Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 14 Reviews

Dynafit Manaslu Ski - 2009 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

Manaslu Ski
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

Your ski-mountaineering buddy has an ultralight setup too, but he’s not enjoying the ride down like you and your Dynafit Manaslu Skis are. The Manaslus have unique dimensions and a crazy-light weight so you can breeze the uphill, make tight, quick turns down steeps, and ride smoothly across the mank.

  • Wide waist and dual-radius sidecut (122/95/108) for tight turns in the steep and float in the deep
  • Slightly rockered tip absorbs shock and rides above crud and wind-crust
  • Ultralight paulownia wood core keeps pair at a ridiculously light 6lb 3oz (178cm) for peak bagging
  • Fiberglass and biaxial carbon reinforcement in upper and lower layers for torsional stiffness
  • Sintered graphite coatings for gliding and wax absorption
  • Inserts make mounting Dyanfit bindings easy
  • Won Backcountry 09 Editor’s Choice

Bottom Line: Ski the Manaslu.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 5

Excellent Touring Ski!!

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
July 29, 2011

These skis helped me tour like a bat out of hell due to their fantasticly low weight for the width. Dynafit really nailed it with the tip on this ski too. It raises up well while breaking trail, which saves energy and time and equals more turns or down in time for a nap after the beers! This is the ski I chose to bring for an expedition to the Wrangle-Saint Elias range in AK, where I was limited to one pair of skis. As a light weight all around ski the Manaslu has no equal. It handled powder, wind blown and breakable well. Sure, a heavier, fatter ski would always be nice on the way down, but you have to get up and the getting up on heavy skis sucks! So the compromise in stability in variable conditions is worth the weight savings on the way up. And these skis ride like bigger boards than they are with a very nice rise in the tip.

Bottom line: Excellent touring ski that skis bigger than it is and is a pleasure on both the up and the down!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I just got a pr of 178 Manaslu's with Dynafit bindings mounted

I just got a pr of 178 Manaslu's with Dynafit bindings mounted in the position indicated on the ski. The problem is they seem to be pretty far back on the ski. When I compare the centerline on the boot to what I assume is the boot center line on the ski (red line across one ski), the boot center in about 20mm aft. Also, when compared to the same length alpine ski, the Dynafits are again about 20mm aft. Any insight? Can I move these forward without damaging the ski?

By:
March 6, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hi, I understand your confusion. The red line is part of the Tibetan graphic, not the boot centerline (though it looks like it should be). The binding position has been determined to be the best overall spot for the ski for most people. You can remount outside of the inserts as long as you stay within the very slightly raised area which has a titanal insert for binding retention. If you move your bindings forward, it typically makes the ski initiate quicker, but some may feel that it is "hookier" and it may not float as well. Hope this helps.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
March 6, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Progression

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 18, 2009

This ski is the progression of the Dynafit system. You love their bindings and now you can love their skis. The inserts are confidence inspiring, and keep the weight low by minimizing the binding platform.

The tip makes the ski feel even wider than its 95 mm, which has been a favorite width of mine for years. Great for deep powder, good for the steeps, pretty versatile ski. Easy skiing, very playful.

The tip also helps when breaking trail, it floats the already light ski to the surface, making gaining vertical easier. way easier.

There is a reason this is the Backcountry editors choice.

Buy and enjoy.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

2 Comments Last Comment: July 19, 2011 by:

By:
July 19, 2011

The combination of Paulownia wood and Isocore laminate with Beech stringers help keep it lightweight without giving up downhill performance.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
February 10, 2011

why are these so light i was checking out some touring skis at rei and these were way lighter than any k2's or BD's

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

I am 6'4/ 190lbs. I ski 181 Baker SL now and looking to replace

I am 6'4/ 190lbs. I ski 181 Baker SL now and looking to replace them with the 178 Manaslu's. What is your opinion on if I will notice the difference in 3 cm's? Second question. How much rocker does the Manaslu have compared to the new Waybacks?

