Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
If you've ever hunched over a map you couldn't quite trust or wondered if there might be some gnarly ice blocking your route, these are the boots for you. The La Sportiva Glacier Men's Mountaineering Boot is a heavy duty boot that can handle any terrain you might encounter in a week on the mountain. If the trail leads over a snowfield or onto a glacier you can slap on crampons and travel with confidence. The Glacier will even handle light mountaineering and it climbs alpine ice comfortably. With a little more flex and rocker than other heavy duty boots, it's more comfortable on long hikes with heavy loads. *AVAILABLE FOR NORTH AMERICAN SHIPMENT ONLY.
Bottom Line: This is the perfect boot for backpackers who might need crampons but mostly want a comfortable boot that can handle heavy loads and technical terrain.
Great boot! I purchased these boots on a great sale in the New England area. Not sure anyone there knew what they were because they were 75% off. I snagged them and have been using them since 2008. I have used them for long hikes in very rough terrain during Adventure Races. I have used them climbing Mt. Baker, WA in wet slushy conditions and on the summit with crampons. What I like about the boot is the comfort and fit along with the warmth when using a good pair of wool socks. The only issue I have had is near the toe area where the rubber covers the leather. There was a small separation between the leather and rubber creating a pocket of less then 1/4 inch. I got some good epoxy, dabbed a little in the hole and everything has been great. I plan on wearing them again for another climb of Mt. Baker in late August and a 14er in Colorado. I will definitely purchase another pair - just waiting on another great sale!
I'm a Minnesota wildland firefighter and I bought these because I felt I didn't need a 'traditional' heel and I didn't want to spend $400-500.
The sizing was accurate. Has a nice comfortable fit. They have broken in pretty good after just one spring season and I get the feeling it will only get better.
Great for the midwest, it keeps the water out.
I have heard about delamination issues but have not experienced anything thus far, although I haven't exposed them to extended periods in white ash.
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
I love these boots. Great all rounder, stiff yet comfy enough on longer approaches. I got these mainly for Colorado 14ners. They are not insulated but are warm never the less. A really good three season boot. They do require a good bit of a break in period producing some shin bang in the early stages. They are bomber, great support. They work well with my snow shoes and Black Diamond Strap-on crampons. Backcountry.com was excellent to work with as well. I am totally happy with these bad boys!
About how long did your break-in period last? I've used mine on 3 trips up Colorado 14ers and on my last trip up Elbert got some pretty wicked blisters on my heels... I think they may be about a half size too large, but am not sure if it's just that they're still too stiff.
Get the same size then. Unless you are wearing wool socks(which I'd actually recommend highly), then they should be pretty true to fit. Plus if they are the wrong size, just exchange them, free of charge.
I just bought a pair of these for a September Rainier climb, and am wearing them on my training hikes (which, sadly, don't test them - I live outside Houston). That said, they have been comfortable from the first time I tried them on. I'm really looking forward to getting them to use them in the kind of environment they're made for!
My unit used these boots in Afghanistan and they were "force multipliers". Regardless of your fitness, your body will give out eventually under extreme loads on rugged terrain. This boot forms the most stable and secure base for your body when fatigue sets in and your muscles can no longer stabilize your joints. Unfortunately, no American boot maker has come close to the craftsmanship and I HAVE spoken directly to the companies. La Sportiva Glaciers are the BEST Boot for the money on the market! No one comes even close.
Got them in the mail yesterday. Put my Croc boat shoe inserts into these bad boys and they are awesome. I was a little confused about the insert that came with the boots, worthless is all i can say. looking forward to putting many many miles in these.
The padded tongue inserts lock your foot in place. They keep your toes from slamming into the front of the toe box on the descent. Trust me, you want to keep them in.
They will keep you dry and comfortable and will do a great job at carrying a load. If you are going fast or don't plan on having a heavy load I'd probably look more at a light hiker as these will probably be too heavy.
