Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 22 Reviews

Black Diamond Megawatt Ski - 2009 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

Megawatt Ski
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

On those glorious mornings when there’s a double-digit number in the snow report, the super-fat, powder-addicted Black Diamond Megawatt Ski begs for untracked lines through bottomless fresh. This zero-camber beast returns this year with a fresh design for added pop and stability regardless of conditions. When the snow stacks up though, the Megawatt’s long rocker tip and massive underfoot width keep you floating along in a snorkel-puff nirvana.

  • Long rocker tip, wide platform and zero camber provide unparalleled performance in deep powder
  • Internal Wall Core Technology uses poplar with birch sidewalls for more pop and better edge hold
  • Formula One geometry features three internal ribs for hard snow performance and improved turning

Bottom Line: Megawatt’s the name, powder’s the game.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 5

Holy cold smoke batman!

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 30, 2009

These skis are incredible. I can not say enough good things. The tip rocker make these skis very turnable even in the 188 length. So do not be afraid to buy them as long or a little longer than you are used to. For telemark skiers the dreaded "tip dive" is virtually eliminated by the unsinkable rockered tip on the Megawatt. The progressive flex gives this ski a nice tail that can handle hard charging skiers no problem yet this ski still seems to be the most user friendly fat ski I have ever skied. 5 stars really doesn't do it. As far as powder big-mountain boards go this ski is 6 stars for sure!

Was this helpful? (6) (0)

Flag

Float yer boat!

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
November 3, 2010

The BD Megawatt skis get up and plane on top of anything, which makes 6" of powder seem much deeper. Fun!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

What is the flex like in the Megawatt? Comparing to 2010 Volkl

What is the flex like in the Megawatt? Comparing to 2010 Volkl Bridges (178cm) and 2009 Coombacks (181cm)?

Has anyone come up with a consistent way to quantify and communicate flex for skis?

By:
October 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Matt,
I guess you send an email to bc.com asking them to forward it Nate to get the answer you need.

By:
October 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Paging Nate to the thread. Nate Blouin to the question thread.

(Found his BC.com profile, but no contact info)

By:
October 20, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I can't give you the exact answer but if you can speak to Nate Blouin, who works for Backcountry.com, he'll tell all you need to know. He swears by those skis.

The other two skis you mentioned are different style of skis vs. the Megawatt. I would recommend the 188 cm, but it depend on your height & weight. See if you can try to contact Nate, he shreds Snowbird everyday on them.

By:
October 15, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Back in Blue!

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 3, 2009

The same old trusty powder slayer with a fresh coat of paint. I still feel the way about them as I did when I first posted a review two years ago.

"Warning, this may read like a bad infomercial, but I'm really in love with these skis.
How do you make 4" feel like 8", 8" feel like 16" and over 2 feet of snow the most fun you've ever had. Behold the Megawatt! Hands up, or hands down the best powder ski I've ever had the pleasure of playing with. We've had some really deep days this winter and it's nice to finally be on a ski that I can say is fat enough. No more wallowing and poling your way out when the slope flattens, these boards bring the fast flotation. The front rocker helps in several ways. The ski turns quickly, it eliminates the classic tip dive tele tumble and makes crusts, upside down pow, and variable snow a pleasure. Accidentally ended up not skiing powder one day and it was a big surprise to find they actually rail on the hardpack as well. They have acquired the nickname "Mega-what", due to all the questions folks ask when they are seen touring around the backcountry. With big skis comes more weight to lug around and I'm down with "light is right", but these are worth every pound and they come with me whenever there's fresh snow on the ground now. If I wasn't clear, I like them very much and highly recommend them if you ski powder often."

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

2 Comments Last Comment: August 6, 2010 by:

By:
January 4, 2010

noah, did you ever mount a set of the 188's for AT / alpine? if so, where did you find they perform the best for a resort ski?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
August 6, 2010

Seth,

Sorry for the huge lapse in time on getting back to you on this. I have only mounted them tele and can't really advise on AT/alpine mount.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Would the Dynafit TLT Radical FT be suited for this ski or should

Would the Dynafit TLT Radical FT be suited for this ski or should I stick with the Fritschi Diamir Freeride (I need touring ability)?

By:
October 11, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I wouldn't say either binding is better for a specific ski, but you should choose your binding based on what type of skiing you intend to do. Fritschis are better for charging and are easier to put on. Dynafits on the other hand are better suited for longer tours because they're lighter.

