- Home
- Ski
- Alpine Skiing
- Alpine Fat Skis
- K2 Kung Fujas Alpine Ski - 2010
Community Rating
K2 Kung Fujas Alpine Ski - 2010 BCS
Available Colors / Styles
Another year, and Pep Fujas just keeps going bigger. Not surprisingly, the K2 Kung Fujas does the same. More width and more rocker translate to an even better version of the previous Kung Fujas. It's an all-terrain, all-conditions tool that brings the park, resort, and backcountry to their knees with a dropkick to the face.
- 7mm wider tip-to-tail for increased float and stability over previous models
- All-Terrain Rocker for optimal blend of flotation and edging response
- Traditional sidecut and camber underfoot
- Removable tip and tail rivets allow attachment of pre-cut K2 climbing skins
- Flat mount for use with bindings of your choice
Bottom Line: More cushin' for pushin' it like Pep.
Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.
I just bought these at 179 and mounted Marker Jester bindings
I just bought these at 179 and mounted Marker Jester bindings in the center. Has anyone had any experience with these skis in the moguls in the east? I skied them for the first time this past weekend at Mad River through the moguls. They're my first wide ski and they felt a bit squirrly in the bumps. I'm thinking I just need to get used to them. I don't do the park stuff so I didn't get the Jester Schizo's, but just the regular Jesters. I'm thinking that I should have to be able to mess around with my stance to see if it makes a difference. Any thoughts?
By: dudeinacab2085627
March 7, 2011
I am thinking about these or the k2 revivals.... lookin for good
I am thinking about these or the k2 revivals.... lookin for good all around action. thoughts?
By: RoyMan
February 18, 2011
great all around
By:
Alex H
January 12, 2011
This ski is big enough to float and take on the backcountry, yet still small enough to be able shred the resort and some of the park.
2012 kung fujas
By: Will Guru
February 7, 2011
Really happy with great time on Kung Fujus 169 ... NorthWest
Really happy with great time on Kung Fujus 169 ... NorthWest pow/crud/groom/small jumps... fun to get some air... aggressive intermediate... not a park user (but these skis tempt me) 5'8" 175 lbs... Most recommend longer 179. Should I purchase 169 or 179 length ski? What kind of bindings? -2 to +2 placement?
By: Rob
February 17, 2011
anybody have these mounted at core center? how do they ski?
anybody have these mounted at core center? how do they ski? i just got 169s, mounted at core center with mojo 15 bindings, have not been out yet, im excited and nervous. always skied +3 on twins, this ski is mostly for midwest allm mountain/park use. im wondering if i'll want to set them back to +5 or something?
thanks
By: Forrest
January 13, 2011
F* it, they ski great w/ center mount
By: Forrest
January 16, 2011
Not a little bit of everything, but all of everything
By:
Nik H
February 13, 2011
They can literally handle anything! I just bought my pair and have not switched them out with my racing skis all season. The Kung Fujas are just as good on the piece and on the pow they float like no other all mountain ski. Light for it's size, I highly recommend it to anyone!
how do the edges hold up on this baby in on the rails and boxes?
how do the edges hold up on this baby in on the rails and boxes? will they easily rip out?
By: Hans Ringger
December 23, 2010
no, thats why its such a good ski for the whole mountain
By: Alex H
January 12, 2011
Not at all. Really is a bomber ski that can take a lot of abuse.
By: Josh Chapman
December 27, 2010
Is this years Kung Fujas just last years Obsethed?
Is this years Kung Fujas just last years Obsethed?
By: tmac 4718
December 12, 2010
Great Ski, you can use it anywhere
By:
Dan Childs
February 10, 2011
I have a pair of Kung Fujas and I absolutely love them. They are soft enough where I can get them into the park, enough tip and tail rocker where I can ski some fresh lines in the trees, and smooth enough to where I can rip on groomers all day. These skis are perfect for a person who is looking for a great twin that will offer a great ski all over the mountain. I highly recommend this ski to anyone who is looking for a great all mountain experience.
I'm 5'5'' 121 lbs and expert skier.I have never
I'm 5'5'' 121 lbs and expert skier.I have never had fat skis before. Im looking for a all-mountain ski, mostly for backcountry/powder. Will the 169 work for me?
Thanks
By: Thomas427
December 11, 2010
yea those will work
By: Alex H
January 2, 2011
Has anybody mounted the 189 Kung Fujas with the Marker Baron
Has anybody mounted the 189 Kung Fujas with the Marker Baron Binding or tried the pre- cut skins with them?
By: SNOWMAN
December 5, 2010
One Ski Quiver
By:
Mike Merrill
November 19, 2010
This is a great all-mountain ski that I would call a "Jack-of-all-Trades, Master-of-None." Not necessarily a bad thing though. A good skier can make up for what these ski's lack in all situations and the ability to go anywhere and do anything on the mountain means I don't have to take a powder ski, quick groomer sticks and a twin-tip park ski up the hill. These ski's will definitely do it all, it just takes a bit of skill to get them to do it all well.
Anyone know a weight on these puppies?
Anyone know a weight on these puppies?
By: sandlot
November 30, 2010
Hey there,
The weight comes in at 6.74 lbs.
By: Josh Chapman
December 2, 2010
Anyone tried these for telemark aswell?
Anyone tried these for telemark aswell?