WENT FOR A 3 HOUR HIKE, UP AND DOWN WITH 30# PACK. THESE BOOTS ARE COMFORTABLE! ROOMY TOE BOX, I WEAR A SIZE 13, 47 GOOD FOR ME W/HEAVY SOCK. VERY LITE. STABLE PLATFORM. I WOULD'NT FRONT POINT WITH THESE ON ANYTHING NEAR VERTICAL BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT THEY ARE INTENDED FOR. SERIOUS BOOTS....
I have 3 pair of hiking boots and use them according to the type of hiking/backpacking. I use the LaSportivia Glacier for hiking Colorado 14ers in winter/snow conditions. They give me good support and are comfortable. I used Sno-Seal on them and they are waterproof. I also like the lacing system allows me to tie it looser on the bottom and tighter around the ankle. They work well with snow shoes and Black Diamond Strap crampons.
I've used these at about that, and with warm socks and some toe warmers (I have sort of bad circulation) and they were great. Only used them a few times though at that elevation.
I live in Alaska and do quite a bit of hiking. I bought these boots in the summer of 2005 for my 6 week geology field course. I'll admit it took a long time to break them in, but once they were, well I wear them everywhere. I wear them in the winter when it's not too cold, the summer when it's not too hot, and all the time the rest of the year. It's now 2012 and I still wear these boots all the time. However, I noticed while hiking this past summer that there is near zero stiffness left in the ankle support; so I decided to finally buy a new pair. They were a winter holiday gift to myself so I could start the long break in period and be ready for summer!
These are real boots. Not as real as Norwegian welt full steel shank 7lbs per pair, takes two years to break in monsters, but I'll take these.
I've had them for a little over a year now, and here's what I've noticed.
-Surprisingly comfy out of the box--made me worry about durability, but no issues there. No blisters even on death march style uppy-downy epics. Even more comfy now.
-Feel extremely stable on all terrain. I know light is right, but I also grew up learning not to sprain an ankle in the wilderness. Ever. Think it would be hard to injure feet or ankles in these boots, even with a heavy load.
-Very warm and dry for a "non insulated, non-waterproof" boot. Yet somehow comfortable(ish) on muggy 90 degree slogs.
-Still look embarrassingly new after a year of steady use. Might need to see if some tight slots near the dirty devil might ugly them up a little.
Recommendations:
-As many others have noted, Size up! I went up about a full size from my measured foot size, and after finally fitting some nice sole insoles wish I would have gone another half size bigger to fit winter socks.
-On the same note, go for the thinnest insoles you can to save that precious toe box space.
A terrific pair of boots that are more than capable of kicking some sh!#.
I have taken these boots up Mt. Baker and really sorry I did not have them for my first attempt on Mt. Rainier where I rented plastic boots that cut into my ankles and a terrible experience. I love these boots and they do well with crampons and snow. While coming down Baker , I post holed all the way down and feet never got cold or uncomfortable. They would be great!
These would be a great Rainier boot for most people. It may not be warm enough if you happen to have really cold feet, are not constantly moving, or are attempting a winter summit. Otherwise they are quite comfortable and will take a crampon very well.
I have now had my Glacier's for a week here in Afghanistan. Outstanding boot! An average day is humping a 30 kilo ruck at altitude on rock, scree, ice, and snow. Then turning around and going south with 115F temps on near vertical shale. This boot has excellent ankle support and NO break-in time. I was amazed. Good boots mean life or death for me and my teamthese boots perform. My only suggestion is that I would like a lug sole option.
Simply Fantastic, FIT like a glove. About Sizing: I am between a 10.5 and an 11, normal width. I ordered the 44.5 and they fit perfectly with normal thickness socks. Merry Xmas to me. Thanks for the RAPID shipping.
Yes, especially if you are carrying a decent load on your back. It will breathe a little bit but could get a little hot in the summer. It is the perfect boot though if you are going to have some technical challenges on your route.
La Sportiva makes solid boots, but unfortunately they don't fit by foot shape well. I'm selling mine for $170 with sof sole insoles. They're practically unused. Check out KSL classifieds if you're interested.