By:
November 27, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Night Skiing on Megawatt's

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
February 1, 2011

Shot this footage a few seasons ago on the best pow ski around.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Review Title

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 4, 2009

Some people like the Megawatts but they are just too big and sloppy for me, dont get me wrong they are loads of fun on deep days but I just all around prefer the new Zealots with a slight rocker tip. Without camber and side cut they just skip all over the place, I like a ski that cuts through the snow, not one that slides sideways when you try and turn. It is also a bit too wide for landing airs and is heavy for touring. Fun but not my favorite. Unless you can afford to have a full quiver including the megawatts for those 3ft utah days I wouldnt recommend it them. I have narrowed my quiver down to the kilowatts for groomer and bumps and hard resort days and the zealots for everything else. When traveling light to ski I would only bring my zealots, they preform surprisingly well on groomers and resort.

Was this helpful? (10) (3)

Flag

7 Comments Last Comment: April 15, 2010 by:

By:
April 15, 2010

People seem to be split, but I love this ski. For what it's worth, I know people who have tele'd on it and generally these are the folks who don't love it. For the past 2 years I've had this ski mounted with Duke's and I have averaged about 65-70 ski days in the Wasatch. I'm on this ski more than I'm not (65% of the time?), and use this ski anytime there's more than 8" of snow. It smooths out crud remarkably well and edges on groomers a lot better than most rockered skis I've tried. This makes them ideal for places where it's pow-stash-to-groomer-to-lift. I find them to even be nimble enough for tight trees when there's snow. Obviously if you take them out in dust-on-crust or down rutted out trees or bumps you're going to hate life... but that should go without saying. They're also not a backcountry skinning ski. In-bounds pow days, the days after a storm, and slackcountry skin laps are where these excel. If I'm going further than that, I'm riding my K2 SideStash's. They're not a one-ski quiver, but that's not why you bought them... right? Ski in-bounds on 'em when it's deep, and then use them to hike around the resorts. Get these and then pair them with something 105ish in the waist and that's all you need in the West.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
March 5, 2010

I know I'm a little late to be commenting on this review but the Megawatt is a sick ski. I will say you make a valid point that the mega is not by any means an everyday ski. It is a powder specific tool that offers the rider an unbelievable experience. While riding this ski I've stomped some of the biggest airs I've ever attempted with ease and smiles. I too ride this year’s Zealot’s and if someone is looking for a great everyday ski, I couldn't agree with you more that the Zealot is the ski for that. This year’s Zealots are a strong, hard charging ski that can crush it all from crud to pow to the groomers. BD is pumping out some great stuff right now and the Mega is an awesome powder slaying tool whether its 6 inches or 3 feet.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
February 10, 2010

I agree with you, Nick. After skiing my Zealots for about a year I decided to demo the megawatts and I couldn't even finish the day with them. I made the mistake of trying to ski them like I ski my Zealots and it resulted in some pretty massive tomahawk style wrecks. At mid-day I traded my friend (who was skiing my zealots) and the day drastically improved for me.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
October 17, 2009

awinstanle#: A friend who skis them says that they are so wide that you don't even have to worry about the landing, "because you're taking it with you."

Flag

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

By:
October 14, 2009

sounds like he just needs more speed!!!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
October 1, 2009

Thanks for this review Nick, it makes an excellent points rather than many of the "mega is teh best" ones.

Saving up for 182 Zealot, should work well in yurp conditions ...

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
September 19, 2009

They're too wide for landing airs?!?!?!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Aspen Deeps!

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
December 1, 2009

Megawatts in full force!

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag Zoom

1 Comment Last Comment: August 26, 2010 by:

By:
August 26, 2010

Great pic.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Write your question here...are black diamond skis only for tele

Write your question here...are black diamond skis only for tele and AT rigs? i was wondering about mounting regular (downhill) bindings on them...

By:
October 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey JonnyReb. This (and all other BD skis) are designed so you can mount them with any binding-style you prefer. You'll see telemark, AT, tech, and standard DIN (downhill) binders used on the Megawatt. It's a great ride and loads of fun no matter how you mount it.

By:
October 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Big Ski big results

By:
April 23, 2011

This ski is great. In fact all Black Diamond skis are great. Mounted with some Dynafit AT bindings and you have one of the lightest set-ups in the backcountry. The mega's are your deep deep deep powder ski. Equivalent to that of K2 Hellbent but just much lighter. You wouldn't want these to be your everyday ski tho. This is your special occasion sort of ski. If you're lookin for a good slack/side country ski for big dumps then this is a great choice. If you're lookin to tour up the side of a mountain, I would look at some of the smaller Black Diamond skis like the zealot.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Glacier Bay AK, Chris Erickson

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
May 11, 2010

Megawatts heading to the top of another epic line

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

Is the 178 too much ski for a 5'6" 125 pound teleie

Is the 178 too much ski for a 5'6" 125 pound teleier?

