Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 7 Reviews

Dynastar Big Trouble Limited Alpine Ski - 2008 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

Big Trouble Limited Alpine Ski
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

Who needs a quiver? The Dynastar Big Trouble Limited Alpine Ski covers all types of terrain in all directions. The Big Trouble hits the early-morning powder lines and heads to the park for an afternoon session without missing a beat. With dimensions of 124/92/114mm, this do-anything performer gives you plenty of width for ripping pow and landing drops in the backcountry and the side cut to lap the park daily. Dynastar's Spring Blade technology adds pop and smoothes out transitions, while 92mm underfoot helps you stomp landings. The Big Trouble Ski's super-raised tip and tail takes the sketch out of landing big hits, and the healthy sidecut rails the groomers when the back bowls get skied out.

Bottom Line: The Dynastar Big Trouble Limited Alpine Ski knows no bounds.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 4

Big Trouble Indeed

By:
February 24, 2009

I bought these skis to be be my powder skis, and man do they fufill that niche. I am an ex-college FB player (6'3" 285) Skied in 35+ inches of fresh snow at Alta this year, and they kept my big butt floating quite well. They even work well on soft slushy snow, but hardpacked and variable snow conditions are a little sketchy. Obviously not the ski for the frontside of the Mt. but when there is fresh pow, grab these boards and "float on"

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am 6'2", 185 pounds, want these for tree skiing, powder

I am 6'2", 185 pounds, want these for tree skiing, powder and park. should I get the 176 or the 186?

By:
August 9, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I agree with the 186. I think you will find that a very versatile ski. You might come up a bit short with the 176.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
March 2, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Definitely the 186. It's not so long that you'll lose maneuverability in tight spaces, but long enough that it'll give you the extra float that you want in deeper snow conditions.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
August 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Its good for the most part

By:
March 13, 2009

First off i want to say that this ski has kind of a girly grphic, but its the ski not the graphic. they have a pretty wide underfoot on them and that usually helps in the park. They are not very thick compared to the blends. they handle very good. It is really just an all around ski and there isn't anything special to them. I do recommend them tho.

Was this helpful? (0) (2)

Flag

Are these good skis for backcountry touring? I'm just getting

Are these good skis for backcountry touring? I'm just getting into doing hut trips and such, and my straight and narrow cross country skis aren't cutting it. If so, what bindings would be good?

By:
March 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I think this is a great touring ski. It is light weight, versatile and its strong enough to get you through any bacountry condition...ice, powder, avy debris etc.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
March 2, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

i'd go 120, the 4 extra mm in the tip won't make much difference if at all

By:
May 3, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you are looking for a strictly touring ski you may want to look at some K2 AT skis. Dynafits would be preferrable bindings, but Fritschis would work well.

By:
March 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

sickness!

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 2, 2009

These are the best skis I've ever been on. I had a chance to demo these for 2 days and decided that I need to get my own pair. My first time down the mountain I felt like I was an instantly better skier; they were fantastic in everything from powder, to bumps, to groomers, to the park. Awesome all mtn. ski!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Skins for these----120 width or 130 with a healthy amount of

Skins for these----120 width or 130 with a healthy amount of trimming?

By:
February 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

120 because you have to trim 2mm off each side= 124 mm tip width. save the pocket book

By:
July 31, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Trim the 130s for a perfect set up. Worth the time and minimal effort.

By:
February 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Big Troub vs. MSP

By: Backcountry.com Employee
March 2, 2009

I've already written a review regarding this ski, and I absolutely love it. I had the chance to try out some 4frnt MSPs, and I wanted to compare them for you all. Both skis kill it all over the mountain so its super hard in most cases to pick a ski in this category. The MSP was fun no doubt, but what it lacked, was that huge Shovel that the BT has making it easier to power through the crud. The big Trouble also has a stiffer flex so at higher speeds, its a more comfortable/easier to handle ski. Both skis are legit, but for someone who wants some re-assurance through crud, and like more stability at higher speeds, go with the BT.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I just bought a pair of Dynastar Big Trouble skis,176cm. Where

I just bought a pair of Dynastar Big Trouble skis,176cm. Where should I mount them. Ski the entire mt. This will be my everyday ski. No park.

By:
January 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I like to go 1 or 2 cm's back of the traditional mark. It give me a little more ski for the whole mountain.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
March 2, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

For the best all-mountain performance, I'd suggest mounting the "traditional" line.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Big Trouble, new design-same ski

By:
January 19, 2009

This is a great ski for the price. I have these as a set of AT/Rando skis w/marker dukes. I'm 5'10 170 lbs. and have the 186. Here's the breakdown: They are stiff, and I love that. They are heavy (need legs), and I like that too. If you are a groom skier these are not the skis for you. If you like the bumps, these are not for you. But if you like new tracks (4-40+ inches) then these are a great bargain. They ride fast (stiff) and they have a good cut.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

HalloCan I get Dynastar Big Trouble Limited Alpine Ski size 166cm

HalloCan I get Dynastar Big Trouble Limited Alpine Ski size 166cm from you ?I live in Tokyo Japan.Regards Hide

By:
December 13, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Sure looks like you can get them Hide. Just add them to your shopping cart and checkout. Shipping appears to be around $75 USD.

By:
January 30, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

All Mountain Goodness...

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 12, 2009

These are a great "All Condition" ski. First thing I noticed is these babies are a heavier ski but because of that they powered through anything...and yes, moguls, crud, and ice were among the powder, corduroy, and trees. These skis do NOT like to go straight...they LOVE to turn. They're a strong ski with a lot of pop and I'd highly suggest them to anyone who wants a ski that will play in the park as well as hit some groomer runs and jumps in the powder and trees.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Big Trouble in Little China

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 12, 2009

The Dynastar Big Troubles definitely handle any trouble that comes their way. From charging groomers to floating in the powder, these made short work of anything I could put them through. They do feel a bit heavier than some skis of similar size, but their stability and the ability to power through anything definitely make up for it. If you are looking for an oversize ski for the deep days out west, the Big Troubles would definitely fit the bill.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Out of Stock

Item: DYN0204

2008 Model No Longer Available

We have a lot more Alpine Fat Skis than that

Alpine Fat Skis

Research other out-of-stock versions:

Big Trouble Indeed

4 star rating

By: Mark Berninger February 24, 2009

I bought these skis to be be my powder skis, and man do they fufill that niche. I am an ex-college FB player (6'3" 285) Skied in 35+ inches of more...

Its good for the most part

4 star rating

By: Freeskier_justin March 13, 2009

First off i want to say that this ski has kind of a girly grphic, but its the ski not the graphic. they have a pretty wide underfoot on them and that usually more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Lengths:
166cm, 176cm, 186cm 
Dimensions:
124 / 92 / 114mm 
Turn Radius:
[166cm] 17m; [176cm] 20m; [186cm] 23m 
Construction:
Full length sidewalls 
Core Material:
Wood 
Base:
UHMW 
Tail:
Twintip 
Binding System:
No 
Binding Included:
No 
Recommended Binding:
PX 12 TI Jib Wide 
Weight:
[Pair] 9lb 14oz (4480g) 
Recommended Use:
Park & pipe, backcountry jib, powder, all-mountain 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 Year 
Country of Origin:
France (Includes Monaco)