Magic boots, no blisters, no hotspots, nothing. comfortable well made. Waterproof and seem very secure with the BD sabertooth crampons. Best boots I've ever owned!
I got these boots and am looking for a good 3/4 crampon for all-purpose mountaineering ( front-pointing, snow-climbing, and traverses.) Any recomendations?
I bought this boot after reading a number of posts and rave reviews from others. I was in the market for a boot for mixed mountain routes, but something lighter than say the Makalu boot. The half shank sole on this boot provided just the right balance that I was looking for. It is stiff enough for hybrid crampon use, but flexes enough to be used for a supportive backpacking boot as well. I wore the boots a couple of days for break-in and then hit a trail just prior to a snowstorm. The boots performed well both on trail (mixed) and on return through 2 feet of snow. One suggestion is to ditch the insoles on these boots as they provide little to no support. I ran the Sole Dean Karnazes heat moldable insoles. These made a significant difference to how the boots felt and the have about the same padding as the originals so as not to take up any of the toe box's volume. Overall, I am very excited to put some miles on these boots.
No complaints about the consturction of these boots, except that I could not get them broken in to save my life. Short hikes, long day hikes, flat, hilly, wet or dry. I just could not make them work. I have 4E, high arched/volume feet, so I dont blame LaSportiva. Wish it was different.
A friend at work has Glaciers. He says its a 'cold boot'. All of the lower metal lacing hardware inside the boot may not be covered by the inner padded tongue. I suspect that could conduct some cold. foot. No direct experience myself and only one person's opinion, so take my comment with a grain of salt.
After two years and many miles these boots are still holding together. Best uses are on long hikes with a heavy load on uneven terrain these boots will give you the support and stability you will need. Overall very well built boot but they may become slick on wet rocks.
First impression is awesome. The boot feels very tough. Definietely needs some break-in period. The adjustable tongue is great. My biggest concern was getting the right size. I went a size higher and it feels great and comfortable. Apparently the boot has no insulation but on a fairly cold winter day it felt VERY warm. I'm wondering if it won't be too hot for July climbs in the rockies. I am so looking forward to getting some miles on it.
On another note I always had doubts about getting boots over the net due to fit etc. This is my, oh I don't know, fifth pair of boots bought over the net and I've yet to be dissapointed.
Are these hiking boots or mountaineering boots? I have a pair of Maks for mountaineering & use light hikers for almost everything else. I've severly twisted my right ankle twice over the last decade (as well as having completely worn out 3 pairs of lites - a pair of Tevas' and 2 of Salomons) & so am moving away from using light hikers & toward a medium to heavy duty hiking boot capable of heavy loads, long miles, & being able to strap on cramps for glacier/snowfield travel or scree field navigation. These are listed as mountaineering here but hiking elsewhere. I don't want another pair of mountaineering boots I can't really use outside of mountaineering. I'm looking at these, Lowa Banff's, Asolo 520's, & Hanwag mountain lights. After a LONG break-in I love my Maks and they've held up well to 13 years of Oregon and Washington cascade volcanos. The durability & functionality of my La Sportiva's bring me here as a starting point. Opinions or experience welcome. BTW, 240lb w wide flat feet
I would categorize them as a cross between heavy-duty backpacking boots and non-technical mountaineering boots. They are notably stiffer, taller, and heavier than Asolo 520. I believe they have a half-length steel shank. They are missing the toe welt but I have used them with both strap-on and hybrid crampons for years. I primarily use them for easier mountaineering with longer approaches while Asolo 520 are my primary hiking-only boots (other than in summer, when I use even lighter boots). My Glaciers were made in Italy while Asolo 520 in Romania. Both have been holding up well so far.
BC reccomends them for heavy backpacking with some light crampon use if necessary. They're designed with insulation, so they might not be as nice in the summer time. The leather means they're not designed for really cold weather though. I believe they have a stiff sole, but no shank, so they should be good as heavyweight hiking and backpacking boots. Sounds like they'd be perfect for your purpose.