By:
October 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Could be. It depends on 3 things: how aggro you are, what kind of turns you like (short or long radii) and terrain you like (bumps/tight trees vs. wide open spaces). If you're pretty aggro and used to longer sticks and like big turns in the open, then these could work. Otherwise, I'd lean shorter for your weight/height.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
October 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Efficient Power Technology: Inside Black Diamond skis design and construction.

By:
March 5, 2010

Our freeride skis are designed for the modern skier who demands maximum performance with no limitations. Watch this video as Thomas Laakso, our Ski Line Category Director, details the design philosophy and construction technologies used in our skis.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great powder ski

By:
April 8, 2011

These skis are so awesome in powder. The fat and rockered tip floats like a dream and I've never had tip dive, which is a constant worry for tele skiers in powder. The non-rockered tail helps to stop wheelies and its great for skinning. I've skied them in a variety of conditions and I have to say they are NOT an all-around ski. They work but I rather take out another ski if there isn't much powder. I ski them with BD 01s and customs

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

i just picked up a pair of these and was wondering were the best

i just picked up a pair of these and was wondering were the best mounting point would be?

By:
September 5, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Write your answer here...I'm mounting standard alpine and I charge pow/crud and like speed

By:
September 7, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Well are you mounting Alpine or Tele? How do you like to ski?

By:
September 7, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

For groomer-phobes, and wheelie haters alike

By:
January 1, 2010

These sticks aren't like other early-rise or reverse-camber models. The shovel rises up like a fire shovel, and looks like it could be used as one. The sudden upturn is unusual, unique, and effective at keeping tips from sinking, even if the sticks are short.
Sure, this early rise shortens the effective edge, and with such a dramatic rise, it will not hook tips into the groomers like other moderately rocked skis would. Other skis like the ObSethed, Gotama, Anti Piste, or Sir Francis Bacons which have 'rocker,' can carve into hard snow like a regular cambered ski, because a regular cambered ski is de-cambered in a turn. The 'rocker' is accentuated when the ski is further de-cambered.
The Megawatts don't really have camber but have 'early-rise,' so when the ski is de-cambered it does not really raise the ski tip anymore.
The main thing that I like about the Megawatts is that the tail is stiff. This is especially good for telemark skiing because you don't get the 'wheelie' effect like you would with Hell Bents or JJ's, which have early-rise tails, too.
With tele-skis, you don't have a back-seat like you do on Alpine setups. The Megawatts' stiff tails give a more stable feeling behind you, so you don't pop a wheelie and land on your ass. This tele-friendly stiff tails is what sets these whips apart from the rest.
Even with the early rise tips, the M'watts handle pretty well on the hard-pack back to the lift, but they are far from a one ski quiver. These are a great ski for people who look at groomer days like vegan looks at bacon.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

megasend

By:
October 14, 2009

dropping into the deep on BD megawatts

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

AT vs Tele? I know it's a dumb "it depends" question

AT vs Tele? I know it's a dumb "it depends" question but I have a pair of Megas and am trying to decide to mount Dukes vs tele (likely HHs). I have the 178 cm, I'm 5'7" and 140lb, I have been skiing a long time but am getting older/slower/less aggressive. I'm concerned that they may be too wide for a lightweight like me to turn with tele, especially on end-of-day chopped up and groomers (I mainly ski Alta or Solitude). Any opinions on this (besides "it depends") and/or do I follow the recommended mounting points? thanks!!

By:
February 20, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I read the review of the skis because I want them but felt inclined to respond, because age has no bearing on tele at all. I'm 32 and have horrible knees, hence why I was afraid to tele for a long, long time. The truth is that if you don't do HUGE (overblown) knee bends (that really aren't needed), Tele'ing makes your legs feel amazing because it works your quads and hamstrings. I ski morning-noon, then snowboard after and have never felt better because of telemark. If you have the bones, go tele and never look back. Meantime I'll be ogling these skis.

By:
August 15, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Even at an older age tele isn't going to make it easier to ski. Always dropping your knees. and if your knees aren't what they used to be, I wouldn't go tele. AT is the way to go. You get all the versatility of goin up the side of a mountain, but you have more control, and less wear and tear on the knees on AT bindings. Plus, when you are feelin a little crazy, you are able to charge a little bit harder with the AT.

