Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50*
Memorial Day SaleMemorial Day Sale
Detail Pics

Description

Not every relationship requires compromise.

The Vulcan TF Alpine Touring Boot has both touring sensibility and freeride ambition, plus the durability of the Parthenon. Made of Grilamid, a powerful yet lightweight polyamide, the Vulcan will climb fast and rip hard in the harshest conditions. You've met your match.

  • Super-strength Grilamid shell, an exceptionally resilient polyamide that endures prolonged exposure to extreme weather, so you can, too
  • Downhill Booster Tongue beefs up forward flex for hard-charging lines; remove it for climbing and cruising mellower terrain
  • Weight for a pair: 7lb
  • Lightweight thermo-formable (TF) liner with reinforced tongue, unique flex zone, and optional lacing, for Dynafit's highest-level fit and performance
  • Carbon fiber and Grilamid cuff and driving spoiler adds stiffness to the shell, holds heel down, and features an adjustable lean angle
  • Magnesium Ultra-Lock System for quick, easy release connected to walk mode
  • 15-18 degrees of forward lean and 60-degree cuff rotation in walk mode, for full-time comfort
  • Compatible with Dynafit Quick Step-In or standard touring binding
  • Durable Dynafit Pro sticky rubber sole with TPU lugs to eliminate play found with rubber

Share your thoughts

What do you think of the

Dynafit Vulcan TF Alpine Touring Boot

? Share a...

No file chosen

Rather attach a photo from another website?

Rather attach a photo from your computer?

  • Product review:
  • Share a video
  • Share a photo

How familiar are you with the product?(optional)

Invalid filetype.

Save

Here's what others have to say...

5 5

jn.p486678

Member since 

Green monsters arrived through a friend in the knick of time. I was a little concerned with sizing, but they fit like a glove. Not as light as other boots, but are far from pigs. Walk great and feel like slippers. No big lines skied on them yet, but based on quick 10k hike and 1000m vert skied on mellow glacier; these guys like to go.

Only disappointment was no goat sticker with the order and I can't request any from Canuck land!

Hey do you guys ship Dynafit gear to...

Jay

Member since 
Posted on

Hey do you guys ship Dynafit gear to Australia??

col4703297

Member since 
Responded on

It's automated on the order page, if you try to order and they can't ship the brand to Australia the webpage will tell you. You can always go through a 3rd party, companies exist for this purpose (google freight forwarding)

If you do get these and happen to have size 29.5 feet and live in Sydney would it be possible for me to try yours on? I don't think I'd ever buy ski boots without making sure they fit first :)

Arthur Debowski

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

We do indeed ship Dynafit products to Australia.

Will these fit the same as some Dynafit...

Pichi

Member since 
Posted on

Will these fit the same as some Dynafit Zero's?

I wont have the chance to try on the Vulcans before buying, but I tried the Zero's and found my size.

Thanks!

Wally Phillips

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

Hi Pichi,

Thanks for the question. When it comes to comparing fits from the Dynafit Vulcan boot and the ZZero boot, the Vulcan is actually a tiny bit wider of a fit in all sizes except the 29.5 size. The lengths are pretty much the same.

Pichi

Member since 
Responded on

Thanks a lot Wally, and regarding another Dynafit product. Do you know if they fixed the problems with the Radical tlt ft, that the heel lifter got broken easily in the first models?

Thanks again!

Wally Phillips

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

Hey Pichi,

No worries. If you're talking about the rotation issue where the heel would auto-rotate at times and could break the heel tower, Dynafit did produce a new fix through a different pin which was supplied for the 2011-2012 inventory and put in to the entire 2012-2013 inventory.

5 5

marp312886

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've used it several times

Great comfortable boot for all day touring. My feet have never felt this comfortable in any other boot before (used supplied liner and Superfeet). As far as the extra tongue, I agree with another post (Evan Tougas - Wally Phillips reply) boot stiffness runs about 100 without the tongues which is great for all but long downhills or laps at a resort. Never thought I could get this amount of stiffness out of a three buckle or an AT boot. Great flex and all around quality build. One of the best investments I've made in ski merchandise in a long time

Evan Tougas

Member since 
Responded on

Thanks for the post! Looking to buy my pair shortly (:

How stiff are these? I see a lot of people...

Evan Tougas

Member since 
Posted on

How stiff are these? I see a lot of people claiming that these are the perfect do it all boot? is the flex in the 110-120 range?
Thanks in advance.