By: Vegar Limstrand
November 11, 2010
to mike mitchel. the rocker on the 09/10 kung fujas is smaller 10/11 model which has all terain rocker
By: Will Guru
January 5, 2011
I agree. These things shred on tele, alpine, park...everywhere. Go anywhere, do anything.
By: Mike Merrill
November 19, 2010
Yeah they rock for telying the whole mountain. the 09/10 model have a sweet all mountain rocker witch lets you ride anything
By: k
November 11, 2010
had last yr's model...
By:
Matthew Falcinelli
November 5, 2010
I had last year's model which were slightly narrower than this year, but the concept is still the same. I skied Utah with it and it was my one quiver ski last year. Last year, it was rated one of the top park skis, but it surprised everyone in being rated as a top 5 all mountain ski as well. We don't have a ton of ice in Utah, but it held on those unexpected patches. I just recommend keeping the edges tuned regularly if you'll be skiing a lot of ice back east. A definite recommendation....
1 Comment Last Comment: November 5, 2010 by: Ryan Cobourn
By: Ryan Cobourn
November 5, 2010
Would you say they're ideal for slaying groomers?
Hi, Im thinking about buing these skis, but I`ve got question.
Hi,
Im thinking about buing these skis, but I`ve got question. I already have movement goliath, which are good but not for pow. So I want somethnig for pow but not only. Im wondering about K2 obSETHed, K2 Kung Fujas or K2 obSETHED (last season model). We don`t have so many pow days so i want to ask if k2 obSETHed will hold me on ice? Or would K2 KF be good for pow? They are 102mm wide but Im 2 meters tall and my weight is 85kg.
Thanks for answering
By: chrome
November 6, 2010
I have the 08 obSETHed skis mounted with Marker Dukes, and I find them versatile enough to use as an all mountain ski. I have never had any problems with them sliding out from under me on icy days, and I don't really have any major complaints about them. The one complaint I do have is with the 100-105 width, and I'm not satisfied with the float and would like to move to an even wider ski. You could try to demo both before you buy. I'm guessing the new Kung Fujas may ride similar to the 08 and 09 obSETHed, which are great all mountain/powder skis. The 10 ski is probably moving towards more powder specific, but if your not skiing groomers and moguls the majority of time then why not? I'm thinking about selling my current set up as well as some 06 seths I have to get the new ones. ~120 under foot I think is the best compromise for a really good powder ski and a marginal ski for everything else, but if you live for pow, who cares about the rest of the season. When there isn't any pow, they'll get you down the hill comfortably if you're a good enough skier. Oh ya, and Seth is the man, so if it's good enough for him its good enough for me. Good Luck
By: Kevn Swanson
November 18, 2010
would this ski be good for skiing on the east coast where the
would this ski be good for skiing on the east coast where the conditions are icier.
By: greenmachine
November 3, 2010
Hey there,
Yes. This ski has a great all-terrain rocker in it that makes it killer for any condition. Mix that with a traditional sidecut and camber underfoot and you've got an awesome ski. The camber underfoot is going to allow better edge hold for the hard pack/ice while you still have some rocker tip and tail for some powder riding.
By: Josh Chapman
November 4, 2010
I think that I am going to get these. I mostly ski SoCal as I
I think that I am going to get these. I mostly ski SoCal as I live here, but I do a lot of Tahoe and Mammoth trips. I make a few runs through the park a day, but mostly I am out searching for good snow, which is rare around here. As some one who literally ski's all types of snow, and is doing at least one AT trip this year (my first one) do you think that these ski's would be a good fit for me? I am 6'1" 220-230 lbs and am advanced/expert. Thanks!
By: Joel Perham
October 26, 2010
These would work great they are like a really fat park ski that rip all mnt. and will have no trouble floating in pow. This ski really does it all. 189 should work well for you.
By: Will Guru
November 3, 2010
I'm 5'10" and 170 lbs. and an expert skier. I've
I'm 5'10" and 170 lbs. and an expert skier. I've never skied a rocker ski before. What length would you suggest? It'll be for off-piste and touring. Thanks. Blake
By: bla4064504
October 7, 2010
Hi, I skied these at Breck/Vail last year for about two weeks. I am 5'10" 168 lbs. I went with 179cm and it was perfect.
They performed well on the groomers and park, and when I dropped into the trees for some virgin powder they gave me no problems. I was pretty happy.
That being said, I ski 185 normaly and have a tendency to gravitate towards longer skis.
I wouldn't discount yourself, unless you're really focusing on the park you shouldn't go any shorter less you sacrifice stability at high speeds.
By: Randomintelligentguy
October 7, 2010
Change me.
Out of Stock
2010 Model No Longer Available
But don't stress, we have the latest model in stock.
K2 Kung Fujas Ski
K2 Kung Fujas SkiResearch other out-of-stock versions:
great all around
This ski is big enough to float and take on the backcountry, yet still small enough to be able shred the resort and some of the park. more...
Not a little bit of everything, but all of everything
They can literally handle anything! I just bought my pair and have not switched them out with my racing skis all season. The Kung Fujas are just as good more...
- Length:
- 169 cm, 179 cm, 189 cm
- Dimensions:
- 133 / 102 / 127 mm
- Turn Radius:
- (179cm) 19 m
- Construction:
- ABS sidewall, triaxial braided core
- Core:
- aspen, paulownia
- Tail:
- rockered twin
- Recommended Use:
- advanced to expert all-mountain freestyle
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 1 year