Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
Do everything and do it well on the K2 BackLash Ski, especially if your definition of everything excludes anything within the resort ropes. This is the silver bullet for any AT or tele skier's bane: those super light backcountry skis that wimp out when the fluff turns funky. With a hint of metal, a touch of rocker, and a sweet progressive sidecut, the 92mm-waisted BackLash puts the hurt on all conditions without weighing down your climb.
Aspen/paulownia/bamboo core for wicked lightness
All-Terrain Rocker for stability and maneuverability
Metal laminate cap construction to bust up apron debris
Snowphobic topsheet to shed weight on the way up
Removable tip and tail rivets accept K2 custom pre-cut skins (sold separately)
The BackLash is labeled as a Telemark ski, but would it work for alpine down hill turns if I mount it with a dynafit or fritschi set-up? Is there something about the construction that is for tele specifically?
This ski would work fine with an AT binding like Dynafit or Fritschi. The construction of modern telemark skis is very similar to AT or alpine skis. Modern telemark skis are typically marketed as AT skis as well. Traditionally, telemark skis have had a softer flex, but with modern bindings and boots some telemark skis actually have a stiffer flex than AT or alpine skis. Telemark specific skis will typically be lighter than an alpine ski and may not perform as well on hard packed groomers or in crud. Additionally, telemark skis may have reinforcement in the binding area to deal with the extra forces and torques. I don't have any experience with this particular ski, but it sounds like it has fairly good stiffness due to the metal cap and performs adequately in all conditions. Check out some reviews and decide if it sounds like this ski fits your style, but don't fret about the telemark designation. If possible, always try before you buy.
I got this ski as more of a spring ski mountaineering board that would be ready for all the conditions I might find on a typical 5,000' elevation change big mountain ski day. Frozen, breakable, chalky, recycled powder and end of the day slop after some corn are what I expect, and I must say that these skis deliver in all of these conditions. Add to the package the snowphobic top sheet, tip and tail holes, flat tails, and you have one of the best one quiver skis around...so much so that I find I used it more than I thought I would!
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
Replacing a pair of Hippy Stinx that are just old.................I love the Hippis and am looking for the latest K2 that will do everything thse have done so well for 5 saesons...................?????
I've been skiing the work stinx 174cm for a few years (and love 'em). With the new early rise tip, should i consider going up a size or staying with the 174?
Good question. I am asking the same uestion since a couple of month and it is very difficult to find the right answer...I skied also on a Work Stinx (metal laminate) at 174cm and i loved it. I am 5'9", 170 lbs and i do not know wich size to pick my Backlash ???
If you can only own one pair of skis, these are them. I've had mine about 2 months now and have skied everything from man-made icy stuff to moguls to deep dry powder. These skis excel everywhere, in all conditions. Haven't had them in the backcountry yet, but I see no reason they wouldn't excel there as well. Could probably sell my Waybacks now. My only very minor complaint is that the tips oscillate up and down on the groomers, it looks funny but dosen't affect control. I got used to it. Also, when you hot wax them be sure and keep the iron moving fast out on the rocker, as it is thin in that area and scorches easily. Oh, and you will need to wax these skis before taking them out the first time- not used to that.
I have last years Backlash set up with Dynafits and they work great! I was on a pair of Rossi B3s which carved on the the hardpack but were not great at shorter radius turns. The Backlash does any radius of turn with ease. The Backlash works in bounds and out, but is somewhat better out of bounds.
I am an east coast intermediate skier trying to decide between the BD havoc and K2 backlash. I have the G3 baron in a 177 and find it is too big and hard to turn. I ski both back country and the slopes, but are more concerned about backcountry performance. Any thoughts?
When a ski is too big and hard to turn your next ski should have one or more of these qualities: 1. Shorter length - a shorter ski is a lot easier to manage especially for developing skiers and when you are making short turns. 2. Softer flex - a softer ski takes a lot less effort and speed to bend making it easier to carve a nice turn. 3. More sidecut - a ski with more sidecut will naturally want to turn with greater ease than another ski that is more straight.
Go with the K2 Backlash. I have a pair of BD Havocs in a 185cm length. The Havocs are a VERY demanding ski that I would not recommend for anyone less than an expert skier. They seem to be more of a big mountain ski, IMHO...
My personal opinion is to go with the BackLash. For one it has All-terrain Rocker. Which will allow you to rise up on top of the snow. And it will allow you to trek up a mountain with ease. They are also lighter than the Havocs. And if you ever decided to take a trip out west. You're going to definitely prefer the larger dimensions. The only draw backs are going to be with size comes less quickness from edge to edge. And they may be a tad bit harder to muscle a turn. But in the long run. You will learn to appreciate the larger dimensions. Plus. . . with a ski like the backlash you'll go from intermediate to advanced in no time.
K2 does not make pre-cut skins for the Backlash. If you want the K2 attachment system, buy the pre-cut skins for the HardSide and trim to the Backlash or get the K2 trim-to-fit skins.
I got this ski as more of a spring ski mountaineering board that would be ready for all the conditions I might find on a typical 5,000' elevation change more...
If you can only own one pair of skis, these are them. I've had mine about 2 months now and have skied everything from man-made icy stuff to moguls more...