So pleasing, perfect, and overachieving, it's a little obnoxious.

Developed by team athlete Chris Davenport, the Kastle FX94 Ski aims to please, whether on powder, hardpack, crud, or corduroy. Because face it: those fat skis with 100mm+ waists don't love the bulletproof stuff. And the FX94 has Titanal sheets on top and bottom for stable, chatter-free speeds and torsional stiffness for rocketing edge-to-edge. A mid-fat waist accommodates pow and hard stuff, because that's what all-mountain dimensions do. ABS sidewalls, a full wood core, and sandwich construction transfers power like a mofo, and the early-rise Hollowtech tip prevents tip-dive and delivers stability without added weight. Naturally, this middle-of-pack all-mountain freeride ski has a crowd-pleasing do-it-all sidecut radius. It really is an overachiever, come to think of it.

  • Early rise rocker profile
  • Traditional camber underfoot
  • Sandwich and ABS sidewall construction
  • Ash and silver fir wood core
  • 94mm waist
  • Titanal top and bottom sheet
  • Hollowtech tip
  • Hook-free shovel and tail
  • Medium-large radius sidecut
  • UHM sintered base

Share your thoughts

What do you think of the

Kastle FX94 Ski

? Share a...

Write a review

No file chosen

Rather attach a photo from another website?

Rather attach a photo from your computer?

  • Product review:
  • Share a video
  • Share a photo

How familiar are you with the product?(Optional)

Only jpg, jpeg, png, gif or bmp files please.


Here's what others have to say...

5 5

Best ski on the planet?!?!?!

  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

Probably! I wrote a lengthy review but accidentally deleted it. so heres the brief version.these are the best one ski quiver on the planet if you know how to ski. they reward good technique. size down if on the fence. i ski the 176 need its all i need! i really think the 186 is only for really big guys, or the absolute fastest skiers on the mountain. kastle is making the Ferrari of skis!!!

Responded on

You're on the 176. How tall and how much do you weigh??

Responded on

I am 5'9" and weigh too much. 215+ . but I ski 100 days a year. and I ski faster than the majority. ( there are certainly some guys who blow me outta the water. but not very many on any given mountain) .. really love this ski. precise. do it all tool.

Responded on

skiing aspen/snowmass... I ski a lot of moguls, trees, pow, groom , variable, wind blown, etc... the fx eats it all up

a 1200 dollar ski that is sold out, but...

a 1200 dollar ski that is sold out, but has no reviews?!?! what gives?! anyone have beta?!

Best Answer Responded on


That's a great question. This is purely a guess but I'm thinking that it's early season and any customers that provide a review on this might be waiting until they get 10-20 days in on these suckers and get the chance to ride in a variety of conditions.

It's just a guess but I know here in Utah our snow coverage is bleak right now and I'm sure as heck not taking out my nice gear right now.

I'd hang tight and hopefully we'll see a bunch of reviews on here about the end of the month and into February.

Jared D.
800.409.4502 ext 4055

Responded on

Jared, I just had my first day on these, at 5'9" on the 176.... WOW!!! Absolutely killed steep double black bumps on Deep Temerity at Aspen Highlands today! So Light, and powerful, agile. Really fun on groomers... not quite the g-force as the MX83. But super stable and great edge hold. Looking forward to getting them in softer/deeper snow. everything I expected and more... fun from the first turn... will also wait to write a full review!!!