versatile * Warm for their weight * Great lace design - no more snagging metal on rocks * Great fit on the first day - no breaking-in
Cons:
* Not as durable as they could be due to their lightweight construction * Not suitable for full-time ice climbing * Not suitable for ultra-cold conditions such as 5000m+ peaks (Denali, etc) * Narrow (may not be suitable for people with larger feet)
Hi - I own a pair of Nepal Evo Gtx boots in a size 45. I usually wear a very thin Bridgedale liner sock and then a medium-weight Bridgedale wool sock in the Nepals.
My questions are: is sizing similar in these boots as compared to the Nepal Evos? And assuming I want to wear them for Spring, Summer and Fall activities, would you recommend a lighter wool sock? And if so, would that affect the size I would wear?
Thanks in advance. Hope my questions were not confusing.
i wear an 11 in nike and montrail, and a 44.5 in this boot with room for thin wicking liners under midweight wool hiking socks from wigwam -my foot measures a D width.great fit, easy to adjust lower boot fit from ankle fit via lace locks -nice feature.i climbed for about 8 hours in these in crampons in snow and ice -pretty warm with only minimal numbness in the toes during the dawn hours on the frozen ice.i had little time to break these in (just a 3 mile loop up and stair climbing), but they felt so good, i was OK wearing them for a multi day trip without worry. they break in like a sneaker -fast and easy.I wore the OEM feetbed, but will switch to my normal superfeet greens for better stability and fit.This boot is a perfect balance between a mid-weight hiker and a mountaineering boot with plenty of stiffness for crampons (i used BD contact straps).I found the sole of the shoe extremely grippy on wet and dry rock, and even on ice w/o crampons they seemed to grip pretty well. overall, i'm very satisfied with this boot, and would recommend for cooler weather/heavier packs and of course summer mountaineering. for reference, my first trip in these was with a 32lb pack over 18 miles and 6000 feet of elevation gain trail/rock/scree/snow/ice. The boot showed no sign of wear on the upper, rand, and soles were even pretty much new looking. i probably wouldn't wear this boot unless i need crampons or expect extreme wetness, so i expect them to last a very long time even with their softer sole. for lighter packs and all-dry climbing, i'd wear a lighter boot or shoe, although given the support and funtionality, these boots are extremely light! cheers.
Is this a good boot for Kilimanjaro - I know that there are varying opinions out there and ultimately it also depends on preference and anatomy but as an overall generalization.....does this boot have the qualities necessary to withstand Kilimanjaro conditions and would it be good for rock scrambling?
These boots are very comfortable and require little to no break-in period. I consider them a mild 3 season Alpine boot that is lightweight and I have never got a single blister while wearing them.
They are stiff enough for crampon use but I have also used them for hikers while carrying a heavy pack. These boots have performed regardless of the task. They are not insulated so they would not be the boot of choice for high elevations or extreme cold.
The only complaints I have about them is the red color and they need a toe clip for crampons.
Yes, I know there is no insulation in these boots. I am beginning to build my gear set, and really dont think I need/want the Nepal EVO GTX boot at 500 bucks!
I live in Utah, along the Wasatch mountains and plan on doing winter trips, as well as spring, summer, and fall.
Now, to my question: If I wear to wear a good expedition type wool sock, at least, as well as another if needed, would these boots do well?
If you're going into the mountains, you want insulation. I also live along the wasatch front and can tell you that you'll want insulation if you'll be spending much time in the snow. These boots will keep your feet warm if you keep moving, but if your stop for any length of time cold toes are sure to follow. I also recommend thick smartwool socks. They cushion, keep feet warm and wick away sweat well.
I agree with most of what others have said. Short version, great boot, minimal break in required, comfy, runs on the narrow side, stiff, great traction on rocks, replace the insole with at least a normal trail running shoe type insole.
I put about 5 miles on these with a pack before taking them out on their first trip. I tend to be more prone to blisters and didn't get any on an 18 mile trek with 20lb pack.
As far as I know I have normal width feet and I do notice that it's a bit on the narrow side as some have mentioned. Not narrow enough to cause me any issues.
The insole that they come with I'd suggest throwing out though don't replace it with green feet or similar bulky insert. All it needs is a normal insole as is found in like a trail running shoe. I took the insoles from my la sportiva trail shoes and put them in they work perfect, w/o all the bulk that the other type of insole would add. I don't see how anyone could even have the boot still fit if they added one of those soles, but I guess they have.