By:
April 23, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Panditah-

Turning these boards is not an issue on Tele or AT. The rocker makes skiing soooo easy. You may fall in love with Tele again. They will bounce around a bit on you in chop so you may want to go with AT. One of those tough life decisions that you will have to make.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
March 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Megawatt in North-Norway

By:
March 26, 2010

Skiing down the east-side of one of my favourite mountains, Strandstinden. My favourite because it is close to my home, and there are several options for the downhill, depending on where the snow conditions is best.. The view from the top is magnificent, Lofoten, Ofoten, Tjeldsundet, you name it!!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great skis for pow

By:
March 23, 2010

For those bottomless pow days!!!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Tom Jungst

By:
September 14, 2009

I used the Megawatt's the past two years and filming for Greg Stump's, Legend Of Ahhhs. This shot was in the Lost Lake Cirque on the west face of Lone Peak, Big Sky MT. I love the Megawatt's but at the end of this day my knee was so swollen that Mike Mannelin had to carry them out or I'd still be back there! It was obviously worth it! Greg and I spent a lot of time talking about the influence of his movies on the development of skis and ski areas. It was in 1988 Schmidt and I stood on top of Lone and encouraged Johnny Bad, the owner to put a tram to the top. Now it is guys pushing the same limits out here that make this the future terrain. Despite the size of the ski I have been totally confident on almost every condition except steep bulletproof. I'm 51 so strengths of days long ago are gone and yet these skis breathed new life into the sport for me! My son and I were able to try the new mega's last spring and it was fun to watch him take right to them as well. So, I'm not crazy, these are a ski for the quiver IMHO.

Was this helpful? (5) (0)

Flag Zoom

I would consider myself to be somewhat close to an expert skier.

I would consider myself to be somewhat close to an expert skier. I demolished a pair of 2009 BD stigmas last year, skied a few days on a pair of BD ethics this year and was unsatisfied in the pow. I just ordered some 188 mega's, I do a lot of backcountry skiing but Im more into the book packing than skinning. I live in Colorado and it seems that every day I want to go backcountry the avie conditions are bad so I end up going on piste and boot packing past the ropes. What would be a good binding to drive this ski knowing that I really dont need the AT setup. Thanks!

By:
January 25, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I think marker duke/baron is the obvious choice here. I have a sidecountry setup that is similar that I use for almost exactly the same things as you seem to intend for these. Big, beefy ski=beefy bindings that fit alpine sole blocks. comparing fritschis to dukes is like comparing a toyota corolla to a BMW. Go heavier and get the control and sturdiness you'll want dropping into chutes and the like.

By:
February 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Runs over badgers and small children

By:
March 24, 2011

Sick in any condition, skis chop like your riding in po, skis pow and pops and porpises really well. Basically kills it, way too easy for a ski this big. Great on groomers with FKS, carves awesome.
188 and I am 188 with gear, great combo

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Mega, Justice, Verdict

By:
September 14, 2009

So many choices. Play day at the Bird, march 09

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag Zoom

I just bought the 188 cm megawatts and will be mounting Marker

I just bought the 188 cm megawatts and will be mounting Marker barons. Does anyone have any suggestions on where to mount the bindings? I'll be using them in open powder, in the trees and for dropping cliffs. I will use these in bounds but if the conditions are good I'll be skinning as much as possible. With these skis powder performance takes priority over touring performance for me.

By:
October 29, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you are going to tour, then get the Marker Dukes (strong AT) bindings that are more like tanks. They are heavier, but the 16 DIN setting is wonderful for large drops. If you are going with straight alpine then the Look Pivot 16 are choice for this wide board. You can always hit the Marker Jester, but the Pivots give you more versatility, I think. For me, I would only go with the AT Dukes. GOOD LUCK. Also, look at the Movement Flyswatter. ANOTHER GEAT SKI!

