Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Gregory Z 55 Backpack - 3050-3660cu in - 2008 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

Z 55 Backpack - 3050-3660cu in
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

The lightweight Gregory Z 55 Backpack holds all the gear you need for a day at the crags, an overnight backpacking trip, or a longer ultralight backpacking adventure. The Z 55 comfortably carries about 35 pounds of gear and weighs less than four pounds. Gregory gave this backpack its Jet Stream suspension system, which includes a perforated frame sheet and a mesh back panel in order to promote ventilation. Padding in the lumbar region and at the shoulder blades makes carrying your load more comfortable. Aluminum stays give you lightweight vertical load support. The padded harness and waist-belt feature moisture-wicking mesh, so you won't get all sweaty underneath your pack. Get into your pack from the top or the side, and load items you want quick access to—such as snacks, your camera, and a shell—in the external pockets or your waist-belt pockets. Gregory made the Z 55 with high-quality nylon for an ideal combination of strength and low weight.

Bottom Line: If you want a lightweight, durable backpack for your backcountry adventures, choose the Z 55.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 5

Lightweight alpine workhorse. (Image: Z55 on the South Face of Annapurna)

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
February 9, 2010

Weight is key for all my alpine gear, and the Z55 is very light without compromising performance. In my opinion, 55 liters is a perfect size for alpine climbing, and this pack can carry plenty more than that with the clever a strap system and a large, very usable, external pouch on the back. A smartly designed access zipper enables mid-pack access so you can get at gear buried deep down- without having to unbuckle the lid. Small but cool details like the 2 zip pouches on the hip belt are great for carrying small items like goggle wipes, candy bars, or performance gels- great for snacking on the go. The Z55 has a snug, close fit, which is great for scrambling and climbing. The zipper on the lid did break this year after over 100 days of use, but I called Gregory and they said it would be fixed under warranty. In my opinion, the only pack matching the Z55 for performance and features is the Black Diamond Quantum- but the Quantum can carry less shtuff on the outside and is almost a 1/2 pound heavier.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

you'll love it or you'll hate it

By:
February 23, 2010

very nice pack, but the gregory lumbar padding just doesn't work for me. after a few trips i had rubbed my back raw too many times and had to switch to a different pack. apparently that is the case with most Gregory packs. I particularly like the mesh paneling, but this pack is full of excellent features and yet still stripped down to the necessities. Unfortunately, the fit under that foam was enough to offset all of the positive features for me and make the pack miserable to use. I could imagine the foam being quite comfortable to someone, but be wary when purchasing online if you haven't tried it out yet.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm debating the Atmos 50 (Osprey) and the Z 55. Which is

I'm debating the Atmos 50 (Osprey) and the Z 55. Which is more comfy carrying about 35 lbs? I love to Airscape ventilation on the Atmos, and I'm having a hard time getting past that. The gregory looks nice too, though. Help me out...what would you recommend?

By:
March 24, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I've used both and I found I hated the Airscape suspension on the Osprey in comparison to this. They are both nice packs, but I think the Gregory has better suspension.

By:
January 24, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I can not speak for the Atmos 50 because I have not used that pack, but I can speak highly of the Z55. I've owned for roughly a month and I've used for an overnight, a weekend and 4 night trip.

35 lbs is no problem for the Z55. You could even squeeze 40 out of it, but the pack doesn't perform as well after the 35 lb mark.

Overall, the Z55 seems to swallow tons of gear. I was even able to fit my bulky, synthetic sleeping bag into the bottom of the pack. The pack really hugs your body and left me with no sore spots after walking 9 to 10 hours.

Maybe go to an outdoors store and try them both on to see which one you like best.

By:
March 27, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Gregory Z55

By:
December 9, 2009

Unstuffed!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

great pack

By:
March 8, 2010

I couldn't even feel the pack on me with this backpack. I ran down the hill with this pack and it kept on. Love it!! Its light, roomy, and perfect for 2-3 days of backpacking.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am looking for a day and a half pack that will work well when

I am looking for a day and a half pack that will work well when I ski into huts with a sleeping bag and 4 days worth of food. Has someone experimented with attaching skis and stuffing a shovel or probe into this pack? I have the Gregory Targhee in a size small for day skiing and love it, but I need something a bit bigger for the over nighters.