Anyway if they'd just put a regular insole into these with a bit of padding vs the paper thin no shock one that's in them it'd be fine. I did an 18 mile hike with about a 20lb pack on my first major trek, and my knees were very sensitive and beat up feeling the next day. After adding the trail running shoe insoles it was fine for the same length trip afterwards.
Boots have been waterproof for me so far but I've done nothing more than gentle stream crossings.
They've been plenty warm for me so far down to 40 degrees with expedition super wool type socks, they are a little bit on the hot side for warmer weather due to the snug fit and waterproofing I assume.
It's very easy to really snug this down around your ankle if you like to they have great support.
I"m using them for normal hiking boots because I'm usually climbing up some peak as the goal, and was rather shocked at how quickly they're wearing so far, but that is the price for such light boots I guess.
I've used them fine with stubai ultralight universal crampons they worked great.
My foot is size 10 I've never worn anything but a 10 or equivalent in euro the 43.5s fit me great. I suggest you checout the chart on la sportivas site for fitting.
I use the Nepal EVO GTX on Rainier (or ski boots if skiing) but have several friends who have summited Rainier with these. I tend to run cold. If you run hot (sleep hot, etc), you'll be fine in summer on something like the DC or Emmons routes. If doing Liberty Ridge or one of the ice faces, these aren't as stiff as what you would want.
Remained waterproof through snow, water and all the other crap the Pacific Northwest throws at us. Lightweight also. I have narrow feet and like a snug fit. These fit the bill well.
Hi guys, in South Africa we do not have this boot available but we do have the Trango Alp and the la spo Karakorum Pro Gtx(not the normal karakorum) in this range. How well would the Trango S evo compare to the mentioned boots? Also I need to know how well these boots handle front-pointing. Thanks Brandon
Overall great boot. Comfortable hiker under heavy loads. I wear them at work everyday and find them comfortable enough for all day wear. Have not done any extensive climbing in the yet, so I can't speak for them there. Stayed dry during some spring backpacking in snow and stream crossings. Awesome product.
I really like these boots. I am generally pretty tough on my gear and these boots can really stand up to whatever you hand them. Great for slightly technical summit attempts where some good edging will be involved. Take crampons very well because of the shank. Did great on mixed rock ascents, as well as a long couloir with crampons. My only complaint which is more of operator error than manufacturer fault is that they are not very well insulated. If you are expecting cold weather make sure you wear heavy socks. These boots are great for Spring, Summer, and Fall asecnts. For winter however I might recommend something heavier.
Any mountain boot is a balance between weight, comfort and utility. Over optimizing on one compromises the others. In my opinion, these boots have hit the sweet spot.
They are very low weight, which makes them easy to wear, and flexible. I have used them on a 6000m peak in the Andes, plus a couple of semi-techincal 5000m peaks, and they were not too cold (I used toe warmers), plus they allow enough ankle articulation to prevent your knees from getting hammered when hitting long days in crampons. A HUGE improvement over my plastics.
These boots are incredible - I used them with my Grivel 12 pt automatics, and they performed flawlessly. I can strongly recommend them for just about any alpine conditions I can think of outside of super cold regions like Alaska. The best purchase I have made for awhile and well worth the money.
On the negative side, they don't provide the ankle support / toe pointing ability of full plastics. I have used them for some ice climbing, but they are more tiring to use, and are probably not the right tool for the job.
PS: Did I mention how incredibly comfortable they are?
No break-in time required for mine. Very comfortable for summer snow climbs, including long approaches, and good on rock so they should perform well in your scenario. That said, I would personally wear something less stiff (and less expensive).
Great boot for a simi technical route on a dry 14K. The weight of the boot and support make them fun to walk or climb in. This is a stiff hiking boot ;-) It is nto a full on 3 season mountaineering boot.
These would be overkill for dry 14ers. If you're backpacking go with stiff hiking boots. If you're not backpacking then some mid-range hiking boots would be plenty.
like others have said great summer boot BUT summer in the cascades can still be cold. I just used them on a Mt hood Mid august climb and my toes were numb for a few hours. Once the crampons went on my toes slowly got cold. Fit is typical sportiva as I also have the Nepal extremes and Baruntse boots in the same size.
