Dropping in three, two, one.
You love your fat skis, but all that weight is hard to lug up the skin track. Get the next best thing with the K2 BackDrop Ski. This touring slayer features superlight construction, a fattened 112mm waist, and an increased shovel rocker so you're able to slash mad pow turns in the backcountry without the pain-in-the-arse excess weight of a heavy powder ski. This lightweight, durable ski also works well as a quick-and-nimble resort powder muncher or sidecountry gate crasher.
- All-Terrain Rocker profile consists of an elevated tip for variable and soft snow performance and camber underfoot for power, energy, and edgehold in firmer conditions
- PowderTip design pulls the widest point of the tip further down the ski, which retains float in soft snow and also minimizes deflection in adverse snow conditions
- Lightweight core features a blend of aspen, paulownia, and maple, which results in a 15% weight savings over traditional cores
- Unique core also decreases the carbon footprint of the ski, which reduces our impact on the winter world
- Cap construction offers a lightweight ski with a low swing weight and smooth turn initiation
- Trixial braided construction consists of braided fiberglass around a wood core that provides torsional rigidity for added control
- Triaxial braided construction delivers a forgiving and extremely responsive ski
- Carbon Web technology (webbed carbon overlay located on the tail and forebody of the ski) gives lightweight torsional rigidity, which increases edge grip especially when you skin up an icy sidehill
- Snowphobic topsheet technology has a snow-repellent topsheet so snow doesn't collect and add excess weight while you climb
- Applying wax to the topsheet also increases its snow-shedding performance
- Tip and Tail hardware functions as attachment points for your K2 BackDrop Precut Skins (sold separately) and comes with a removable plug
- Tip and Tail holes also allow you to build a rescue sled, construct various ski anchors, and carry less weight while increasing your safety margin
Terms And Conditions
This Usage Agreement (the "Agreement") governs your conduct while using various services on the web site Backcountry.com and its affiliate web sites (collectively, the "Site"). All references to "we," "us," and "our" shall mean Backcountry.com and all references to "you" and "your" shall mean the user of the Site and Site Services. This Agreement applies to various services and activities on the Site as well as to gear review and product ratings (collectively, "Site Services"). Please read this Agreement carefully.
BY ACCESSING, BROWSING, AND USING THE SITE, ANY SITE SERVICES AND OTHER SERVICES THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THIS AGREEMENT AND ITS TERMS. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION THEREOF, DO NOT ACCESS, BROWSE OR OTHERWISE USE THE SITE OR SITE SERVICES, INCLUDING THE SUBMISSION OF ANY REVIEWS OR COMMENTS.
Any comments, reviews (including gear reviews and product ratings), posts, feedback, questions, answers, notes, messages, images, video, audio, materials, documents, data, graphics, ideas, suggestions or other communications (collectively, "User Content") you submit on the Site are not private or proprietary. By submitting User Content on or through the Site, you grant, assign and transfer to Backcountry.com all of your rights, title and interest, including without limitation, all intellectual property rights and moral rights, in and to such User Content. To the extent the preceding assignment and transfer is ineffective, you hereby grant Backcountry.com an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, perpetual right and license to use, copy, modify, adapt, display, publish, archive, store, distribute, reproduce and create derivative works based upon such User Content, in any form, media, software or technology of any kind now existing or developed in the future.
By submitting such User Content on or through the Site, you are confirming that (a) you are the sole author of the User Content and the User Content originated with you and not copied in whole or in part from any other work; (b) you have obtained all necessary permissions associated with the User Content, including without limitation permissions relating to copyrights, trademarks, rights of publicity and/or rights of privacy; (c) the User Content does not contain hate speech or profanity and is not unlawful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, libelous, obscene, racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable, an invasion of another's privacy, or otherwise in violation of this Agreement; (d) that you are not a minor and have the legal right and capacity to enter into and comply with this Agreement; (e) such User Content does not and will not, in any way, violate or breach any of the terms of this Agreement; and (f) Backcountry.com shall not in any circumstances be required to pay or incur any sums to any person or entity as a result of its use or exploitation of the User Content.