By:
September 30, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Jimmy, It's not designed as a ski-specific pack, but you can attach skis to the outside compression straps and the shovel blade/handle/probe can go into the space between the outer pocket and the main pack body. One of Gregory's reps used this on a week-long ski tour in the Canadian Rockies.

By:
October 1, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

love it

By:
June 12, 2008

Where do I start?

First off, big kudos to these guys for having such amazing customer service and helpful employees. Our packs were lost in transit by UPS. Zach managed to find me a replacement pack, along with a pack for my gf, and got it to me overnight. What could have been a terribly disappointing set back, turned out to be no problem at all!

Bought this pack to replace a Northface pack I had for several years. It's first trip was to the Sabine National Forest and the Indian Mounds Wilderness. During our week trip I put this pack through serious hell. It was ziplined through the trees, hauled through the mud, dropped, slept on, stuffed to excruciating levels, and hauled up the side of white cliffs. This pack is very versatile. It rained the first few days we were out, and all my gear stayed perfectly dry.
A few things worth noting;

Zippers are rugged and do not leak.

A lot can be strapped to the outside of this pack, and I do mean a lot.

The bags compression ratio when not full is amazing, and can and has been used for day excursions.

The bladder sack is huge, but is on the outer most point of the pack, store your water bladder in a box or cooler or stiff container during transit nozzle up. When in use, place a 10x14 piece of cardboard between the material of your pack and your bladder to help protect the bladder from thorn, nail, branch, etc, punctures. This also adds a little durability to the backside of the pack in case you find it necessary to bail on your pack while being chased by bees. (amazing how fast you can move through the forest when being pursued by bees isn't it?)

The waist belt is awesome with lots of storage.

The bright color keeps it highly visible even in foggy conditions.

The suspension of the pack is fantastic, even with about 50-60lbs of gear loaded down on the pack, the load remained balanced and easily managed.

The one thing I have against this pack is I ran out of pockets! I'm a little OCD about having things stored properly, so I'll be investing in some stuff sacks to better separate the goods. Over-all I'm loving this pack!

Another bit of advice, practice disassembly and reassembly of the pack before your first trip with it. The amount of buckles and loops all being very close together can be somewhat confusing, and in my gf's case, very irritating.

Great buy! especially for the price!

Was this helpful? (8) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: October 4, 2009 by:

By:
October 4, 2009

You say the water bladder sack is huge, but is on the outer most point of the pack. I think you over looked your pack. The water bladder sack is on the inside of the pack closest to your back. The hydration hose gos from the inside of your pack to the front of your pack. It's about the only thing I dislike about it. Sound like you found a way around it though. There is also nothing to keep your hydration sysytem in place.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

I should be studying for my math finale instead I'm fantasizing about this pack and the AT!