I bought my Trango S EVO GTX online with some reservations. New to mountaineering, I wanted something that will work right away. I was torn between getting the tried and true Makulu or these boots. In the end, the Trango performed beautifully on Mount Rainier and I can highly recommend them.
They felt comfortable right out of the box. I trained in them for a few weeks before heading up to Seattle for the Mount Rainier acid test. During the training runs, the boots went through rocks, sand, streams, hills, and grass. No leaks and no major issues. I did get a small blister coming down a 1,700ft hike with a 40lb pack.
Time came for the Rainier test. We took the Ingraham Direct route. On the first day from Paradise to Muir Flat, the weather was awful -- complete whiteout. No visibility, rain at the lower elevations, and snow on the Muir Snow Field. Had to kick steps into the snow with the front of the boots for 2 miles and 3,000 vertical feet. No problems! The boots felt light and easy to use.
The second day was the summit bid -- crampons, ice axe, and rope teams. Again, the boots performed well. I used Grivel Air Tech Light crampons with the anti-bott device. The crampons fit onto the boots easily and almost felt like they weren't there. (BTW, get the anti-bott! It's worth every penny.) We went through hard snow in the morning, and complete slush in the afternoon. Again the boots did very well. Front pointing in the crampons with these boots felt natural and easy.
Descending from the summit was an adventure. The hot sun melted a lot of the snow, so we were post-holing a lot. Especially on the Muir Snowfield. The slushy snow went up to our knees with every step. The boots felt great and secure. My feet were in complete comfort. No blisters either, after I put on merino wool socks with a pair of smooth liner socks.
When I finally took the boots off back at Paradise parking lot, I did notice that my socks were damp after 17 hours of straight hiking in these boots. However, I think some of it was sweat. Anyway, the boots felt dry the whole way and my feet were very comfortable. I can forgive the dampness after such a long grueling trek. I was very happy with the Trango S EVO GTX, and will heartily recommend them.
Do you carry (or plan to carry) the Trango Alp Gore-Tex. This version seems to be newer with better uppers and soles. See http://www.lasportiva.com/catalogue/catalogo.php?cat=1&cod3=559&Language=EN
I also really wish BC carried the Trango Alp. It's a more durable boot than the Trango S, being made mostly of leather, and only slightly heavier. I would seriously consider ordering a pair if they were available backed by BC's incredible return policy.
right up the Mt Baldy bowl to the summit, flawless. Got a liiiiiittle cold but I was postholing some and in deep snow a lot of the day. Many comments and others said how much they loved theirs or their friends loved theirs. Great boot, highly recommended!!
I am curious to see how comfortable these boot can be in any situation I can muster. Before I hit a mountain I need to know how these stack up under various conditions.....sans gaiters-feet dry, warm and happy.
Much narrower than the Glacier yet plenty of clearance in the toe box and heel. Arch is held nicely although I added "blue" Superfeet to eliminate heel slip.
In the pic above I was wearing a super heavy weight fleece sock that was wet going into my boots. After 'shoeing for 20+ minutes the Gore-tex took over and my toes warmed nicely. Tighter lacing and I can drop down to a mid-weight hiker sock and still be comfortable in a BD crampoon.
Since I lack gaiters, the ankle padding of the boots was pretty wet by the time I made the return to the TH. The boot took about 3 hours to dry completely (I'll remind you NOT to dry them in the sun, over the fireplace, etc).
I have to say, I am very impressed with the weight and performance of this boot so far.
Love these books. Worth the money. They are really low-weight. I don't have to make the trade off between weight and ankle support. (I would have twisted my ankle twice yesterday if I didn't have the hightops.) Will be using these on my Mt. Whitney Mountaineering route trek in two weeks. Double socks recommended in order to reduce friction.
My motives weren't quite so grand as the other reviewers, I just wanted a boot I could use for everything, and these are just the trick. Had always used 3 season boots before but had aspirations for all year round and further afield through europe etc. I can safely say I have thrown everything at these boots without failure. Mid summer mountain walks where its been hot where my feet have been slightly damp through sweat, mid British winter with wind, much rain and snow with dry feet slightly damp through sweat again, no change, I've scrambled, this is where these boots really come into their own. Solid assured yet light and comfortable. Pity they have a disco theme colour scheme. Only fault I can find. If they made an all black boot I'd buy them for work (military). Expensive but worth every penny.