I went up a full size (US 10) from 43 to 44 in these boots. My previous snow boots were Columbia's which rocked until they literally came apart during a hike & snowshoe expedition. I've only worn the Glacier's twice, but so far they're wonderful. The lacing system caused me to over-tighten the lower section, but there are plenty of adjustments to get it right.
No troubles as of yet...Fit true to size. Solidly built, great ankle support. Some people use these for a wildland fire boot but they de-laminate. So unless you live on helibases, I'd stick with Nicks or Whites.
I have wide, flat feet. I read other reviews and followed their guidance. I bought 1/2 size bigger than I normally wear. Perfect fit! The adjustable tounge make the wearing of different thinkness socks perfect. I only needed (2) days for break-in. Wore them (3) weeks in the Seirras with no hotspots or wear. Felt great!
This is the ideal mountaineering boot for narrow feet. Be aware that La Sportiva shoes and boots typically fit small, and this is no exception, so order it a half size larger than normal.
Great boot---comfy right out of the box-used them on a 10 mile traverse of the Blackheads (Catskills) Lots of ankle support--haven't used them w/ crampons yet
After 2 winter seasons I still love these boots--Super comfy and warm. Great stability. I've put a ton of Catskill and Adirondack miles on these and they are still in great shape--Keep 'em clean and spray on fresh coat of silicon and you're good to go.
I bought these boots for WildLand Fire Fighting, they took no time to break in. I wore them just last week for the first time on a fire and I loved them. My feet did not hurt after a 14 hour day on the line and no blisters. I am glad I invested in these boots!!!!!
These boots acceptable. The construction is excellent, typical of La Sportiva. However, I have to say that the warmth and water resistance leave something to be desired; even for leater boots. If you are looking for a rugged trekking boot, these are great. I would look elsewhere for a general mountaineering boot.
These boots are great. I have used them in a variety of situations and the only problem was the tongue inserts. They require a bit of repositioning to get it right, but any boot will require some break in period. Other then that, The are awesome. I have used them for hiking, snowmobile and snowshoeing. My feet never got cold or wet. I wear them everyday for work. However, they are not designed for firefighting. Hot ash eats them up. A friend of mine also has a pair and the toe rand came unglued after one week. Great for burning in fall and winter but not on the line. Hope this helps.
I have a pair of Scarpa's that are a 45.5, and in the tongue of the shoe it says this equates to an 11 2/3 (American). They fit very snug. I notice on the La Sport sizing guide for the Glaciers a 45.5 equates to a 12- why the difference? These are both Italian boot makers- shouldn't a 45.5 from one be the same size as a 45.5 from the other? Based on suggestions in the reviews, I sized it up and ordered a pair of Glaciers size 46, which I now have and they feel really big on my foot. I would estimate about a half cm from end of toe to the end of the boot and at least a full cm of "airiness" above/around my toes in the box. Also noticing significant heel slippage. Should I keep these boots and perhaps throw in a Sole footbed or (if La Sports run bigger than Scarpa) can I size down to a 45.5?
I am actually the person that submitted the above question, and if it will help anyone else I will just say that I went ahead and kept the size 46, put in Superfeet, and wore these things to the top of Windam Peak in CO (14,000+) and also Shasta (with crampons). They rock. Comfortable on the hikes in, warm and stable to the summits. Love 'em.
Excellent boot for foul weather. I use them for search and rescue work in Oregon. After a very short break-in, wore boots for all day training mission in a daylong downpour. Feet stayed dry and warm. Boot is very sturdy and stiff soled, but now uncomfortable to wear. Would recommend sizing down 1/2 size using Nike] as a reference. For reference, I bought a 45.5 for my normal Nike size 12.5.
My glacier boot has seen it all, chasing my dogs up the backside of Taos Mountain and juants to flyfishing spots in the Adirondacks....I also wear'em to shovel the driveway in the winter....
