- Home
- Ski
- Telemark Skiing
- Telemark Skis and Alpine Touring Skis
- Icelantic Nomad SFT Alpine Ski - 2009
Community Rating
Icelantic Nomad SFT Alpine Ski - 2009 BCS
Available Colors / Styles
Be the first to upload your photo of the Nomad SFT Alpine Ski. >
The lightweight Icelantic Nomad SFT Ski boasts the do-it-all capability as a one-ski quiver while its buttery Nollie Flex Core offers some extra playfulness for those looking to get their jib on in the BC. The Nomad’s 105-millimeter waist and smooth shape take the labor out of turn initiation—creating a quick, versatile platform for just about any condition you encounter while touring or slaying the resort. The chubby shovel planes up over the deep stuff, allowing you to surf the powder rather than trudge through it, and the substantial tail begs for switch landings and fakie point lines.
Bottom Line: Your one-ski quiver for BC exploration and some extra RAD!, too.
Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.
I skied on the 168's this last friday and was thinking it
I skied on the 168's this last friday and was thinking it was to short for me because I usually ride a 176cm. The problem with this though is the next size up is the 181 is this to big of a ski for me. I am 5' 11" And weigh 150 something. I'm mounting them with AT gear and mostly doing big mountain skiing with some landing switch and such.
By: Ben Shay
March 14, 2010
Soft Snow Specialists-For those that like to Ski
By:
Liam
August 22, 2010
I own the 181cm w/ marker baron bindings. These are Pretty great skis. They handle all soft snow-from 1 inch of fluff to a few feet of slush with ease and aplomb.
They work best with a more modern carving style of skiing (more tipping oriented) than a twist and slash method. However, they're very light feeling and can be man-handled around when the need calls for it.
They are light and playful and ease to spin around on, jump etc.
They look wonderful and will lead to a conversation on every lift ride (unless you are exclusively an AT-er of course).
They can 'survive' hard-firm snow with their decent side cut and wood core-but it's not the most pleasant of experiences. Some call these a one-ski quiver, but not for me here in the east (maybe at snowbird or targhee!).
The waist runs about 5 mm wider than the listed 105mm.
The bases are very durable and have shrugged off a few good rock shots and stumps.
All in all, one of the best soft snow skis on the market.
Hey, I was wanting these skis for Trees and back country jib,
Hey, I was wanting these skis for Trees and back country jib, and any other powder i can find. I'm going to mount them with some AT bindings. My question is if i should get the 168's or 181's, I'm 6' and 160 lbs. Where i mainly ski the tree's are tight, so i was leaning toward the 168's, but, i any input would be greatly appreciated. Also, i havn't been able to decide on a mounted point, so any input on that also, would be great.
By: Nathan
February 8, 2010
The 181's would probably be best. They'll plow through crummy snow and powder really well, and still turn really well due to the 20m turning radius. The 168 will be really short for you. I'm the same size, and I'll never ski anything under a 180. Longer means better float, faster lines, stomped landings, and more control. I used to ski 177 T-Stix, and they were barely too short. Definitely go with the 181. You'll have no problem in the trees. The twin tip will make them ski a bit shorter, and keep that in mind when mounting, too. A forward, freestyle mount would be best. I never really go by suggested mounting points, though. I've skied enough different skis that I pretty much stand on them in the living room and see what feels and looks right. Then, I drink a beer and do it again. I have heard that the Nomad has dip dive problems if you go too forward. Try boot center between -4 to -6 cm from chord center. Hope that helps a bit. Mounting point questions are not my specialty. Good luck, and enjoy!
By: Jack Wizo
February 8, 2010
These are Fat!
By:
kristin Carpenter-Ogden
February 7, 2010
I am trying desperately to get better at skiing, and to be honest, I might have bought a ski that is a bit too fat for my ability level. My friends how are incredible skiers are foaming at the mouth at these skis and all of their fat glory. I had to buy new skins for them, and I'm using Marker Barons on them.
All of that aside, however, I have to report that these skis are super fun and make off-piste skiing so much better for me than what I was on before (an old Rossi Tele ski that is skinny compared with this one). I think I might need two pair of skis now, this one for powder days and another pair that are a bit skinner for groomer in area days. Icelantic is a great company (not a client either).
I am a fairly aggressive skier, 6', and 185 lbs. My main
I am a fairly aggressive skier, 6', and 185 lbs. My main thing is bowls and bumps, but I still ski glades, deep pow, groomers, and occasional BC. I need a one ski quiver for both budget and convenience. Based on what I've read and heard, this seems like my ski. I ski a 177 Salomon ten eighty JF Cusson model. It's not bad but I'm looking to upgrade. Normally I would go for the 181 no question, but in the description of the non-soft one it says size down for best results. I think I'm fine with the 181 but I just want a second opinion. Any advice?
By: Brendan Jewitt
January 1, 2010
maybe too little too late but just posted a review on the regular flex model. I'm 162-165lbs minus gear and have the 181. Not that super stiff but definately not a weak flex. They rip through turns at mach. You'll like either but I would go the regular flex if I had to guess for your size. Some metal in the softer flexing ski would be interesting. Dimensions that I measured on the 181 are 145/111/136... purrrfect
Hope that helps
By: skidawg
January 23, 2010
I just skied the SFT 181 for a day and it took everything I threw
I just skied the SFT 181 for a day and it took everything I threw at it (hard pack, crud, couple of inches on groomers, tight trees, heavy boot top snow, tight turns, GS turns...).
However, I do prefer a little stiffer feel so I'm wondering if the regular Nomad will be just the right ticket or a little too stiff in the deep pow.
Anyone tried both versions and can offer some comparative thoughts?
TIA!
PS- Regardless, I'll be painting over the graphics with matt black before mounting: too much visual stimulation when I'm skinning up for a sunrise or spending a quiet day with nature (resort or b/c).
By: hav2826555
December 21, 2009
In the end I purchased the 181 Nomad SFT (5’10”, 150 lb]) and have been thoroughly satisfied in their performance in all conditions and slopes (although I painted them because the graphics are way too loud). The extra softness has been just fine: I'm super confident with the skis at high speeds, and the extra pop is lovely in powder.
By: hav2826555
January 20, 2010
Change me.
Out of Stock
2009 Model No Longer Available
We have a lot more Telemark Skis and Alpine Touring Skis than that
Telemark Skis and Alpine Touring SkisSoft Snow Specialists-For those that like to Ski
I own the 181cm w/ marker baron bindings. These are Pretty great skis. They handle all soft snow-from 1 inch of fluff to a few feet of slush with ease more...
These are Fat!
I am trying desperately to get better at skiing, and to be honest, I might have bought a ski that is a bit too fat for my ability level. My friends how more...
- Lengths:
- 156cm, 168cm, 181cm
- Dimensions:
- 140 / 105 / 130mm
- Turn Radius:
- 20m [181cm]
- Construction:
- Traditional Laminate, P-Tex sidewall
- Core Material:
- Poplar
- Base:
- Durasurf 4001 Sintered P-Tex
- Tail:
- Twintip
- Binding System:
- No
- Binding Included:
- No
- Weight:
- 7.3 lb/pair [181cm]
- Recommended Use:
- All mountain, backcountry touring
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 2 Year