Its possible - but unlikely that it wouldn't dramatically compromise the fit. If you want something that will be warmer, check out other insulated boots like the La Sportiva Nepal.
These are my go to boots for the outdoors. I use them for everything. Great for climbing, hiking, and all the crampon work I have needed to do. Keep my feet warm and dry. Ive stoop in creeks for close to 15 minutes and they worked like a charm. One time I did have water get into the top of my boot and my foot felt dry within 5 minutes. If you dont have a pair and are looking for an awesome boot try these out!
Have a couple climbs in my new pair, and they're great. Had to tie on my crampons though, since there are no toe welts. So . . . I need new crampons. Looking at BD sabertooth clip. Does anyone know how compatible these are? A good fit? I noticed the heel of the boot did not sit snugly on the heel piece of my petzl vasaks (spirlock, i believe).
Pretty much straight out of the box I took these to Kilimanjaro and hiked in them. Then from there went to Mt. Kenya and used them for upto a 5.7 multi-pitch alpine trad climb and they got the job done. Maybe not the ultimate best boot to use for alpine rockclimbing but if you're like me and just want one boot to fit many needs for a large expedition then it'll work. I will admit that this boot can be a bit narrow if you have a wider foot but if that doesn't apply to you then you'll love these boots. Light, Warm, and Great price!
My question is about sizing. I have an old pair of Trango S's, these are not Gore-Tex lined as the current ones are. Anyway, my old ones are a size 45 and have become too small for me. My toes are right at the end of the boot...I mean touching the end. So my question is this: should I go up a full size or only 1/2 size? How much space should there be between the ends of the toes and the boot?
These boots are amazing. Great spring or summer mountaineering boot. Light enough and flexible enough that a long approach to the snow isn't an issue and still still enough that it takes a crampon great and provides ample support in the snow.
Used this boot to climb mount Rainier in July. Was a little chilly standing on snow in camp, but i just stood on a pad if i wasn't moving around. Used this in the wind river range. Back packed over 50 miles on that trip including Ganet peak. Plenty warm.
Hey Ryan, as a rule Scarpa boots are generally wider than La Sportiva. Check out the Scarpa Summit, Triolet, or Mont Blanc and see if they will suite your needs.
I, too, was torn between these and the Makalus. I actually got both, but have worn these on 6 fourteeners so far. They did chew the tops of my outer toes a bit, but I taped them and so no problem. On a 3rd class ridge, they were superb. Edging is phenomenal and they aided my accent in a huge way. They're also waterproof, and don't rub my feet in any meaningful way. They tend to wear quickly, but they perform so well I won't have a problem buying another pair. And now I have the Makalus: these Trangos are so much lighter! For scrambling/mountaineering, get these. Cheers.
How are these boots for trekking/backpacking? I already have a good pair of solid (read: heavy) boots for backpacking (Hanwag Alaska GTX). However the Alaskas are terrible for climbing- too heavy, not flexible enough and not a tight enough fit to keep the boot in a stable position when edging. I would like a lighter, more flexible boot suitable for scrambling/ via ferrata (and able to hold a crampon for glacier travel), that is still ok for the hiking portion of the approach. Are these boots suitable? Or any other contenders I should consider (Kayland Apex Rock-- but these are bigger and stiffer I thought?)? Thanks for any assistance!
They are great for backpacking. I've used them for day-long approaches to base camps wearing a heavy pack. I'm usually prone to blistering but with a medium to heavy Smartwool sock, I had no problems. My feet weren't even tired or sore.
They edge great and perform well in all kind of conditions. You can go from snow/slush/water to rock and these things grip like mad. I've used them with BD Contact Straps and they work great. Late last summer, I summited Sunlight Peak in Colorado after a graupel storm and did the entire class 4 section while it was wet (see pic). There's no way I would have done that with regular hiking boots.
I broke mine in in under 10 miles. They're very rigid before break-in but fairly flexible afterward - but rigid enough for you to be comfortable in crampons.
Im new to mountaineering due to the geographical limitations of southern Illinois. Im looking to climb some of the 14ers in Colorado this summer and am stuck between the La Sportiva Trango S EVO GTX and Asolo Expert GV Mountaineering Boots. Can anyone help me or at least point me in the right direction?