They are by far the best pair of boots I have ever owned. Bar none. Just the little bit of flex is what makes all the difference. With or without load they perform the same: solid, unswerving, no question.
Six years and thousands of miles, across every kind of terrain imaginable (including fishing on frozen lakes) with & without gear, has finally worn down the sole good in a couple of spots. The rest of the boot is still as the day it came out of the box: leather is soft and very pliable (no cracks or dry rotting), gusseted tongue didn't slide all over and resting where it belongs...not off to one side, padding around collar of boot is very "puffy"/ comfortable. Plus, they still have the original laces!
My La Sportiva boots are one of the very few purchases I would consider a true value in this world. I purchase my next pair without hesitation....hell, I like my boots so much, this time around I am considering two new pairs. The Trango's and Glacier.
I am forty years old and have been walking hill n dale since I fell outta my mothers uterus. This isn't my first day at the rodeo, I've worn OUT every boot worth wearing....If someone doesn't like this boot....their only fartin' around with a camelbak in the backyard stackin' wood or maybe cuttin' the grass! One might need to leave the safety of their suburban backyard with a couple days load to give La Sportiva's the real test.
Does anyone know the height of these boots in a size 39? I am considering them as a back-up boot for wildland firefighting, and am wondering if they meet the 8" requirement in this size.
in the past few years i have seen a huge increase of wildland fire fighters using these boots. why you may ask? well.. they are far more comfortable than a leather boot, they are about 1/2 the price of a danner or pair of whites and they are lighter! plus you dont roll your ankles in these compaired to a normal leather boot.
only problem i have seen is the rubber toe begins to come off if you stand in hot ash. other than that excellent boot. i think on my next pair i am going to have that part professionally stitched down. ill rate it an B+
Had my La-Sportiva Tibets for 3 years until they practically disintegrated from over-use. So I went for a heavier boot this time but trying to keep the same look&feel. These boots felt comfortable the moment I put them on (La Sportiva have yet to disappoint me). They're tough as hell which is great for heavy backpacking activity. no real break-in needed. Gets pretty hot in there in warm weather, but they'll protect your feet superbly during those long treks. I really like them.
Just ordered these boots in 43.5. I normally wear a 10 but I have other lighter weight La Sportiva boots in same size that fit great. With these, toe box feels perfect, however, my heel lifts off the sole. The only way I can get it to stay put is to tighten down the ankle to the point there I feel its too tight. Has anyone else encountered this problem. I really want this boot because they are supper comfy but feel the heel situation is going to lead to problems. Thinking about getting the 43.0 but worried the toe box will be compromised. Any thoughts?
An aftermarket insole often will fix minor fit issues--especially if you upgrade to a insole that is larger-volume than the insole that comes with the boot. I use green or orange superfeet in my La Sportivas, and they work awesome. There are also excellent bake-to-fit insoles made by companies like Sole that will customize themselves to your foot after you bake them in the oven according to the directions. This might alleviate your heel-lift problem.
Bought these for the wildland fire season and they may not be npfa certified any longer due to the height. But if you are looking for a great outdoor adventure boot these are great. i have hiked many miles in tons of different environments all over the state of Utah and they are great. almost no break in period.
By far the best boot I have ever owned. I have had them about 6 years and they still have good support on side hills. The soles hold up very well. Hiking up steep terrain is a breeze and coming down is not bad either. The sole has good down hill breaking ability built into the heel piece, IMO. I wish they were water proof and I don't like the design of the lace holder (where lace threads through black/yellow nylon strap) It is wearing thin. Not sure what to do when that breaks because the rest of the boot is still in great shape. I use them mainly for deer/elk hunting. I have packed out many animals/camps in these boots and they have held up great with the extra weight I have put on them, (over 100 pounds at times)
Like GB said the grivel new classic crampons are strap crampons which means they will work with anything from ski boots to tennis shoes. Most people prefer a neumatic crampon to the strap as its a little easier to get a secure fit. So if you're buying a crampon at the same time consider the neumatic version of the g10. but the new classic will work great too.
