Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 6 Reviews

Kelty Trekker Backpack - 3900-3950cu in - 2009 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

Trekker Backpack - 3900-3950cu in
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

The Kelty Trekker Backpack offers a no-fuss, tried-and-true, original backpack design. Purists love an external frame, and why mess with a good thing? Hydration compatibility and a breathable back panel add modern comfort to this pack.

  • Sleeping bag compartment holds your sleep-stuffs
  • Reservoir sleeve holds water bladder so you can just sip as you go
  • Daisy chain and ice axe loop on the pack’s exterior hold extra equipment
  • Top loading design offers classic ease of use
  • Sternum strap, foam waist belt, and adjustable suspension let you distribute weight comfortably
  • Ventilating design and mesh back panels hold the pack away from your skin for tons of airflow

Bottom Line: A simple, indestructible old school backpack.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

i have a 1978 kelty serac an i am looking for replacement shoulder

i have a 1978 kelty serac an i am looking for replacement shoulder straps

By:
March 17, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Trekker

By:
November 19, 2011

I love this thing, old school pack and it still looks great!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am looking into getting my first backpack and found the Kelty

I am looking into getting my first backpack and found the Kelty Trekker 3950 and was wondering if it was right for me. I know I need to try it own before I buy one but I am a 5 foot 10 inch male weighing in at 180. Is the Trekker 3950 the right size, to small, to big, what are your opinions on this.

By:
November 14, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Jeremy, This pack would fit you fine, but before buying anything I would also take a look at the internal frame brother of this pack, the Kelty Cyote. It is in the same price range, but gives you a fully internal frame pack with most of the same features as the more expensive top tier packs.

I prefer internal frame packs simply because they do a better job of protecting my gear, while still giving me the option to strap a pad or tent to the outside if I have to, though I usually find a way to get all of my gear on the inside

With that being said, some people still and always will prefer external frame packs as it gives them the ability to attach bulky or awkward objects on the outside of the pack without worrying about how they fit on the inside. It also gives them faster access to these objects, which can be nice for getting camp set up quick.

Good luck on your decision

By:
November 17, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This pack will be good for your size. It does depend on what gear you have and how long you are going out for. If for an overnight or a weekend you could carry all you need in this pack.

By:
November 15, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Excellent!

By:
April 5, 2010

I am not a big fan of internal frame packs. I understand there are advantages and disadvantages to both, for me the external frame provides the versitility I need. On the Kelty I purchased, the expandable top rail was the tipping point! I like hard points to attach gear to, keeping my personal items tucked away. The hardpoints allow me to attach my tent above, and my sleeping bag and pad below while leaving ample room for food, water, clothing and other sundries in the main pack. While no pack is "comfortable", this one distributes the load nicely, and is less uncomfortable than any other I have used!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

How easy is it to find accessories that attach to the outside

How easy is it to find accessories that attach to the outside of the pack .....and how hard is it to attach....waht is it compatable with

By:
October 12, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Excellent!

By:
April 5, 2010

I am not a big fan of internal frame packs. I understand there are advantages and disadvantages to both, for me the external frame provides the versitility I need. On the Kelty I purchased, the expandable top rail was the tipping point! I like hard points to attach gear to, keeping my personal items tucked away. The hardpoints allow me to attach my tent above, and my sleeping bag and pad below while leaving ample room for food, water, clothing and other sundries in the main pack. While no pack is "comfortable", this one distributes the load nicely, and is less uncomfortable than any other I have used!

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I have a 22" torso but would really like to have the Tioga

I have a 22" torso but would really like to have the Tioga 5500 for extended trips.But it only shows a 21" torso range.How important is that extra inch of torso range going to be on a heavy long trip.?

By:
December 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

It all depends on you. This is only a guide. If you don't mind the pack riding an inch higher, you'll be fine. Actually one inch isn't that much. Two or more would become uncomfortable over longer distances. The first external frame packs didn't even employ waist belts. The entire weight was carried on the shoulders. We're all glad they evolved from that!

By:
December 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

would recommend kelty

By:
March 17, 2011

i have hiked over 5,000 miles with my 1978 kelty would no trade it. i am planning a 2012 at thru hike. the lifetime warranty is great.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have a 17.5" torso, I'm 6'2" male with broad

I have a 17.5" torso, I'm 6'2" male with broad shoulders and I'm skinny (32" pant waist, 34.25 at the iliac crest.

Which pack should I get, the 3900 or 3950?

I wouldn't mind having an extra 50 cubic inches, but it isn't necessary. I somewhat like the tan color better, but that isn't a deal breaker for the green. Also, the belts on the two models look like they are different (vertical) widths, are they?

If the belts are different widths, should I opt for a wider belt, or would that just make me warmer, or less mobile?

I've hiked on some really ruggid terrain with an old Kelty frame pack. I don't know what people are talking about when they say stick to the internal. I'm going backpacking, not walking down a street, of course the terrain is ruggid. And wet, dry, cold, hot, miserable and fun, the external never let me down.