Hi Ryan, I too am from IL so I feel your pain. I just moved out to Colorado towards the end of December and anticipate climbing many 14ers this summer. I've tried on both the Expert Gvs and the Trango S Evo and I feel like this is a much superior boot. If you have a chance though try these guys on in a store. I'm normally a size 11 (44.5) but the 45 ended up fitting better for some reason. Although the color scheme is a little crazy, you just can't beat it's flexibility and for climbing 14ers, I don't think you can find a better boot on the market. See you on the trails!
how do these compare to the trango alp? even though bc.com doesn't offer the trango alp, the two they look like a similar boot. vibram mulaz vs sasslong? sportiva site states only 8 gram difference/boot, can one comment - is weight difference noticeable? comfort? performance on ice and approach trek?
like the trango s features and lightweight, but the trango alp is appealing for its color, if it can match the s in performance...
This shows the high snowpack we had in Northern Colorado summer 2011. This is mid summer and the snowpack was still high. Every slope and meadow was saturated and whole hillsides were flowing with water. The Trango's performed flawlessly, going from postholing bogs to river crossings on sketchy logs to rock scree slopes to 60 degree snow fields and finally to tundra. Dry feet after a full day of saturation. Really amazing boots. I am about to pick up my second set, as after 5 seasons, the bushwacking is starting to take its toll.
Long backcountry trip in the ADKs, temps in the teens, neg temps at night, thrashing backcountry snowshoeing, kicking alpine steps, mixed ice and rock, white-out conditions, wet bag - toes? Warm and toasty. By far the lightest boots I have owned. Paired with smartwools, go all day. Laces froze up, but other than that, light ,sticky, fast boots. When Sportiva discontinues, let me know -- I will buy all of their stock. And backcountry.com? Awesome service. Ordered two pairs to get fit, free shipping return. Will be return customer. Oh, and took these boots into the backcountry without any break-in. Not a blister or hotspot. Most impressed.
I need a boot for summer mountaineering trip such as Shasta, Adams, etc. and a few late spring trips in the Sierra. Can't decide between this boot and the Trango Extreme Evo. Would this boot be sufficient since I won't be on overly cold trips or is the Extreme the way to go?
You won't be in cold places so this boot would be adequate and it is lighter and easier to walk in than the evo. Great all around boot for this stuff, BUT extended time on the snow and ice will be a little cold. For example I guided Rainier in them once, and it was just a little too cold of a boot for being on the ice all day, even in summer.
I miss the old green leather Trangos of the past. I had to finally give mine up when they failed at the soles somewhere in Nepal, but it took ten years of hard use to accomplish this. I replaced them with the new red Trango S EVO GTX (what the hell is with that name - have the guys in Italy completely lost their minds? Should they come up out of the boot cobbler's dungeon and get some fresh air?) and, I have to say, that I love them! They are super light (a future drawback that I will have to pay for I'm sure), have good support, and just fit like a glove. I am, and always will be, a Sportiva man. Whatever last they build shoes on seems to be the perfect fit for my hideously deformed foot and toes. But I know two other people that have them, taken them to the Alps and Tetons, and are also in love with them. I once wore them on a late fall climb up the Kautz headwall on Rainier, and other than cursing the lack of rigid crampons, they performed well - even with the foot of snow, the roaring wind, the whiteout, the descent into the abyss, becoming lost on the Nisqually Glacier, and the cold and rain - they did well. I can, however, see wear in them that is quite accelerated when compared to a full leather boot. I would guess that with heavy use these will see half the years of my old green Trangos, but they are so light.
I have been looking at getting into mountaineering and was wondering if these boots would be good for a beginner looking to progress? If not do you have any suggestions?
These are great boots, and would probably work just fine for you as a beginner. Personally, I'd suggest picking up the La Sportiva Makalu boots over these. They are tried and true, and only get more comfortable the more you wear them. You'll be able to climb everything you can climb with the Trango S EVOs, and be able to use them for backpacking the next weekend. You sacrifice a little extra weight for a bunch of all-around durability.
Either way, you're going to be getting great boots that aren't going to hold you back.
Short and sweet. These shoes are the easiest and least bulky to walk in then any other boot I've tried. These are on my feet for every 14er (unless its Quandary!). They are light and fit like a glove. My foot is a bit thick, not too wide, but thick and they fit fine. I wear a 10 in Nike and New Balance and the 44 fits perfect. I love this boot, it is extremely durable and fits great!