It's my understanding that the New Classic binding doesn't need any welts or other specifics in boot design. Although I've never tried these bindings myself, I've been led to believe that you just do up the strap and your crampon is on. It should work on any boot you care to use.
Best footwear I have ever purchased! Totally worth the price. I wore them the for an afternoon the day they shipped in and went on a 6mi hike the next morning throgh dirt, mud and snow. Comfortable as heck, no breaking in neccessary and my feet stayed as dry as can be. Awsome boot!
I have tried both these boots and they are awesome for wildland firefighting. They are super comfortable and side hill a lot better than whites or nicks. They are light and the break-in time is less than a week. The size seems to run a little big, and they are hotter than typical fire boots, but these are the best boots for wildland fire out.
This has been a newly approved boot for fire suppression and Rx burning so I figured I would test it out. So far a great boot! They break in a little quicker than a pair of nicks or whites. The tops of the boots are great for people with large legs or ankles not so good for us on the slim side. Overall they are great I wear them everywhere. Great ankle support!!!!!
I used these boots on a climb of Mt. Shasta in May, 2006. They held up well and my feet were warm with a pair of liner socks and Thorlos Mountaineering socks (pretty thick wool). The boots have a good amount of flex due to the half shank. They fit my foot well (I am an average to wide) and gave me no hot spots or blisters. I treated the boots with some Nikwax before running through the slush and wore them around town for a week or so to break them in. I am pretty pleased with the Glaciers as hiking/light mountaineering boots.
These boots are very comfortable and I haven't even put replacement insoles in them yet. My Grivel air tech crampons lock onto them rock solid. I am a 5'9 240 pound guy so I put stuff to the test. These were a perfect match for scrambling around on frozen waterfalls carrying a pile of expensive camera gear.
Have a quire about sizing for the La Sportiva Glacier boot, I have heard that you may need to size down. Is this true for the most part, I am a 11US 10.5 Aust and since I need to order by mail (Australia) I would like to go through the process once only ?? Regards Murph
If you have a normal-width foot, then do a straight across size conversion. If you have wide feet like me, then you would have to do a lot of experimenting with sock combo's and bigger-sized boots to get the right fit. Also, aftermarket footbed will help with compensating for wide feet.
Murph, trying to guess Aust-US sizing sucks, but lucky for you La Sportiva also uses a Euro size which is regulated by a governing body and therefore much more acuate. Try to figure out your euro size than they you should only have to buy once. The drop down menu at the upper right shows the US Men, US Women and Euro. I would guess you are likely a 44, but try to find a shoe store that can meansure your foot. Often ski boot retailers can determine this also. Good Luck.
These boots are tough! I walked around in a blizzard with them for a week and didn't get wet at all, this was before i coated them with Nikwax. Then went on a 40 mile trek after that through mud, rocks, hills, snow. No hot spots or blisters at all. New-matic crampons fit well. These stiff backpacking boots (or slightly flexible mountaineering boots) are versatile and comfortable for whatever job or adventure you're on!
The boot has half-length shank so it flex's well for a mountaineering boot.
It is stiffer than a hiking boot, but with a 50lb pack and humping 70 miles; These would give great support in handling what you put the boots through.