With respect to your conduct on the Site or while using the Site Services, you agree not to: (a) attempt to disguise the origin of any User Content transmitted to the Site Services whether through the Site or any third party site; (b) act in any manner that negatively affects other users' ability to use the Site and Site Services; (c) impersonate any person or entity, including without limitation, a manufacturer or owner of any product, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (d) interfere with the Site or Site Services, or servers or networks connected to the Site or Site Services, or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies, or regulations of networks connected to the Site or Site Services; (e) upload, post, or otherwise transmit any User Content that with respect to the Site Services: (i) is not relevant to the product, service, person or entity being reviewed; (ii) you do not have a right to transmit under any law or under contractual or fiduciary relationships (by way of example but not limitation, inside information, proprietary and confidential information learned or disclosed as part of employment relationships or under nondisclosure agreements); (iii) contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; or (iv) is unsolicited or unauthorized advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam," "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation.
User Content does not reflect the views of Backcountry.com, and Backcountry.com does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, integrity, quality or reliability of any User Content, nor does Backcountry.com endorse or support any opinions expressed in any User Content. In no event shall Backcountry.com have or be construed to have any responsibility or liability for or in connection with any User Content, Any gear reviews and/or product ratings submitted on the Site, if displayed, are displayed for entertainment and informational purposes only. Under no circumstances will Backcountry.com be liable in any way for any User Content, including but not limited to, any errors or omissions in any User Content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any User Content posted, emailed or otherwise transmitted via the Site or Site Services.
If Backcountry.com determines, in our sole and absolute discretion, that you or any User Content you submit violates this Agreement, we reserve the right, at any time, without notice and without limiting any and all other rights Backcountry.com may have under this Agreement, to: (a) refuse to allow you to submit further User Content; (b) remove and delete your User Content; (c) revoke your registration and right to use the User Content Submission Features; and (d) use any technological, legal, operational or other means available to enforce the terms of this Agreement, including, without limitation, blocking specific IP addresses or deactivating your registration, access to the Site and Site Services using your e-mail address, and your user name and password. Without limiting the foregoing, once User Content is submitted to the Site, Backcountry.com may take any or no action with respect to such User Content, including without limitation, deleting, editing, modifying, rejecting, or refusing to post such User Content, but is under no obligation to offer you the opportunity to edit, delete or otherwise modify User Content once it has been submitted. Backcountry.com shall have no duty to attribute authorship of User Content to you and shall not be obligated to enforce any form of attribution by third parties.
If, despite the foregoing assignment and transfer of rights in the User Content, it is determined that you retain moral rights (including the rights of attribution or integrity) in the User Content, you hereby declare that: (a) you do not require that any personally identifying information be used in connection with the User Content or any derivative works of or upgrades or updates thereto; (b) you have no objection to the publication, use, modification, deletion and exploitation of the User Content by Backcountry.com or its licensees, successors or assigns; (c) you forever waive and agree not to claim or assert any entitlement to any and all moral rights of an author in any of the User Content; and (d) you forever release Backcountry.com, and its licensees, successors and assigns from any claims that you could otherwise assert against Backcountry.com by virtue of any such moral rights.
You are prohibited from violating the security of any system or network compromising the Site or the Site Services, including but not limited to the following: (a) unauthorized access to or use of data, systems, or networks, including any attempt to probe, scan or test the vulnerability of the Site or Site Services or to breach security or authentication measures; (b) unauthorized monitoring of data or traffic on the Site or of the Site Services; (c) interference with the Site or Site Services including without limitation, any type of flooding technique or deliberate attempt to overload the system such as denial or service attacks; (d) forging of a message header or any part of a message header; or (e) using manual or electronic means to avoid any use or access limitation placed on this Site or the Site Services. Such violations may result in criminal or civil liability.