By:
July 30, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

The 3950 fits a toso range of 16-22". The 3900 fits a torso range of 14-20". The waist belts are the same, you won't have a problem fitting your skinny waist! You're basically in the middle of each range, I'd go for the extra 50 cu in.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
July 31, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Pack

By:
July 29, 2010

Just got back from a 36 mile hike up Mt Olympus in Washington state, and this pack was great. I am a former boy scout with good bit of hiking experience. I needed new equipment since mine old stuff was 15 years old, lost, and or broken after college and relocating for a job. I started looking for a new pack in the beginning of the year and pick the Kelty 3900 external for a couple reasons.
1. External Frame- some love them and other hate them.
2. Size - 3900 cu in is a good medium size pack good for a couple days or over a week
3. Price - $139 you can not beat it
To be straight forward this is a great pack. I like external frame because of the weight they can take. Last trip over 50lbs without water(Boy Scout always prepared). This pack takes it. It felt like 30lbs. ok it starts off feeling like 20lbs but 25 miles in and 7000 feet of elevation change it was heavy. But kelty has put some heavy duty shoulder straps and hip belt with padding that absorb alot. Lashing things to the frame is easy, pick a spot and tie. I like the sleeping bag compartment its great for my clothes. I had enough room for a over a weeks worth. (Yes again over prepared for a four day trip). I always lash my bag and tent to the bottom. More then enough room for stove, pad, bear can, and other stuff inside the main compartment. I will say the little pockets on the side are a little small they could be larger. Kelty should redesign to use the whole side for a pockets. As for durability I cannot say, two trips in and no tears or weak spots. Would I buy it again, yes, I wsh I had this back in my Boy Scout years. Great pack buy one, dont think that just because the new fad is to go internal frame that you should overlook this.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

would this be good for someone just getting into backpacking?

would this be good for someone just getting into backpacking? i like the look of external frame packs, but im not sure if it would be right for me.

By:
July 11, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I have to agree with chris. External frame packs have their strong points (monster load capacity and tons of lash points) but today's internal frame packs are generally more comfortable and easier to live with. They fit more closely to your body and would probably be the better choice in the Cascades.

I would suggest walking into your nearest outfitter and trying on a few different packs before buying one. They'll get you set up for the correct torso length and help you sort out the features you might want in a backpack.

By:
August 8, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Frame packs are great if you plan on hiking on well maintained trails without low hanging branches. They're easy to pack and can haul a ton of gear. If you plan on doing a lot of hiking on uneven ground or off trail, I'd recommend an internal frame pack like the Red Cloud 6650 or Coyote 4750. Hope that helps.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
July 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Excellent!

By:
April 5, 2010

I am not a big fan of internal frame packs. I understand there are advantages and disadvantages to both, for me the external frame provides the versitility I need. On the Kelty I purchased, the expandable top rail was the tipping point! I like hard points to attach gear to, keeping my personal items tucked away. The hardpoints allow me to attach my tent above, and my sleeping bag and pad below while leaving ample room for food, water, clothing and other sundries in the main pack. While no pack is "comfortable", this one distributes the load nicely, and is less uncomfortable than any other I have used!

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

Flag

What's the difference between this year's model Kelty

What's the difference between this year's model Kelty Trekker and last years I get pick up for a bit cheaper?Thanks,Doug

By:
March 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

The color and the material. This year's color does not look like an angry forest demon made the pack. This year's material is 600d poly ripstop vs. the old 210d poly ripstop. Last year's version is also 4oz. lighter. Unless you plan on putting the thing through a wood chipper or carrying swords, last year's model should do nicely.

By:
March 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Out of Stock

Item: KEL0649

2009 Model No Longer Available

But don't stress, we have the latest model in stock.

Kelty Trekker Backpack-3950cu in - 2011

Kelty Trekker Backpack-3950cu in - 2011

Research other out-of-stock versions:

Trekker

5 star rating

By: eri3776944 November 19, 2011

I love this thing, old school pack and it still looks great! more...

Excellent!

5 star rating

By: how100524933 April 5, 2010

I am not a big fan of internal frame packs. I understand there are advantages and disadvantages to both, for me the external frame provides the versitility more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Material:
600D Poly ripstop, 600D poly oxford 
Volume:
[Khaki] 3900cu in (64L); [Woods Green] 3950cu in (65L) 
Suspension:
External 
Hydration Compatible:
Yes, bladder sold separately 
Torso Adjustment:
Yes 
Detachable Pack:
No 
Sleeping Bag Compartment:
Yes 
Rain Cover:
No 
Access Types:
Top 
Pockets:
1 Main compartment, 1 sleeping bag, 1 top, 5 external zip, 2 mesh bottle 
Snowboard Carry:
No 
Ski Carry:
No 
Gear Loops:
3 Daisy chain 
Ice Axe Loops:
Shovel Pocket:
No 
Weight:
[Khaki] 5lb 6oz (2438g); [Woods Green] 5lb 7oz (2466g) 
Recommended Use:
Backpacking 
Manufacturer Warranty:
Lifetime