Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
Lace up the Kayland Men’s Contact Boot for multi-day treks in the great ranges or heavy backpacking trips closer to home. This heavy-duty hiking boot features a leather and textile upper backed by an eVent waterproof breathable lining for full weather protection. An enhanced rocker last promotes a natural rolling step, and ergonomic internal padding keeps the heel locked and the ankle supported for rocky, barely-there trails.
Bottom Line: Make full contact with the trail when you're wearing this boot.
I have owned these boots for just over a year. I take very good care of my hiking boots and usually get 5 - 7 years out of a pair before the sole has worn off. There is still plenty of traction left on these boots but I am replacing them.
First I can't complain about the fit or sole on these boots. They are very comfortable right out of the box and they grip just about any surface (excluding wet roots of course). I hike only in New England primarily in the White Mountains. I hike year round but I change my footwear depending on the hike and the season. I primarily wore these boots on longer day hikes or over night hikes. The White Mountains are usually wet and I had problems right from day one with wet feet. I do not know if I got a bad pair or if the eVent lining is not great. But within the first hour of a hike I can already feel the water starting to soak through my wool socks. I have tried treating the boots with various products to repel the water, But nothing seems to help. My previous boots were a full leather gore-tex boot and I never had a single problem with leaking. I will be going back to a standard full leather boot.
Talk to a rep through the chat button on the top right. They can check if more are on the way. Otherwise, google shopping is always a good place to look.
Length is true to size, perhaps a tad on the long side. Fits a narrow heel and lower instep well. A little higher volume in the mid to forefoot, but good for low to medium volume feet. Forefoot width higher than average, but not wide - definitely a D width. Toes taper but more spacious than most, so people with more rounded toes might appreciate this boot. Seem to work well for my low volume feet with think ankles/narrow heels but a wider forefoot. Lock my heels in like no other, rigid where needed but good forefoot flex. Built solidly but not too heavy. Outstanding outsole lugs. Stock insole is fantastic, moderate arch support, perfect for my medium arches that find superfeet green arches a little too high. Have yet to take them on a hike, but confident they will take a thrashing.
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
I'm looking at getting a pair of these boots to replace my Solomon Quests, but with so many people saying to go up a half size, then others saying not to. Can anyone give me an answer as to how these fit compared to a Solomon Quest in 10.5. Thanks in advance
DEfinitely do not go up half a size - they fit very much true to size. I find the volume of the fit very similar to the Salomon Quests - both have snug heels and midfoots - but there is a lot more volume in the toe box of the Contacts. These are a much burlier and stiffer boot as well.
i would venture to say that people are saying go up a half size from your normal shoe (not other boots) due to wearing heavier socks. just order them from backcountry.com. if they dont fit, return them and get another size.
I agree with chrisw001330206. The boot has a very nice fit for those of us with narrow heels and wide forefoots (not that uncommon among outside people, oddly). I've had horrors with a lot of modern boots that have too narrow of a toe box and are poorly built. My pair of Contacts are probably the best boot I've tried in 4 years. Their advantages are: excellent shank for full-length protection, rocker in the shank that makes walking a breeze, FULL breathability and solid water protection, and space for the little piggies up front (i.e. toes). I normally fit a 9.5-10 (due to foot width), and the Contact 9.5 was my size of choice. I strap BD hinged crampons to these for lightweight spring snowfield climbing, and also wear them in 80F heat through baking dry deserts in the Southwest. I find E-vent's breathability better than that of Goretex, and the ankle support is superb. The full shank also makes edging in the boot quite reasonable for mountain scrambling. My only hesitation is the worry that the materials may not last very long -- put a full leather upper on this boot, and you have a classic, legend-worthy mountain hiker. Probably the best boot on the market for narrow-heeled, wide footed hikers (though still a little tight, and not a true wide).