By:
December 2, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

after more time on these

By:
February 10, 2010

I have skied these in all sorts of conditions now and have them mounted with dukes (3cm forward) for skinning.
The forward mount is CRITICAL!!! This allows you to have a much more versatile ski (and I had them factory suggested mounted at first). Some people say that you can go back because of the huge rocker tip and that is ski contact you don't have. WRONG - when you are in the conditions these are made for you are using the rockered length. I can maneuver so much better in tight spots and in cruddy/hard snow because of this, whether it's in a tight couliour or trees. I was also having trouble backslapping landings with the 'suggested' mount. Now that I'm just a bit more forward I am stomping much more and it feels ROCK STAR. Bottom line: I can ski these anywhere! However, I also contend that it is the skier who can ski anywhere, but these sticks can keep up.
I do not mind the weight for skinning with dukes/glide lite BD skins. It's worth the bomber factor for me and I know it's only making me stronger on the way up. The rocker on the way up has not been a problem yet. The wide platform gives you more surface area to grip slick tracks. My only problem skinning comes up when people use a skin track to ski down and make it slant down the fall line, then I have to step to the side and have at least one ski making a new flat track.
My only beef about these skis is that I believe the base material is softer than almost any ski I've ever owned. Thank goodness I have a p-tex gun. But I also need to buy some base patch material now too...

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: November 4, 2011 by:

By:
November 4, 2011

is that horseshoe?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Allan Jungst

By:
September 14, 2009

Tip testing the New Blue
Megawatt March 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

Just bought the '10 Megawatts! Now, what bindings to get?

Just bought the '10 Megawatts! Now, what bindings to get? I'm used to skiing a light ski (PM Gear's BRO Model 174s) with Dynafit comforts. I'll still use those for long touring days, but I think I'll need a much stronger binding for the Megawatt powder days. Oh, and I've got Dynafit Zzero 4 buckle boots.

By:
October 1, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

the watts

By:
October 16, 2010

mounted them +3cm to make the more agile in the trees and varied terrain. almost feels like cheating when it's deep, feels like you are on a mini trampoline bouncing in the deep powder. buy these for when its deep and ski them all day even when the resort gets chewed up.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Tom Jungst

By:
September 14, 2009

and bend zee knees, it's alta if you please.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

how are the bd megawatt in the forest?? i am thinking abouth

how are the bd megawatt in the forest?? i am thinking abouth baying them but i ski som in forest with much trees..

By:
September 8, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

With the help of the rocker they turn quickly for a big fat ski. They are fine for tree skiing. And if it's any sort of powder snow you'll love it.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 8, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

“Here is your cape Mr. Superman.”

By:
March 25, 2010

Hmmm, where to begin.
188s w/ Dukes mounted on the line, me 210lbs, 6’ charger.
One line summary: “Here is your cape Mr. Superman.”

Just finished my 2nd season on my 08/09 ‘watts and I must say, I’m in love. They have quickly become my go-to ski no matter what the conditions are. My now backup pair are 184 mantras w/ FFR+, I used to loooove my Mantras, but now 99% of the time I’m on them, I wish I’d brought my ‘watts… The only time I don’t bring them is when I know it hasn’t snowed in over a week and there aren’t ANY leftovers. If you ski big out west, they could be a one ski quiver. Im of the opinion I’d rather have a ski that excels in good to perfect conditions, and is adequate in anything less, vs. something excels in blaah conditions and is just ok in great conditions…

Groomers:
Very surprising here. They rail SG/GS turns with ease. With the dukes they just need to be put on a more aggressive edge tilt and ones weight needs to be forward (as it should be anyways!). don’t try to keep your feet together like a bump skier, spread em out! These rail like my old college race skis, very stable at warp speed, the tips do bounce around a bit at high speed but that doesn’t affect the stability or edge hold, just sounds/looks very unnerving. Just step on the gas and hold on. They still do bite on the ice, just don’t expect them to hold like a 68mm waste SL ski. You lose edge contact length with the tip rocker, so don’t expect 188cm of edge. I’ve finally figured out shorter turns and can manage to carve short turns as well as long turns, takes a bit of playing around. Pretty much have to sway your hips side to side, it’s a lot more of a rolling motion, REALLY have to unweight/hop them in-between turns but then they come around quickly and nicely for short turns.

Pow:
Makes anyone a superhero. They go anywhere, at any speed. I used to fight to keep up with my friends on big pow snowboards, now it’s the reverse. High speed smears are easy, turn on a dime in the trees, you can try to touch the tips and they won’t dive. Stomp airs (just don’t get in the backseat) with ease. Not really much else to say here that isn’t already known… Straight line big lines, or sign up for a powder 8 comp, do it all.

Crud/Chop/Mank/Crust
Put on your hardhat and orange vest, because you’re hopping on a steamroller. Unstoppable at any speed. Whats the best way through an obstacle?...Go over it. De-tune the tips a bit so they don’t snag/hook. They make chopped up leftovers feel like untracked. You’ll find yourself making bigger and bigger radius turns in the chop, easier than making shorter turns.