George,These boots would not be ideal for hiking 70 miles not in, or in, snow. The reason for this is the Glacier is a very stiff boot that doesn't flex in the toe that easily. A similar Sportiva mountaineering boot (hybrid crampon compatible , stiffer, sportiva fit) is the Trango S Evo. http://www.backcountry.com/store/LSP0021/La-Sportiva-Trango-S-EVO-GTX-Mountaineering-Boot-Mens.html This boot is still pretty stiff but the break in time will be a lot less and in comparison springs forward when walking. Here are two additional options to look at as well Asolo Powermatichttp://www.backcountry.com/store/ASO0014/Asolo-Power-Matic-200-GV-Backpacking-Boot-Mens.html This boot is very comfortable, stable, and performs well as a workhorse boot. Another boot that would be suitable is the Salmon 3D Fastpackerhttp://www.salomonsports.com/us/#/footwear/footwear/trekking/3d-fastpacker-mid-gtxIt provides support (not as much as the heavier Sportiva or Asolo) and is great if you are more of a light packer or like to cover a lot of miles (say 70) and at a brisk pace. Best of luck.Mahalo, Sumo
i spend most of my free time hiking around in the southern nevada desert. the environment here is extremely hard on footwear. the rocks are jagged and razor sharp and stepping on cactus is almost unavoidable. i have been through many types and brands of boots over the years and have not been able to make a pair last more than a year or so. i bought these boots a couple of months ago and have about a hundred miles on them. the reviews are correct. buy them a half size bigger than you normally wear. they are stiff but break in readily. after getting used to the extra support it is more than welcome. ive already punished them and i can tell they are tough and resilient. they are relatively light but offer excellent foot protection. over all i think these are the best boots ive ever owned and expect to get several years of good comfortable service from them. furthermore they look frickin awesome! backcountry's service rocks too (bought the wrong size at first and the return/reorder process was pain free).
Have had these boots for approx 5 years. My feet are very hard to fit and with these boots I can backpack without blisters. They have worn very well. The seventh eyelet from the toe is a cloth material and only recently have ripped on both boots but again its been 5 years. I am now looking to buy my second pair and hope they are still make in Italy.
Since I rely heavily on reviews, I thought it is about time that I contribute one of my own. Just bought these boots for some hiking/mountaineering. My impressions so far: Out of the box, they are fairly comfortable. I threw in an old pair of running shoe insoles and now they are amazingly comfortable. I had them out in <0deg F and my feet were toasty. The lace cleat midway up the boot is great - and can fix my BD Sabretooth crampons with no difficulties. The bad: well, so far these boots have served me well so I can't say too much here - The two boots were a slightly different colour (strange). Overall - two thumbs up.
I've had these boots for over 4 years now and they have performed very well as an all around mountaineering boot. The Pros are... Very very durable, stick to rocks like a mountain goats hoof, work well with crampons, they keep your feet warm in freezing temperatures (with a Gobi Liner, thick Cold Weather Sock, and a Vapor Barrier Sock if its really cold) but can also be worn in warmer temps without over heating your feet, and they keep your feet dry in wet conditions. The Cons are... 10 to 20 hour break in period, heavy boot weight decreases endurance, and my biggest gripe about this boot is the poor ankle support. I'm not able to get these boots tight around my ankles and my lower leg. I'm able to fit 2 to 3 fingers in between my ankle and the boot and that has always bugged me. I'm 6'4" and 185 Ibs so I have pretty skinny legs so this little problem may not be as big as a deal for the average person. Overall, a very good all purpose mountaineering boot. Just be sure you like the fit. I'm going to try the La Sportiva Lhoste GTX for my next boot. It looks like it has a little more upper ankle support.
A very rugged and sturdy boot. Still in the breaking in process, so I cannot give a detailed review on this product yet; however, the construction and materials seem to be quality. I have replaced the insoles which give better arch support, but one should probably do this anyway, for most boots. I definitely like the shoestring versatility when cinching down the boots. It allows room and snug fit where you need it. All in all a great boot! Great price! Thanks again backcountry.com! I am looking forward to my first muliple day/mile hike with these boots. They are waterproof also (goretex), but you might want to supplement that with some nikwax or similar.
For the most part I have found this boot to be good. Seems to have rugged constuction (only time will truely test that). There is really only one thing I was dissatisified with, and the problem has corrected itself. If you don't spend a few good weeks breaking these boots in, and you attemp a semi-signifigant incline, the footbeds will slide on you (espically on the downhill) causing you get get blisters if you don't correct the footbed as needed on the trail.