I can't find those crampons on the site but...If they have a front bail (the wire that goes over the toe) they will NOT work. If they have a plastic toe piece then they WILL work.
Bought these boots two years ago and they are still going strong. I've taken them through just about every type of environment there is within a 1000 mile radius of Albuquerque, N.M. and have been very pleased. Not only have they performed well for hiking and mountaineering, but I have used them for ice climbing as well in the middle of the winter in Ouray, Colorado and they got the job done. On top of that, they are still water proof and I have used nothing to treat them since I got them. Like most people, one complaint is the width of the boot. I have wide, flat feet and so this boot definitely gets a little "spicy" after a long day of climbing. Part of the problem is that since I have a low instep because of my flat feet, it's hard to get the boot to feel equally tight along the top side of my boot. I fixed this by putting some more padding in the bottom of the boot and putting my orthodox in. This kept my foot from sliding around as much in the boot and maximum comfort was achieved (although there is always room for improvement). That said, after doing some very cold high altitude mountaineering in Ecuador and Peru, I decided it was time to get a more burly boot (mainly for the warmth and automatic crampon features) so just recently I bought the big brother of these boots, the Nepal Evo GTX. After two more years, I hope to write a good review about those boots as well!
Oh yeah, one more thing--in cold weather camping situations these boots are EXTREMELY hard for me to put on if they get frozen. If you plan on camping in really cold weather, figure out a way to keep these babies warm. If not you'll end up like me spending the better half of an hour with your feet halfway in boot waiting for them to get warm enough to shove the rest of the foot in there--not fun.
Comfortable right out of the box. They say its a 3-season boot but I've been using them this winter and my toes stay pretty toasty down to about 10 degrees.
How do I take advantage of the lifetime warranty of this boot? I bough them here via Amazon Feb 15 2008, order number 3535800. Used for one hiking trip last summer. Problem: the glue between yellow plastic and red foam on the inside of the heel of one boot is coming apart. There is no wear in that area of the shoe - it is just failing in an area shoes usually don't fail from wear.
So you bought them on Amazon or on backcountry.com? If you bought them through backcountry.com you have two options. 1. You can return them to backcountry for a full refund or exchange, no questions asked.2. You can set up a return for inspection, fix/replacement straight through La Sportiva. Just contact them through their site.Either way you'll be taken care of.
I love this boot! They give great ankle support (I have been able to backpacked with a sprained ankle thats to these). They have great traction when going up rocks! Well worth the money. I did put in a insole but they are super comfortable.
I am looking for a good boot that will work for just about everything. Good in the snow, but nothing really hardcore, but I'd like some that also hike really well. I was considering these and also the Nepal EVO's just cause I like the look of them so much better. So my question is would these work well, and would the Nepal's be too hardcore for my needs?
This is a great mixed use boot. I have a buddy who uses his for minor ice climbing and hiking and is planning on getting another pair soon. If you want a boot for the all around then this is it. Also check out the Kayland MXT Mountaineering Boot in the outlet. It is a similar makeup though not as sweet looking. Neither have insulation though. So if you are going real cold, the Nepals may be what you want. Plus I believe the Nepals are a little more rigid for ice climbing.
These will wear out after 30 days in the mountains. Granted I'm using them in the Canadian Back Country, but I am surely disappointed. A good pair of full leather boots have lasted much longer in the same conditions. It's a shame, I wish, because the first day I had them was amazing. They're OK when light is right, but avoid scree slopes at all costs.
Has anyone compared these boots with the La Sportiva Glacier? Is the main difference that these are waterproof? I'm trying to decide between these boots, so would love any input on how they compare to one another.Thanks!
Depending on usage, the Trango is more of a GTX mountaineering/climbing boot designed for moving fast over technical terrain. The Glacier is suitable for mountaineering, difficult hiking on rugged terrain, snowfields and glacier travel. It also uses a "Dri-Lex" lining as compared to GTX. To add to that, they are quite different boots, I have owned both. The trango is way lighter and more nimble, it also climbs technical rock way better. The glacier is more of an easy mountaineering/heavy backpacking boot. It is heavier and way less nimble.