Are these boots made in China? This will actually be my 3rd pair of Kaylands...the last were made in China and have fallen apart after only a couple hundred miles. My old Contact 1000 boots lasted much longer and were made in Romania.
argh! i really want to like these boots. i also have the kayland convert, which is a very good boot, and the kayland apex trek, which is an awesome boot. this boot (the contact) is also very nice, but doesn't have enough toe box room. kayland's web site led me to believe that the contact and convert shared the same asymmetric last. but, in contrast an absolutely huge toe box of the convert, the contact is quite a bit tighter up front. otherwise, this boot is actually very nice. it's a nicer hiker than the convert, except that my toes get smooshed after they warm up and expand.
hi PY! thanks for catching my errors. wow, the names are close and kinda confusing! i have updated my review to state that the Convert has the giant toe box, but this shoe (the Contact) while really nice, doesn't have nearly as spacious a toe box as the Convert. thanks :)
I'm confused by this review. Is this a review for the Kayland Contact or for some other boot? The reviewer states that the Contact has "an absolutely huge toe box" but that "this boot doesn't have enough toe box room." The review is listed under the Kayland Contact. So...Does the Kayland Contact have ample toe room or not? Thanks.
Will these boots hold a crampon(not for ice climbing, for glacier travel)? How flexible/ senstive are they? I want a pair of boots for mountain scrambling/via ferrata. I would like a combination of lighter/ more flexible hiker to give sensitivty when climbing rock, but still a robust enough boot for crampons/ steep terrain.
I did put a glacier walk type universal crampon on my first pair of Kayland's while in Patagonia and this my 2nd pair have the same sole configuration so it will be no problem. I have not put a pair on this new version, but can see no reason why it won't work just as well.
This is my 2nd pair of Kayland. I wore the first pair completely out trying to find a source for Kayland over the past few years; none really in Canada so I went south and glad I did. Perfect balance of lighter weight but full support at ankle and sole. I have a hard to fit foot. This boot is a perfect fit. Nice tight heal box holds the heel down perfectly and no sliding when laced up snugly. I only had a week to try the new ones out before heading to Peru; no real breaking in require with this boot for me and they performed flawlessly for a 7 day lodge to lodge hike. I like this boot so much I've ordered a back up pair in the new REV Contact version in case I have trouble finding them again.
These look and appear to be great boots after reading the plentiful reviews... here's my problem, I wear a size 14, firm. I have so much trouble finding any decent boots in my sizing. My feet aren't overly wide, they're are just a full 14. I cannot get by with any size 13 without severe pain especially in my big toe/other toes. I usually end up wearing basketball shoes all the time, but this does not work out for long backpacking trips in inclement weather. Does anyone know of a shoe that will fit me?! This has been going on for years, and with the emergence of larger people in many cultures, I can't believe shoe companies still only go to size 13, but they do. I have been dealing with this since junior high, and it's is so frustrating. I am 6' 4" and 210 lbs., what size shoe do they expect me to wear? Does anyone have any good recommendations?
The North Face Dhaulagiri is currently available in a 14.0. I usually try to suggest the same brand of the pages people are asking on, but it doesn't look like Kayland has that size.
I couldn't find a Kayland dealer in town, but have family that wears this brand. I took a stab at trying the sizes, and I suggest going almost at least a half-size bigger. I have 11 1/2 feet, but almost always wear 12s. These boots don't feel too narrow, perhaps just a tad, but I don't have wider feet. The insoles are pretty worthless like most hiking boots, I HIGHLY recommend the Superfeet Orange. Great shock absorber and fits awesome in this boot! The maiden voyage in these turned out very surprising! They have awesome ankle support; not hella stiff like a mountaineering boot, but not flimsly like lighter boots are. I took them through streams, on steep open face rock, up steeper dirt trails, etc. The vibram soles gripped right on every environment like they should. The eVent breathes better than gore-tex in my opinion. This is a great all-around boot for the 3 seasons. I haven't snow tested them yet, but I trust them already! I will recommend Kayland to everybody as a solid product.
I disagree - these fit very true to size, I've measured them inside with tape and they fit exactly with standard US measurements. Measure your foot with the sock you intend to wear to make sure to get the right size.
After reading all the reviews I took a chance on a size 12 even though I wear a 13. Very close, but no cigar. Very sturdy, very well made, good forefoot cushion and great fit except for being a tad too short. I'm beginning to understand that I have a D width forefoot with a narrow heel. These boots fit better than anything I have tried so far. Return was painless...love doing business with BC. Talked with a rep who told me they don't anticipate getting in a size 13 anytime soon so I will continue my search, but if BC ever has this boot in a 13, I'm ordering it no questions asked.