Wally Phillips

Member since 
Groups:
Best Answer Responded on

Hey Evan Tougas,

I run in this boot personally and I'm finding that the flex without the tongue is around 100 to 110 and with the Downhill Booster Tongue it is more like 120 to 130 depending on the temperature.

As to the claims, when it comes to the shell performance the phrase "do it all" is pretty darn close. The weight and 60 cuff movement do well for climbing and it is more than stiff enough for most people on the way down. I'd be sure to shell fit and try out the liner as I've seen people switching it out a bit.

do you have to remove the tongue to get...

Greg

Member since 
Posted on

do you have to remove the tongue to get the full 60-degree rotation in walk mode? or can you just leave the tongue in at all times? seems like a bit of a hassle to constantly be removing and reinserting when switching between climbing and descending...

Oscar

Member since 
Responded on

Well it's possible but I doubt you would be able to flex that tongue in every stride...
If too much of a hassle because you are doing plenty of laps or w/e - I'd leave it out.

Steve Brain

Member since 
Responded on

I found I always remove the tongue for skinning and almost always insert it for downhills. The boot tours so much better with it out. If I'm doing a short downhill section I'll ski without the tongue, but for anything worthwhile I find it's worth inserting. Good news is removing the tongue is quick and easy, and re-inserting it gets quicker once you're practiced.

does anyone know the biggest size this...

step233398

Member since 
Posted on

does anyone know the biggest size this boot comes in...i wear a size 13...if not available can someone suggest a similar boot in a different brand. thanks

Sandy Brown

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

Largest is 30.0.

kwt3598278

Member since 
Responded on

Check out Scarpa for larger sizes... Maybe the Mobe or new Maestrales depending up on your skis and touring ambitions.

jesp480204

Member since 
Responded on

I am a size 13 as well. I have a bought a Titan UL in mondo 30, but it is too big. The mondo 29 shell will give you one finger behind your heel with the liner removed.

5 5

BennyFire

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've used it several times

Overall I love this boot, tours great and skis similar to my langes. Fit is good, I have a lot of room in my toe box, only slightly problametic area is the outside anke but my ankle bones stick out. Not bad enough to have worked on. If they don't fit well I would guess they would be a pain to work especially since grinding is out of the picture. The rear latch gets stuck at times, so I cleaned the burrs that formed and is still a PITA to unlatch in rear, it might also be I have them clamped down super tight and unlatch for chairlifts. Another complaint is that it is not easy to take liner in and out if you switch footbeds. Overall they ski just as stiff as my langes but with more vertical feel, insanely light, moderatly comfortable, warm. What more can you ask for but an improved latch, replaceable bottom soles and a cheaper price!

marp312886

Member since 
Responded on

Easy fixes - Try leaning forward on the boot, it relieves the pressure and then it is easy to unlatch. I also find after a couple of tries getting use to taking the liners out is relatively easy (remove and reinstall in under 5 secs) push down on the back heel piece to open up the space, same with reinstall. Hope this helps

Anyone used a vulcan in a Duke in extreme...

husp394877

Member since 
Posted on

Anyone used a vulcan in a Duke in extreme terrain vs. an alpine boot, any thoughts?

Mark Parrett

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

This boot is ready to go for anything you can throw at it. It won't flex exactly like a plug boot, but I don't think there is a line in the world that you couldn't ski on account of having the Vulcan on your foot. Steve Brain (see his review below) skied some very significant lines in his Vulcans last week so I'll let him chime in with more details.

Steve Brain

Member since 
Best Answer Responded on

The Vulcan is super stiff. I ski it with the Dynafit bindings, and it's the first boot I've had with similar flex to my downhill boots. I certainly was much more confident skiing steep lines than I had been with my prior AT boots. No idea how it'd do with the Duke though. Bottom line though, for me it's my skiing, rather than the equipment, which I would question these days ;-)

Josh

Member since 
Responded on

While the Vulcan is indeed as stiff as everyone says it is, the purpose of the vulcan is stiffness combined with reasonable weight. In my mind, the Duke undoes that equation. If you're skiing bigger lines than Hoji, perhaps the Duke is warranted, but I've been skiing some big committing lines with dynafit bindings. If you spend even 30% of your time outside of the ski area, dynafit bindings are the way to go, even if you're skiing big lines. If you're really concerned about binding stoutness -- check out the CAST system...personally, I think it's overkill, but at least you're not picking up the rediculous Duke with every step.

If you spend 80-90% of the time in the ski area, and only 10-20% of the time in the backcountry or side country, the duke-vulcan would be a comfortable, yet stiff option.