By:
May 7, 2009

I use the Z55 as my primary pack. I purchased it one year ago after it was picked by National Geographic for the gear of the Year 2008. I have taken this pack on week long adventures and it distributes the weight like a dream. Honestly like a dream! Over the last year I have been switching out much of my light gear to accommodate even lighter gear.For example My new tent weighs 13oz plus stakes and using trekking poles (tyvek floor)(old tent was 39oz), My pad is the small aircore (16oz) (and yes I am aware of the neoair - I'm just not very fond of it), my pot is a titan kettle (used to be GSI soloist). I use the MSR miniworks filter (I know heavy at 15oz - I'll explain later), my sleeping bag is a Montbell UL down hugger #2 (for me the perfect all around 3 season compromise) My base weight three season is now a respectable 6-7lbs(not including my pack which I will get to). The real weight comes in when I need to carry food for a week w/out resupply (plus 1 - 3 liters of water). figure depending on the cuisine about 1.5 - 2lbs a day if I am treating myself really well - and why not I deserve it. Bare with me there is a point to all this - Im going get to the point of this review shortly. People have different reasons for hiking and many chose to hike light and honestly I began my hiking foray within the last two years looking to hike light from the onset. Some people have weak knees, others are survivalists, others race trails and each oz costs them time, while some just enjoy seeing to what extreme they can push themselves (regarding clothing, shelter and food). My reason is pure and simple I am lazy, I have no desire to spend a week in Yellowstone, the Appalachian trail, Rocky Mountain National Park or wherever hauling 40 - 60lbs like some sort of human donkey. frankly if that was the only way to hike Id rather stay in bed, watch TV and eat bonbons. Plus being a former NYC urban rollerblader traveling for me means being swift, and nimble - jumping curbs, and weaving through midtown traffic, and grabbing NYC transit bus rear wheel wells so I dont have to blade uphill to get to the MOMA or class. My approach to hiking is the same I want to be able jump a stream, stomp through shrubs, slide down a steep hill rather than take the long way or even bend down and smell a flower with my pack on. I dont want to be separated from nature because I am carrying crap I dont need like three pairs of pants, two fleece and a frying pan. I WILL BE WEARING THE SAME SMELLY CRAP I STARTED MY HIKE IN TWO WEEKS AGO - AND ILL LOVE EVERY SECOND OF IT - if i need to I will find a stream and break out the bronners and scrub my one pair of pants in my boxers (two pair if you must know) like they did in the old west. Don't get me wrong I enjoy comfort as well which is why I carry the air core since it allows this side sleeper to sleep like a baby, and the filter because I want my water to BE CLEAN, taste clean, and smell clean. Chemicals, and 3oz UV pens may kill god knows what creatures eggs are in the water but the dead eggs are still in the water - plus what sane person chooses to drink water with bleach in it - not I.
Now to the Z55 after reducing my weight this winter I figured perhaps it's time for a new pack. So I ordered the touted Osprey EXOS 46. It came in the mail I loaded it up 25lbs and the straps cut into my shoulders (and trust I adjusted the straps every which way for 45 min. I wanted the pack to work)I even ordered the larger size to see if it was a fit issue (it wasn't). much of the weight was not placed on my hips with the exos - it was on my shoulders further the pack wobbled and bobbled on my back when I tested it on steep stairs (then again packs are like shoes and the Exos was not the pair for me). No way am I reducing weight just to suffer that completely defeats the purpose - hiking is not about pain for me it's about pleasure. So instead I removed the lid on my Z55, and cut the remaining excess straps (and there are a lot). This pack hugs my body, my back breaths, and the waist straps are a dream. It carries everything flawlessly, I am now considering the Z35 for a pack with less volume (and yes pack suggestions are welcome if you understand my hiking philosophy) only those that own this pack will truly understand how sweet it is and where I came coming from, and until the day comes that a lighter pack provides me the same comfort while strapped to my back for 10 - 12 hours while I hike for multiple days - I will stay devoted to the Z55. - so if you are considering it go for it. There is one annoying issue I have with it - theres no bottle mesh, they expect that everyone wishes to soley rely on a platy. I would like a water bottle mesh pocket. This pack is great overall and you can take that to the bank. Shoot I got a math test in 5 hours!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

I'm just under 5'10" around 185, which size would

I'm just under 5'10" around 185, which size would work best? M of L?

By:
July 2, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm 6'0" and I use a large- I have a long torso, like a brontosaurus.

By:
September 20, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

As Shane says it depends upon your torso length...I'm 6'1" and use a Medium. Check this vid for how to size yourself: http://tinyurl.com/65e6me

By:
July 15, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Measure the length of your back, from shoulders to bottom of the shirt about, and then check the sizing chart, but if you are not all legs, then the large will probably be an alright pack for you.

By:
July 2, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Awesome mid sized pack

By:
February 18, 2010

The first thing I have to say about it is how versatile it is! You can load it with all you need for a multi day trip or you can cinch it down to hold just a math book and it still is snug and secure all around! This is an awesome pack for just about anything and I've only found a couple of problem spots. The first thing I don't like is that there really isn't a water bottle pouch so you have to pack the bottles in the front stretch pocket or inside the pack or use a hydration system. The second is when I had the pack packed to capacity for a 5 day. After a day or two, I noticed that the lumber pad had an underlying piece of plastic or something that, when the pack is heavy, can irritate your lower back through the foam padding. Otherwise, an awesome pack and nothing to stop me from buying it again. Definitely recommended. Oh, and the little description list on the upper left of the page is wrong! There are in fact two ice axe loops with elastic fasteners and the front stretch pocket is the perfect shape for a shovel even when the pack is full.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Top Shelf

By:
May 4, 2009

The Gregory Z series packs are my favorites, and not just me, I have seen many through hikers wear this on the AT. This pack is so comfertable, and has a great design. The arched back gives you great ventilation to keep you cool. Then there is the bucket pocket. I keep my camp shoes and all my rain gear in there, and there is room for more. It is perfect for large bulky items, anything you need to get to quick, or even wet or realy dirty items you don't want iside your pack. The zippered front pocket is large and more usefull than I first thought. I also appreciate the side access to the main compartment. The only thing to consider is if you carry a heavy pack, over 35 pounds, try a different pack.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

What are the elastic loops attached to both sides of the external

What are the elastic loops attached to both sides of the external back pocket for? Are they gear loops? If so, what type of gear do people attach to them?