By:
April 10, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

You are a big skier for a lightweight manaslu, I would not ski a 178 for sure, and they do not have much rocker at all. Early rise tip. I think the waybacks have a touch more rocker, and they are also a touch burlier ski. I would go with the added length of the 181 wayback and slightly stronger construction.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
April 27, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Thinking this ski is too short for you given I am of similar dimensions (to you not the ski). However if you are not skiing bigger mountains or going super fast you are probably OK.

By:
April 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Light and fast, but...

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
April 27, 2011

I have seen a fair number of clients and guides in training this winter and last using these skis. The weight and very light tip rocker make them quite a good ski for the fast and far touring days for sure, but I have also seen 2 broken pairs this winter, and also have noticed lots of bigger, stronger skiers over power these skis, or get tossed around in anything but fresh pow. If you want to ski endless fields of powder, this is probably a great choice, but expect to be bounced around in other conditions. But really, who wants to ski anything but deep pow?

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm an aggressive beginner looking for my first set of skis.

I'm an aggressive beginner looking for my first set of skis. I live in New England so they will be used for White Mountains CCC trails, touring, and Mt Washington. I'm considering BD Prime boots and Dynafit ST bindings. Skis I'm looking at now are Manaslus, BD Aspect, K2 Wayback and Backlash. The only skis I've demoed were 176cm BD Stigmas which I hated/couldn't handle. I'm 5'10" and 175 lbs. I want something easy and fun to ski in most NE conditions. Model and size suggestions would be great.

By:
March 16, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey there! Sounds like the Manaslus would be just right for you! Got a pair of 187 this season to ski out West (Golden, BC area) and just love them! I'm about 165 lbs, maybe 185 lbs with pack and gear. If you're around 200 lbs without gear, you might find them a little soft... Not that good for charging big lines but awesome turning abilities for more technical ones! My other bc setup is a 192 BD Zealots before they had the early rise...

By:
March 29, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Fun all around ski

By:
February 1, 2011

I have been skiing the Manaslu 187 with Dynafit Vertical ST, ZZero Boots for 2010-11 season. This setup has turned into my primary skiing setup and have since retired my old traditonal alpine setup. I have been skiing back country, side country and resorts and don't want go back to my old 20+ lb setup. These skis are light, great to skin and hike as well as ski. I am a advanced/expert skier and like the steeps. I ski fast and in control and have had no major issues with the skis performance. These are not GS racing ski's but will get you down the mountain quickly and securely.
I'm 6.0ft 190 lb and have had no issues with pre-release with this ski-binding combo.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Are people using epoxy with the screws when mounting dynafit

Are people using epoxy with the screws when mounting dynafit bindings into the 'predrilled' holes. It's not like there's empty holes there, so it seems epoxy wouldn't do much.

By:
February 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Some people do use epoxy but it's not necessary. If you do, make sure you use a blend that is able to bind to the nylon of the insert.

By:
July 19, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Less of a compromise than expected

By:
April 2, 2010

I bought these realizing they were really light and would be a compromise. The first time I skiied these I went from 4 days on my alpine powder setup (193cm 4frnt EHPs, Rossignol 15 din bindings and Lange Banshee Pro boots) and spent two days skiing the Manaslus with dynafit ST and Garmont Radiums. I thought it would be a tough comparison, but had a blast on this setup. Overall the Manaslu's rock - very good in powder, reasonable on softish groomed runs and bumps and overall great fun. They're great for skining and breaking trail in powder, and being light are comfortable to carry on bootpacks. On real icy hardpack conditions they do tend to chatter and slide at speed, but it's manageable and better than I expected for such light skis. I'm 6' and weigh 200lbs and had therefore been wary of such a light setup. I'm excited to get them out on multi-day ski traverses in the Cascades and BC, where I think they will excel. Just going to take it easy on real hardpack/icy conditions.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

with the inserts already in the ski's. will I need to get

with the inserts already in the ski's. will I need to get differnt mounting scews other than the ones that came with the vertical TLT's?