Downsides:
Weight, they’re heavy, no doubt! But they will make you stronger on the up! Maybe try D-fits if you’re a weight wus. I’ll suffer on the up for unquestionable performance on the down.
Bases are a tad weak compared to other skis, but skiing where they’re designed to go, it shouldn’t matter.
If you’re on an icy or hard packed skin track be careful, I’ve found myself more than once having to get out of the track when it gets steep, with the massive tip rocker you lose a LOT of skin contact patch/grip.
Bumps, duuh… They’re not great unless they’re big, deep, pow pumps (then you can make SG turns across them!). They still work, but they’re not a lot of fun, depends on how tight they are. You realllly have to lean forward in the bumps and pivot/yaw them a lot. They’re just too wide for icy troughs.
They’re a tad weird in 6” of dust on crust conditions, when the snow isn’t that deep the tips/tails bend as designed, but not enough as the base underfoot hits the bottom layer of hardpack not allowing for enough ski flex/bend, hard to explain, they do well, but one just has to be aware and expect some tip hooking.

Tip:
Keep your seat backs in their upright and FORWARD position. I wouldn’t mount them any more than +1cm unless you tend to ski the backseat. They respond very well to weight shift, turns them into a different ski depending on where you’re leaning.

Hope this helps!

get 'em.

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

Tom Jungst

By:
September 14, 2009

Yum yum, I can float. April at Alta, it's not fair!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

will the zealots be hugely better as an all round ski? If not

will the zealots be hugely better as an all round ski? If not what length megas should i get? im 6' 150lbs and not too aggressive.
thanks!

By:
July 30, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

yeah the zealots would be much better bacuse wats are a powder specific ski.

By:
November 11, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great for crude, and Spring as well...

By:
July 17, 2010

Enough has been said about this beast's outstanding pow capabilities, so I will not expand on this. Let me tell you why this is a must as a versatile second ski. I went to the Black Diamond sponsored BigLePowSki in St Anton late Spring 2010, (a must event in the US and Europe for back country fans and newbies, because BD lets you ride all their sleds all day, for free). The piste was mushy, melty, icy mounds and uber-crudy on the shady piste, etc. Piste you say, why are you on the piste at a back country ski venue – well you have to traverse on piste from time and again, and at the end of the day we wanted to get a few runs in and check out the Apre ski. I asked my trusted BD consigliere, Danny, what ski I should use if I wanted to get a few piste runs in at the end of the day. He said “Big man, you need to take the big ski,” so I did. I had already been on the piste earlier in the day, and had to labor on other DB skis. Let me tell you, these water ski’s slammed through the Spring Krap like the Ginsu cuts through a tin can, effortlessly. They were actually a pleasure, even when going over the endless ice bumps at med-fast speeds.

So what am I trying to tell you. If you are on a budget and you already have pair of all mountain / piste skis, and you are looking for a second ski to go off piste in the pow, this is it. Why?

1. Because this is a forgiving ski in the pow that is easy to ski, and a ton of fun that lifts you like no other.

2. Many people put their skis away when March 1 turns the calendar – not with these planks. Instead of saying as Feb ticks down “I can’t wait till next year,” you will be saying, “cool, I have another month or more of skiing and gawking at the snow bunnies.”

3. When you ride these sleds, everyone will stop and ask you about them. You’ll be the guy all the birds are flocking to, and if you are no so good looking like me, you need all the help you can get, and the Megawatt is it.

If you are a classically trained Swiss or French style skier that keeps your knees and feet together like a school girl who wears patent leather shoes, these will take some getting used to as they are wide and will clank together, but I found that after 2-3 runs I had it figured out, and I am not a great skier – just an average Joe.

Word of advise – think about the randonee bindings you want to use. Beefy bindings will add weight, while these skis are not as heavy as they look, they can become heavy with heavy bindings. If you go with a cheaper binding that is too light, you may not want to rip it up on piste. So think about the bindings. I recommend either the heavier Markers, or lighter Fritschi Diamir. Talk to someone smarter than me about which one is right for you.

Peace, Love & the BD Megawatts

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

okay here's da' deal heading to alaska in feb/march Haines

okay here's da' deal heading to alaska in feb/march Haines to be exact I'm 5'8", 165-170 with pack/gear on, but I am an Eastie Maine/Vermont. Should I go for the gusto and snag the 188 in anticipation of 40+ degree 2000 ft AK. faces or should I snag the 178's for my return to East coast, strong,agressive skier fattest pair of boards i have now are pre rocker Coomba's sz 174 and on some days railing a open face high speed G.S. turns I get a little softness in the tips with chatter. I'm thikin' with the big rocker of the mega i can size up and still be good back east comments appreciated

By:
December 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Tough to say. You might want to ski haines first to figure out what kind of ski you want. Overall, this is a rad ski for AK, but for your height, it may not be right.