Thanks

By:
May 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Pat, notice the elastic loops are vertically in line with the sturdier webbing gear loops that are on the bottom rear of the pack... That is the setup for Ice Axes/Hatchets. You are supposed to drop the handle of the axe all the way through the webbing loop at the bottom of the pack until the head rests on the webbing, and then rotate it vertically toward you and all the way up so that it is upside down with the hand pointing up. You would then use the elastic loops too wrap around, hook to itself, and secure the handle of the axe. Note, most people probably do a custom random gear attachment instead because most people probably don't use this pack for ice climbing with axes. (Not that it can't take the cold and wet..it can)

By:
May 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes those are gear loops. Most seem to use them in conjunction with the web runners at the bottom of the pack to attach trekking poles are even an ice axe.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

A couple comments on size and planes

By:
December 16, 2009

I bought this pack mainly for rock-climbing trips, but I also wanted to use it for regular traveling and flights. I originally bought the z65, but people said it would be too large to fit in the overhead compartments, so I returned it and got the z55. However, it turns out the z55 and z65 are the exact same height, it's just the diameter that's different. They will both fit perfectly in the overhead bin and will not need to be stored horizontally (and I have the large). This is a big deal now with all the ridiculous charges to check bags.

Otherwise, it's a comfortable, sturdy pack. My only complaint is that there are no water bottle holders on the side.

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

The best midsize bag I have ever used.

By:
February 7, 2010

I hike a lot in the Sierras, and this pack is just about perfect for the 2-3 night outing.
The past weekend I went x-country skiing to the Glacier Point and hit by an epic blizzard (see the weather report in the Yosemite last week of January), and the pack held up no problem. I really appreciated the side access to get the stuff out in intense snow storm with the gloves on without emptying the entire bag.
From the summit of Mt Whitney to Death Valley, this durable bag got me through with comfort and ease.
I very highly recommend this bag.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm a little confused, i just got this pack off of steep

I'm a little confused, i just got this pack off of steep and cheap, and the specs said that it was hydration compatible, but i'm a little confused where the hydration pocket is. is it the opening inside the main compartment where the stays can be removed that is closest to your back, or is it the large, open pocket on the outside, farthest away from your back?

By:
May 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Closest to your back. If you don't like that placement though, just stick the bladder in the pack lid.

By:
May 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Light weight, bomber, and sleek

By:
November 9, 2008

Great pack all around. My first trip with it was to steal apples from a tree in Logan, UT. It carried 35+ pounds of apples so well I couldn't even feel the weight of guilt on my conscience. Next trip was a 20 mile overnighter. Room for everything you need for shoulder-season camping. Hip pockets are great--perfect size for a digital camera and Leatherman. My one complaint is the pack doesn't have water bottle side pockets so for those of us still living in the pre-bladder world it's a pain to pull out bottles from the main compartment when you're walking. Great pack.

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: October 8, 2009 by:

By:
October 8, 2009

Shame on you. Good review!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

Great Backpack

By:
October 5, 2009

Overall, this is a great backpack - it's functional, it holds a lot of stuff, and the fit is very comfortable. (I'm 5'6", and the small fits just right, and the harness is the right size, compared to other brands.) I'm a Gregory fan.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This pack or the North Face Terra 60? Need a pack for overnight

This pack or the North Face Terra 60? Need a pack for overnight hikes in Alaksa all summer rain or shine. Need to pack tent, bag, food, cooking, layers, etc. Also, will use in rocky mountians for overnighters in spring and fall.
Watcha think?

By:
April 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

do you use bear canisters in Alaska? if so you might want to consider the bigger TNF pack, as those canisters tend to be rather bulky.

By:
May 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Both of these packs are really good, and will be able to hold all the gear you need, but it kind of comes down to preference. I like the Gregory packs better than TNF packs, because I find TNF packs sit higher up, and that feels less comfortable to me. If that doesn't bug you, then I would say grab the TNF Terra 60, because you can pack a little more stuff in that one, that could come in handy.