By:
October 27, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

No, you should be fine, assuming you got all the screws that should have been in the binding box

By: Backcountry.com Employee
November 5, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Super ski

By:
July 2, 2011

I'm 225 lbs and I put over 70 days in the backcountry on 187 Manaslus this season using TLT5 Mountains, Zzero 3s, and Zzero 4s in everything from deep light powder, to heavy powder, packed powder, sastrugi, breakable crust, heavy wet snow, and corn snow. Short turns, long turns, slow turns, fast turns, no worry; up and out of all the deep snow with no fuss. A very easy ski to ski, very forgiving and very powerful for its weight. A great all-around ski, but now on ice, frozen snow, and corn I use my 178 Seven Summits, which are only a pound lighter but roll so easy from edge to edge on firm snow and are so quick to make very tight turns on firm snow.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I'm 5'10" and 190lbs. I ski the Sierras (i.e. mostly

I'm 5'10" and 190lbs. I ski the Sierras (i.e. mostly heavy stuff, not many days of real pow, but enough deep stuff) and I'm coming into AT from a dedicated tele mode. I've got a Dynafit Zzero 3 C boot and am wary of getting too much ski for it. I'm having a hard time trying to pin down the best choice between the Manaslu, Mustagh ATA SL, and Se7en Summits -- not to mention the question of (model-dependent) length. I was leaning towards the Se7en Summits as an all-around good choice for peak bagging out here, but if I only have one set of boards, maybe a mid-fat would be better? Recommendations?

By:
March 11, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I respectfully disagree with Ed. I spent several weeks on the Se7en Summits and they did not preform nearly as well as the Manaslu. The only situation were they MAYBE had a edge was in hard, icy conditions. Remember, by definition backcountry experiences = highly varied snow conditions and carrying varied loads. I used the Manaslu on a multi-day Sugar Bowl to Squaw Valley trip and they preformed beautifully.

By:
September 9, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Joel, I just tried out the Manaslu in 187 with the Scarpa Spirit 4 boots and Dynafit TLT Z12 bindings. Great light setup. I skinned up some late afternoon spring snow here in New Mexico and they worked great on the way up and in the softer snow. When I got the harder snow that had refrozen, the Manaslu was very squirrely and unstable. So, ..., remembering my days of skiing in the Sierra, especially in the spring, I would not want to take the Manaslu's. In fact, I purchased the Manaslu for a trans-Sierra this spring and I will not bring them now. Instead going with a Atomic RT86. I am also suspect to the many rave reviews you read on the Manaslu's being the great ski for all conditions -- mostly by guides or people that are given free skis to review...

By:
March 21, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Awesome ski, especially with dynafit bindings

By:
January 15, 2010

I love these skis! I ran the 187's with the dynafit bindings on a demo day at Alta and the rocked! In free heel mode it feels like ther's nothing there. The skiis ase stiff but not too much. Tips float well.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I'm 5'8" and ~148 lbs. I've been skiing 170cm

I'm 5'8" and ~148 lbs. I've been skiing 170cm Verdicts. What size would you recommend in the Manaslu. Will the 169 be too short (I haven't been on anything with tip rocker)?

By:
January 12, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Although it is minimal, the rocker tip will make the ski handle somewhat shorter. This will me most pronounced on hard snow, and you won't really be able to notice in deep snow when the ski is decambered. At 150 lbs, you could afford to ski a 178. You won't be overwhelmed, but you'll be glad for the added 9cm when it's really deep. The longer ski will go faster, too, but with a 21m turning radius and extra light-weight construction, you'll still be able to flip 'em around quickly enough for trees and tight terrain. If you'll be using a pack, too, remember to consider that weight as well. You're kind of on a cusp, so either way will be fine. If you're going to be skiing a lot of fresh snow, though, and like speed, the 178 would be your best bet. If you've been doing fine and not getting any tip dives with your 170 BD's, then the 169 Manaslu won't be too different. If it were me, though, I'd go with the 178.
Hope your turns are happy, whichever length you choose. Enjoy.