Assuming you're a strong skier, I like the 185cm JJ for your size. It skis short, and you won't sacrafice a whole lot of float. AK is big lines, not 3 foot pow (usually).

You're going to lose some versatility w/ zero camber (and 125mm at the waste is getting up there). The megawatt still rocks though. Sadly, skiing it back east on-piste could be UGLY.

The S7 would be very similar to the J also, both good choices!

By:
December 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Go big man, you'll want the 188s for AK and you can always sell them if you're not liking them back east.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Review Title

By:
October 14, 2009

I love these skis but the mounting point is way old school/tele. Get them mounted a bit forward (3 to 6cm) for maximum pleasure. Nice and floaty, kill crud and are stable on groomers. I am remounting mine with Dukes. I'm told that the rocker is okay for skinning with these, especially if you aren't going for 6k vert on an icy track.

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

What kind of bindings work with this wide a waist? I cannot find

What kind of bindings work with this wide a waist? I cannot find a binding with brakes that span 125mm. Additionally, will the brakes need to be greater ( > ) than 125mm or greater than or equal ( ≥ ) to 125mm?

By:
October 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Also, if you get the Fritschi Freerides with the Super XL brake size, the shop where you get them mounted can bend the brakes (slightly too skinny stock) to make them fit.

By:
December 2, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

You can get marker royal family bindings with brakes that are 130mm wide. So either the griffons or jesters or baron or duke. You might have to purchase the 130mm brakes separately though.

By:
October 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Don't be afraid

By:
December 8, 2010

DO NOT BE AFRAID TO SKI THESE. Just because they are fat does not mean that they are only going to work on powder days!!!! I ended up demoing these skis because the shop said they would have the justice (that i wanted to ski) but ended up only having this in...ends up i went home and ordered the ski. I'm a telemarker and unless i'm trying to beat bode miller down sheet ice, i have no issues carving on these. Definitley worth a demo if you are between these or something more like the justice. You will be surprised!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am about 5'10" and 160 ... right on the line for either

I am about 5'10" and 160 ... right on the line for either length. I got to ski the 178's last year on several deep days and loved them. I unfortunately never got to take out the bigger size. I didn't feel like the 178's were floppy or not enough ski for me, but wonder what I am missing on the bigger boards, I ski a 178 Legend Pro most days. I am not really into going as fast and straight at all times. What size should I get??? With the giant shovel what does the larger size really feel like?

By:
September 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The general rule of thumb with rockered skis is to go 5 to 10 cm longer than you normally go, because the rocker makes it more maneuverable and you have less edge contact on harder snow. This make it easier to ski in both pow and on the groomers. I would go with the larger size, you will get more floatation in the pow, and more stability in all conditions. The ski is really nimble, fun and easy to ski. The 188 is the way to go. I skied this ski for a little bit last season in the 188 and really enjoyed it. I would feel like a little awkward on the shorter version. I'm 5'8" 160, so roughly the same size as you.

By:
October 1, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I would say go with the bigger size. I am pretty much the same size as you and have skied the 188 and because of the long rocker and the shorter base contact they actually ski shorter than their printed size. Be ready to go fast and get buttery with those turns.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 30, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Write your answer here...I would probably say get the larger size, the shovel tip allows for easy turning and the surface area actually is alot smaller than the length. If your going for the megawatts you may as well go big right.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

megawatt forever!

By:
March 26, 2010

I tried those two years ago, a couple of demos, and the feeling was right there. But I waited almost two years before I actually bought them (from Backcountry) january this year. Since then I have used them almost every day, skiing in the north of Norway, from Lofoten to Lyngen. They are made for me, I`m shure about that!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Megawatt08 /09

By:
November 5, 2009

Monte bianca Italia

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Floatation Devices

By:
April 5, 2010

Are they water skis? Are they floatation devices? Questions I got in the lift line. No they just helped an old man levitate down the mountain. WOW, WOW, WOW! I was just like a snowboarder floating down the slope and through the trees. I have skied the megawatt and I have risen on Easter weekend.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Tons o' Fun!