5 5

mcn2787616

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

I've used these boots in-bounds and in the backcountry (two peak summits, steep couloirs, long decents). Lightweight, easy transition from walk to ski and back again, plenty of backbone (esp. with booster tongues installed). I was concerned about catching or even breaking the cuff buckle in walk mode...but it snaps snugly against boot shell out of harm's way (trick is to pull cable forward out of cuff buckle slot). No need for front-side alpine boots with these.

5 5

mikegbne

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

This boot is worth every penny! This boot tours great, hikes great, and skis great. It is more than stiff enough for the downhill. The removable tongue offers variety for different terrain. BUY THIS BOOT, YOU WON'T BE DISAPPOINTED.

Unbeatable

Two seasons ago I purchased the Titan TF-X....

James Bristol

Member since 
Posted on

Two seasons ago I purchased the Titan TF-X. I could never get them to fit right--lots of work by techs who knew what they were doing. I have a wide foot and will use the boots with DPS Wailer 112 and Dynafit bindings. Any recommendations? Thanks!

Joe Schaaf

Member since 
Best Answer Responded on

Avoid the BD Quadrant IMO.
The liners are lame and the buckles over the lower foot press into the nerve on my foot making them numb. Out of all my boots, never had an issue with buckle related numb foot.
Keep looking, I know the Scarpas are for wide feet and the Technica Cochise, but are more weighty.

arnaud de brux

Member since 
Responded on

I also have a wide foot, and got fitted with the Vulcan: a good custom bedfoot instead of the stock one, liner molding and canting adjustment, and i was good to go. I also tried the Scarpa Maestrale RS, but they were tighter on the to of the foot than the Dynafit.

Mark Parrett

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

FYI Scarpas are not for wide feet - Quadrants work quite well for wide feet though the liners do suck and they don't tour nearly as well as the Scarpas or the Dynafits.

Josh

Member since 
Responded on

The vulcan / mercury have a medium width (definitely wider than the TLT series). For a wider foot, I think the Technicas could be a good option as would the Dalbello Virus Light. I agree that the Scarpa Maestrale feels a touch narrower than these dynafits

Is there any guidance on the general fit...

Jon44

Member since 
Posted on

Is there any guidance on the general fit of these boots--wide vs. narrow (or high vs. low volume, if you like) ???

(Dynafit Titans fit me more or less perfectly (after lots of fiddling) and I'm hoping to find same)

Sandy Brown

Member since 
Groups:
Best Answer Responded on

Compared to many past Dynafits (including the Titans), these fit a little wider at the metatarsals. Volume is similarly a bit more generous. If you like your Titans, you'll like the Vulcan, and will probably have to do less fiddling to make them perfect.

Jon44

Member since 
Responded on

Sandy, Thanks for response. Actually, that kind of worries me, as I have a very narrow foot (Titans just needed to be punched out in a one or two spots). I assume boot-fitters can make a boot wider, but not go the other direction, so just wondering how to know when "more generous volume" is too much (?)

What is the difference between the Vulcan...

Ach wie gut, dass niemand weiß

Member since 
Posted on

What is the difference between the Vulcan and a) the Titan Ultralight TF-X and b) the Titan TF-X?

Sandy Brown

Member since 
Groups:
Best Answer Responded on

Totally different boots. The Titans are classic 4 buckle side-country oriented AT boots that offer an interchangeable Alpine-DIN sole. The Vulcans are based of Dynafit's TLT5 series and offer incredible touring performance (60 degree cuff rotation), light weight combined with downhill rock-solid downhill ability.

Steve Brain

Member since 
Responded on

Ultralight TF-X is 10% heavier than the Vulcan and the TF-X is 26% heavier. Both TF-X boots are claiming a 30 degree rotation in walk-mode, whereas the Vulcan claims 60 degree. I've no experience with the TF-X boots, but I found the Vulcans to better uphill and stiffer downhill than my old Garmont Radiums. I'm a fan of the Vulcans.

5 5

Steve Brain

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

Had a few days skiing in the Vulcans I'm really impressed with how comfortable with they are on the way up. Felt totally unrestricted when skinning (tongue removed). Replaced the stock crappy footbeds with Surefoot and had Surefoot heat-mold the liners for me. No foot pain but tight feel. On the way down these boots are SOLID. Stiff and supportive.

Two areas I was previously concerned with was the single move from walk to ski and back, and the hassle of removable tongues. I found that using the top buckle to go from walk to ski was super convenient. The tongues took a little bit of fiddling, but easier than expected.

Overall, found they were the most comfortable of any first day ski-touring in a new pair of boots, while being super solid... will update when I get some more time in them.