By:
January 12, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

Good Feel, Terrifying Construction

By:
November 14, 2010

These skis feel great under foot and ski well in a large variety of conditions. However, the inserts are not to be trusted. I had a pair of Dynafit FT12 bindings mounted on my manaslus at a dynafit-certified shop. Then, 3 months later after about 25 days of touring, I ripped the insert of out the ski. Not just the screws-- the inserts came with. And this was on moderate terrain. Had this happened 10 minutes earlier, I might not be writing this. Dynafit offered me a full refund, but no explanation. Having talked to friends at a couple ski shops, this isn't an isolated problem, but is a recurring one with this ski. I can't recommend this ski to anyone who needs a no-fail system.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I am thinking of getting the Manaslu but I am a little turned

I am thinking of getting the Manaslu but I am a little turned off by the predrilled holes. I have a small boot size making my sole length not compatable with the pre-drilled drilled holes on the 178 ski. I was also told by a local shop that Dynafit will not waranty any ski that is mounted with a binding other than Dynafit. Does anyone know if this is true?

By:
January 2, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Mounting anything but Dynafit bindings on the Manaslu will void the warranty and that's coming straight from Dynafit. The grey colored area you see on the topsheet is a Titanal plate, this is the only area you can mount a binding on. Doing otherwise will cause your binding to rip right out of the core. If mounting Dukes or Fritschi's, The mounting screw on each mounting position cannot be halfway over the pre-drilled hole in the ski. It must fit entirely inside the pre-drilled hole or completely out of the pre-drilled hole. Hope this helped.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 7, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Superlight, best for soft snow

By:
March 20, 2010

Just started skiing this with Dynafit TLT vertical FT Z12 as bindings. Very light, unbelievably light. However, I do think you sacrifice a turning performance on hard pack and ice. They felt like they railed out of control quickly on an icy groomer. Perhaps they came with a bad tune from the factory? I purchased these for a long spring tour in the Sierra, now I am having second thoughts since I am not confident they will do well on steep frozen spring snow. I also wish they had more sidecut to them, they were not near as responsive as Atomic Kailas, or K2 World Piste.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

"Recommended Binding: Dynafit, but will work with almost

"Recommended Binding: Dynafit, but will work with almost any AT or tele hardware". I'm still looking for the definitive answer about mounting these with tele bindings.
and spare me the sermons, just the the facts please.

By:
October 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I would mount Dynafit bindings to Dynafit skis for the best performance. Mount tele bindings to tele skis or skis with a specified tele binding plate. The titanal on this ski was designed for the insert system.

By:
February 15, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey OldDude. The inserts are designed specifically for Dynafit Bindings, BUT, you can mount any binding to the Manaslu by drilling holes away from the inserts. The Manaslus have a Titanal Plate in the binding area, which can be tricky when drilling holes (the plate is thicker than a regular Titanal topsheet. There's a good article at WildSnow about this very issue: "Drilling your own holes and mounting bindings in the Titanal plate area is ok so long as this is done by an expert mechanic who uses the correct bit for a metal top skin, taps the holes, mounts with epoxy and doesn’t over tighten the screws. Last winter, many Manaslu skis were tested with bindings such as Duke and Fritschi, mounted without using the nylon inserts." http://www.wildsnow.com/1457/dynafit-manaslu-binding-holes-mounting/

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great, lightweight ski

By:
August 30, 2010

great ski. I'm doing backcountry in the sierras out of Reno/Tahoe area. Performed well for me regardless of snow conditions, even packed up for multiday trips. Awesome in big snow conditions. Only gripe was that the plastic tip for the dynafit skins broke off. They are sending me a new one, and I hope that's the end of it. I'm 5'10" 165 lbs, and riding the 178. Using matching zzero boots and dynafit bindings. Overall, excellent setup. CAUTION: The Dynafit skins just don't cut it in the heavier, wet sierra snow. I'm switching to the BD Ascensions.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Can you fit other bindings to this ski or do you have to use

Can you fit other bindings to this ski or do you have to use dynafit ones?

By:
September 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I asked one of the reps if I could mount the Manaslus or Stokes tele (or I guess it would work with any non-Dynafit binding). His answer was that if you drill holes in the ski, other than the ones in the plate, than it will void the warranty on the ski. His recommendation was to pick up a lightweight bamboo cutting board from the dollar store or some place and then mount that to the ski using the pre-prethreaded holes. Then mount your other bindings to the bamboo cutting board. That way you aren't adding much weight or stiffness to the ski and you aren't voiding the warranty.