My feet do tend to get cold easily, but in this boot with wool socks on and a little snow creeping in the back of my boots, my feet still stay warm as long as I am moving.
I don't necessarly believe the price is entirely worth it but again only time will tell. Between the footbed issue (even though it is better now), the price, and the question of durability still to be answered, I give it 4 stars.
considering these boots for trail work in the selway-bitterroot.. (danner rain forest broke down)....do they come with a gore-tex liner? concerned about stream crossings and early season rain...any comments on wet-weather use????
These would do very well in my opinion although I prefer using actual gore-tex inserts. These use Dri-Lex which works pretty well but I've never found anything quite as good as the real thing. They would be great none the less for that kind of work.Hope that helps.
Overall, I am happy with the performance of the Glacier Mountaineering boots. I use mine on a variety of terrain and conditions. The sole on the toe did begin to pull off after two years, but Backcountry replaced the pair at no extra cost to me. I have chicken legs as well, so the uppers come almost completely together, but they are still comfortable. They have been up volcanos, through the wet tundra of Alaska, and from the East coast to the West coast of the United States.
I bought the Glacier Boots for wildland firefighting. It's not the perfect wildland boot, but it SMOKES my old pair of Whites. They are extremely comfortable and easy to break in, plus I don't roll my heel and walk bow-legged anymore. Hopefully Sportiva will produce a tailor-made fire boot in the future (lug sole, stitched sole, 10-inch height).
Very comfortable. Short break in. Described as a heavy duty backpacking boot to mountaineering boot, but I disagree. This boot isn't much more heavy duty than my last pair of backpacking boots (Asolo leathers). I noticed that the rubber covering the sole/upper interface began delaminating after minimal use.
You must have the toughest feet in the world, or a pair of Asolo mountaineering boots, because the glaciers are FAR stiffer than any Asolo backpacking boot - they make the Asolo 520 TPS look like a canvas shoe in comparison.
I have not been on the fire line yet with these boots but they feel excellent on my feet. the only concern I have is how the glued on soul will hold up in the heat. I think this boot would be a great seller to wildland firefighters if they had a stitched on vibram soul with kevlar thread.
had these boots on numerous wildland fire assignments now with no problems. Light,comfortable,and tough. La Sportiva should make this boot taylored to wildland firefighters, they would be a great seller
No. These boots have zero insulation. If you are seriously asking this question, you should consider talking to the guides. They are great for one or two day spring and summer climbs in above freezing temperatures. Wearing these boots in the Himalaya for anything but a trek to base camp would likely cost you your toes. Perhaps hybrid double boot (performs like a single, warm like a double) is more for you if you are staying away from double boots.Steve House climbed Nanga Parbat in La Sportiva Spantiks a couple years ago. It's best to wear a plastic mountaineering boot for any Himalaya peak even though these are lower 6K meter peaks.
The boot does well with loads, technical terrain, and even easy to moderate alpine ice. It was not designed for firefighting and it becomes obvious after walking out of a hot ash pit. The glue doesn't stand a lot of heat. I would recommend them for heli-slack and engine slugs but not for hand crews with limited water.
I tried to break these boots in for two days with no luck. Just too stiff and probably too much boot for what I was looking for (i.e. hut tours, approaches with skis on my back). The tongue insert is also a bit unusual and I couldn't get it to fit right. But, feet are unique and it just could be this particular boot wasn't a good fit for me. All the other reviews seem very positive so keep that in mind. Returning them was a snap!
Can't comment on mountaineering use... which is, of course, the intended design. I wanna help out all prospective buyers for wildland use and tell you that they've not worked out too well. Not enough shin binding to support well going downhill; lots of extra muscle to make them go uphill, too, IMHO. Put the White's back on after three weeks of trying these out and never being happy with them. I'll put them back on come winter and give it another shot. Again, probably great for their intended design. Cheers, Lincoln
Great boot! I purchased these boots on a great sale in the New England area. Not sure anyone there knew what they were because they were 75% off. I more...