I am looking at the new North face boa's and am wondering about the quality. The Boa is cool but will it hold up. I'm debating between that and the Kayland contact. If money weren't an issue how would you compare them? I've always used Asolo or at least for about fifteen years and am an avid supporter and am wondering about these other two.
I have a narrow (Size A), low volume, long (Size 13) foot with a narrow heal. I have been looking for a boot (Approx. 30 years) that fits correctly and will not give me blisters on my heals. Up until now, I have yet to find it. I ordered these boots based on the description and reviews. When I received them I tried them on immediately. They fit my narrow feet well from the width and volume perspective. Unfortunately, They didn't feel long enough. I was afraid that my feet would expand and they would become too short. That may be due to the boots' toe box being narrower than some of the other boots I have tried on. I went online to Kayland and noticed that they do make a size 14US size. But, Backcountry does not carry them. I asked them if they could order it from the manufacturer but they said they do not do special orders. So, I sent them back without wearing them. Very disappointed that they did not have my size. I am giving them 4 stars because they fit well and were constructed well. I feel that if they were a little longer, they might have been the boot that I have been searching for.
Also,I have narrow (A)width feet and usually have a problem with boots and shoes being too fat requiring inserts,double socks or both and then lacing the shoes as tight as they go. I didn't see a width option for this boot,yet I did see reviews that indicated they are wide after the heel part. Will they be too wide? Why no width choice,or did I miss that?
Thanks for the reply.Is there a boot that one can order (similar to this one) by any manufacturer (who actually wants to sell boots that FIT) that are available in different widths?
I've used this boot for a couple of intense 2 day backpacking trips, as an approach shoe at red rocks, and for carrying a heavy pack up the climbers trail. In all cases, I was very pleased with this boot. I've found that it fits my heel well, despite that I typically have trouble finding boots that will hold my heel in place, without being overly tight around the forefoot. They are not quite as stiff as I was expecting, however, they offer adequate support with a 45 lb pack. Additionally, I found that the rocker on these boots made for very comfortable walking. And finally, when using these boots on 4th class approaches, and while climbing a couple of 5.easy chimneys, I was happy with how well the rubber gripped.
I need a lightweight boot with good grip on dirt hillsides. This boot is listed at 1 lb. 10 ozs.per pair! That is 13 oz. each. Is this a misprint? If not, are the soles heavy enough to last or do you have to replace them often? What is a "contact" boot. I've never had an issue with my feet not contacting the ground when I walk,although I admit,the idea of no contact seems very appealing. This seems to be the boot for me(and my sore knees) but they seem too good to be true. Thanks-BrianAlex
You will be able to stand on dirt hillsides all day long with the Vibram sole paired with the flex 5 rating they give and enhanced rocker, you could hike sideways with a heavy pack on. The weight is for a single boot, problem is being fixed. The soles will last, and replacing them would probably cost more than a pair of boots. "Contact" is the model of the boot, not the type of boot.
my needs are simple, rugged, waterproof, and worth the price. the comfort of this boot is top notch. great stability, incredible support. my feet don't hurt after a long day of hiking. but, after 8 months of average use, they leak. bummer. i expected more from such a great, and expensive boot.
how does this Kayland Contact boot work with a foot that is a bit on the thin side,,,,and if i order from you and they are the wrong size, can i send them back and exchange....jack
Backcountry really has a great return policy. I had to return a set of Lowa Banff boots that were too heavy and wore out my knees. Even though they were worn,they took them back,which was way beyond the nornal return policy (and will make me a regular customer for sure).
Jack, you can always return to Backcountry. The fit has plenty of toe room but superior ankle hold and comfort to spare. The Contact also has a stiff midsole and eVent lets you breathe while staying dry. Perhaps you already have these since you asked on Dec. 26th. So now maybe you are now ready to tell us about them...?