I have owned it for one season and have worn it to the top of Jefferson, Hood, Rainier, Baker, Shuksan, Eldorado, little T and some other local peaks. They won't weigh your feet down. If you want something warmer, however, e.g. Mt Rainier in the winter/spring, I'd recommend La Sportiva Glacier.
My only complaints is these boots don't stand much abuse. Mine have already shown signs of wear and tear after one season. I had to glue the rands on both boots. I have been wearing them pretty much every weekend since spring though.
La Sportiva Trango S EVO GTX Mountaineering Boot - Men'sI take a 12 wide boot. I noticed in the sizing charts that there are no wide shoes listed. Just wanted to verify that there are no wide boots available. If there are wides, I would love to buy a pair.
sportiva does not really cater to wide feet. Especially, and i mean especially anything built on the trango last. If you need a wide, nothing from the trango series will fit you. If you want a warmer, stiffer mountaineering boot check out the Sportiva Nepal EVO. I have it and the heel is narrow but the toe box is much wider and it's an incredible boot. Still a single leather.According to La Sportiva, their boots are only available in medium widths.
pros : lightweight, stiff enough for anything besides vertical ice, comfortable, fairly grippy soles even on wet rock.cons : not all the durable (a couple seasons w/ a lot of cross country travel will have the woven material extremely frayed), pretty narrow, definitely needs a nice sole or superfeet insole
After reading all the reviews and the hype I was still somewhat skeptical. After 8 days in the bugaboos I'm a believer they are super light, comfy right out of the box, great on the trail, work stellar with my Grivel G12's, and work great climbing. 5.6 trad was no problem, jam well in the cracks and rubber is incredibly sticky. Would definitely recommend them. Only drawback would be the fire engine red.
Loved these boots. Only took a day hike and an overnight trip to break 'em in. My foot fits well in Merrell and North Face boots and my foot fit fine in these too.
I wasn't so lucky and I did have a break-in period, but on a recent 4-day trip, there was no discomfort and no blisters.
Super versatile on my recent trip as we crossed creeks and hiked through scree, scrambled over rocks and traversed ice and snow fields.
I bought these boots for climbing trees and they work fantastic! Im spreading the word among other arborist I work with. They ae very light and durable. They grip very well on limbs and they hold a pair of spikes well too for tree removals. They're not just a boot for the mountain people anymore, they are also for the tree people!
Awesome boots. MY feet have never gotten cold or wet in these. They will go through the mud and water at lower elevations and perform well in tough snow pack up high. Look no further, this is a great all around boot.
I have a difficult to fit foot. Narrow with a narrow heel. I often have trouble finding boots that fit. The Trango S EVO GTX fits great. I can snug them down and they hold my foot comfortably. They are great to hike in, with enough rocker to make up for the stiffness of the sole. I have never had a problem kicking steps, the boot is solid and my foot is held solidly so I don't have any toe bang, with my foot sliding to the front. A great boot for scrambling adventures where snow and rock are mixed.
Never thought in a million years I would get into technical ice climbing. Obviously these boots aren't made for that, but heck they have been doing a fine job. I bought these boots with the intentions of long approaches with glacier travel like gannet peak. Great for hiking, work very well with BD saber tooths. Any how, I went out first day ice climbing with a friend at a very popular area and got laughed at by just about everyone that I was wearing that combo. By the end of the day I was finishing up WI4+ on TR and the next time leading WI3. Boots and crampons worked well, I think their were a lot of very surprised people their that day, including myself.
I've owned them for 2+ years now. It's a good day boot for me, but not an overnighter.
My feet get cold in these and they don't dry out well in a tent on a glacier. There are no removable boot liners to put in your sleeping bag. I hate putting wet (sweat/condensation) boots on the next day.
They don't replace plastics (for me). Even at double the weight I still pick the plastics everytime for glacier climbing on the PNW.
My heels get hot spots when cramponing all day. With the plastics on I have no problems.
I wore them in Colorado this summer on 14er's. They performed well, but a hiking boot at half the cost would have also.
You might love em. I don't hate em. But wouldn't get another pair.
Done a couple of local day hikes to help break them in. Feel great, no hot spots, and except for the razzing I get for the fancy color scheme I think these boots will be perfect. I have had them in the snow for some snow and ice rescue training. I also built an igloo wearing these boots. All of this for a total of approx 10 hours and my feet never got wet or cold (with just one pair of regular socks).