By:
April 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

stuff it..

By:
April 1, 2008

...like a thanksgiving turkey, she can handle it. i loaded this thing up with way more than i originally thought i would need. maybe i overpacked for a four day trek through the everglades but it was well worth it. and keeps your back very cool. you can strap a whole lot more to the outside of the pack than it may seem in the photo.

Was this helpful? (4) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Best Backpack I've ever had

By:
July 2, 2009

I haven't logged too many miles with this guy yet, but so far it's more than what I expected. When looking for a new pack I did a lot of research and tried on several packs. I can't believe how well the ventilation and padding worked. I'm usually somewhat sore after a backpacking trip, but my shoulders felt nothing after my most recent trip. It handled very well in some rough terrain and all of my gear stayed in place. You can pack this backpack very well too. It has several straps to tighten it down similar to a stuff sack. I think this is really helpful for the weight distribution. Bottom line is that it's loaded with a lot of features and for light backpacking, I doubt you'll find a better pack.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am a large male. How will I know pre-purchase if this bag will

I am a large male. How will I know pre-purchase if this bag will fit me (i.e., straps, waist belt, etc.) Thank You.

By:
January 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have found that you really have to be willing to send a pack back if it doesn't fit. One well-known brand everyone raves about just didn't fit my long waist, and another kept slipping off my normal-sized shoulders. You'll just have to see for yourself, Jeremy.
Maybe you can find somebody with one and try it on for size.

By:
May 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Check out this fit guide from Gregory.http://www.gregorypacks.com/us/files/fit_guide.pdf

By:
January 30, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Very nice

By:
January 29, 2009

I really liked this pack, unfortunately I had to send it back because I needed a little more room than I thought, would have gone with the z-65 if backcountry had it.

I like how this pack is lightweight, but extremely comfortable. I felt as if everything was close to me and my balance wasn't thrown off because I had a bulging bag on my back. There was plenty of space for most of my stuff and 30 pounds felt feathery. The waist belt is very comfortable and easy to adjust, and the pockets on the belt come in handy.

The only issues I had were:
There wasn't a side pocket for a water bottle. In order to store stuff with somewhat easy access, you would have to put it in the front pouch but this would still require you to take off the pack in order to gain access to it. The only other problem was the amount of straps. While it was nice that you were able to adjust basically everything, it was kind of annoying to have 10 straps hanging down.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Nice pack with a couple quirks....

By:
January 9, 2009

I've had this pack for a while now and mainly use it for overnight to 3 day trips. I find it carries weight very well and i get a good amount of ventilation on my back due to mesh back panel. I'll post a pic soon to show the open area between the mesh and backpack frame. The pockets on the hipbelt are great for storing small items you need close at hand. I use them for my camera and compact gorillapod tripod which i also love. The shoulder straps have areas to clip small items onto, i usually clip on my knife. I also find that the strap setup for securing trekking poles to the back of the pack works well. I do have two gripes with the pack design though. One, there are no easy access pockets for water bottles. I don't know about everyone else but i don't like using hydration bladders when backpacking because i drink alot of water and don’t like having to pull stuff out of the pack just to get the full bladder back into the sleeve every time i refill it. I like my nalgene so i just purchased a fabric bottle holder and attach it to the strap that connects the hipbelt to the bottom of the pack. Works great and keeps my bottle close at hand. Second, the straps on the bottom of the pack don’t have buckles, they just have slide adjusters for the webbing. I like attaching my pad to the outside of the pack and getting my z-lite in those straps was hard when the pack was full, even when the straps were fully lengthened. I solved the problem by just cutting the straps, removing the sliders, and attaching some plastic buckles to the ends. Now i just buckle the pad on. Overall a very good pack.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

It says its hydration compatible. What kind of bladders work

It says its hydration compatible. What kind of bladders work best in this pack?

By:
June 21, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Well, my camelbak 3 litre fits fine in the sleeve but it's hard to get it in there if the bag is packed. There are holes for your tube on either side and a nice elastic loop to secure the tube to the strap. Hope this helps!

By:
February 18, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Any one would work, it has a sleeve, and a place for the hose to come through. I do not use the sleeve though. Once the pack is stuffed full, it is hard to squeeze a bladder down into the sleeve. I just put it on top below the "brain" pocket.