I REALLY, REALLY wanted these boots to work for me. At first I thought they might, but a few test hikes proved me wrong. History has taught me that regardless how much I admire a boots quality and attention to detail if it does not fit its pointless. So Im returning them. I guess my feet just dont jive with Italian designed footwear for this isnt the first time Ive been shot down by the Boot Country. The proper length for me always feels alittle narrow at the forefront of my feet, and I dont have wide feet! Half size up gives me a comfortable width, but now the boots too long. Ive tried and failed in the past with two other Italian boot manufacturers with blistering results ( pun intended) even years after. But I do want you to know that these are very high quality boots. This is the first pair of Kaylands that Ive tried and I am impressed. Doesnt seem that long ago that if you were going to spend this kind of money on a pair of boots that little things like QUALITY wasnt an issue! Boy have times changed. Granted its been afew years sense Ive gone boot shopping, but I was amazed at the amount of junk on the market at even the two hundred bucks plus range! At least these boots have Vibram soles, no plastic eyelets anywhere and one of the better (if not the best) water-proof liners. Stitching uniformed and tidy . Nope, the Italians still dont like me, but they my love you! Id recommend you check these out.
I have bad feet--really bad arthritic feet--and went through four pair of medium-high end hiking boots (all returned to REI) that simply brutalized my feet until I found the Kayland Contact 1000s at a local custom bootfitter. The 1000s are the previous model of the Contact boot that is being reviewed here. I liked the Contact 1000s so much, I bought a pair of the Contacts--they are essentially the same boot. I have just worn the Contacts once--on a nearly 10 mile hike above 13K. Though they will break in, they are amazingly comfortable right out of the box. Great for wide feet with narrow heels as has been stated in previous reviews. They are rigid where they need to be and flexible where they can afford to be. One key for me is that the lacing stops short of going over my big toe joint (where I have arthritis) and this makes all the difference (the new Contact Revs have different lacing that will take the bottom of the laces over my toe joint and that won't work for me). I can really tighten the laces up for steep descents and it doesn't feel like it is crushing my feet. My toes *never* get smashed in the end of the boot on descents. I recommend the Kayland Contact boots unequivocally.
Very nice boots. Construction quality is awesome! I have a feeling these boots will last longer than Asolo, Vasque...you name it. The fit is true to size and perfect for those of us who have a wider foot but a narrower heel. E-vent is nice, i like it more than gore-tex because i feel it breathes a bit better but still retains the waterproof properties. The heel cup is fantastic and the toe box is a nice size to keep your feet from feeling crunched. The soles have I've used them on trails and in snow and there is nothing to complain about. If I was able to i would never take these things off.
Bought a set of these for Christmas and had to send them back a month later. These boots were fabulous and I definitely support all the positive things mentioned about them. I had to return them due to the padded collar seperating from the eVent liner while putting them on one morning. Unfortunately my size would not be back in stock for over a month, so I had to settle for some Montrail Heliums..which I have on right now and while they are a good boot, they do not compare to the Kaylands at all. Hopefully I'll have a chance to buy another set of the Kaylands in the future.
They run a little small.I wear a size 10.5 shoe and these in a size 11 fit great. (had to send back the 10.5). So far I've hiked in them twice; no hot spots,no blisters. They held great on wet rock, needed crampons for icy conditions. The eVent lining kept my feet dry as I sloshed through mud and pooled water. They are good looking and supportive. I only gave 4 stars because I have'nt worn them enough to know if they are a 5 star boot.
These definitely do NOT fit small. In fact, if anything they fit a little long. People with very high volume feet may feel the need to size up a half size to accomodate their feet better, but length-wise they are not short.
Believe the hype. These boots are excellent. Just christened them on a big hike in the Adirondacks after two days of wear at work (outdoors). No blisters, hotspots, problems, etc Ive never had this much room in the toe, and must say it feels quite luxurious. Worth every penny.
Just got them in today and love them so far. Excellent stability and support; I feel like I am rooted to the ground. The extra room in the toe for my piggies to wiggle is nice too. I'll find out next week how they feel hiking around in them when I head back to work.
I have owned these boots for just over a year. I take very good care of my hiking boots and usually get 5 - 7 years out of a pair before the sole has worn more...
Length is true to size, perhaps a tad on the long side. Fits a narrow heel and lower instep well. A little higher volume in the mid to forefoot, but good more...
1 Comment Last Comment: September 11, 2011 by: Cheffy
By: Cheffy
September 11, 2011
This is a silly response. If the boot leaks, it was defective. Get it exchanged from backcountry - they have a lifetime guarantee.
Flag
Comment on JimB's review >