I used these in the Alps and most notably on the Matterhorn. This is a perfect boot for Matterhorn-style, mixed rock and snow climbing. They are very light and nimble on rock sections but stiff enough for crampons. I had one small blister the first time I wore them but no big deal (almost no break-in necessary.) I am fairly disappointed with the quality control however. I've seen a few pairs and on some the sole is cut flush with the boot (as it should be) and on others the sole sticks out a quarter inch around the boot. Also certain pieces of the upper were completely off center (for example, the tongue on my left boot is severely off to the side instead of being centered.) Fortunately none of this affected performance and overall I think it's a great boot.
Almost no break-in time for these incredibly light, comfortable hybrids. I put these to the test on Mount Elbrus two weeks ago. They got me to the 18,513 summit and turned out to be the perfect boot for the climb. I would be cautious about wearing them in temps much below 15-20F, and despite the Gore-Tex they weren't entirely waterproof. However, their light weight and comfort outweighed these negatives.
Being new to hiking and living in Utah, I wanted boots that would be light weight and perform right out of the box with little break in. Let me tell you what, I was not disappointed at all. From the first time that I put these boots on and went for a hike I have been telling people that they were well worth it.
yeah,they are light, they look good, are supportive, etc - too bad they just don't fit a normal foot, nor do they last long enough to get them broken in.
These boots are too narrow - my cobbler claims there's no way to stretch them due ot the protective rubber. My feet are actually narrow and the length of the boot is perfect, but after 15 miles of hiking I have numb toes for half the night following the hike. Worse: the shoe soles come apart after less than 200 miles, so that now I am stuck with boots that have to be replaced. The local shoe repair guy claims unless he has the special glue the factory uses, he cannot fix the part where the red foam is separating from the yellow layer on the left heel. Then I post here to get an answer regarding that alleged lifetime warranty (go to La Sportiva and there they only know of a one year warranty), but my post gets flagged as misplaced. Well, the boot is less than a year old, but nobody here at this site bothers to answer my question about the warranty claim process - La Sportiva wants you to go through the vendor. Bottom line - a shoe that expensive should not come apart from light use (no climbing, just walking on a marked trail), and if it does somebody should honor the alleged warranty that is being advertised right here on this page right below the weight.
Back to reliable Lowa of Koflach for me - at least they know how to glue their stuff together.
I have narrow feet and the boots fit me perfectly. I could see how someone with a really wide foot would have problems but would not go as far as to say they will not fit a normal foot. As for quality, have not had any issues so far.
Wow Peter, this sounds like a different boot. I bought my pair in 2006 for a climbing trip in the Alps. I've put about 250 miles on mine since then and they are still going strong (although they don't look as nice as they used to). I have a low-volume foot and I have a perfect fit. They may not be so good for those with a wide foot or high arch. They are great for alpine style climbing with steep snow and easy fifth class climbing.
I just measured my foot. It's 27,5 cm long. What size is this? 9,5 US, 42,5 EU???? I really need to buy a pair of these, but I can't decide on the size.
Euro sizing can be confusing, specially since the euro boots also tend to run narrow. I wear a standard US size 10 D. In Euro sizes I wear a 44 (US size 10.7), which fits me well. A 44 is closer to 11 than it is ten, but since they run narrow, I go up half size. I just got the Scarpa Charmoz in 44 and it fits a bit snug. I also have the Scarpa Kailash in 43.5 Wide, and they fit perfectly. Best bet, look up a size chart online and go half size up if you are anything over C/D foot.
This boot like all La Sportivas are for narrow feet. These boots are for alpine/mountaineering junkies! snow shoeing, ice climbing, snowmobiling, and every other winter/fall/spring use period. Light boot. Durable boot. Best boot ever built!. Yes they cost 285 bucks. And you will be thanking yourself later! Let me make this clear if you don't get the point. Michael Jordan said, " Its the shoes!" Well if Michael Jordan wore these boots. He'd have 14 championship rings instead of only 6! These baby are like REDBULL. They give you wings!!
About 3/4 of my Search and Rescue team colleagues have Trangos. They are light, comfortable hikers, yet have the support for moderate crampon work and more...
These boots are light and relatively warm. They run a little narrow for my medium-wide foot. I take care of that by bringing them to my local cobbler who more...