By:
August 27, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

the patterns are pre drilled for dynafits and do NOT fit other bindings. Besides, why would you want to use any other binding?

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (2)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Very Nice Ski for What I Like

By:
January 1, 2011

Going on my third season with this ski and probably 80 days or so (80% bc, 20% area.) I like long tours and things like the Haute Route that involve variable snow and lots of wine. The Manaslu is awesome in pow, although most skis should handle consistent or powder snow. Where I have been surprised is in windjack and other variable snow like one finds in Colorado - they do quite well. Only 2 stars for mank and refrozen junk but these skis aren't meant to destroy the chop and I avoid that crap anyway. Construction is excellent for the weight. I ski these early season and have skied over pepper and cheese graters and shark fins and everything has held up nicely.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Write your question here... I'm wondering if the smallest

Write your question here...

I'm wondering if the smallest size that the Manaslu makes is too much ski for me...I'm a female 5'6 136lbs and currently ski a k2 Phat Lov in a 160--dimensions are 122-90-112. Thanks!

By:
September 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Manaslu has a slight bit of rocker on the tip which makes them ski shorter than the full stated length. You many also want to consider your boot sole length if you are planning on using the Dynafit inserts. According to the sticker that comes with the skis, the 169cm can accommodate a BSL ranging from 274mm to 323mm. The 178cm and 187cm can adjust for 294mm to 343mm. This adjustment range is assuming the use of Vertical FT or ST bindings.

By:
September 25, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

Easily Broken, Poor Warranty

By:
November 21, 2010

I love how these ski: they float nicely in powder and for a light ski are very stable at high speeds. They even handle breakable crust pretty well. Problem is, they break, and when they break Dynafit does not stand behind them. I broke a pair in my first season on them, right under the front binding mount. Dynafit said Tough Luck. Bummer. Although I love how they ski, I would not buy another pair. Don't want to end up stranded on some long tour with a broken ski, and out another $600.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

These things rock

By:
October 21, 2010

When starting to look for an AT setup my friend told me to buy the lightest stuff I could afford. I went with these skis and they rock. I have skied 3 14ers with them along with a bunch of other back country and they ride great. They work great in the crap snow you find at the summit of most 14ers and they are awesome in the POW. I rode them down Baldy Chute at Alta and they were excellent. They are mounted towards the back of the ski so they don't ride bumps at the resort very well - but you don't buy these skis to ride at the resorts!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

EXCELLENT

By:
January 12, 2010

This is my 2nd year with these skis and I have been very pleased. I have the Dynafit TLT vertical FT Z12 binding and the Manaslu Speedkins. The set is ultra light and the pre cut skins are awesome. This is a great backcountry touring setup. The skis perform great in the powder and steeps. Highly recommend this set up for ski Mountaineering and touring.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Out of Stock

Item: DNF0023

2009 Model No Longer Available

But don't stress, we have the latest model in stock.

Dynafit Manaslu Ski

Dynafit Manaslu Ski

Research other out-of-stock versions:

Excellent Touring Ski!!

5 star rating

By: Stephen Koch July 29, 2011

These skis helped me tour like a bat out of hell due to their fantasticly low weight for the width. Dynafit really nailed it with the tip on this ski too. more...

Progression

5 star rating

By: Greg Hill September 18, 2009

This ski is the progression of the Dynafit system. You love their bindings and now you can love their skis. The inserts are confidence inspiring, and keep more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Length:
161 cm, 169 cm, 178 cm, 187 cm 
Dimensions:
[178 cm] 122 / 95 / 108 mm 
Turn Radius:
21 m 
Construction:
carbon and fiberglass laminate 
Core:
hand-selected paulownia wood, fiberglass reinforcement 
Base:
sintered graphite race 
Tail:
raised, notched 
Binding Included:
no 
Weight:
(pair, 178cm) 6 lb 3 oz 
Recommended Use:
ski mountaineering, alpine touring, backcountry skiing 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 year