Backcountry.com reserves the right to report any activity or persons that Backcountry.com suspects has violated any law or regulation to appropriate law enforcement officials, regulators, or other appropriate third parties (including the disclosure of appropriate subscriber information). Backcountry.com may also cooperate with appropriate law enforcement agencies to assist in the investigation and prosecution of any illegal conduct. Indirect or attempted violations of this Agreement and actual or attempted violations thereof by a third party on behalf of any user shall be considered violations of this Agreement by such user.
BACKCOUNTRY.COM DOES NOT ENDORSE THE USER CONTENT, IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE USER CONTENT AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON OR ENTITY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, PERSONS WHO MAY USE OR RELY ON SUCH USER CONTENT) FOR ANY LOSS, DAMAGE (WHETHER ACTUAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR OTHERWISE), INJURY, CLAIM, LIABILITY OR OTHER CAUSE OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER BASED UPON OR RESULTING FROM ANY USER CONTENT PROVIDED THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.
Share your thoughts
I am 5' 6" 115 lbs. I'm a great hiker and...
I am 5' 6" 115 lbs. I'm a great hiker and skier but I find the light skies are tough for me to control on the way down. I've tried the Black Diamond Starlet and it's too light. I don't like fully rocketed skies either. So, would this ski be more aligned with me? My favorite ski ever was the volkl kiku from 2008 before volkl made kiku a rocketed ski.
K2 BackDrop Ski
I am 5''7 and 150, I am an Advanced to...
I am 5''7 and 150, I am an Advanced to Expert skier. I am willing to buy those for around 2 hours touring from ski resort in the Alps. I was wondering if I should go with 174 or 181. I am used to ski on shorter skis....
Any advice on sizing ? I'm 5'8" and 145...
Any advice on sizing ? I'm 5'8" and 145 lbs .... Don't normally expect to ride the longest ski in a series, but the 181 doesn't look that big!
About the same question !
174 as well
I'm an intermediate resort skiier looking...
I'm an intermediate resort skiier looking to go backcountry. Most of my skiing experience is groomers and resort pow in Nor Cal. I need a forgiving ski that can handle the pow and Sierra cement (for spring days) that won't break the bank. These skis are on the $$$ side but would they work for the descrip above and if not, what do you recommend?
If by backcountry you mean doing some touring these will be great, as they have the notches for your skins.
The elevated tip and camber underfoot on these skis gives you an all around ski for variable conditions.
Another ski you could check out for those conditions would be the Rossignol Squad 7.
Hope this info helps!
Is the extra width/weight worthwhile in...
Is the extra width/weight worthwhile in regards to increased performance? I ski the Wayback which lists as 1.5-2 lbs lighter per pair. Significant weight over a full tour but willing to sacrifice if the performance is that much better.
I think I have an answer but it may not be one that you like. The short of it is, it depends. I think the primary determining factor of whether or not its worth it is where you ski and in what conditions. I find that touring on my fatter skis on days that don't have a lot of power and when I'm not breaking trail don't seem to be worth the weight penalty. But on deep days I find the joy of skiing on fatter skis as well as the added efficiency of increased surface area while skinning on unbroken terrain to be worth the weight penalty. Overall I would say these creep towards being a quiver ski for deeper days, I ski and tour in the Wasatch and I'd say 99% of the time I take out my skis that are in the 105 range underfoot for a good compromise of surface area and weight. But that's just my two cents.
Thanks Arthur. Spend a lot of time on both well tracked and unbroken trails. Sounds like a compromise between these and the Wayback is in order.
Can you please put these on sale already!?...
Can you please put these on sale already!? All the other skis are...
Sorry about that! We only have 2 pairs of these skis remaining in inventory, which may be the reason we have chosen not to put them on sale. We do offer a 30 day price protection, should you purchase the skis and they go on sale.