By:
October 22, 2009

These skis are a blast on big pow days and even on days when the slopes have tons of tracks. The Megawatts the crud skiing from bump to bump. Not for all mountain skiing, but I still enjoyed them on front side trails while working towards the back country.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

fun in the deep stuff

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 2, 2011

Rode these bad boys at Solitude about 2 weeks ago on the 188 with O1 tele binding. It had dumped several feet in the last couple days and I was able to snag a couple of first lines in deep stuff and they just floated so wonderfully. I'm still pretty new to tele and had no problems. Later in the day they dropped the ropes for Honeycomb and it was just incredibly. Effortless floating through the deep stuff, just too bad a tree knocked out power in the canyon so the one trip through honey comb was all i got.

The day before that it was wet clumpy snow and they worked pretty well there too but were a bit much for the churned up, heavy packed out bumps that were forming (atleast for me). On the grromed stuff though I was amazed at how well they got me back to the lifts being full rockered and so wide but there were no issues.

I'll be taking them out again soon and will keep you all updated.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

smooth like the butter on the muffin

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 18, 2010

Confidence inspiring, floaty, and so much more versatile than you would think. I probably used these 8/10 days last year. One look at the dimensions and tip rocker and it's obvious that Black Diamond declared a holy war on tip dive. They ski suuuper smooth in the soft stuff because of the lack of shape and flat tail. In fact this could be a problem because you start going faster than you normally would and when you get to tighter terrain/trees you'll need to shut it down right quick. I started a torrid love affair with a new mistress, and her name is megawatt.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Pretty Cool

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 25, 2010

My review likely won't be very helpful.

I took this ski out on some of the worst conditions possible this year. It had snowed 2 days prior, but the day after the storm things started to get slushy. That melted snow quickly re-froze again and we had conditions similar to a coral reef...except somewhat sticky.

Why was I on this ski...no idea.

I decided to drop into a little chute up at Snowbird. I hit an ice chunk and broke the Demo Marker Jester bindings clean off of the ski. I now had to ski a 42m turn radius ski on 1 foot, while carrying the broken one in my other hand, on snow that these skis shouldn't have been on in the first place... I wasn't having fun.

I started to get the hang of skiing on 1 foot even though I was barely able to put it on edge. I got to the bottom of the lift, looked at the binding, and thought I could simply slide it back onto its track. I got back on the lift. Everything seemed okay. Immediately upon exiting the lift the binding ripped off of the ski again. I had snapped the plastic hardware for this demo binding so my attempt at sliding it back onto the track proved to be futile.

I began the unwelcome task of skiing such a massive ski on 1 foot again. This time I switched feet.

Needless to say, i was not a very happy skier. I cannot blame any of this on the ski. The few runs I did get on it with both feet were on some of the worst snow conditions possible. The ski seemed like it could be fun in deep pow (although I like a ski with a little more tail), I guess we will have to try it again on a better day..with better bindings.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Awesome Powder Ski

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 29, 2009

First, this is an awesome powder ski. It floats up high in fresh snow and busts through crusts and crud like they're not even there. In deep, heavy or wet pow, these are my go-to ski.

On that note however, that's where the fun stops with these skis. You really have to swing them out wide to carve down any sort of packed snow. Instead of laying trenches, you just have to make big, surfy, skidded turns on the groomers and packed stuff. In the bumps, they're a bit burly, tankish, and while you can easily get through them, it's just not the most fun I've ever had. For instance I skied about 6 inches of fresh over some decent-sized bumps in the Wildcat area of Alta and the skis just felt slow and heavy. Still, these are my first choice for fresh deep snow conditions.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

The Best Ski of 2008

By: Backcountry.com Employee
September 21, 2009

This ski is fantastic in all off-piste except firm. They get a bit twitchy at very high-speeds.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Out of Stock

Item: BLD0450

2009 Model No Longer Available

But don't stress, we have the latest model in stock.

Black Diamond Megawatt Ski

Black Diamond Megawatt Ski

Research other out-of-stock versions:

Holy cold smoke batman!

5 star rating

By: Andy Jacobsen September 30, 2009

These skis are incredible. I can not say enough good things. The tip rocker make these skis very turnable even in the 188 length. So do not be afraid to more...

Back in Blue!

5 star rating

By: Noah Howell September 3, 2009

The same old trusty powder slayer with a fresh coat of paint. I still feel the way about them as I did when I first posted a review two years ago.

more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Length:
178 cm, 188 cm 
Dimensions:
(178cm) 147 x 120 x 126 mm, (188cm) 153 x 125 x 130 mm 
Turn Radius:
(178cm) 38 m, (188cm) 42 m 
Base:
sintered 
Tail:
raised 
Weight:
(pair 188cm) 10 lb 1 oz 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 year