By:
June 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Camelback Bladders will NOT fit inside the slots in the internal frame of this bag. at least not the medium bag. Camelback's bladder openings are round screw in's that do not fit in the tight opening to the internal frame. I just bought the Platypus Big Zip/Insulator as suggested in the answer below, and even that is a chore to get within the internal frame pocket, and i can only fill my 2 liter bladder to a liter and a half because you need the extra empty bladder space to finagle the bladder into the small frame opening. it's do-able, but frustrating, and that's without the insulator on the bladder. I have no idea how Ozzy is managing it, if we're talking about the same thing. Must be some kind of pack Houdini. or we have different versions of the pack. I'm stickin with Houdini though.

By:
May 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Most any bladder system will work - Camelbak, MSR etc. I personally like the Platypus Big Zip/Insulator (works great in this bag). Most of the leading hydration systems are designed to fit the slots in modern internal frame backpacks. You shouldn't have a problem with any of the leading brands.

By:
August 27, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Awesome versatile Midrange Pack

By:
June 26, 2009

I've had this pack for two trips now and have absolutely loved it. Packed to the gills, it still felt great on my back. I could wear this pack all day and not have a complaint.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Light Pack

By:
September 20, 2009

This is a Great pack. I didn't know that Gregory made such a sick pack- but now I do. It is super light. The ventilation next to your back is great- it sort of archs away from your back and it is so nice and breezy that my camping friends often thrust their arm through this "breeze-way" when I first put it on because they are so amazed.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Does it have outside water bottle pockets...very hard to fill

Does it have outside water bottle pockets...very hard to fill a blatter from a spring.

By:
May 19, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

No specific pockets, I just put my quart bottle in the large shovel pocket on the back. It is sort of a catch all pocket for things I need often, like a water bottle. However, you cannot retrieve it w/o some help or taking off the pack. I use it to fill my water bladder.

By:
June 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Since I hike in the Sierra where a bear canister is required, there isn't room for a bladder. I don't like them anyway.
I attached a bottle holder/stuff sack to the belt. I also slide a liter water bottle into the huge back pocket.

By:
May 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

They're not water bottle pockets per se (they're just pockets made of stretchy panel material), but a nalgene fits no problem. As for getting to it easily...not so much.

By:
August 27, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Impressive in the wet

By:
September 9, 2009

I love this pack anyway (Great design and suspension, well thought out, light and capacious and a great deal, relative to Osprey and Arcteryx) but I have to give it extra kudos for putting up with a 3.5 hours hike in pouring rain this weekend with no cover. It did a pretty good imitation of of being waterproof. The only thing wet in the main compartment of my pack was the insulated synthetic jacket, which was up against the fabric on the base, which seems to be a lot less water resistant than the fabric the rest of the pack is cut from. So, on top of the fact that this is my favorite pack in the world at the moment, it just added "almost-waterproof" to the pro side of things. Well worth checking out if you are looking for an overnight or light weekend pack, especially if you are thinking about the Osprey Atmos/Stratos duo. Two thumbs up, Gregory.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Best Pack Ever!

By:
May 28, 2009

Packs need to be tried, since no one pack is right for every person. That said, my Z pack the best pack I've ever used. I used it to hike the JMT last summer with 38 pounds on re-supply day. I used it this winter for a six week expedition in Chile and Argentina. It held all my gear for the entire trip!
I've attached a stuff sack/bottle carrier on the belt, since I prefer not to use the bladder option. The front belt pockets hold my camera and glasses.
When there is bulky stuff to carry the huge back pocket expands. The pack is so adjustable, I use it as a daypack by tightening all the adjusting pulls. It is a good idea to familiarize yourself with all the straps before you set out.
It is very sturdy and has held up well under rough conditions. Pretty water tight in the few light rain situations I found myself.
It's a little heaver than my two ultralight packs, but OH so much more comfortable!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: July 19, 2009 by:

By:
July 19, 2009

Where did you get the watter bottle attachments for the belt?? and did you feel like the water bottle got in the way? Im thinking about the z 55 for my longer trips. I have the z 35r for shorter ones.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

PCT pack

By:
December 9, 2008

Well, it's going with me on the PCT in 2009. As of right now, it's the most comfortable pack that I have owned. The shoulder straps are soft and supportive right from the get go and the waist belt, with pockets, is very comfy. I like that the hood pocket is not as large as other Gregory's (don't like to put alot on top). I'm so far able to stuff all that I need to backpack with some room leftover. I will let you know what I think of this after the trail.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Now a Gregory Fan!