Deep pow, all day vertical
I must start off by saying I was surprised at how well these skis performed. I was expecting a spineless and not too playful ski as I ride the sidestash and sideseth a ton, and I find the coombacks to have a speed limit and be a little boring on the high end comparatively. But for the weight and dimensions, I can't believe how fast and fun these skis are. k2 nailed a good balance between weight and performance, and the ski has enough backbone and spring in its step to work really well. Granted I have only used this ski in deep powder backcountry conditions, so I can't tell you how it performs on any other surface, but in those conditions it rocked. In reality though, with dimensions like this, I wouldn't really use it for much else.
Playful, fun ski!
- Gender: Male
- Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer
I switched from the Dynafit Stokes to the K2 Backdrops this season, and could not be happier. The Backdrop is equally playful in fresh backcountry powder and cruisers back through the resort at the end of the day (although it certainly wasn't built for the latter). I found the Stokes to be lifeless, but the Backdrops are springy, and they float better. The All Terrain Rocker compensates for inadequacies in my form by keeping the tips on the surface even if I'm not perfectly balanced (which my friends say happens often). I've even skied these on steep, icy backcountry lines and was pleasantly surprised how well they held -- they will not be mistaken for a carving ski, but they held pretty well. This season, I've skied steeper and more narrow terrain than ever before and my confidence on this incredibly responsive ski is part of the reason. I use the Dynafit TLT Radical ST binding, the Dynafit Titan TF-X boot and the K2 trim-to-fit climbing skins.
I just purchased a pair of K2 BackDrop 174...
I just purchased a pair of K2 BackDrop 174 cm. What is the best skin to pair them with?
Hey Thomas Laffont,
Thanks for the question. The skin you'll pick to accompany your new K2 BackDrop Skis will depend on what kind of skinning you do. The Black Diamond Ascension STS skins work very well with their adjustable tip loops and tail clip. They come in 3 different materials: Nylon (best grip/durability, heaviest); Mohair (lightest and best glide, not very grippy/durable) or a mix of the two (decent grip, glide, durability and weight). So, pick the material that fits what you need most and be sure to pick the width that at least covers the waist width of the ski. Size off of the tip if more skin coverage is needed on the base of the ski.
I use the K2 Trim To Fit skins on my K2 Backdrops and I love them. They are a mohair blend and do a decent job gliding and gripping. They are not quite as grippy as the Black Diamond Ascensions, but they glide better.
- Gender: Male
- Familiarity: I've used it several times
These ski's have great response and can get through anything!
All Mountain Fat BC Ski
- Gender: Male
- Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions
Dec 2012, Skiied 181 cm K2 BackDrop Fat skis w Hammerhead bindings here in Colorado.. tried every surface at the resort: off-piste virgin powder, nasty tree runs, crusty crud, mogully black diamonds.. these skis impressed me. I was concerned about the ski performance on crusty resort snow, but the skis sailed through the crud with very nice stability. Even at 181 cm, they are light enough to stitch through moguls. For skiiers worried about the width of these skis for resort skiing, I suggest you demo them and decide - I certainly was won over.
I'm looking for mounting recommendations...
I'm looking for mounting recommendations either +/- 1 or 2 cm from factory mid boot mark. I'm going to mount em with a pair of Dynafit radicals. Thx.
Thanks for your response. I wasn't even...
Thanks for your response. I wasn't even considering the Backdrop until I read Arthur's review down below. So, if it's essentially a wider version of Coomback why not go with that? I am riding lifts primarily, and while I want something that can handle groomers, I also want something that will excel in power, crud ,etc. I want that one quiver ski. My only concern with the Backdrop is if it's too wide (i.e. more of a powder ski) as opposed to something you can really enjoy every day no matter what. That said, we are not talking Darkside or Pon2oon dimensions here, so maybe my concerns are misplaced?
Yeah I don't think you'll be bummed about the width. But for resorts, I'd just pick between this and the Sidestash and let the guiding factor be your preference on stiffness. Good luck!
