Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
The Kelty Trekker Backpack offers a no-fuss, tried-and-true, original backpack design. Purists love an external frame, and why mess with a good thing? Hydration compatibility and a breathable back panel add modern comfort to this pack.
Sleeping bag compartment holds your sleep-stuffs
Reservoir sleeve holds water bladder so you can just sip as you go
Daisy chain and ice axe loop on the pack’s exterior hold extra equipment
Top loading design offers classic ease of use
Sternum strap, foam waist belt, and adjustable suspension let you distribute weight comfortably
Ventilating design and mesh back panels hold the pack away from your skin for tons of airflow
Bottom Line: A simple, indestructible old school backpack.
I am looking into getting my first backpack and found the Kelty Trekker 3950 and was wondering if it was right for me. I know I need to try it own before I buy one but I am a 5 foot 10 inch male weighing in at 180. Is the Trekker 3950 the right size, to small, to big, what are your opinions on this.
Jeremy, This pack would fit you fine, but before buying anything I would also take a look at the internal frame brother of this pack, the Kelty Cyote. It is in the same price range, but gives you a fully internal frame pack with most of the same features as the more expensive top tier packs.
I prefer internal frame packs simply because they do a better job of protecting my gear, while still giving me the option to strap a pad or tent to the outside if I have to, though I usually find a way to get all of my gear on the inside
With that being said, some people still and always will prefer external frame packs as it gives them the ability to attach bulky or awkward objects on the outside of the pack without worrying about how they fit on the inside. It also gives them faster access to these objects, which can be nice for getting camp set up quick.
This pack will be good for your size. It does depend on what gear you have and how long you are going out for. If for an overnight or a weekend you could carry all you need in this pack.
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
I am not a big fan of internal frame packs. I understand there are advantages and disadvantages to both, for me the external frame provides the versitility I need. On the Kelty I purchased, the expandable top rail was the tipping point! I like hard points to attach gear to, keeping my personal items tucked away. The hardpoints allow me to attach my tent above, and my sleeping bag and pad below while leaving ample room for food, water, clothing and other sundries in the main pack. While no pack is "comfortable", this one distributes the load nicely, and is less uncomfortable than any other I have used!
I am not a big fan of internal frame packs. I understand there are advantages and disadvantages to both, for me the external frame provides the versitility I need. On the Kelty I purchased, the expandable top rail was the tipping point! I like hard points to attach gear to, keeping my personal items tucked away. The hardpoints allow me to attach my tent above, and my sleeping bag and pad below while leaving ample room for food, water, clothing and other sundries in the main pack. While no pack is "comfortable", this one distributes the load nicely, and is less uncomfortable than any other I have used!
I have a 22" torso but would really like to have the Tioga 5500 for extended trips.But it only shows a 21" torso range.How important is that extra inch of torso range going to be on a heavy long trip.?
It all depends on you. This is only a guide. If you don't mind the pack riding an inch higher, you'll be fine. Actually one inch isn't that much. Two or more would become uncomfortable over longer distances. The first external frame packs didn't even employ waist belts. The entire weight was carried on the shoulders. We're all glad they evolved from that!
I have a 17.5" torso, I'm 6'2" male with broad shoulders and I'm skinny (32" pant waist, 34.25 at the iliac crest.
Which pack should I get, the 3900 or 3950?
I wouldn't mind having an extra 50 cubic inches, but it isn't necessary. I somewhat like the tan color better, but that isn't a deal breaker for the green. Also, the belts on the two models look like they are different (vertical) widths, are they?
If the belts are different widths, should I opt for a wider belt, or would that just make me warmer, or less mobile?
I've hiked on some really ruggid terrain with an old Kelty frame pack. I don't know what people are talking about when they say stick to the internal. I'm going backpacking, not walking down a street, of course the terrain is ruggid. And wet, dry, cold, hot, miserable and fun, the external never let me down.
The 3950 fits a toso range of 16-22". The 3900 fits a torso range of 14-20". The waist belts are the same, you won't have a problem fitting your skinny waist! You're basically in the middle of each range, I'd go for the extra 50 cu in.
Just got back from a 36 mile hike up Mt Olympus in Washington state, and this pack was great. I am a former boy scout with good bit of hiking experience. I needed new equipment since mine old stuff was 15 years old, lost, and or broken after college and relocating for a job. I started looking for a new pack in the beginning of the year and pick the Kelty 3900 external for a couple reasons. 1. External Frame- some love them and other hate them. 2. Size - 3900 cu in is a good medium size pack good for a couple days or over a week 3. Price - $139 you can not beat it To be straight forward this is a great pack. I like external frame because of the weight they can take. Last trip over 50lbs without water(Boy Scout always prepared). This pack takes it. It felt like 30lbs. ok it starts off feeling like 20lbs but 25 miles in and 7000 feet of elevation change it was heavy. But kelty has put some heavy duty shoulder straps and hip belt with padding that absorb alot. Lashing things to the frame is easy, pick a spot and tie. I like the sleeping bag compartment its great for my clothes. I had enough room for a over a weeks worth. (Yes again over prepared for a four day trip). I always lash my bag and tent to the bottom. More then enough room for stove, pad, bear can, and other stuff inside the main compartment. I will say the little pockets on the side are a little small they could be larger. Kelty should redesign to use the whole side for a pockets. As for durability I cannot say, two trips in and no tears or weak spots. Would I buy it again, yes, I wsh I had this back in my Boy Scout years. Great pack buy one, dont think that just because the new fad is to go internal frame that you should overlook this.
I have to agree with chris. External frame packs have their strong points (monster load capacity and tons of lash points) but today's internal frame packs are generally more comfortable and easier to live with. They fit more closely to your body and would probably be the better choice in the Cascades.
I would suggest walking into your nearest outfitter and trying on a few different packs before buying one. They'll get you set up for the correct torso length and help you sort out the features you might want in a backpack.
Frame packs are great if you plan on hiking on well maintained trails without low hanging branches. They're easy to pack and can haul a ton of gear. If you plan on doing a lot of hiking on uneven ground or off trail, I'd recommend an internal frame pack like the Red Cloud 6650 or Coyote 4750. Hope that helps.
I am not a big fan of internal frame packs. I understand there are advantages and disadvantages to both, for me the external frame provides the versitility I need. On the Kelty I purchased, the expandable top rail was the tipping point! I like hard points to attach gear to, keeping my personal items tucked away. The hardpoints allow me to attach my tent above, and my sleeping bag and pad below while leaving ample room for food, water, clothing and other sundries in the main pack. While no pack is "comfortable", this one distributes the load nicely, and is less uncomfortable than any other I have used!
The color and the material. This year's color does not look like an angry forest demon made the pack. This year's material is 600d poly ripstop vs. the old 210d poly ripstop. Last year's version is also 4oz. lighter. Unless you plan on putting the thing through a wood chipper or carrying swords, last year's model should do nicely.
I am not a big fan of internal frame packs. I understand there are advantages and disadvantages to both, for me the external frame provides the versitility more...