By:
October 2, 2009

This is a great pack. I was previously using an Osprey Kestrel series which wasnt great for more than an overnighter but if you had too much weight it in it was a bear. Either way, I packed the Z55 up a couple weeks ago with about 30lbs of stuff for a weekend and put together a nice 25 mile hike. This pack acted like it didnt exist on my back. It held everything with room to spare (more stuff than I realistically needed). This will be my go to pack for everything now. From ultralight overnighters to big weeks. I think this thing could handle it all.

Also on my weekend venture I did some serious bushwacking and the pack did not get a nick or scrape what so ever!

All around buy this pack.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

mmm tastey

By:
July 17, 2009

bad things: (1)the zipper pulls fell off. no big deal: replaced with string.(2)no water bottle holders! weird. no big deal. bought a camelback. much better.(3)butt slid in winter. scratched up the bottom. solution: cover with duct tape when you plan on beating it up.
awesome pack. great dorsal ventilation. comfortable + light. good for a day hike, better for an UL overnight/multinight trip.pockets in hipbelt great for a small(one clif bar per pocket)snack or a camera. bottom line: great pack that'll get lots of use.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great pack!

By:
June 23, 2009

I had the G35 and decided to buy this pack when it came on sale since I could use the extra room for hiking the Colorado Trail this summer and the mesh panel for ventilation is much cooler. I've taken it on a couple of 3 day trial trips and it's been great. I'm normally with my wife, so one of us carries a water bottle on the outside mesh pockets (which the other person can grab) I stick my water bladder in the outside bucket pocket since it's easy to access. You can definitely go lighter on packs, but it shelters the load really well and is very comfortable. Last weekend I carried an extra 4 liters of water we needed for a dry campsite up a couple thousand feet with no problem.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Perfect

By:
December 15, 2008

I used this pack to hike in for a basecamp type trip. 8 miles in and with about 50 pounds (7 days). It was overloaded but showed no signs of wear. Created a hotspot on my lower back. But that was probably bc it was overloaded (or my pants). The hike out with less food was perfect. I liked it so much, I bought the womens version for my wife. We both wore them into the grand canyon, down to the river and back out. They were great. The pack sits away from your back in the middle, and allows for fantastic cooling. It was definitely appreciated in the canyon. It is cooler than wearing a camelback.

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Change me.

Out of Stock

Item: GRE0061

2008 Model No Longer Available

But don't stress, we have the latest model in stock.

Gregory Z 55 Backpack-3722cu in - 2010

Gregory Z 55 Backpack-3722cu in - 2010

Lightweight alpine workhorse. (Image: Z55 on the South Face of Annapurna)

5 star rating

By: don bowie February 9, 2010

Weight is key for all my alpine gear, and the Z55 is very light without compromising performance. In my opinion, 55 liters is a perfect size for alpine more...

you'll love it or you'll hate it

4 star rating

By: Peter Kaminski February 23, 2010

very nice pack, but the gregory lumbar padding just doesn't work for me. after a few trips i had rubbed my back raw too many times and had to switch more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Material:
210D Double box HT ripstop fabric 
Volume:
[S] 3050cu in (50L); [M] 3350cu in (55L); [L] 3660cu in (60L) 
Suspension:
Ventilated Jet Stream Suspension system, Auto-Fit harness systems 
Hydration Compatible:
Yes 
Detachable Pack:
No 
Sleeping Bag Compartment:
No 
Rain Cover:
No 
Access Types:
Top, side 
External Pockets:
2 Front, 1 top, 2 waist-belt 
Snowboard Carry:
No 
Ski Carry:
No 
Gear Loops:
Yes 
Ice Axe Loops:
No 
Shovel Pocket:
No 
Weight:
[S] 3lb 2oz (1400g); [M] 3lb 5oz (1500g); [L] 3lb 8oz (1600g) 
Recommended Use:
Fast-packing, through-hiking, weekend backpacking, rock climbing, all-day hiking 
Manufacturer Warranty:
Lifetime 
Country of Origin:
China