I'm debating between the K2 Sidestash,...
I'm debating between the K2 Sidestash, Coomback or Backdrop for use as a telemark ski in the Sierra and NW. Not sure which ski to go with or what size. Leaning toward a 181 but maybe a 174 in the Backdrop. Wondering if that would be too short? I'm about 6' and 180 lbs. with many years of tele skiing under my belt. I'm looking for an all mountain, all condition ski. Have some experience on the K2 Hardside from a few years back. Any thoughts/recommendations appreciated. Thanks, RA
Hi - I think that the Sidestash is just too heavy for my taste if you're going to be touring with it. That being said, for an all around PNW ski, it might be my choice is you are riding lifts primarily due to a bit of extra heft and stiffness. I like the coomback as a tele ski (mounted it alpine and hated it), but it is probably the softest of the three. For the rockies the Backdrop is the no-brainer, but where you are it will just depend on how fat you'd like to go. If you're skiing a bunch of crud and powder while hiking for turns, I'd still go for the backdrop. If you find that you ski groomers and spring corn often and want to carve a bit more in the resort, Sidestash. If you want one ski that can do everything from mountaineering on side ice to powder turns to groomer runs, the Coomback is the all-rounder. Whichever ski you choose, I'd go for the 181. I'm a pretty bad tele skier and I have no trouble with my 181 Coomback.
What length would you recommend for someone 5'11" and around 140 lb. Do I need to size up for the rockered tip? Or at my weight, should I go for the 174, because of the flat tail and since the 181 is going to be at least 184 in K2 centimeters? I'd be using them mostly for touring around Tahoe.
at 140 lbs, you better go for the 174 dude.
I have the Voile Vector BC with Dyanfit...
I have the Voile Vector BC with Dyanfit bindings as a light ski mountaineering ski, and want a fatter powder option for deep backcountry days. The backdrop looks great.
I am wondering how these compare to the Voile Charger for skiing feel and versatility. Looks like a more traditional design (less tip rocker) but similar otherwise. The other ski I am considering is the Volkl Nunataq.
The Vector and Charger will be a more turny ski than the K2. I'd say this ski is more of a powder board that you can either make big GS turns on or break it loose in soft snow and slarve your way around. The Charger skis more like a "fun shape" ski to me while the K2 backcountry skis all trend towards a tradditional feel (largely due to the flat tails and lack of tip and tail taper). Since you have the Vector, this would be a cool addition to your quiver - the Charger overlaps the vector a ton and I've skied some deep powder on Vectors without disappointment so maybe add something new?
Mark, so I too am in the market for a similar kind of board. I've narrowed down what I think is the list to a 181 Backdrop, a 191 Charger and then a 187 District. Looking for something to round out my current barn = 195 Karhu XCD Guides w/X2 Switchbacks, and a 179 Jak Team w/HH. Thoughts on your comments above between the Charger and Backdrop, and how either would complement my existing?
Is there a longer version than the 181cm...
Is there a longer version than the 181cm in this ski? I thought I saw a 188cm offered somewhere??
According to K2's website they only have the 174cm and 181cm. K2 skis always used to run longer than advertised - my old 181cm Mt Baker's were the same length as my old Dynastar 188cm's. Curious if that's still the case here.
Thanks Steve.. If that's true, then the 181 would be fine... but, wow, that's a big difference from a "normal" 181cm ski.
Float on, in, and around the mountain
These were touted by the rep as being the same weight as the Coomback but with 10mm extra in the waist and with nearly the same flex characteristics. I would say that was a spot on description of the ski and I found that it skied nearly identically to the Coomback but with extra float. At no weight penalty I do not see any reason why someone would not choose the Backdrop instead of the Coomback. Maybe if you didn?t need the float or the coverage I could see wanting the smaller ski. The other way you would get weight savings in the Coomback is that it will take a lighter ski (smaller surface area). If choosing between the two in the Wasatch (or anywhere in the west really), get the Backdrop.